AsiaFinest Forum
Ad: 123Designing.com

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

5 Pages V  « < 2 3 4 5 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Asian-american women have more STD's than Caucasian women
thisguyrightchea...
post Aug 2 2011, 01:31 AM
Post #61


Newbie
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 3
Joined: 14-June 11




This article is old but still has relevance to the current situation Asian women face in today's society. In fact, the rate of STD's is probably even higher now than it is when the date of the article was published four years ago.

It's another reminder of why you should avoid Asian women and just American women in general. Not only are you getting sloppy seconds, but you're catching a black, anglosaxon and Mexican mans leftovers.

No thanks, but I'll pass.

At least the girls overseas in Asia have pride and still put Asian men on top of their list of dating preferences unlike the majority of Asian girls in America who put other groups of men, first than Asian guys.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
LittleDeathAngel
post Aug 2 2011, 01:46 PM
Post #62


AF Addict
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 972
Joined: 10-December 08




Asian girls don't like it when guys use condoms. (So I have heard.)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mastaping
post Aug 2 2011, 01:57 PM
Post #63


AF Pro
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 1,019
Joined: 15-July 10
From: Shhh




WOW @ some of these comments... all i can say is..


This post has been edited by mastaping: Aug 2 2011, 01:58 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
boobu
post Aug 3 2011, 05:23 AM
Post #64


AF Pro
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 1,855
Joined: 4-March 09




QUOTE (afewminutesofyourlife @ Mar 15 2010, 02:51 PM) *
Part of it is partially naturally the fault of our ancestors.

Our ancestors treated women like objects and whores , our male ancestors were far too dominant. Our female ancestors are programmed to be whores for us , and being that we were never aggressively racist - we never instilled education to degrade and enslave other races or for our females to find disgust in other races. This is deeply engrained into our cultural psyche.

Along the way , other groups saw this and exploited the women seeing that they were obedient and ready to do whatever to please , they had never seen anything like it.


$hit! this is so spot-on. bravo!

so true but i have to say it's so disgusting i don't respect asian culture anymore as i see there are deep roots of weakness there while those who had real strength aren't even noticed as such because they are so oppressed while the ones who conform are not as punished by it.

This post has been edited by boobu: Aug 3 2011, 05:26 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BlkLady2001
post Aug 5 2011, 11:30 AM
Post #65


AF Fan
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 49
Joined: 16-December 10




QUOTE (boobu @ Aug 3 2011, 06:23 AM) *
$hit! this is so spot-on. bravo!

so true but i have to say it's so disgusting i don't respect asian culture anymore as i see there are deep roots of weakness there while those who had real strength aren't even noticed as such because they are so oppressed while the ones who conform are not as punished by it.

Not to butt in, but I would be very, very, very careful about how much stock you put into trusting Western statistics and research about minorities, and then judging Asian women because of it.

Coming from a group of women who have had every lie and exaggeration in the world told about them, I implore Asian men and women to take a critical eye towards information given to the masses.

For instance, I mentioned this in the thread about blk women, but apparently, minority women are about far more likely to be screened for stds than white women thus skewing disparities between the two groups.

http://www.emaxhealth.com/4214/only-half-w...e-std-screening
"However, according to this study which will appear in the February issue of the journal Pediatrics, white women are not receiving the STD screening that they need from their health care providers."

What's dangerous about this is that because of racial assumptions (i.e. black/asian/hispanic women are whores), white women may be infected with stds but you would never know because they aren't tested.
Another factor is having private health care which means results of testing aren't required to be counted in national statistics thus further compromising a snapshot of STD breakdowns between ethnicities.
My friend works in public health and he's currently trying to publish his findings on information he has gathered from private clinics in the D.C./Virginia area and the results would blow anybody's mind! However, he's being caught up in ethnographic ethics committee red tape.

My point is this: I'm sure women of all races should be encouraged to be more careful with their bodies, but everything isn't always as it seems when it comes to data gathered on minorities. I won't go as far as to claim that "Da MAN" is trying to make everybody except for whites look bad, but a healthy dose of skepticism and having a research driven mind never hurt nobody.

In the meantime, everybody wrap it up, take your sexuality more seriously, be discerning in your partners and happy humping to all.
To keep everyone informed, here's another article that talks in-depth about this mess. A damn shame too... icon_confused.gif

http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/43009472/ns/...s/#.TjwoElvsaWE

"Dr. Carolyn K. Holland, a pediatric emergency room specialist at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital, studied the hospital's records of 293 patients aged 13 to 21 with abdominal, urinary or gynecological symptoms that could indicate an STD. The records, from 2010, revealed that 71.3 percent of young black women were tested, compared to only 18.6 percent of young Caucasian women."

