West should be prepared to use force against China, says Kevin Rudd Options

[bear11]

Former Australian PM Kevin Rudd said the West should be prepared to use force against China if it acted irresponsibly, a cable leaked by Wikileaks alleges.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-11925438

Why the fu-k China still has only 200 atomic bombs, it need immediately produce at least 10000 bombs, how fu-king arrogant are those white pigs.

And what the fu-k is this about Tibet, Aborigines in Australia live at least 10 years shorter than white people, this white pig should take care of them.


And what is wrong with the communists, China must arm it self to the teeth whit every available weapon of mass destruction, so what if it comes to nuclear war, we all be dead.

Imagine how would they scream if some Chinese official said that we need to invade Australia if China need resources

this makes my blood boil, China arm yourself for the total war, if it comes so we will all be dead , so what, but this white pigs must be touth a lesson.

This post has been edited by bear11: Dec 6 2010, 06:34 AM

[qwerty2010]

swingdoctor, you remind me so much of all the other US jingoists, still NADA, NOTHING that refutes, just your opinions as if they amount to FACT, unsupported by any information.

A COUP, as anyone know, can be orchestrated by someone from WITHIN as well as a FOREIGN entity. In this case, it has been fully established and agreed by the major news that Arbib 1) is a US agent, and 2) orchestrated the COUP against Rudd, and 3) assured Americans Gillard is solidly pro-US.

Even a single-cell protozoan can put two and two together.

I rest my case, if you like, you may go on and on and on and on and on....

This post has been edited by qwerty2010: Dec 14 2010, 06:22 AM

[swingdoctor]

swingdoctor, you remind me so much of all the other US jingoists, still NADA, NOTHING that refutes, just your opinions as if they amount to FACT, unsupported by any information.

A COUP, as anyone know, can be orchestrated by someone from WITHIN as well as a FOREIGN entity. In this case, it has been fully established and agreed by the major news that Arbib 1) is a US agent, and 2) orchestrated the COUP against Rudd, and 3) assured Americans Gillard is solidly pro-US.

Even a single-cell protozoan can put two and two together.

I rest my case, if you like, you may go on and on and on and on and on....

Yes and in the articles case they meant internal rather then foreign. I'm assuming you are not Australian and therefore haven't been following the Rudd saga, well I have. Again show me where besides your already discredited article that demonstrates Abib acted based on the US's involvement. Even the opposition party have come out in support of him. But wait, like the conspiracy-theory-believing-socialist, you believe that Australian politicians on both sides of politics are under the beck and call of the US govnt. And you want us to believe this without proof, just the opinion of some Socialist author who has no integrity. Also in reference to your highlighted statement, please tell me which "major news" believes that Abib is a "US Agent", come on just name me one, like your Socialist friend, you are so full of $hit.

I'm not the one trying to argue that Rudd was toppled by the Americans, so as far as I'm concerned the onus is on you to provide the evidence, I see though that you have not contradicted any of the points I made in challanging O'Connors article. Can I assume then that you agree with me. In which case you have provided no facts to support your assertion that the Americans had anything to do with Rudds downfall. In fact your last few posts have provided no credible facts whatsoever. Simply parroting the same lines from a discredited article isn't going to make it fact.

People who try to make assumptions by adding two and two together often end up with 5 and in this case your maths ain't that good.

But if you're really keen to find out the real reasons the Labour Party dumped Rudd this article provides a good summary. Also note that the source of the article is a well respected Australian newspaper, not some political website http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/the-r...6-1225883564857.

I would also suggest you google "Home Insulation Scheme", "Super Profit Tax" and "School Building Projects". These 3 reasons plus a host of other reasons clearly demonstrated Rudd couldn't manage his staff let alone the economy or the country. By bringing Gillard in Labour managed to tap into the womens votes, and by doing so just held on to power with the help of independents. An election that most polls predicted they would lose based on the slide in Rudds popularity.


Anecdotally, 3 of my female cousins were first time voters, they voted for Gillard simply because she was a woman. This disappointed me greatly but it was exactly the reason Labour brought her in.

This post has been edited by swingdoctor: Dec 14 2010, 08:07 AM