A small country defense strategies Options

[Suione]

For All The Military Nuts Here Smaller nations vs bigger ones!

by Andrei Chang
Hong Kong (UPI) Jan 11, 2007
China, Taiwan and Singapore all share the Chinese language and culture. Yet due to their different positions in the international sphere and the capabilities of their respective military industries, the three have chosen very different military strategies and weapons systems. It is interesting to compare the three approaches.First, in terms of military strategy, China is now gradually transforming itself from the passive defense of the Cold War years to today's active defense, with balanced offensive and defensive capabilities. China's navy is also turning from coastal defense to offshore defense.
The two sides of the Taiwan Strait are now under abnormal adversarial conditions. Taiwan's strategic goal has changed from staging large-scale counterattacks on mainland China to engaging in a decisive battle away from Taiwan Island and establishing balanced offensive and defensive capabilities.
Singapore's approach is proactive defense, typical of a small country. Since Singapore is much better off than other countries in the region, and it has a sensitive historical relationship with Malaysia, Singapore's national defense policy has followed the dual-track principle of diplomacy and deterrence.
While building up formidable military strengths to dissuade potential enemies from reckless action, Singapore also tries to reinforce its national defense through diplomatic ties, hoping it will receive support from the outside world should the regional situation deteriorate. Singapore learned from the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait that wealth does not equal peace.
The military strategies and doctrines of Singapore and Taiwan are becoming increasingly close. Both are attempting to establish effective deterrence against potential adversaries through building up their military machines. Both also rely on the diplomatic or even military involvement of world powers should they face a protracted conflict.
By procuring large batches of arms and establishing special military ties with the United States, both Singapore and Taiwan hope to guarantee their own security, expecting that the United States would come to their rescue should a major conflict arise.
Singapore's practice of purchasing AIM-120C air-to-air missiles and storing these weapon systems in the United States is clearly an attempt to establish a tangible military alliance with the United States and to integrate diplomatic deterrence with military deterrence. If a conflict broke out, Singapore would inevitably ask the United States to deliver the weapon systems stored on U.S. territory, which would make it impossible for the United States to remain neutral.
Taiwan's approach in recent years has been more or less similar. For the same purpose, Singapore may also deposit the 66 Leopard 2A4 main battle tanks it procured from Germany in Australia, as a tactic to contain the latest move of the Malaysian army to import PT91M main battle tanks from Poland.
Secondly, Singapore hopes to win additional layers of protection through its "diplomatic deterrence" strategy. Through reinforcing its ties with Australia, Canada and the joint defense cooperation among the five ASEAN countries, Singapore intends to implement the strategy of multilayered diplomatic deterrence; that is, using different diplomatic deterrence strategies to deal with different adversaries.
In recent years, Taiwan has also sought to weaken the dominance of the United States in the dynamics of the Taiwan Strait and actively expand its military exchanges with Japan, Australia and India, with the same strategic objectives as Singapore.
Although China, Taiwan and Singapore all seek to balance their offensive and defensive capabilities, Singapore's navy and air force have the most advanced Western military technologies and the most formidable attack power in comparison with Taiwan and China. In other words, in implementing the strategy of balanced offensive and defensive deterrence, the Singaporean military forces place much greater emphasis on offensive operations than the Taiwanese and Chinese forces.
Singapore's "active defense" strategy is probably influenced by traditional British military ideology. Similar traces can be found in the military strategies of fellow former British colonies India and Pakistan. With the import of 12 plus 8 F-15ST fighters from the United States, Singapore has become the first of the three militaries to acquire joint direct attack munition bombs.
In addition, Singapore has acquired APG-63V3 active electronically scanned array radar systems ahead of Japan and Korea. The Singaporean air force is also equipped with 20 of the most powerful AN-64D attack helicopters in the region.
Because of the differences in the combat capabilities of their prospective adversaries, Taiwan and Singapore also have different deterrence strengths. The powerful offensive weapon systems mentioned above are already sufficient to give Singapore the capability to paralyze the enemy through pre-emptive standoff operations, which could be followed by diplomatic measures to resolve the conflict.
Singapore's latest replacements of military equipment, particularly in the navy and air force, show that the deterrence capability it aspires to is not directed solely at Malaysia. Thanks to the procurement of F-16 Block52 fighters and the KC-135R tanker, plus the fact that four E-2C aerial early-warning aircraft are already in service, the Singaporean air force can now project its power over almost all of Southeast Asia.
Singapore is already armed with 70 F-16 fighters, among which 62 are F-16 Block52s. These fighters are equipped with the Israeli Python-4 and AIM120C AAM. The Taiwanese air force also dreams of acquiring the F-16 Block52. Both the Singaporean and the Taiwanese air forces are equipped with AGM-65G infrared-guided anti-ship missiles.
Singapore is favored by the West and Russia and has experienced no restrictions in the import of arms. Unlike Taiwan, Singapore has access to diversified weapons sources. The Singaporean army is equipped with Russian Igla (SA-18) ground-to-air missiles, for example.
As for military cooperation between Singapore and Taiwan, there has been constant speculation and many unconfirmed reports about this. Sources say that Singapore's batch of SA-18 missiles was actually ordered by Taiwan. Both Taiwan and Singapore are now employing the French-made La Fayette guided missile frigates. The Singaporean variant of the La Fayette and the same model of FFG assembled indigenously are called the Delta Project, which has undergone major upgrading, but the price is said to be less than two-thirds the price Taiwan paid for its La Fayettes. Obviously the two received far different treatment in their purchase deals.
As a matter of fact, Israel has close ties with all three of the militaries under discussion. Singapore's ground forces, air force and navy use a lot of Israeli-made equipment. The Singaporean navy's "Victory" class missile patrol boats are equipped with the Barak I vertical launch surface-to-air systems made by Israel Aerospace Industries/Rafael, while the F-16 Block52 fighters of the Singaporean air force are equipped with Israeli-designed electronic warfare systems.
As is widely known, both Taiwan and Singapore have acquired Gabriel I surface-to-surface missiles from Israel's IAI. In addition, Singapore has also purchased submarines from Sweden. In 1990 Singapore received the first batch of two A17 submarines, and four Sjoormen-class submarines were delivered to Singapore in 2004. The Sjoormen submarine has a standard displacement of 1,130 tons. As a result, Singapore has become the first country in Southeast Asia with genuine underwater combat capability.
Since international attitudes toward Singapore have been the most open and favorable, it has had the broadest training opportunities for its military personnel. The pilots of the Singaporean air force not only receive training in the United States, they also actively participate in joint military exercises with India, Australia and other countries, including joint naval and air force operations. The Singaporean air force has even carried out confrontational exercises in which the Su-30MKI fighter planes faced Singapore's F-16 Block52s.

