AsiaFinest Forum
Ad: 123Designing.com

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

127 Pages V  « < 88 89 90 91 92 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
New Theory on Angkor, Who were the last Varman kings?
KhmerBoi
post Feb 18 2012, 02:01 AM
Post #1781


AF Pro
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 1,953
Joined: 30-July 11
From: PHNOM PENH




QUOTE (LoveIsAllAround @ Feb 18 2012, 01:42 PM) *
That's funny logic, thanks LOL

You can claim China if you think your Khmer race built The great wall of China.
embarassedlaugh.gif

What we claim here, is what belonged and are Siamese. beerchug.gif


Thank you to give us this idea but sadly only Thai can dream about it!!!

This post has been edited by KhmerBoi: Feb 18 2012, 02:01 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
chadwarden
post Feb 18 2012, 02:11 AM
Post #1782


AF Geek
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 184
Joined: 3-February 11




QUOTE (LoveIsAllAround @ Feb 18 2012, 02:42 PM) *
That's funny logic, thanks LOL

You can claim China if you think your Khmer race built The great wall of China. embarassedlaugh.gif

What we claim here, is what belonged and are Siamese. beerchug.gif


why would relatives to the emperor of china build the great wall?

anyway that logic is obviously false even you get a laugh out of it.

angkor was built by siamese yet there is still no recorded anything of them saying they did. im just missing the point that some race lets say these mon proto tai mutts built angkor yet failed to record a single word about them doing it. hey guys lets build the worlds biggest temple complex but not say we did it just so our moron mutt children of the future can fight over it later yes that makes perfect sense.

the fundamental questions still lie that why did the siamese call themselves siam. somehow they get siam out of combining the mon and proto tai people?
why do the mon upon mixing with proto tai just give up their mon language and tradition.
what was the ratio of mon to proto thai?
where is the evidence of a proto tai language being spoken in angkor? better yet thailand?
why do the kings of angkor not carry a proto tai name like you said the kings of funan have a proto tai name by switching a chinese transliteration of h to kh
why didnt the tai that came down from china not chronicle these proto tai siam as one of their own?
why would the government of thailand its scholars all follow the bat$hit theory of a khmer empire creating angkor?
if the siam are such a proud race why havent they been researching their supposed proto tai ancestors and the creation of angkor?
why didnt they care to do their own research and disprove khmer once and for all?
why are there still khmer references slapped to many buildings in thailand?

you guys have to be the ones to find this information since you are coming to cambodia chat to spam about angkor being siamese.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
chadwarden
post Feb 18 2012, 02:23 AM
Post #1783


AF Geek
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 184
Joined: 3-February 11




QUOTE (LoveIsAllAround @ Feb 18 2012, 02:35 PM) *
what is 'RACE' for you? Your race definition is contradict concept. Prove me that Viet is Khmer race, and Cham is Khmer race and I will believe you.

Didn't you say Thai history can't be trust? Thai members talk about new theory. Even the word Austro-Tai is new theory. Autstro-Tai never exist when the French came here. Or your Austroasiatic theory can vary every year!

Is this the latest one?


Not this one from wiki?


It's your work to prove that your 'KHMER race' is the rulers of Funan, Chenla and Kampuja. and it's my job to disprove that, or maybe present that Siamese were those Angkor kings. LOL


its not our work to prove anything. its your work to back up your ape$hit theory since you guys are coming here to blab and disprove and eliminate other peoples history. maybe you should discuss this on your page instead of spamming ours.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
yugi2013
post Feb 18 2012, 02:27 AM
Post #1784


AF Geek
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 147
Joined: 13-February 12




QUOTE (chadwarden @ Feb 18 2012, 03:23 AM) *
its not our work to prove anything. its your work to back up your ape$hit theory since you guys are coming here to blab and disprove and eliminate other peoples history. maybe you should discuss this on your page instead of spamming ours.

