AsiaFinest Forum
Ad: 123Designing.com

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

5 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
US asks China to explain why it needs aircraft carrier
CheolSu
post Aug 11 2011, 10:43 AM
Post #21


AF Pro
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 1,678
Joined: 30-March 06




Hahaha! I hope China just ignores the US and does what it wants. Why even respond to such a question?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Chiphoenix
post Aug 11 2011, 11:47 AM
Post #22


AF Fan
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 25
Joined: 23-April 11




QUOTE (VJDay @ Aug 11 2011, 07:52 AM) *
The West is just butt hurt that they cannot resort to gunboat diplomacy to force China to grovel at her knees for more unequal treaties to be implemented like 1985 Plaza Accord of Japan which forced the Japanese Yen to appreciate, thus starting the whole debacle known as "Japanese Lost Decade" of stagflation and slow economic growth.

If this was the 19th century, the West would have sent a gunboat, forced Western products upon China, just to rectify the trade deficit. In fact, the British force fed addictive opium to Chinese just to fix the silver trade deficit. Now, the modern time equivalent of trade deficit is the whole debate over the Yuan appreciation, which China isn't stupid. Appreciation before industrialization will simply produce a massive consumer market of middle class Chinese that will be dependent on foreigner Western companies for production to satisfy the Chinese consumer society - whereas China won't be self-sufficient to produce $hit for herself.

We all know one thing - China isn't going to let foreign companies dominate the Chinese domestic market. Korea didn't, and their Chaebols are world renown (Daewoo, Hyundai, Samsung, Kia, etc....) and Japan didn't, and their Zeirekstsu are world renown (Sony, Nissan, Toyota, Mitshubitshi, etc...).... China isn't dumb.


beerchug.gif
Yeah, these imbeciles think that we are still living in the 19th century. China is already too powerfull for them. They can't use their gunboat, like what they did in the past, that's why they use the divide and conquer tactic. They also use the media to demonize China because they are powerless.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
bear11
post Aug 11 2011, 12:08 PM
Post #23


AF Addict
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 577
Joined: 2-July 10




China needs at least 10 aircraft carriers.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
orange peel
post Aug 11 2011, 01:06 PM
Post #24


AF Guru
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 3,012
Joined: 15-April 07
From: Markham




China needs a lunar base and space bombers

This post has been edited by orange peel: Aug 11 2011, 01:07 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
KraterosHellas
post Aug 11 2011, 02:28 PM
Post #25


AF Elite
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 7,784
Joined: 5-April 10
From: AF Supreme Admin




QUOTE (orange peel @ Aug 11 2011, 01:06 PM) *
China needs a lunar base and space bombers

first china needs to set up military bases in the carribean and canada and let its aircraft carrier have its maiden voyage up the chesapeake bay. oh and build ten more of those carriers.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Southasianguy
post Aug 11 2011, 06:49 PM
Post #26


AF Geek
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 146
Joined: 18-May 11




QUOTE (Chiphoenix @ Aug 10 2011, 05:39 PM) *
Hahahahaha... are these dumbass for real???

Are they thinking that China is a US province? China don't need to answer to these a$$holes!!!!!
It's not your foucking bissness!!!!! China is not a vassal country like some other countries.... So go fouck yourselves with your stupid question!!!!! icon_twisted.gif

Oh i forgot, why the US needs 11 aircraft carriers???????????


Screw these loser obese american douchebags. Who do they think they are?

Remember they asked the same thing when India were developing nuclear weapons, they put sanctions on India but we didn't give a crap cuz our economy don't depend on them.

They are doing the same thing (sanctions) to Iran, but Iran is breezing through the sanctions cuz every other country is trading with them! biggrin.gif

Screw these obese capitalist, imperialist, fascist world-warmongers/terrorists biggrin.gif

QUOTE (arabianights @ Aug 10 2011, 07:22 PM) *
u.s. is being silly, acting like a spoiled child who hasn't realize that the world is not centered around him anymore


The sooner it reaches their thick skull, the better icon_smile.gif

QUOTE (bear11 @ Aug 11 2011, 12:08 PM) *
China needs at least 10 aircraft carriers.


QUOTE (KraterosHellas @ Aug 11 2011, 02:28 PM) *
first china needs to set up military bases in the carribean and canada and let its aircraft carrier have its maiden voyage up the chesapeake bay. oh and build ten more of those carriers.


That should be China's answer icon_smile.gif

This post has been edited by Southasianguy: Aug 11 2011, 07:01 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
phop
post Aug 11 2011, 07:07 PM
Post #27


AF Addict
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 689
Joined: 3-December 09




QUOTE (InitialDJay @ Aug 11 2011, 12:20 AM) *
that a big @$$ ship to go for fishing. embarassedlaugh.gif

the US wants to play the global leadership role, and china had say they were supporting it. multi-polar power is better anyway.

naa.. In case pirates come we can fly some jets to terrorise those sea going pirates.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
VJDay
post Aug 12 2011, 12:46 AM
Post #28


AF Geek
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 212
Joined: 27-June 11




Seriously, U.S. sends aircraft carriers in between Taiwan straits, and right in front of Beijing's doorsteps (Yellow Sea), and yet, the United States has the gall to ask such stupid condescending obvious questions.

No great love for China, but who the fu-k does the Americans think they are?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
faydabakery
post Aug 12 2011, 12:48 AM
Post #29


AF Addict
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 991
Joined: 8-February 11




QUOTE (VJDay @ Aug 12 2011, 01:46 AM) *
Seriously, U.S. sends aircraft carriers in between Taiwan straits, and right in front of Beijing's doorsteps (Yellow Sea), and yet, the United States has the gall to ask such stupid condescending obvious questions.

