Do You Want War With US? Options

[AtlantisStar]

Please give back up support to your statements or I will dig your grave and shove your corpse in!

Personally I don't, war is the killing of humans, innocent or adulterated, which I hold as the ultimate sin.

[直隸總督]

Please give back up support to your statements or I will dig your grave and shove your corpse in!

Personally I don't, war is the killing of humans, innocent or adulterated, which I hold as the ultimate sin.

[opinion], I voted "doesn't matter". I prefer diplomatic solutions much more than going to war. China should not go around and seek troubles ( like US), but it must be ready at all time.

[Kulong]

Please give back up support to your statements or I will dig your grave and shove your corpse in!

Personally I don't, war is the killing of humans, innocent or adulterated, which I hold as the ultimate sin.

[opinion], I voted "doesn't matter". I prefer diplomatic solutions much more than going to war. China should not go around and seek troubles ( like US), but it must be ready at all time.

I completely agree. China should be prepared for the worst, which is an U.S. invasion, as unlikely as it may be. Better safe than sorry.

[herosword]

Taiwan should also prepare for the worst. A Chinese invasion, as unlikely that it maybe that Chinese would attack Chinese, right? And whoever voted to want war with the US is a dipstick. China vs. US, it'll be bloody and bad for both country. Peace and diplomacy is the best way.

This post has been edited by herosword: Mar 3 2004, 07:40 PM

[Byron]

I sure don't want a war with the U.S and China. Since nukes would probably be involved if both countries fight to change the regime of the other.

If nukes are used on China, the radiation might affect Vietnam, so I don't want the U.S nuking anywhere near Vietnam.

[CTangCG5]

I sure don't want a war with the U.S and China. Since nukes would probably be involved if both countries fight to change the regime of the other.

If nukes are used on China, the radiation might affect Vietnam, so I don't want the U.S nuking anywhere near Vietnam.

What is your reasoning behind those two countries using nukes - i see no nuclear bomb tensions b/w them anywhere. By the way good job sneaking in that last sentence.

[Byron]

Well I thought the war was gonna be based on regime change. Where the U.S will try to conquer China and put in a new government. So when a government knows they are gonna be destroyed they might as well use nukes since they are gonna die anyway, and any nukes used on the U.S would cause them to nuke back as well.

Why do you think America isn't going after North Korea who obviously is working on a nuclear program? America believes North Korea has one or two nukes that can hit the west coast of the U.S. So that's why they aren't bothering with them.

This post has been edited by Byron: Mar 3 2004, 07:47 PM

[Kulong]

Taiwan should also prepare for the worst. A Chinese invasion, as unlikely that it maybe that Chinese would attack Chinese, right? And whoever voted to want war with the US is a dipstick. China vs. US, it'll be bloody and bad for both country. Peace and diplomacy is the best way.

Being from the R.O.C. and still have family members there, I do agree that R.O.C. should be well guarded. However, I personally find the chances of P.R.C. launching an attack on R.O.C. far less than U.S. invading P.R.C. Also, we're talking about China and U.S., what's your intention of bringing up Taiwan?

[CTangCG5]

Well I thought the war was gonna be based on regime change. Where the U.S will try to conquer China and put in a new government. So when a government knows they are gonna be destroyed they might as well use nukes since they are gonna die anyway, and any nukes used on the U.S would cause them to nuke back as well.

Why do you think America isn't going after North Korea who obviously is working on a nuclear program? America believes North Korea has one or two nukes that can hit the west coast of the U.S. So that's why they aren't bothering with them.

So what if it the government changing I see no basis of China launching nukes out of desperation. Why didn't Iraq launch any? Their leadership was a lot crazier than China's ever was in terms of global disturbance. And why would they "die anyway" ?

The US just invaded the middle east, thats one reason they aren't launching another operation. They are "bothering" with N. Korea, they recently had talks.

[Rad Raz]

Please give back up support to your statements or I will dig your grave and shove your corpse in!

Personally I don't, war is the killing of humans, innocent or adulterated, which I hold as the ultimate sin.

war is a part of humanity in this world, you can't just simply avoid it.
And just like what Einstein have said, "There would be no war, if the humanity does not exist in this universe"
There will be World War 3, probably fuss between china and USA or any country involves with USA. I just want the WW3 to happen during my life, so I can witness the people's suffering and dying. I don't wanna miss the world's greatest event after my death.