So we don't need proof of history? We just need to rely on the word of the white man? Is that what you're saying?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
chadwarden
post Feb 18 2012, 02:40 AM
Post #1785


AF Geek
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 184
Joined: 3-February 11




QUOTE (yugi2013 @ Feb 18 2012, 03:27 PM) *
So we don't need proof of history? We just need to rely on the word of the white man? Is that what you're saying?


first concrete your own races theory first then come and spam the khmer channel

angkor was built by siamese yet there is still no recorded anything of them saying they did. im just missing the point that some race lets say these mon proto tai mutts built angkor yet failed to record a single word about them doing it. hey guys lets build the worlds biggest temple complex but not say we did it just so our moron mutt children of the future can fight over it later yes that makes perfect sense.

the fundamental questions still lie that why did the siamese call themselves siam. somehow they get siam out of combining the mon and proto tai people?
why do the mon upon mixing with proto tai just give up their mon language and tradition.
what was the ratio of mon to proto thai?
where is the evidence of a proto tai language being spoken in angkor? better yet thailand?
why do the kings of angkor not carry a proto tai name like you said the kings of funan have a proto tai name by switching a chinese transliteration of h to kh
why didnt the tai that came down from china not chronicle these proto tai siam as one of their own?
why would the government of thailand its scholars all follow the bat$hit theory of a khmer empire creating angkor?
if the siam are such a proud race why havent they been researching their supposed proto tai ancestors and the creation of angkor?
why didnt they care to do their own research and disprove khmer once and for all?
why are there still khmer references slapped to many buildings in thailand?

you guys have to be the ones to find this information since you are coming to cambodia chat to spam about angkor being siamese.



This post has been edited by chadwarden: Feb 18 2012, 02:42 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
yugi2013
post Feb 18 2012, 02:42 AM
Post #1786


AF Geek
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 147
Joined: 13-February 12




QUOTE (chadwarden @ Feb 18 2012, 03:40 AM) *
first concrete your own races theory first then come and spam the khmer channel

HOw long you been on this forum? Asked anyone on this forum. It was Khmerboi & Nagaprincess that started trolling Thai forum. Some thai members like Nojek thought that Khmerboi & Nagaprincess were either vietnamese or Filipino.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
chadwarden
post Feb 18 2012, 02:43 AM
Post #1787


AF Geek
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 184
Joined: 3-February 11




QUOTE (yugi2013 @ Feb 18 2012, 03:42 PM) *
HOw long you been on this forum? Asked anyone on this forum. It was Khmerboi & Nagaprincess that started trolling Thai forum. Some thai members like Nojek thought that Khmerboi & Nagaprincess were either vietnamese or Filipino.


angkor was built by siamese yet there is still no recorded anything of them saying they did. im just missing the point that some race lets say these mon proto tai mutts built angkor yet failed to record a single word about them doing it. hey guys lets build the worlds biggest temple complex but not say we did it just so our moron mutt children of the future can fight over it later yes that makes perfect sense.

the fundamental questions still lie that why did the siamese call themselves siam. somehow they get siam out of combining the mon and proto tai people?
why do the mon upon mixing with proto tai just give up their mon language and tradition.
what was the ratio of mon to proto thai?
where is the evidence of a proto tai language being spoken in angkor? better yet thailand?
why do the kings of angkor not carry a proto tai name like you said the kings of funan have a proto tai name by switching a chinese transliteration of h to kh
why didnt the tai that came down from china not chronicle these proto tai siam as one of their own?
why would the government of thailand its scholars all follow the bat$hit theory of a khmer empire creating angkor?
if the siam are such a proud race why havent they been researching their supposed proto tai ancestors and the creation of angkor?
why didnt they care to do their own research and disprove khmer once and for all?
why are there still khmer references slapped to many buildings in thailand?

you guys have to be the ones to find this information since you are coming to cambodia chat to spam about angkor being siamese.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
KhmerBoi
post Feb 18 2012, 02:44 AM
Post #1788


AF Pro
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 1,953
Joined: 30-July 11
From: PHNOM PENH




QUOTE (yugi2013 @ Feb 18 2012, 02:42 PM) *
HOw long you been on this forum? Asked anyone on this forum. It was Khmerboi & Nagaprincess that started trolling Thai forum. Some thai members like Nojek thought that Khmerboi & Nagaprincess were either vietnamese or Filipino.


