The Battle of Salsu: Salsu Daechup, Grandest defeat in asia's history Options

[Titanium]

LOL seriously Chyna, you don't have to take this from anyone. Afterall you're the freakin mod. Let them cry a river......... (IMG:http://www.asiafinest.com/forum/style_emoticons/default/embarassedlaugh.gif) 2

[Jizzah]

One thing is clear, Mr. Tree had no idea what he was talking about and was incorrect to accuse hi-head of bs'ing on a standard article of history. Lest people forget, that's the important point. Will Mr. Tree learn from this lesson and get a clue for the next time?

[Jasel]

No. The point is to stop fu-king flaming over stupid $hit and then b!tching about it when you get a warning.

[Jizzah]

No. The point is to stop fu-king flaming over stupid $hit and then b!tching about it when you get a warning.

History isn't stupid $hit, and repetitively attacking someone's credibility is not a minor issue. It can be quite annoying, especially when it's ignorant.

- I haven't written in regard to the warnings.

This post has been edited by Jizzah: Jul 8 2005, 01:55 PM

[MadGhoul]

damn, Hi-head sure does fly off the handle pretty easily

from what i read "your retarded country's academics" which basically states the academics of a retarded country. thats sounds pretty damn insulting to me. that attacks a whole country's integrity. its uncalled for

now if he said "your country's retarded academics", that would be fine because thats attacking one aspect of a nation.

anycase, you guys are some blind @$$ motherfu-kers who see what they wanna see and hear what they wanna hear. no point in disputing it. any level headed person would agree

but I will give Hi-head a point for typing up a historical event that was worth reading. the credibility i'm sure is probably at least somewhat true. overexaggerated maybe. don't know i don't have the academic expertise to say so. the intent though not so sure. probably to feed nationalistic ego like everybody else does around here.

now if anybody says, that i'm being one sided, like so many would love to accuse, fu-k you

This post has been edited by MadGhoul: Jul 8 2005, 02:17 PM

[MadGhoul]

One thing is clear, Mr. Tree had no idea what he was talking about and was incorrect to accuse hi-head of bs'ing on a standard article of history. Lest people forget, that's the important point. Will Mr. Tree learn from this lesson and get a clue for the next time?

So what, just cause Mr. Tree doesn't believe it out of ignorance doesn't mean he should have been insulted so vehemently. $hit, if someone insulted me like that without really knowing me, they'd get a boot in the throat.

Mr. Tree was being ignorant
Hi-head was being a prick

[Adwaregator]

damn, Hi-head sure does fly off the handle pretty easily

from what i read "your retarded country's academics" which basically states the academics of a retarded country. thats sounds pretty damn insulting to me. that attacks a whole country's integrity. its uncalled for

now if he said "your country's retarded academics", that would be fine because thats attacking one aspect of a nation.

anycase, you guys are some blind @$$ motherfu-kers who see what they wanna see and hear what they wanna hear. no point in disputing it. any level headed person would agree

but I will give Hi-head a point for typing up a historical event that was worth reading. the credibility i'm sure is probably at least somewhat true. overexaggerated maybe. don't know i don't have the academic expertise to say so. the intent though not so sure. probably to feed nationalistic ego like everybody else does around here.

now if anybody says, that i'm being one sided, like so many would love to accuse, fu-k you

actually it's stating that their academia is biased and slanted...sigh same can be said of n. korea's. Or maybe the Chinese like the Japanese historical claim on the massacre. Retarded no?

[chynagongju]

damn, Hi-head sure does fly off the handle pretty easily

from what i read "your retarded country's academics" which basically states the academics of a retarded country. thats sounds pretty damn insulting to me. that attacks a whole country's integrity. its uncalled for

now if he said "your country's retarded academics", that would be fine because thats attacking one aspect of a nation.

anycase, you guys are some blind @$$ motherfu-kers who see what they wanna see and hear what they wanna hear. no point in disputing it. any level headed person would agree

but I will give Hi-head a point for typing up a historical event that was worth reading. the credibility i'm sure is probably at least somewhat true. overexaggerated maybe. don't know i don't have the academic expertise to say so. the intent though not so sure. probably to feed nationalistic ego like everybody else does around here.

now if anybody says, that i'm being one sided, like so many would love to accuse, fu-k you

actually it's stating that their academia is biased and slanted...sigh same can be said of n. korea's. Or maybe the Chinese like the Japanese historical claim on the massacre. Retarded no?