"In past research, Goyal has found that taking a sexual history and being tested “were significantly associated with race and insurance status,” she said. “Patients who did not have private insurance [relying on programs like Medicaid or who were uninsured] were more likely to be tested."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SemperFidelis
post Aug 6 2011, 06:39 AM
Post #66


AF Addict
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 502
Joined: 5-June 11
From: Australia




Practice safe sex and you'll be fine

QUOTE (devils666 @ Aug 1 2011, 02:42 AM) *
But Asian males have reason to complain about AF/WM and how WM's come to Asia and fu-k everything up.

How many WM males go to asia and "fu-k everything up"?

This post has been edited by SemperFidelis: Aug 6 2011, 06:40 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jacq
post Jan 29 2012, 12:58 PM
Post #67


Newbie
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 6
Joined: 29-January 12




I have to wonder if anyone who has read this misinformation has actually done any follow-up research of Mr. Hyeouk Hahm’s ‘study.’ His data sources are from 1995 and 2001.

According to the CDC (data from 2010), Asian American women collectively have lower rates of STD infection than white women, across the board. The only exceptions are with HIV, in which they have the same likelihood of infection as white women; and also for The Clap (and I don’t know why) amongst Asian women 35+. Perhaps they are foreigners, I don’t know.

So there you have it. Straight from the CDC.

But really, ladies…. (as someone who is sexually active, and not ashamed of it, and yes I’ve slept w/ both white and Asian guys) Put a wrapper on it, and go get tested regularly (if you’re sexually active). There’s no shame in protecting yourselves… And don’t be afraid to be choosy amongst the men that hit on you. ;-)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
AgentBach
post Jan 29 2012, 02:22 PM
Post #68


AF Supreme
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 10,231
Joined: 15-June 04
From: Secret Base




Af get some and Am don't. Simple.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
LittleDeathAngel
post Jan 29 2012, 02:28 PM
Post #69


AF Addict
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 972
Joined: 10-December 08




I think all you dudes should chill out on the "white men are taking our asian women" mentality.

I used to think like you guys but I came to a realization.

The charts, the numbers, the rumors, and what you see outside aren't what they appear to be.

There are many factors contributing to why Asian girls marrying White guys that aren't included in the charts.

These hidden factors are beauty, past baggage, and divorce.

Have you ever noticed how screwed up a White person's preferences are?

They find most of what we consider to be ugly, fat, and old to be attractive Asian women.

This is one of the reasons why Asian women date white men.

White men are blind.

Asian women that are unattractive and unwanted in their own race, are very attractive to White men.

The second reason is baggage.

From a traditional sense, the perfect Asian wife should be a virgin with little to no sexual experience.

Those who are deemed whores or have been around, are considered unsuitable to become a wife.

White men don't have that mentality.

They don't value virginity as much as Asians do.

Third, is divorce.

Same as above. White people don't really care if an Asian woman has been divorced several times or not.

To get an accurate view of what really is happening is...

Good Asian Women get Good Asian Men

Unwanted or Rejected Asian Women get White Men

If an Asian Woman is beautiful, faithful, a virgin, and hasn't been married before.

She is "Grade A" quality.

She doesn't need to look outside her race because she is already has top quality Asian men courting her.

Most of the time, she is already taken.

Then, there are those Asian women who are deemed ugly, old, unattractive, unfaithful, have past baggage, whores, and are divorced.

These are the women, most Asian men don't want anyway.

Therefore, these women look elsewhere.

Which is why you shouldn't hate them for dating White guys because it is you that don't want them in the first place.

This post has been edited by LittleDeathAngel: Jan 29 2012, 02:38 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jacq
post Jan 30 2012, 03:24 PM
Post #70


Newbie
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 6
Joined: 29-January 12




Gee, try to sound a little more pissed and disillusioned why don't you? I agree that AA men have nothing to worry about, but definitely not for such bitter/resentful 'reasoning.'

And I didn't even know that was the topic.... I thought the topic at hand was concerning AA females and stats on STDs.

Fyi, for all racial groups (Caucasian, Black, Hispanic, Asian, and Natives), females collectively tend to have a rate several times over than that of their male counterparts. Not a pleasant fact, but it's a fact.

So your 'rationale' behind your 'points' against AA women solely is moot.

Also, there are certain STDs Asian males actually have a higher rate of infection of (such as syphilis, overall); and then there are certain age brackets, such as 25 years and older, where AA males have rates higher than women. Stats are as of 2010.