Are you create another theory?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
yugi2013
post Feb 18 2012, 02:45 AM
Post #1789


AF Geek
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 147
Joined: 13-February 12




QUOTE (chadwarden @ Feb 18 2012, 03:43 AM) *
angkor was built by siamese yet there is still no recorded anything of them saying they did. im just missing the point that some race lets say these mon proto tai mutts built angkor yet failed to record a single word about them doing it. hey guys lets build the worlds biggest temple complex but not say we did it just so our moron mutt children of the future can fight over it later yes that makes perfect sense.

the fundamental questions still lie that why did the siamese call themselves siam. somehow they get siam out of combining the mon and proto tai people?
why do the mon upon mixing with proto tai just give up their mon language and tradition.
what was the ratio of mon to proto thai?
where is the evidence of a proto tai language being spoken in angkor? better yet thailand?
why do the kings of angkor not carry a proto tai name like you said the kings of funan have a proto tai name by switching a chinese transliteration of h to kh
why didnt the tai that came down from china not chronicle these proto tai siam as one of their own?
why would the government of thailand its scholars all follow the bat$hit theory of a khmer empire creating angkor?
if the siam are such a proud race why havent they been researching their supposed proto tai ancestors and the creation of angkor?
why didnt they care to do their own research and disprove khmer once and for all?
why are there still khmer references slapped to many buildings in thailand?

you guys have to be the ones to find this information since you are coming to cambodia chat to spam about angkor being siamese.
As I recall. Many khmer claim that siam are mon/khmer/mon-khmer decendant, so it would make sense for the siam to make that claim
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
yugi2013
post Feb 18 2012, 02:47 AM
Post #1790


AF Geek
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 147
Joined: 13-February 12




QUOTE (KhmerBoi @ Feb 18 2012, 03:44 AM) *
Are you create another theory?

Rofl. No, it's not a theory. Thais members and Khmers members on AF gotten a long fine until you two show up. why don't you pm xigonchau and ask her. she recording all the history that happen on af.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
KhmerBoi
post Feb 18 2012, 02:50 AM
Post #1791


AF Pro
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 1,953
Joined: 30-July 11
From: PHNOM PENH




QUOTE (yugi2013 @ Feb 18 2012, 02:45 PM) *
As I recall. Many khmer claim that siam are mon/khmer/mon-khmer decendant, so it would make sense for the siam to make that claim


Only if their general understanding is Siam is Khmer-Mon people... and It still not that easy because for Khmer; Siam is not Siem! and we do call those Evil Thai as Siem! Siem who invaded Cambodia!
and the other impossibility is Syam is already existed during that time.. if Angkorean consider them as foreigner they also can't claim it! and the proved is the inscription call them SyamKok (possibly Mon-Khmer who mix with Ai-Lao or at least Tai-Dam)which mean the country of Syam(modern literate: Siam)! and modern day they speak Siem (Tai with heavy influence by Khmer) not Khmer! ^^

This post has been edited by KhmerBoi: Feb 18 2012, 03:01 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
chadwarden
post Feb 18 2012, 02:51 AM
Post #1792


AF Geek
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 184
Joined: 3-February 11




QUOTE (yugi2013 @ Feb 18 2012, 03:45 PM) *
As I recall. Many khmer claim that siam are mon/khmer/mon-khmer decendant, so it would make sense for the siam to make that claim


that answers nothing.. yea i heard that siam are supposedly calling themselves some magic proto tai and mon mixed together but i want to hear answers to these questions though



angkor was built by siamese yet there is still no recorded anything of them saying they did. im just missing the point that some race lets say these mon proto tai mutts built angkor yet failed to record a single word about them doing it. hey guys lets build the worlds biggest temple complex but not say we did it just so our moron mutt children of the future can fight over it later yes that makes perfect sense.