[asean.asia]

can you tell me about Andrei Chang war experience and how many battle have he fought.

what he need is a xbox to practice his war fighting skill which is much better then telling others how to fight with a pen.

[Suione]

Don't thinks he is a battle-harden warrior He is a defense analyst base in HK; someone who collects information and presents them.

[matigasngulo]

China has a far lower threshold to use nukes than any other country, including Iran, NK and the USA. if anyone manages to take out their boomers and CVs would that be a reason for them to use them ? Probably. Even a conventional deterrent able to strike their major cities would be a better defense investment.

[Suione]

China has a far lower threshold to use nukes than any other country, including Iran, NK and the USA. if anyone manages to take out their boomers and CVs would that be a reason for them to use them ? Probably. Even a conventional deterrent able to strike their major cities would be a better defense investment.

Guess I've more faith in China than Iran or NK on the nukes. Also, a direct threat on their cities would be an unwise 'defense' doctrine imo.

[matigasngulo]

Guess I've more faith in China than Iran or NK on the nukes. Also, a direct threat on their cities would be an unwise 'defense' doctrine imo.

the most vocal Chintrolls around here, KJK and lillz have both stated that an attack on their carrier will most certainly invite nuclear reprisal. anyway, all nuclear weapons are inherently offensive, being an a direct threat to the other 99 % of people.

US neocons tried to apply this strategy, since you never know what might be on a icbm coming your way.