This post has been edited by Rad Raz: Mar 3 2004, 08:11 PM

[AtlantisStar]

Please give back up support to your statements or I will dig your grave and shove your corpse in!

Personally I don't, war is the killing of humans, innocent or adulterated, which I hold as the ultimate sin.

war is a part of humanity in this world, you can't just simply avoid it.
And just like what Einstein have said, "There would be no war, if the humanity does not exist in this universe" T
There will be World War 3, probably fuss between china and USA or any country involves with USA. I just want the WW3 to happen during my life, so I can witness the people's suffering and dying.

I agree but it can be prolonged.
Two huge wars in one century, we don't need one beginning the new century (or millenium for that matter)

WW3 Was suppose to be right after the Cuban Missile Crisis, when one of the 3 generals voted not to attack the U.S.

You're disgusting by the way. You should just shut up and watch what's happening with the potential immigration to Mars, that will be the greatest world event to date.

This post has been edited by AtlantisStar: Mar 3 2004, 08:13 PM

[Rad Raz]

how am i being disgusting?

[Byron]

Well I thought the war was gonna be based on regime change.  Where the U.S will try to conquer China and put in a new government.  So when a government knows they are gonna be destroyed they might as well use nukes since they are gonna die anyway, and any nukes used on the U.S would cause them to nuke back as well.

Why do you think America isn't going after North Korea who obviously is working on a nuclear program?  America believes North Korea has one or two nukes that can hit the west coast of the U.S.  So that's why they aren't bothering with them.

So what if it the government changing I see no basis of China launching nukes out of desperation. Why didn't Iraq launch any? Their leadership was a lot crazier than China's ever was in terms of global disturbance. And why would they "die anyway" ?

The US just invaded the middle east, thats one reason they aren't launching another operation. They are "bothering" with N. Korea, they recently had talks.

Well Iraq didn't launch any nukes because it doesn't have any. But it did fire missles at Kuwait I believe in desperation. Of course only 1 of them hit which was a Chinese made missile that hit a shopping mall.

[CTangCG5]

Answer my other questions.

[Byron]

lol the reason why America went to war with Iraq according to what Bush said was because they believed they had nuclear weapons which probably isn't true. North Korea obviously was farther into their nuclear program, but why didn't America attack it like they did with Iraq? You might say they were busy with Iraq but wouldn't you attack a country that was farther into a nuclear program?

Fact is the U.S even said they believed Iraq had 1 or 2 nuclear weapons. So I believe the U.S didn't attack North Korea.

This post has been edited by Byron: Mar 3 2004, 08:23 PM

[AtlantisStar]

how am i being disgusting?

For hoping for a WWIII

Guys you getting off topic.

Nonetheless, Byron, you're really bragging about the Chinese missile hitting that Kuwaiti mall... Odd...

[CTangCG5]

Byron you still haven't answered my quesetions, just elaborated on your last point. And AtlantisStar I notice he adds little comments to get on people's nerves alot.

This post has been edited by CTangCG5: Mar 3 2004, 08:24 PM

[Byron]

how am i being disgusting?

For hoping for a WWIII

Guys you getting off topic.

Nonetheless, Byron, you're really bragging about the Chinese missile hitting that Kuwaiti mall... Odd...

How am I bragging about the Chinese missile hitting the Kuwaiti mall? I'm not even Chinese. lol I'm Vietnamese so what would I have to be proud of by Chinese missile technology.

I would have added that the Chinese missile missed it's target and hit the mall instead, but I didn't want to offend any Chinese here.

[AtlantisStar]

I notice that lol...

But get on topic.

Somehow I don't think the next major war will be China and U.S.
I'm not sure. I don't think there is enough sparks flying to do that (now at least)

After 9/11, the incident of the Spying Planes is now a thing to be disregarded about. China is worried itself on terrorism, if you've ever seen those new skyscrapers being built. (They're number one worry was to counter a chance of a toppling building from a plane or a bomb etc...

[Rad Raz]

For hoping for a WWIII

that doesn't make me a disgusting person. I just want to witness the WW3 during my life time. I wouldn't be surprised if they use nukes or bio weapons on each other....

Back to the topic.

This post has been edited by Rad Raz: Mar 3 2004, 08:32 PM