Is This True? Chinas Defense Minister Talks of War |
![]() |
|
![]() ![]() |
Is This True? Chinas Defense Minister Talks of War |
Feb 20 2006, 12:54 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
AF Geek Group: Members Posts: 139 Joined: 5-July 05 |
http://www.halturnershow.com/ChineseDefens...rAgainstUS.html
QUOTE: We must prepare ourselves for two scenarios. If our biological weapons succeed in the surprise attack [on the United States, the Chinese people will be able to keep their losses at a minimum in the fight against the United States. If, however, the attack fails and triggers a nuclear retaliation from the United States, China would perhaps suffer a catastrophe in which more than half of its population would perish. That is why we need to be ready with air defense systems for our big and medium-sized cities. Whatever the case may be, we can only move forward fearlessly for the sake of our Party and state and our nation’s future, regardless of the hardships we have to face and the sacrifices we have to make. The population, even if more than half dies, can be reproduced. But if the Party falls, everything is gone, and forever gone! QUOTE: From a humanitarian perspective, we should issue a warning to the American people and persuade them to leave America and leave the land they have lived in to the Chinese people. Or at least they should leave half of the United States to be China’s colony, because America was first discovered by the Chinese. But would this work? If this strategy does not work, then there is only one choice left to us. That is, use decisive means to “clean up” America, and reserve America for our use in a moment. Our historical experience has proven that as long as we make it happen, nobody in the world can do anything about us. Furthermore, if the United States as the leader is gone, then other enemies have to surrender to us. I got this from a different forum To be honest, I don't believe this... I mean, come on... Hal Turner Show? But I just wanted to make sure if the defense minister really said this or not... Or if it is blown out of context. This post has been edited by karupt: Feb 20 2006, 12:57 PM |
|
|
|
Feb 20 2006, 01:01 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
AF Elite Group: Members Posts: 6,773 Joined: 23-January 06 |
QUOTE (karupt @ Feb 20 2006, 01:54 PM) http://www.halturnershow.com/ChineseDefens...rAgainstUS.html QUOTE: We must prepare ourselves for two scenarios. If our biological weapons succeed in the surprise attack [on the United States, the Chinese people will be able to keep their losses at a minimum in the fight against the United States. If, however, the attack fails and triggers a nuclear retaliation from the United States, China would perhaps suffer a catastrophe in which more than half of its population would perish. That is why we need to be ready with air defense systems for our big and medium-sized cities. Whatever the case may be, we can only move forward fearlessly for the sake of our Party and state and our nation’s future, regardless of the hardships we have to face and the sacrifices we have to make. The population, even if more than half dies, can be reproduced. But if the Party falls, everything is gone, and forever gone! QUOTE: From a humanitarian perspective, we should issue a warning to the American people and persuade them to leave America and leave the land they have lived in to the Chinese people. Or at least they should leave half of the United States to be China’s colony, because America was first discovered by the Chinese. But would this work? If this strategy does not work, then there is only one choice left to us. That is, use decisive means to “clean up” America, and reserve America for our use in a moment. Our historical experience has proven that as long as we make it happen, nobody in the world can do anything about us. Furthermore, if the United States as the leader is gone, then other enemies have to surrender to us. I got this from a different forum To be honest, I don't believe this... I mean, come on... Hal Turner Show? But I just wanted to make sure if the defense minister really said this or not... Or if it is blown out of context. read the first line, SCENARIO! look it up |
|
|
|
Feb 21 2006, 01:26 AM
Post
#3
|
|
|
AF Pro Group: Members Posts: 2,386 Joined: 12-August 05 From: A Loose Cannon |
QUOTE (karupt @ Feb 20 2006, 12:54 PM) And i 2nd this, only difference is. The Native Americans were left at peace after the discovery, until the British, French & Spanish Imperialists landed later on also & started takeing control by force & uneccassary aggression. |
|
|
|
Feb 21 2006, 02:38 AM
Post
#4
|
|
|
AF Fiend Group: Members Posts: 377 Joined: 27-January 06 From: nowhere and everywhere |
1. If this is what the Chinese defense minister said and its printed version was in secret circulation, then it proves that the CIA and its secret agents are really good in getting their hands on things.
2. This information could be leaked out on purpose to test the American reactions, see how much of it the Americans believe, how much they regard as false information. 3. The third possibility is this is a fake document created by the Americans to test the Chinese reactions to see how much the Chinese are startled by the American ability to read Chinese mind and thinking. It's a cat and mouse game, some kind of psychology warfare going on..... War can take the form of a chess game where real and fake moves are being done to test your opponents..... This post has been edited by xyz: Mar 4 2006, 04:23 PM |
|
|
|
Feb 21 2006, 07:24 AM
Post
#5
|
|
|
AF Pro Group: Members Posts: 2,386 Joined: 12-August 05 From: A Loose Cannon |
^
Beautiful. The C.I.A have been proven as a bogus organization, a bunch of amateurs who doesn't really know what's going on in certain cases in the past. But just to stir up nonsense between 2 parties. We don't need the C.I.A. |
|
|
|
Feb 21 2006, 10:56 AM
Post
#6
|
|
|
AF Addict Group: Members Posts: 816 Joined: 21-December 05 From: Qin |
I read news everydays, never heard about such things. I guess both of them are fake.
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th May 2013 - 08:35 AM |