Sorry you can't be bothered to look up actual info. You're welcome.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MinhKhiem
post Jan 31 2012, 11:54 PM
Post #71


AF Geek
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 179
Joined: 27-August 11




QUOTE (GlowingMouse @ Mar 18 2010, 01:36 AM) *
I think statistically vietnamese are less likely to be with white unlike the Japanese Koreans.

Chinese arnt thaaaat bad statistically in the States either according to that asian nation website. http://www.asian-nation.org/interracial.shtml

Perhaps its the anti Chinese environment and the all Vietnamese war movies that remind these women or families some common sense.

Its so humiliating how black G.Is have positive experiences in asia because thier simply percieved as American by asians and not N*ggas like in thier own country so a lot of them have a thing for asian girls too, which they tell to all thier civilian friends back home who in turn start looking for asian girls.. Its sad and we need to get USA military bases out ASAP.

But we cant blame everything on other factors at the bottom of the day an asian female with a white/black male is seriously nothujng but a gutter whore slut.


I'm pretty sure Vietnamese and Korean were the two Asian ethnicity LEAST likely to date/marry outside their race.

Excluding those small misc. ethnic minorities in most Asian countries of course. embarassedlaugh.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
monster123
post Feb 1 2012, 02:00 AM
Post #72


AF Fan
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 21
Joined: 19-February 06




You know why there is a double standard for men and women? A guy who gets laid a lot is called a stud or player. A girl who gets laid a lot is called a slut.

Why is that? When a guy gets laid, he was overcome some obstacle and made an accomplishment.

On the other hand, ANY woman can get laid as much as she wants. It's no big deal.

Don't believe me? My next door neighbor in my apartment building is this fat, ugly, 40 something, loudmouth single mom with 4 kids on welfare. She literally brings home a different guy every other night. Granted, the guys are every bit as ugly as she is. But she has no problem getting laid as much as she wants. Yes, there are guys out there that will screw anything.

So I don't think any girl who has a lot of STD's is considered "desirable" or must be wanted by others.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SemperFidelis
post Feb 1 2012, 03:08 AM
Post #73


AF Addict
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 502
Joined: 5-June 11
From: Australia




QUOTE (monster123 @ Feb 1 2012, 11:30 AM) *
You know why there is a double standard for men and women? A guy who gets laid a lot is called a stud or player. A girl who gets laid a lot is called a slut.

Why is that? When a guy gets laid, he was overcome some obstacle and made an accomplishment.

On the other hand, ANY woman can get laid as much as she wants. It's no big deal.

Don't believe me? My next door neighbor in my apartment building is this fat, ugly, 40 something, loudmouth single mom with 4 kids on welfare. She literally brings home a different guy every other night. Granted, the guys are every bit as ugly as she is. But she has no problem getting laid as much as she wants. Yes, there are guys out there that will screw anything.

So I don't think any girl who has a lot of STD's is considered "desirable" or must be wanted by others.

If a key opens many locks, its a master key. If a lock is opened by many keys, its a $hitty lock.

Not that I agree there should be a difference between a man having 10 sexual partners and a woman having 10 sexual partners.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Suijen
post Feb 1 2012, 02:30 PM
Post #74


AF Legend
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 39,502
Joined: 15-June 05
From: TEAM RAMROD




You'd think that Ivy League education would teach you to use protection.

And, you know, be careful where you stick the vag.



This post has been edited by Suijen: Feb 1 2012, 02:31 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jacq
post Feb 2 2012, 01:26 AM
Post #75


Newbie
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 6
Joined: 29-January 12




QUOTE (monster123 @ Feb 1 2012, 02:00 AM) *
You know why there is a double standard for men and women? A guy who gets laid a lot is called a stud or player. A girl who gets laid a lot is called a slut.

Why is that? When a guy gets laid, he was overcome some obstacle and made an accomplishment.

On the other hand, ANY woman can get laid as much as she wants. It's no big deal.

Don't believe me? My next door neighbor in my apartment building is this fat, ugly, 40 something, loudmouth single mom with 4 kids on welfare. She literally brings home a different guy every other night. Granted, the guys are every bit as ugly as she is. But she has no problem getting laid as much as she wants. Yes, there are guys out there that will screw anything.

So I don't think any girl who has a lot of STD's is considered "desirable" or must be wanted by others.



1) The last Asian guy I was with has had sex with 50+ women to date (obviously responsibly, and he's 2 years younger than me at 23 years old). Anecdotal evidence is not very reliable.
2) Um, neither is a guy who has an STD.... No one with *any* STD is desirable. At least not in my mind. Hence, protection.

