West should be prepared to use force against China, says Kevin Rudd Options

[bear11]

Former Australian PM Kevin Rudd said the West should be prepared to use force against China if it acted irresponsibly, a cable leaked by Wikileaks alleges.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-11925438

Why the fu-k China still has only 200 atomic bombs, it need immediately produce at least 10000 bombs, how fu-king arrogant are those white pigs.

And what the fu-k is this about Tibet, Aborigines in Australia live at least 10 years shorter than white people, this white pig should take care of them.


And what is wrong with the communists, China must arm it self to the teeth whit every available weapon of mass destruction, so what if it comes to nuclear war, we all be dead.

Imagine how would they scream if some Chinese official said that we need to invade Australia if China need resources

this makes my blood boil, China arm yourself for the total war, if it comes so we will all be dead , so what, but this white pigs must be touth a lesson.

This post has been edited by bear11: Dec 6 2010, 06:34 AM

[qwerty2010]

swingdoctor, I will let others decide for themselves WHOM is parroting over and over the SAME nauseating pro-US bull$hit propaganda despite the FACT that HEADLINES ALL ACROSS Aussie papers dropped the bombshell about the Wikileaks and the OUTING of the US MOLE, Arbib, and what he did to Rudd.

Which is MORE believable, the Aussie newspapers and journalists, or some anonymous poster who repeat over and over the same WEIRD "anti-Socialist" torrents?

Yes, the most memorable parts of your posts aren't some startling new information nor intelligent insight, but ridicuous knee-jerk reaction over the "Socialist" nature of the links, despite the fact that they were based on events and facts published in MAINSTREAM AUSTRALIAN NEWSPAPERS.


Think, what would a NORMAL Australian do when their newspapers expose one of their most powerful political kingmaker as a US agent and "protected source"? They'll go and try to find out more, try to read about what this guy has done, how he has influenced the domestic politics, perverted the democratic process, etc. They want to know if Australian interests have been compromised.

The last thing a normal Australian would do is to spend time on a forum to repeatedly attack those who expose this subterfuge. A bit ridiculous as he can't even provide any information that counters this pervasive, explosive media expose to substantiate his touching faith in the unsullied goodness of America.


Australians are actually more open-minded about Left-leaning government, they just VOTED one in, the Labour Party, plus they have a strong Union tradition. They do not go into paroxysms of political hysteria frothing at the mouth over "Socialism" - that is the usual reactionary thinking of AMERICANS.

This post has been edited by qwerty2010: Dec 15 2010, 03:24 AM

[swingdoctor]

swingdoctor, I will let others decide for themselves WHOM is parroting over and over the SAME nauseating pro-US bull$hit propaganda despite the FACT that HEADLINES ALL ACROSS Aussie papers dropped the bombshell about the Wikileaks and the OUTING of the US MOLE, Arbib, and what he did to Rudd.

Which is MORE believable, the Aussie newspapers and journalists, or some anonymous poster who repeat over and over the same WEIRD "anti-Socialist" torrents?

Yes, the most memorable parts of your posts aren't some startling new information nor intelligent insight, but ridicuous knee-jerk reaction over the "Socialist" nature of the links, despite the fact that they were based on events and facts published in MAINSTREAM AUSTRALIAN NEWSPAPERS.


Think, what would a NORMAL Australian do when their newspapers expose one of their most powerful political kingmaker as a US agent and "protected source"? They'll go and try to find out more, try to read about what this guy has done, how he has influenced the domestic politics, perverted the democratic process, etc. They want to know if Australian interests have been compromised.

The last thing a normal Australian would do is to spend time on a forum to repeatedly attack those who expose this subterfuge. A bit ridiculous as he can't even provide any information that counters this pervasive, explosive media expose to substantiate his touching faith in the unsullied goodness of America.


Australians are actually more open-minded about Left-leaning government, they just VOTED one in, the Labour Party, plus they have a strong Union tradition. They do not go into paroxysms of political hysteria frothing at the mouth over "Socialism" - that is the usual reactionary thinking of AMERICANS.

You're so full of $hit. Come on you keep claiming "major Australian newspapers" BUT YOU HAVE YET TO SHOW 1 fu-kING EXAMPLE. That is all I ask, otherwise that stink you smell is all the bull$hit coming out from your @$$.

Yes, let others decide its plainly obvious you haven't any decent facts to present.

And yes please believe the Australian media. So far I am the only one who has referenced them, you have not made 1 single reference, your only 2 references are from a Socialist website, one of which you were even too ignorant to realise was written BEFORE the wikileaks cables came out. You are so stupid that you believe blindly what someone with a political agenda has written, too lazy to check the accuracy of his conclusions and finally too proud to admit that you're wrong when someone points it out to you. Which in summary makes you an @$$hole.

Come on just show me one fu-king example. Show me you have some substance and not just another @$$hole.

This post has been edited by swingdoctor: Dec 15 2010, 07:05 AM