The Real China Military military capabilities, lilzz, stop lying Options

[asean.asia]

Since lilzz likes to run into VN Chat to show-off China toys, let's see what others have to say.
lilzz should stop coming in here posting china's remote control (RC) toys.

"it will be years, if not decades, before China will be able to produce a much-feared ballistic missile capable of striking a warship or overcome weaknesses"

"China has increasingly relied on supply of fighter jets from Russia and has not been successful in developing its own despite its well known capabilities in reverse engineering and best of its efforts over the past few decades. "

"the PLA remains untested in modern combat"

"when it comes to Chinese submarines carrying ballistic missiles, he said, "they could be sitting ducks"."

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/p...how/7162799.cms


"After years of trying, Chinese engineers still can't make a reliable engine for a military plane, or a missile to strike a warship."

http://www.beijingnews.net/story/723848/ht...ry-plane-engine

[SoCal]

As I study the history of Viet and Han, it is often the case that when the Hans threaten the security of the Viets, that's when the Viets become stronger. Please see the article below for more information. Please note that the year 1497 represented one of highest peaks of Vietnamese civilization due to the Hong Duc code (Flood of Virtue).



Chinese Military Technology and Dai Viet: c. 1390-1497

by Sun Laichen


http://www.ari.nus.edu.sg/docs/wps/wps03_011.pdf



Le Thanh Tong (the Vietnamese Hammurabi)
(1460-1497) and the Hong Duc Code



http://books.google.com/books?id=Jskyi00bs...p;q&f=false

This post has been edited by SoCal: Dec 26 2010, 12:54 PM

[Hugham]

Since lilzz likes to run into VN Chat to show-off China toys, let's see what others have to say.
lilzz should stop coming in here posting china's remote control (RC) toys.

"it will be years, if not decades, before China will be able to produce a much-feared ballistic missile capable of striking a warship or overcome weaknesses"

"China has increasingly relied on supply of fighter jets from Russia and has not been successful in developing its own despite its well known capabilities in reverse engineering and best of its efforts over the past few decades. "

"the PLA remains untested in modern combat"

"when it comes to Chinese submarines carrying ballistic missiles, he said, "they could be sitting ducks"."

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/p...how/7162799.cms


"After years of trying, Chinese engineers still can't make a reliable engine for a military plane, or a missile to strike a warship."

http://www.beijingnews.net/story/723848/ht...ry-plane-engine

It's true. We are very weak. Even Taiwan, S Korea and Japan has mightier military power than us. They have very advanced stuffs while we stuck in outdated Cold War era technology. Even India can produce 5th generation jet fighter and world fastest supersonic missile ballistic.

What US said about China military power and threat is a joke. Part of their demonizing propaganda.

[lilzz]

Since lilzz likes to run into VN Chat to show-off China toys, let's see what others have to say.
lilzz should stop coming in here posting china's remote control (RC) toys.

"it will be years, if not decades, before China will be able to produce a much-feared ballistic missile capable of striking a warship or overcome weaknesses"

"China has increasingly relied on supply of fighter jets from Russia and has not been successful in developing its own despite its well known capabilities in reverse engineering and best of its efforts over the past few decades. "

"the PLA remains untested in modern combat"

"when it comes to Chinese submarines carrying ballistic missiles, he said, "they could be sitting ducks"."

Lol, I read the guy article, after yrs of China threat publications, all nieghboring nations are scaring $hitless, US now does 180 degree turn to bash China ability realizing what China threat has done all this yrs.

Let's make bet, China will not buy anymore of Russian Weaponries anymore. It's one side story from Russian claiming China still its customer.

[asean.asia]

^ US was in the West water between S. Korea and China, and China didn't do anything about it. If China were doing the same thing, US would have sunk those china warships.

Just the "will not buy anymore" itself is a lie.

China buys air defense systems from Russia (8 months ago)
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6310WG20100402

Just a few months, lillz wants to speak for China and declares not to buy from Russia anymore.

I'd say China will and continue to buy weapons from Russia. Let's make a bet, if you lose, you have to give me your wife.