I know what you're saying when you say that Hi-head meant "retarded" in a certain aspect. However, read all of Jasel's quotes of Hi-head. He used retarded a lot. Did he mean retarded the way you want him to? Or did he mean it the way he used it the other 10 times?

Also, you choose to lecture him through PM privately, but have no problem lecturing me in public? Quite nice and fair.

[MadGhoul]

damn, Hi-head sure does fly off the handle pretty easily

from what i read "your retarded country's academics" which basically states the academics of a retarded country. thats sounds pretty damn insulting to me. that attacks a whole country's integrity. its uncalled for

now if he said "your country's retarded academics", that would be fine because thats attacking one aspect of a nation.

anycase, you guys are some blind @$$ motherfu-kers who see what they wanna see and hear what they wanna hear. no point in disputing it. any level headed person would agree

but I will give Hi-head a point for typing up a historical event that was worth reading. the credibility i'm sure is probably at least somewhat true. overexaggerated maybe. don't know i don't have the academic expertise to say so. the intent though not so sure. probably to feed nationalistic ego like everybody else does around here.

now if anybody says, that i'm being one sided, like so many would love to accuse, fu-k you

actually it's stating that their academia is biased and slanted...sigh same can be said of n. korea's. Or maybe the Chinese like the Japanese historical claim on the massacre. Retarded no?

like i said, if that is what he intended to say, fine, i won't argue that the Chinese govt, doesn't tamper with historical evidence. thing is thats not what he said. go back to his first response. he clearly says retarded country's academia. which is completely different from saying your country's retarded academia. given his track record where he's usually the first one spouting off blatantly racist remarks to other members even when it isn't justified, sorry i can't believe that he didn't mean to attack China's integrity and just its academics. if thats what he intended to say, then he should have stated it.

and yes, ANY historic distortion as means to saving face or to instill a false sense of national pride is stupid. it prevents progress of any kind. if you don't learn from your mistakes, then you don't learn at all. this doesn't go for just China. this include all nations, including Japan and Korea. which obviously has its fair share

[Adwaregator]

damn, Hi-head sure does fly off the handle pretty easily

from what i read "your retarded country's academics" which basically states the academics of a retarded country. thats sounds pretty damn insulting to me. that attacks a whole country's integrity. its uncalled for

now if he said "your country's retarded academics", that would be fine because thats attacking one aspect of a nation.

anycase, you guys are some blind @$$ motherfu-kers who see what they wanna see and hear what they wanna hear. no point in disputing it. any level headed person would agree

but I will give Hi-head a point for typing up a historical event that was worth reading. the credibility i'm sure is probably at least somewhat true. overexaggerated maybe. don't know i don't have the academic expertise to say so. the intent though not so sure. probably to feed nationalistic ego like everybody else does around here.

now if anybody says, that i'm being one sided, like so many would love to accuse, fu-k you

actually it's stating that their academia is biased and slanted...sigh same can be said of n. korea's. Or maybe the Chinese like the Japanese historical claim on the massacre. Retarded no?

like i said, if that is what he intended to say, fine, i won't argue that the Chinese govt, doesn't tamper with historical evidence. thing is thats not what he said. go back to his first response. he clearly says retarded country's academia. which is completely different from saying your country's retarded academia. given his track record where he's usually the first one spouting off blatantly racist remarks to other members even when it isn't justified, sorry i can't believe that he didn't mean to attack China's integrity and just its academics. if thats what he intended to say, then he should have stated it.

and yes, ANY historic distortion as means to saving face or to instill a false sense of national pride is stupid. it prevents progress of any kind. if you don't learn from your mistakes, then you don't learn at all. this doesn't go for just China. this include all nations, including Japan and Korea. which obviously has its fair share

the way he might have typed it is different from the way you view it but that's what i got from it during my first reading. It goes along with the theme of a "chinese" person arguing the historical facts and the sentence fits right in. Either way, both ways can mean that the person learned from a slanted academic arena or is involved in one. Brainwashed is brainwashed

[azndood]

One thing is clear, Mr. Tree had no idea what he was talking about and was incorrect to accuse hi-head of bs'ing on a standard article of history. Lest people forget, that's the important point. Will Mr. Tree learn from this lesson and get a clue for the next time?