This post has been edited by Jacq: Feb 2 2012, 01:27 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jacq
post Feb 2 2012, 02:30 AM
Post #76


Newbie
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 6
Joined: 29-January 12




QUOTE (SemperFidelis @ Feb 1 2012, 03:08 AM) *
If a key opens many locks, its a master key. If a lock is opened by many keys, its a $hitty lock.

Not that I agree there should be a difference between a man having 10 sexual partners and a woman having 10 sexual partners.



I get the analogy; inanimate objects are not people though. Unless you literally see your penis as only a key to try in as many locks as possible. In which case.... =/ Also, the point was already made... It logically follows that women are not letting just any key in, since men are having to 'work harder' at it. The anecdote about the neighbor contradicts this point that was first made. Also, by that measure (in the aforementioned post), the polygamous practice polygyny is just fine, but polyandry isn't (therefore double standard).

In case anyone still isn't getting why this analogy doesn't work though (and I don't know why, as the logical fallacies are obvious)... Locks are designed to only fit one key, and as we all know, women (or men for that matter) do not “work” like that. Every human “lock” fits every human “key” and vice versa; applied to real locks and keys, this would render them useless.

Any person in the world can copulate with anyone else; but again, any key in the world will not fit into every lock, and any lock in the world will not work for every key.

Hence, keys and locks are not people.

It could easily be said that if you have a pencil that can be sharpened by any sharpener, you have a normal/non-exceptional pencil; or that if you have a sharpener that will only sharpen certain pencils, you have a $hitty sharpener. They're analogies that make just as much sense, but obviously lead to very different conclusions. False analogies, in case people really think it was meant to be more than an actual joke.

This post has been edited by Jacq: Feb 2 2012, 02:41 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MinhKhiem
post Feb 2 2012, 03:26 PM
Post #77


AF Geek
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 179
Joined: 27-August 11




The percentage of women with std for all races were higher than men was because women are more likely to get an STD. Not because they're whores or anything but because they physically are more susceptible to any STD due to the their physical anatomy.

http://stdtesting.com/why-women-are-more-prone-to-stds

To bad b!tches embarassedlaugh.gif

There isn't a single thing on this earth that women can say they have an advantage over men with.

This post has been edited by MinhKhiem: Feb 2 2012, 03:26 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jacq
post Feb 2 2012, 09:56 PM
Post #78


Newbie
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 6
Joined: 29-January 12




QUOTE (MinhKhiem @ Feb 2 2012, 04:26 PM) *
The percentage of women with std for all races were higher than men was because women are more likely to get an STD. Not because they're whores or anything but because they physically are more susceptible to any STD due to the their physical anatomy.

http://stdtesting.com/why-women-are-more-prone-to-stds

To bad b!tches embarassedlaugh.gif

There isn't a single thing on this earth that women can say they have an advantage over men with.



Despite that, women in both developed and undeveloped countries still outlive men.

Women in more egalitarian societies also tend to be more educated than men... Not just in obtaining 'degrees,' but in grades/honors as well.

Men also apparently crave sex more than women (on the average).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SemperFidelis
post Feb 4 2012, 05:50 PM
Post #79


AF Addict
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 502
Joined: 5-June 11
From: Australia




QUOTE (Jacq @ Feb 2 2012, 12:00 PM) *
I get the analogy; inanimate objects are not people though.

Cool, except whether or not things are inanimate doesnt matter in an analogy.

QUOTE (Jacq @ Feb 3 2012, 07:26 AM) *
Men also apparently crave sex more than women (on the average).

I'd say its about equal, men are just more open about it

QUOTE (MinhKhiem @ Feb 3 2012, 12:56 AM) *
There isn't a single thing on this earth that women can say they have an advantage over men with.

On average females perform better in school than males do. So thats 1 thing
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jacq
post Feb 5 2012, 03:46 AM
Post #80


Newbie
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 6
Joined: 29-January 12




QUOTE (SemperFidelis @ Feb 4 2012, 06:50 PM) *
Cool, except whether or not things are inanimate doesnt matter in an analogy.


I'd say its about equal, men are just more open about it


On average females perform better in school than males do. So thats 1 thing



Yes; but as I said, all people are able to have sex with each other. Therefore we are not keys and locks. And that matters. Again, as I said, unless a guy really see's sex with a woman/her vagina as purely being a commodity. Which is sad. Can anyone blame women for not being into that?

And no, testosterone is one of the hormones controlling libido in human beings; so biologically, men (on average) do tend to have higher sex drives than women. This is a fact backed up by research and generally accepted.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

5 Pages V  « < 2 3 4 5 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 21st May 2013 - 11:56 PM