[Suione]

We are talking about small countries with small militaries here , so no danger of Chinese carrier being sunk.
If they decides to park a carrier battle group at the Paracel, there's pretty much nothing anybody can do about it.
Multi-layer diplomacies should be a key facet in defense for small countries, not just military might.
And then again, China is not the only big guy here.
What about India? whose military is growing at an alarming rate.

[XigonCongchua]

the most vocal Chintrolls around here, KJK and lillz have both stated that an attack on their carrier will most certainly invite nuclear reprisal. anyway, all nuclear weapons are inherently offensive, being an a direct threat to the other 99 % of people.

US neocons tried to apply this strategy, since you never know what might be on a icbm coming your way.

All they got is a mouth. I doubt China will ever dare to use its nuclear weapon on any country, assuming the IQs of Chinese leaders are not low.

(*Oh $hit I've just given away 20 dollars. As I was about to hit Submit for this post, some Asian guy - like Chinese or Japanese - came and asked me to donate money for children in wherever I couldn't hear because the food court is loud and I didn't even know what organization he worked for, I just saw some flyer asking for donation and I just gave 20 dollars Was I stupid? I can never say no when people ask me to donate money, some pitiful feeling always comes to me, and after they go away for awhile, I think back and feel like I might have been stupid *)

[matigasngulo]

All they got is a mouth. I doubt China will ever dare to use its nuclear weapon on any country, assuming the IQs of Chinese leaders are not low.

(*Oh $hit I've just given away 20 dollars. As I was about to hit Submit for this post, some Asian guy - like Chinese or Japanese - came and asked me to donate money for children in wherever I couldn't hear because the food court is loud and I didn't even know what organization he worked for, I just saw some flyer asking for donation and I just gave 20 dollars Was I stupid? I can never say no when people ask me to donate money, some pitiful feeling always comes to me, and after they go away for awhile, I think back and feel like I might have been stupid *)

good intentions count but wow,
what a coincidence: i lost 20 € sometime yesterday at lunch- i loaded up 40 € on a chipcard before going to the university canteen, a girl ran into me and hit my hand pretty hard with her tablet, so i didn't notice what the cashier was doing. so today, surprise, i'm twenty euros short.
a good meal for all saints day.

[XigonCongchua]

good intentions count but wow,
what a coincidence: i lost 20 € sometime yesterday at lunch- i loaded up 40 € on a chipcard before going to the university canteen, a girl ran into me and hit my hand pretty hard with her tablet, so i didn't notice what the cashier was doing. so today, surprise, i'm twenty euros short.
a good meal for all saints day.

Wow you're even worse than me. At least I know where my 20 bucks went while you're just clueless about them.

The most regretful thing was I didn't have change so I just gave 20 bucks. 5 bucks would have been sufficient. It's all because I always use debit card to purchase everything, from my books and school supplies to my foods. It's more convenient than using cash for me because if I use cash I'd have to count the money, then count the changes, and the due amounts are always something like $17.13 or $5.79 or $54.36 blah and so I'd always have to carry a bunch of coin changes, nickles, dimes, quarters, that the cashiers give me, and I lose them pretty easily. Debit card is quick and convenient. But from now I'll add a note to myself, "Bring changes for solicitors".

This post has been edited by XigonCongchua: Nov 3 2010, 02:37 PM

[asaiofinest]

We are talking about small countries with small militaries here , so no danger of Chinese carrier being sunk.
If they decides to park a carrier battle group at the Paracel, there's pretty much nothing anybody can do about it.
Multi-layer diplomacies should be a key facet in defense for small countries, not just military might.
And then again, China is not the only big guy here.
What about India? whose military is growing at an alarming rate.

If you are going to troll through threads trying to make the chicoms out to be the good guys, at least try to come up with at least half-way decent excuses that a 5 year old couldn't refute with ease.

[Suione]

If you are going to troll through threads trying to make the chicoms out to be the good guys, at least try to come up with at least half-way decent excuses that a 5 year old couldn't refute with ease.

Child, I did not favoured anyone in particular

This post has been edited by Suione: Nov 5 2010, 12:28 AM