the fundamental questions still lie that why did the siamese call themselves siam. somehow they get siam out of combining the mon and proto tai people?
why do the mon upon mixing with proto tai just give up their mon language and tradition.
what was the ratio of mon to proto thai?
where is the evidence of a proto tai language being spoken in angkor? better yet thailand?
why do the kings of angkor not carry a proto tai name like you said the kings of funan have a proto tai name by switching a chinese transliteration of h to kh
why didnt the tai that came down from china not chronicle these proto tai siam as one of their own?
why would the government of thailand its scholars all follow the bat$hit theory of a khmer empire creating angkor?
if the siam are such a proud race why havent they been researching their supposed proto tai ancestors and the creation of angkor?
why didnt they care to do their own research and disprove khmer once and for all?
why are there still khmer references slapped to many buildings in thailand?

you guys have to be the ones to find this information since you are coming to cambodia chat to spam about angkor being siamese
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
yugi2013
post Feb 18 2012, 02:58 AM
Post #1793


AF Geek
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 147
Joined: 13-February 12




QUOTE (chadwarden @ Feb 18 2012, 02:51 AM) *
that answers nothing.. yea i heard that siam are supposedly calling themselves some magic proto tai and mon mixed together but i want to hear answers to these questions though



angkor was built by siamese yet there is still no recorded anything of them saying they did. im just missing the point that some race lets say these mon proto tai mutts built angkor yet failed to record a single word about them doing it. hey guys lets build the worlds biggest temple complex but not say we did it just so our moron mutt children of the future can fight over it later yes that makes perfect sense.

the fundamental questions still lie that why did the siamese call themselves siam. somehow they get siam out of combining the mon and proto tai people?
why do the mon upon mixing with proto tai just give up their mon language and tradition.
what was the ratio of mon to proto thai?
where is the evidence of a proto tai language being spoken in angkor? better yet thailand?
why do the kings of angkor not carry a proto tai name like you said the kings of funan have a proto tai name by switching a chinese transliteration of h to kh
why didnt the tai that came down from china not chronicle these proto tai siam as one of their own?
why would the government of thailand its scholars all follow the bat$hit theory of a khmer empire creating angkor?
if the siam are such a proud race why havent they been researching their supposed proto tai ancestors and the creation of angkor?
why didnt they care to do their own research and disprove khmer once and for all?
why are there still khmer references slapped to many buildings in thailand?

you guys have to be the ones to find this information since you are coming to cambodia chat to spam about angkor being siamese


Leeporter already answer those. Anyways, we'll just wait for him to come back to answer them again.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
KhmerBoi
post Feb 18 2012, 03:05 AM
Post #1794


AF Pro
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 1,953
Joined: 30-July 11
From: PHNOM PENH




QUOTE (yugi2013 @ Feb 18 2012, 02:58 PM) *
Leeporter already answer those. Anyways, we'll just wait for him to come back to answer them again.


You too young to be here... I know exactly how he though!!! that guys always confusing!!! even just claiming who is Thai! But if you believe him you can follow us here.. welcome another troll....
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
chadwarden
post Feb 18 2012, 03:07 AM
Post #1795


AF Geek
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 184
Joined: 3-February 11




QUOTE (yugi2013 @ Feb 18 2012, 03:58 PM) *
Leeporter already answer those. Anyways, we'll just wait for him to come back to answer them again.


no he didnt answer anything at all they were all just off the wall theories

nobody can answer why if siam built angkor they never recorded it for everyone to know. because obviously building the worlds biggest temple complex you know u might wanna get acknowledged for it?

he claimed tai speaking kings of funan by switching letters on a chinese transliteration while he has no knowledge of proto tai language or chinas ancient language and pronounciation system.

he couldnt answer how the chinese end up talking about the funanese as dark skinned people but completely miss how the kings were supposed tai lineage and most definetly lighter

the prove of this is that china already knew about tai speakers and race and labeled them already in southern china. im sure they arent stupid to completely miss them when they most likely spent the most time with the leaders.

