The Migration of White Racism to South Korea, by "Nadia" Kim Options

[InquisitorOfKore...]

http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p_mla...7/p242217-1.php

This article shows the evolving culture of South Korea that accepted American influence since the occupation and has progressively internalised the culture and attitudes of America, including the racist ones which has contributed towards what some notice as an inferiority complex in Korean media. This culture is the one white posters like Captain Corea feed on and actively spread/promote.

This post has been edited by InquisitorOfKorean: Sep 1 2011, 05:25 PM

[Teshub]

i dont believe this is any internalization of culture. in my view, it goes back to the biological factors. some people are born to be servants, and it is automatic fort them to assume that role when a more authoritative force appears. for example, when european explorers went to the new world or other places, even though there was complete lack of verbal communication due to both sides not knowing their language, the natives readily prostrated to the europeans or were swayed by them in various degrees.

second, it seems 'internalized racism' is liberal doublespeak to say that anytime someone hates a black its the fault of whites and not those blacks themselves.
in la there are also just as many mexicans and other hispanics in california who who much better relations with korean even though they are in the 'bottom rung' of society.

[InquisitorOfKore...]

i dont believe this is any internalization of culture. in my view, it goes back to the biological factors. some people are born to be servants, and it is automatic fort them to assume that role when a more authoritative force appears. for example, when european explorers went to the new world or other places, even though there was complete lack of verbal communication due to both sides not knowing their language, the natives readily prostrated to the europeans or were swayed by them in various degrees.

second, it seems 'internalized racism' is liberal doublespeak to say that anytime someone hates a black its the fault of whites and not those blacks themselves.
in la there are also just as many mexicans and other hispanics in california who who much better relations with korean even though they are in the 'bottom rung' of society.

biological factors? So you are saying asians are naturally inferior to whites as they inherently react subserviantly?

It had to do with other people not understanding the mentality of whites. Who the hell genocides a whole continent so he can grow crops? People generally try to get along with one another and nature not destroy it and poison it with complete utter disregard like whites. Its why theyve been called white deveils so consistently across so many cultures. I duno how they got like that...maybe they really are satans children I duno, maybe the industrial age or enlightenment or something changed them or maybe it was something left over from the Roman legacy. Duno but to say it is inherent shows what you believe to be the relationship between asian and white as the normal course. I notice a lot of asian natioanlsits or whatever have these views that basically put whites on a pedestal. Its really bizarre. Talk about internalised culture and internalised racism. lol

That being said hispanics are often poor and I heard they work in Korean restaurants sometimes and they like our food since both our food is a spicey ah!

This post has been edited by InquisitorOfKorean: Sep 1 2011, 06:03 PM

[Teshub]

biological factors? So you are saying asians are naturally inferior to whites as they inherently react subserviantly?

It had to do with other people not understanding the mentality of whites. Who the hell genocides a whole continent so he can grow crops? People generally try to get along with one another and nature not destroy it and poison it with complete utter disregard like whites. Its why theyve been called white deveils so consistently across so many cultures. I duno how they got like that...maybe they really are satans children I duno, maybe the industrial age or enlightenment or something changed them or maybe it was something left over from the Roman legacy. Duno but to say it is inherent shows what you believe to be the relationship between asian and white as the normal course. I notice a lot of asian natioanlsits or whatever have these views that basically put whites on a pedestal. Its really bizarre. Talk about internalised culture and internalised racism. lol

That being said hispanics are often poor and I heard they work in Korean restaurants sometimes and they like our food since both our food is a spicey ah!

what about the mongols? i believe they committed even more genocide on a shorter amount of time. but the mongol's destruction is even more impressive because they went against strong civilizations like the chinese and in the middle east, etc.

meanwhile whites were killing people who were basically stuck in the stone age in australia, subsaharan african and some places in america

[InquisitorOfKore...]

what about the mongols? i believe they committed even more genocide on a shorter amount of time. but the mongol's destruction is even more impressive because they went against strong civilizations like the chinese and in the middle east, etc.

meanwhile whites were killing people who were basically stuck in the stone age in australia, subsaharan african and some places in america

Well the mongols assimilated and became those people of the conoquered territories.

They didn't commit genocide or create Indian hunters to further chase down the few remaining Indians that were hiding out in deep country or the mountains.

The Mongols were still one with nature. The whole way of thinking is different.

And I'm not just talking about killing, who gets children addicted to opium? Like they did in China? Would asians really try and fu-k the women of a race they despise like the whites do to us? As I said its the whole mentality not just who they genocided and I dont think the Mongols genocided anyone just killed a lot of people in the act of war.

This post has been edited by InquisitorOfKorean: Sep 1 2011, 06:55 PM

[Teshub]

Well the mongols assimilated and became those people of the conoquered territories.

They didn't commit genocide or create Indian hunters to further chase down the few remaining Indians that were hiding out in deep country or the mountains.

The Mongols were still one with nature. The whole way of thinking is different.

And I'm not just talking about killing, who gets children addicted to opium? Like they did in China? Would asians really try and fu-k the women of a race they despise like the whites do to us? As I said its the whole mentality not just who they genocided and I dont think the Mongols genocided anyone just killed a lot of people in the act of war.

the mongols did commit genocide. they basically killed everyone who wasnt a mongol, especially if they were swarthy caucasians who were their enemies. and completely destroyed their cities. the mongols also selected the beauties of china and northern asia/eastern europe for themselves. they say about 10% of men in asia had an ancestor from a single mongolian male. shows how much they enjoyed 'sexing' up foreign women. just bcus liberal propaganda of evil whitey didnt exist back then doesn't mean other people before whites werent as bad or even worse than them

and nature is also about killing, so i guess they were with nature.

[InquisitorOfKore...]

the mongols did commit genocide. they basically killed everyone who wasnt a mongol, especially if they were swarthy caucasians who were their enemies. and completely destroyed their cities. the mongols also selected the beauties of china and northern asia/eastern europe for themselves. they say about 10% of men in asia had an ancestor from a single mongolian male. shows how much they enjoyed 'sexing' up foreign women. just bcus liberal propaganda of evil whitey didnt exist back then doesn't mean other people before whites werent as bad or even worse than them

and nature is also about killing, so i guess they were with nature.

The Mongols did not commit genocide. Those people still have their civilisation and in many cases the Mongols re-created what they destroyed.

Taking women from an enslaved people isn't genocide and they didn't last very long in the empires they created.


"liberal propaganda of evil whitey" - whats that all about? You like denigrating Koreans and defending whites? Lol.

Whatever. Whites good, Korean bad, Chinese guy.