This post has been edited by asean.asia: Dec 26 2010, 05:51 PM

[Hugham]

Lol, I read the guy article, after yrs of China threat publications, all nieghboring nations are scaring $hitless, US now does 180 degree turn to bash China ability realizing what China threat has done all this yrs.

Let's make bet, China will not buy anymore of Russian Weaponries anymore. It's one side story from Russian claiming China still its customer.

Not all the neighbor countries fear about China, probably it just Vietnam (just kidding), because we did a lot of military cooperation.

My suggestion is your country should join us! We all East Asian after all. If European can united, why not us. I'm dreaming about NATO-like military alliance in East Asia.

[lilzz]

^ US was in the West water between S. Korea and China, and China didn't do anything about it. If China were doing the same thing, US would have sunk those china warships.

Just the "will not buy anymore" itself is a lie.

China buys air defense systems from Russia (8 months ago)
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6310WG20100402

Just a few months, lillz wants to speak for China and declares not to buy from Russia anymore.

I'd say China will and continue to buy weapons from Russia. Let's make a bet, if you lose, you have to give me your wife.

It's a fullfillment of the contract signed many yrs ago

[asean.asia]

I accept that explanation, but say china will never buy russia military wares is like saying I will never lie again.

It's a fullfillment of the contract signed many yrs ago

[KraterosHellas]

Not all the neighbor countries fear about China, probably it just Vietnam (just kidding), because we did a lot of military cooperation.

My suggestion is your country should join us! We all East Asian after all. If European can united, why not us. I'm dreaming about NATO-like military alliance in East Asia.

a common security bloc would benefit vietnam more than it would benefit china. it's really in vietnam's interests. confrontation and mistrust gains nothing

[embandoda]

The Academy Give with regard to Greatest Photograph is amongst the best recognizes a motion picture may earn. The item basically is actually praising the sum of the actual videos areas (behaving, guiding, producing and many others) because greatest perform completed of which yr throughout picture. program tv puls This Academy continues to be handing out it's Greatest Image Oscar because late 1920s. Within modern decades, the academy selected just five unique motion pictures that would be nominated for ideal photograph, the actual victorious one via which team. Truly the Academy thought we would transform the amount of nominees from 5 in order to 10. The point with this ended up being to permit your academy to realize some sort of bigger variety of videos. Generally best pictures tend to be smaller far more indie videos and this also granted the academy for being much less snobby making use of their selections. I'm sure an alteration in this way have been within the Academys radar for a while though the Oscar snub pertaining to equally Wall-E program telewizyjny na dziœ tvn and also the Dark Dark night last year created things fresh pertaining to modify. 09 would have been a great season to be able to carry out your adjust. The two of the films might have obtained some sort of deserved nomination together with several additional movies of which just barely skipped out and about. 2010 authorized many motion pictures, most specially The particular Shades Side, for you to generally approach the open location given it was at this time there. My spouse and i are not aware of why the Academy is really officious making use of their unspoken principles. The academy once was all about smaller boutique videos. My spouse and i acquire that adjust enables a wider selection of motion pictures to become nominated pertaining to very best photo, however there have been many numerous better videos compared to the Blind Facet not too long ago. The fantastic Mr. Fox, and 500 times involving Summertime equally could have effortlessly already been put into individuals spots. All this new transform would had been show off much larger more well-known films that don't have the need for it anyway along with generate more which should be packed into your telecast between useless musical figures and also cartoon personas representing a few give which not a soul has feelings for you with regards to. Ultimately this modify isn't going to genuinely issue considering that 5 from the nominees were from natural stone, so we're in essence only picking 5 more motion pictures that get to state many people received any greatest picture nomination. If you ask me this kind of makes the top photograph nomination suggest a reduced amount of compared to this do recently (not it meant a whole lot subsequently). It also makes voting much harder as it involves Ideal Image voters to own viewed 10 films rather then 5 (properly, program tv religia in order to election truthfully these people do). I'm certain there are a lot of advantages of generating these kinds of improvements however I am want it had been generally in relation to getting a lot more youth to observe your Oscar telecast and I guess, eventually, get more people to observe these kind of films. Maybe a much better change could well be to remove every one of the musical and boogie amounts, the boring cracks, simply just include one sponsor and perhaps this telecast may be trim down to a scant four several hours