Chinese, Japanese scholars agree on Japan's aggression Options

[wuen]

A group of twenty Chinese and Japanese scholars who recently completed a three-year joint history study have concluded that the Sino-Japanese War (1937-1945) was an action of aggression by Japan against China, chinanews.cn reported today.

The scholars, selected by both governments to conduct a joint study on related Sino-Japanese history, also agreed the Nanjing massacre was a large-scale massacre against humanity.

The joint research report will be made public next month, according to Chinanews.cn.

This post is not about bashing Japanese past mistake, but to show past mistake of imperialist adventure.

This post has been edited by wuen: Dec 29 2009, 03:33 PM

[Manders]

Oh, no $hit really?? Japan was the aggressor here???????

[wuen]

Oh, no $hit really?? Japan was the aggressor here???????

You underestimate the value of this joint history study of the Sino-Japanese War (1937-1945). This is a big mile stone for stopping any plan to denied the Japanese aggression like the Nanjing massacre.

The joint research report presented by scholars can be use in court in Japan to prevent revisionist of this part of history. China will not need to use political pressure or protest to make her voice heard again. This is a scholarly report which have the seal of both Japan and China approval. When the report will be release and it get a foothold in Japan, any publish revision of history of Nanjing massacre can be consider a crime in Japan. It is a big win for the victim of the war. The first step will be to use it in the court of Japan for any revision of history of Japanese aggression in China during the period of 1937-1945.

This post has been edited by wuen: Dec 29 2009, 07:31 PM

[chineseboygoingt...]

You underestimate the value of this joint history study of the Sino-Japanese War (1937-1945). This is a big mile stone for stopping any plan to denied the Japanese aggression like the Nanjing massacre.

The joint research report presented by scholars can be use in court in Japan to prevent revisionist of this part of history. China will not need to use political pressure or protest to make her voice heard again. This is a scholarly report which have the seal of both Japan and China approval. When the report will be release and it get a foothold in Japan, any publish revision of history of Nanjing massacre can be consider a crime in Japan. It is a big win for the victim of the war. The first step will be to use it in the court of Japan for any revision of history of Japanese aggression in China during the period of 1937-1945.

our chinese business is not your vietnamese business i know who you are
you dont need to lie to be chinese, last time is saw you try to bullshi-t about someone chinese grammar
and told lie about him using traditional chinese when he was obvioulsy using simplifed chinese
we dont need the sympathy or support of vietnamese
we want to cut complete ties with vietnamese

[wuen]

our chinese business is not your vietnamese business i know who you are
you dont need to lie to be chinese, last time is saw you try to bullshi-t about someone chinese grammar
and told lie about him using traditional chinese when he was obvioulsy using simplifed chinese
we dont need the sympathy or support of vietnamese
we want to cut complete ties with vietnamese

Vietnam and China will continue to have good relationship. The ties cannot be cut because China and Vietnam are neighbor and share similar culture, river, sea and heritage.

I know you are a agent provocateur that want to hurt China and Vietnam. I see plenty of people like you. You people cannot concentrate on one topic of this thread so you use provocation to show your ignorance.

You tried to hide your ignorance by trying to find fault on other people weakness instead of debating. If I took the literal meaning of the other person who wrote Chinese, it would mean that he is associating Malaysian people to a animal. It was right of me to have change his sentence into a less hostile view.

This post has been edited by wuen: Dec 29 2009, 08:36 PM