the fundamental questions still lie that why did the siamese call themselves siam. somehow they get siam out of combining the mon and proto tai people? not answered
why do the mon upon mixing with proto tai just give up their mon language and tradition. not answered
what was the ratio of mon to proto tai? not answered
where is the evidence of a proto tai language being spoken in angkor? better yet thailand before 1300s? not answered
why do the kings of angkor not carry a proto tai name like you said the kings of funan have a proto tai name by switching a chinese transliteration of h to kh not answered
why didnt the tai that came down from china not chronicle these proto tai siam as one of their own? not answered
why would the government of thailand its scholars all follow the bat$hit theory of a khmer empire creating angkor? not answered
if the siam are such a proud race why havent they been researching their supposed proto tai ancestors and the creation of angkor? not answered
why didnt they care to do their own research and disprove khmer once and for all? not answered
why are there still khmer references slapped to many buildings in thailand? not answered

also who are the chao bon people? they are remnants of the mon kingdom in thailand and speak an ancient version of mon. their bones and dna were found in the research he tried to pass off as being found tai speakers in southeast asia. his research was from biased thai racial nazis my research was done 1 year after his and showed the bones and dna found were of the chao bon people a mon khmer people at phimai site.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
yugi2013
post Feb 18 2012, 03:07 AM
Post #1796


AF Geek
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 147
Joined: 13-February 12




QUOTE (KhmerBoi @ Feb 18 2012, 03:05 AM) *
You too young to be here... I know exactly how he though!!! that guys always confusing!!! even just claiming who is Thai! But if you believe him you can follow us here.. welcome another troll....

I always take a white man words as a grain of salt. YOu should move to the states. You'll fit right in with majority of America.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
KhmerBoi
post Feb 18 2012, 03:14 AM
Post #1797


AF Pro
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 1,953
Joined: 30-July 11
From: PHNOM PENH




QUOTE (yugi2013 @ Feb 18 2012, 03:07 PM) *
I always take a white man words as a grain of salt. YOu should move to the states. You'll fit right in with majority of America.


I am been educated in Cambodia and travel abroad to learn and experience the difference world... My life in Cambodia is great enough to be real and do whatever I like! why should I go to feed (fit) those American? You must be kidding with my personal identity!!!! Or you might find that hard to understand me... I give you sometime because I noted you will be here for other stay! ^^

This post has been edited by KhmerBoi: Feb 18 2012, 03:15 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
khmerpride
post Feb 18 2012, 03:15 AM
Post #1798


AF Geek
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 206
Joined: 15-May 10




QUOTE (KhmerBoi @ Feb 18 2012, 01:25 AM) *
When you have nothing to say you used the diplomatic speech to proved the history?? ^^ lolzzzz

Don't you feel that Indonesian saying I don't care about Thailand but Siam ^^ Lolzzz Anyways, if relationship between Thailand and Indonesian that close Do you have special military training with them? lolzzz the world know that Indonesia have a very strong military and they teach no one but Cambodia! ^^ u can ask Indonesian how special of it!! We are more real man!!! not being fake like Thailand!!!! kekekeke
and you can ask Lao, Burma, Malaysia, Vietnam, and China base on diplomatic tie if Thai really want to have serious war with Cambodia what will happen..? Thai friend of Noone! ^^ kekeke but American who give them brain to expend their imperial knowledge and that not mention about Indonesia who a bit far from Cambodia(but we known).... kekekeke



Watch this my Friend icon_smile.gif

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QSoyMJkP378
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
yugi2013
post Feb 18 2012, 03:17 AM
Post #1799


AF Geek
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 147
Joined: 13-February 12




QUOTE (KhmerBoi @ Feb 18 2012, 03:14 AM) *
I am been educated in Cambodia and travel abroad to learn and experience the difference world... My life in Cambodia is great enough to be real and do whatever I like! why should I go to feed (fit) those American? You must be kidding with my personal identity!!!! Or you might find that hard to understand me... I give you sometime because I noted you will be here for other stay! ^^

I stated that you would fit in America with most of the sheeps due to you thinking highly of the whiteman and never questioning them. Khmer history was bought to you by the white man, do you question the white man history that was given to you? No, u don't
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
khmerpride
post Feb 18 2012, 03:18 AM
Post #1800


AF Geek
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 206
Joined: 15-May 10




QUOTE (yugi2013 @ Feb 18 2012, 03:58 AM) *
Leeporter already answer those. Anyways, we'll just wait for him to come back to answer them again.


You shouldn't believe to much in him ^^
Maybe one day you get dissapointed icon_smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

127 Pages V  « < 88 89 90 91 92 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 24th April 2014 - 03:16 PM