Why not Two Chinas? Options

[Elite2]

How come the UN didn't give ROC a seat huh?

It could have been Two Chinas, one PRC and one ROC, just like NK and SK.

Pls, don't give me an already tried and true reason: Well, PRC is the legitimate China (since it's bigger, Soviet boycott, opening up relations with West, China won the civil war.... )

Just like Korean war is not over and there is two Korean states, There could have been only ONE korea: South Korea as the legitimate ruler of Korea.

Why didn't the UN just create a PRC for PRC, and have kept the ROC seat as ROC seat.

It's just interesting because there is clearly TWO Chinas.

You ca'nt denie that ROC doesn't exist as Chinese administered land by the Chinese Nationalists that calls themselves China.

[badparticle]

Yet another Chinese troll thread.

People like you only make Taiwanese forum a perpetual propaganda wasteland. By the time no Taiwanese members want to stay in forum, you'll have experienced a vicarious conquer of Taiwan Island. Way to go, 阿Q.

I rather be in Korean or Japanese Chat.

[Elite2]

It's a legitimate honest question.

Why no two Chinas like two Koreas? They are very similar - both civil wars declaring each as illegitimate ruler of the entire nation.

Idiot, you suck balls.

[badparticle]

A gang of people, armed or not, that got rejected by the Chinese people and kicked out of China is NOT China. It is just a gang of people who left their home country. it is not the country itself.
You should discuss with the real Chinese whether they want one, two or three Chinas.
You are not really interested in Taiwan. Don't lie to yourself.

[zombie]

A gang of people, armed or not, that got rejected by the Chinese people and kicked out of China is NOT China. It is just a gang of people who left their home country. it is not the country itself.
You should discuss with the real Chinese whether they want one, two or three Chinas.
You are not really interested in Taiwan. Don't lie to yourself.

This.

[KraterosHellas]

first, usa influence must be kicked out of all asia..then peace and secuirty will come.

This post has been edited by KraterosHellas: Apr 29 2010, 08:46 PM

[elite3]

PRC is the successor to the Qing Dynasty and ROC on the mainland.

The ROC still exists and still governs Chinese territory that is KMT owned even before the fall of the Mainland.

So why not 2 Chinas?

[Mid-Night_Sun]

even when it was actually half like Liao/Jin and Song, they advertise them self as legit and not the other. neither side acknowledge there could be 2 middle kingdoms.

PRC and ROC isnt even close to being half and half.

[elite3]

KMT is a waste of human resources.

This is what happens when losers of war retreat - they waste resources. Time and resources are wasted over this Taiwan problem which should have concluded back in 1949 - but did not thanks to US intervention.

US should have never intervened in Chinese affairs - she should have allowed the Civil war to conclude because whoever controlled the Mainland was the victor anyways.

Taiwan is in a pretty $hitty situation anyways - I'm not sure if US really thought it thoroughly when it came to the aid of Taiwan in 1949.

This post has been edited by elite3: May 10 2010, 09:52 PM

[Mid-Night_Sun]

if the Communist could take out KMT at Taiwan they would have.

although i agree that if they were true Chinese nationalists, they should have acknowledged they lost and willingly given up. should have been their decision to hand over the UN seat to the PRC. should be their move to return to China. there shouldnt be 2 countries with official names with "China" in it.

[elite3]

^ Exactly.

Taiwan's mere existence is symbolic in nature. It doesn't function nor want to make the mainland Nationalist again, so what is the point.