So what, just cause Mr. Tree doesn't believe it out of ignorance doesn't mean he should have been insulted so vehemently. $hit, if someone insulted me like that without really knowing me, they'd get a boot in the throat.

Mr. Tree was being ignorant
Hi-head was being a prick

exactly h-head was being a prick to mr tree for his ignorance...

[hi-head]

yall would understand if you've seen mr.tree's posts in response to mine during the past 3 months. Every single motherfu-kin time, same @$$ $hit he gives me, even though i was telling mostly simple facts that most forumers here know. It's like getting picked on by a little child, thanks to the safety of the internet. It really gets to me, and i deserve sympathy for having to put up with it. Go look up the sucker's posts. I think the TREE was being a prick, AND being ignorant.

not that i'm defending myself in my actions on the little idiot, but at least i deserve some understanding from you guys. Imagine how pissed off, say, a german dude would be if some French kid constantly replies "you're sprouting BS, your nationalist bull$hit" every single motherfu-kin time when the german dude is posting facts regarding german history, germanic tribes invading the roman empire, and the anglo-saxons being germanic in origin. The french faggot goes "you're sprouting nationalist BS, english dont come from germany." Not just once, but every single time, because of the kid's lack of intelligence and knowledge, i have to be questioned all the time. And i NEVER bull$hit out of my @$$, i only say things i truly believe to be facts, which are established in my mind after hearing about it from MULTIPLE sources. There are theories out there that i have it on waiting list, cuz i have yet to hear from enough credible sources. I'm not the type this TREE is accusing me of, and instead of being intelligent and try to refute my views, this fu-ker just insults me. Just cuz he never heard of it.

understand?

btw chyna, i meant the retarded academics. Okay, from what i wrote you could draw two meanings, but i meant that. And I DO mean that, cuz your country's academics dont deserve any respect. Koguryo as china's history?
If you were able to deduce abstract meanings from the sentence flow, (a crucial SAT skill?), you'd understand what i meant.

[chynagongju]

from your order of words, like madghoul has said, "retarded country's academics" the country is called retarded. "country's retarded academics" is a different thing. Retarded is being applied as an adjective to academics. Get it? Simple english skill.

SAT is BS btw, it's totally useless.

Also, you used retarded many many times before, I doubt you meant it in the same way everytime. Can YOU understand why I would deduce your meaning in a separate way and how others would as well and report it? And yes, its understandable that you'd be mad and such, however, like I said before, do it through PM. Use allllllll the expletives and insults you like . When you do it in the public thread, you get warned for it. That's also why Mr. Tree was warned.

If I was bias, wouldn't I warn YOU only? So. Understand yet? There really was no reason for you to take your anger on Mr. Tree to me.

[hi-head]

alright alright, i dont have a problem with you anymore since you gave the same amount of warning to me as with tree, you can calm down. this is an old issue.

let's get back on topic now

[MadGhoul]

from your order of words, like madghoul has said, "retarded country's academics" the country is called retarded. "country's retarded academics" is a different thing. Retarded is being applied as an adjective to academics. Get it? Simple english skill.

SAT is BS btw, it's totally useless.

Also, you used retarded many many times before, I doubt you meant it in the same way everytime.  Can YOU understand why I would deduce your meaning in a separate way and how others would as well and report it? And yes, its understandable that you'd be mad and such, however, like I said before, do it through PM. Use allllllll the expletives and insults you like . When you do it in the public thread, you get warned for it. That's also why Mr. Tree was warned.

If I was bias, wouldn't I warn YOU only? So. Understand yet? There really was no reason for you to take your anger on Mr. Tree to me.

Hey, Chyna, I like your reasoning. How bout we get together and make beautiful babies together. Does that sound reasonable? (IMG:http://www.asiafinest.com/forum/style_emoticons/default/icon_redface.gif)