Noncomputable Signal and its Manifestiation
Posted by ICUQB4UQRU, Dec 10 2008, 09:03 PM
"You know, I can just literally kill you if I wanted it to."
--Gray Fox refering to Solid and Liquid
[Ms. Skilless' Teddy bear] How come I can read you every moves?
Hint: no hint
[Mail]
Fisher's Invisibility Method
Posted by ICUQB4UQRU, Dec 10 2008, 08:32 PM
"What's up L."
--Light refering to his enemy in Death Note
[Mr. Who]You know, sometime I can see the fish in the water tank and sometime I can't.[Mr. Who]
Hint: no hint
[Opened Mail]
A Frank Discussion on the Level of Precision in Engineering
Posted by ICUQB4UQRU, Dec 10 2008, 07:57 PM
"I am deaf, I am blint, I am mute."
--Laughing Man
[Mr. Who]The "Proof of In-and-Out" mentioned below implies that we have: In theory, if we can draw a perfect "square" then we can draw a perfect "circle." Assuming that we can draw a perfect line with perfect right angle. So how would one perfected the art of drawing a perfect line with a specific lenght? Mechanically speaking there is a limitation on its refinement, that is, how small of a gear can we possibly create. This led to inacurracy due to the fact that mechanic depend on fiction interaction between surfaces of its medium. Yet, there exist a more accurate line that can be engineer into existence, literally, than all possible pure-mechanically dependent line producing machine. Explain.[Mr. Who]
Hint: no hint
[Opened Mail]
Smith-Harware's Relay
Posted by ICUQB4UQRU, Dec 10 2008, 02:40 PM
"The writer of this page is just one person." 
--Some kid in his parent basement
[Mr. Lifeform]It is possible to totally destroys the Japanese's Navy in 7 ways.[Mr. Lifeform]
Hint: Does there exist a software that gives complete advantage over opponets with the same hardware.
[Opened Mail]
Classical Newtonian Calculus and the Fane's Singularity
Posted by ICUQB4UQRU, Dec 10 2008, 02:10 PM
"Hey don't look at me, I only followed hints left by human, backward beings some say!" 
--Liena Fake
[Mr. Who]Imagine in deep space where there exist a large cloud of dust and gas; a black hole will be form after a certain finite amount of time. Explain.
Hint:
kcus laitini eht si erehw. egap siht no "klat llams" ot srefer osla N.A.I. no twen eno siht rof tseb eht uoy dehsiwi.
[Opened mail]
Bullist's Theory on New Probability
Posted by ICUQB4UQRU, Dec 9 2008, 09:19 PM
"The day that you create black crystal is the day I'll call you master."
--Japanese's Arrogance/Stupility
[Mr. Who]Palm's reading is a superstition. What else is also I wonder?[Mr. Who]
Hint: Do Mr. Mosteller's exercise (there is only one exercise you needs to do if you're educated in probability.)
BTW: Mr. Mosteller's exercise is the first-step in what Mr. Who called the Mosteller's sequence. The real object-orient program make strong use of these sequences in the opinion of Mr. Who; it has the ability to anticipate with strong probability.
[Opened mail]
Harkin's Graph Theory Quest
Posted by ICUQB4UQRU, Dec 9 2008, 09:02 PM
"I can only do seven pull-ups."
--Thor
[Mr. Who]Is there a forest such that a tiny little change in its leaf collapse the entire forest?
Hint: no hint
[Opened mail]
Ja-Bang's Proof of In-and-Out
Posted by ICUQB4UQRU, Dec 9 2008, 08:43 PM
"Kana can be easy!"
William Averson refering to his book on A Short Course On Spectral Theory
[Mr. Who]There is a short fundamental proof of: if you draw a circle on the plane, there is an inside and an outside.
Hint: The complex plane can be shink into an open ring.
[Opened mail]
Read's Theorem on the Order of Chaos
Posted by ICUQB4UQRU, Dec 9 2008, 08:29 PM
"I love small book but small talk, it's ok I would have guess."
--Gray Fox
[Mr. Who]There exist a region on the plane whom perimeter is isomorphic to a line geometrically speaking.
Hint: ?soahc gniredisnoc nehw etaluclac ot trats uoy erehw rettam ti seod.
[Opened mail]
A Discussion on the Continuum Hypothesis
Posted by ICUQB4UQRU, Dec 9 2008, 07:58 PM
[Mr. Who]
There is a bijection between the real set and the set of all possible function between two fixed countable sets. It is quite supicious that perhaps there exist a set T such that Card(N) < Card(T) < c. Indeed, the infinite cartisian product of N over itself is bijective relative to R; but, what if the infinited cartisian product of N over itself with N "changing." This might have something to do with the construction of N:
Let k = empty set.
k
{ k, {k} }
{ {{k,{k}}}, {k}, k }
...
Perhaps, equivalencely, the set of all possible function between ??? The concept itself is not consistent from the beginning. What do you think, is there a better theory or explaination for the current one so that the concept itself flow smoothly? Does there exist a better construction for the set N in this sense?
[Mr. Who]
[Opened mail]