No great love for China, but who the fu-k does the Americans think they are?


And who do you think you are to say what Chinese and Americans should do?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
VJDay
post Aug 12 2011, 12:49 AM
Post #30


AF Geek
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 212
Joined: 27-June 11




QUOTE (LOL)
And who do you think you are to say what Chinese and Americans should do?


Who do you think you are to challenge me? You want to get your @$$ flamed?

Little Japanese twert. I'll hurt you in real life if you dare challenge me like this.

This post has been edited by VJDay: Aug 12 2011, 12:50 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
faydabakery
post Aug 12 2011, 12:54 AM
Post #31


AF Addict
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 991
Joined: 8-February 11




QUOTE (VJDay @ Aug 12 2011, 01:49 AM) *
Who do you think you are to challenge me? You want to get your @$$ flamed?

Little Japanese twert. I'll hurt you in real life if you dare challenge me like this.


Why do you keep insulting Japanese people!?!? Stop making Chinese look bad you idiot!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
VJDay
post Aug 12 2011, 12:55 AM
Post #32


AF Geek
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 212
Joined: 27-June 11




^ stop messaging me, and stop talking to me, you little troll.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
faydabakery
post Aug 12 2011, 12:58 AM
Post #33


AF Addict
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 991
Joined: 8-February 11




QUOTE (VJDay @ Aug 12 2011, 01:55 AM) *
^ stop messaging me, and stop talking to me, you little troll.


This coming from the person that insults Japanese, women and anyone not Chinese constantly to make Chinese look bad. You're obviously the troll here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
VJDay
post Aug 12 2011, 01:02 AM
Post #34


AF Geek
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 212
Joined: 27-June 11




Look at you, defending Americans, when clearly the entire Chinese community disagrees with America's typical arrogance.

Why are you defending typical white arrogance? Clearly you are not the Chinese, but either anti-Chinese white bastard barbarian, or a Japanese.

This post has been edited by VJDay: Aug 12 2011, 01:04 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Southasianguy
post Aug 12 2011, 01:11 PM
Post #35


AF Geek
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 146
Joined: 18-May 11




QUOTE (VJDay @ Aug 12 2011, 01:02 AM) *
Look at you, defending Americans, when clearly the entire Chinese community disagrees with America's typical arrogance.

Why are you defending typical white arrogance? Clearly you are not the Chinese, but either anti-Chinese white bastard barbarian, or a Japanese.


Screw him "VJDay" he is obviously an obese american troll icon_smile.gif

This post has been edited by Southasianguy: Aug 12 2011, 01:13 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
iberian
post Aug 12 2011, 03:04 PM
Post #36


Newbie
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 5
Joined: 9-August 11




QUOTE (Noliving @ Aug 11 2011, 01:19 AM) *
That is not hypocritical at all. The US is simply asking what are the intentions China has with such equipment, seeing as one of the obvious possible reasons for having such equipment is to challenge US forces. They are not saying China can't have the equipment, what they want to know is what china plans on doing with it, that way the US can help avoid any type of misunderstandings, such misunderstandings have a tendency throughout history of causing skirmishes and or wars.



Exactly. However, If China does intend on intimidating their neighbors and start enforcing territorial claims, you better believe that the US is not going to just stay on the sidelines when other countries might need assistance. I believe the US has made this very clear. Again it's all about understandings.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Southasianguy
post Aug 12 2011, 03:15 PM
Post #37


AF Geek
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 146
Joined: 18-May 11




QUOTE (iberian @ Aug 12 2011, 03:04 PM) *
Exactly. However, If China does intend on intimidating their neighbors and start enforcing territorial claims, you better believe that the US is not going to just stay on the sidelines when other countries might need assistance. I believe the US has made this very clear. Again it's all about understandings.


If they did, the Dragon and the Russian Bear will make kebab out of the little chicken that is america!

Also don't forget that they have to go through North Korea first icon_smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ComradeDeki
post Aug 12 2011, 06:16 PM
Post #38


AF Fan
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 24
Joined: 8-August 11




QUOTE (Southasianguy @ Aug 12 2011, 04:15 PM) *
If they did, the Dragon and the Russian Bear will make kebab out of the little chicken that is america!

Also don't forget that they have to go through North Korea first icon_smile.gif


Russia wouldn't dare attack or participate in any attack towards the United States. Many of Russia's oil profits depend on NATO, and Russia-United States relations have been reset to peaceful levels already.

Despite being nearly 2 million men strong, China is nearly a decade behind the United States in terms of hardware. 1 aircraft carrier won't make a difference; the combat capabilities of the People's Liberation Air Force is outnumbered and outgunned by superior American aircraft.

North Korea's navy is green-water at most and the ground forces still operate Cold War Era T-55s and T-70s. North Korean personnel don't even wear body armor. South Korea could wipe out North Korea by itself if it wanted to.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
UnZipped
post Aug 12 2011, 06:32 PM
Post #39


AF Addict
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 906
Joined: 13-November 04




The us will.not want to mess with china.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
orange peel
post Aug 12 2011, 10:44 PM
Post #40


AF Guru
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 3,012
Joined: 15-April 07
From: Markham




QUOTE (iberian @ Aug 12 2011, 04:04 PM) *
Exactly. However, If China does intend on intimidating their neighbors and start enforcing territorial claims, you better believe that the US is not going to just stay on the sidelines when other countries might need assistance. I believe the US has made this very clear. Again it's all about understandings.


I'm afraid time is on China's side
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

5 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 31st August 2014 - 12:19 AM