If you could nuke any country..., which country will it be |
![]() |
|
![]() ![]() |
If you could nuke any country..., which country will it be |
Nov 30 2005, 08:56 PM
Post
#41
|
|
|
AF Pro Group: Banned Posts: 1,696 Joined: 2-September 05 From: Overhere. |
^ well I know that concentration camps wouldn't work this time.
|
|
|
|
Nov 30 2005, 08:57 PM
Post
#42
|
|
|
AF Addict Group: Members Posts: 904 Joined: 7-March 05 From: 108°199E; 16°439N |
QUOTE (freefallz @ Nov 30 2005, 06:48 PM) But they are still Indians? I doubt that all ethnic groups in India consider themselves true Indians. Just like China, where only Han Chinese consider themselves Chinese. Tibetans don't consider themselves Chinese. |
|
|
|
Nov 30 2005, 08:57 PM
Post
#43
|
|
|
AF Legend Group: Members Posts: 39,502 Joined: 15-June 05 From: TEAM RAMROD |
QUOTE (SunZi @ Nov 30 2005, 06:22 PM) QUOTE (VietSk8rGUI @ Dec 1 2005, 01:20 PM) id nuke antartica i dont trust them penguins yeah you know.. melt the polar ice caps and raise world sea levels, causing mass disasters to all coastal countries in the world.. It's not the melting of the polar ice caps that is the big problem. Melting ice caps indicates rising earth temperature, and as things get warmer, things also expand. Ocean + Expansion= sux0rz. This post has been edited by Suijen: Nov 30 2005, 08:58 PM |
|
|
|
Nov 30 2005, 09:01 PM
Post
#44
|
|
|
AF Pro Group: Banned Posts: 1,696 Joined: 2-September 05 From: Overhere. |
Melting the ice caps in the northpole actually would lead to a new iceage.
|
|
|
|
Nov 30 2005, 09:21 PM
Post
#45
|
|
|
AF Elite Group: Members Posts: 9,253 Joined: 20-April 04 From: xxxxxxx |
QUOTE (SunZi @ Nov 30 2005, 08:46 PM) QUOTE (freefallz @ Dec 1 2005, 01:44 PM) Simple countermeasures make anti missile defenses useless, atm. ICBMs are countered in a different manner. QUOTE (worker_bee @ Nov 30 2005, 08:57 PM) QUOTE (freefallz @ Nov 30 2005, 06:48 PM) But they are still Indians? I doubt that all ethnic groups in India consider themselves true Indians. Just like China, where only Han Chinese consider themselves Chinese. Tibetans don't consider themselves Chinese. I doubt that all ethnic groups in India don't consider themselves as true Indians as well. |
|
|
|
Nov 30 2005, 09:39 PM
Post
#46
|
|
|
AF Guru Group: Members Posts: 3,863 Joined: 18-July 05 From: Heaven |
Nuke Saudi Arabia.....Too many damn rich mofos.
|
|
|
|
Nov 30 2005, 09:54 PM
Post
#47
|
|
|
AF Fan Group: Members Posts: 25 Joined: 22-October 05 |
China and India. That will reduce the earth population by 1/3.
Also Mexico should be taken out and the U.S. should be placed in its spot. Not many people hate Mexico. More people hate the U.S. |
|
|
|
Nov 30 2005, 09:56 PM
Post
#48
|
|
|
AF Addict Group: Banned Posts: 813 Joined: 29-October 05 |
Which country do you want nuked?
Russia [ 0 ] ** [0.00%] China [ 21 ] ** [65.63%] Israel [ 3 ] ** [9.38%] America [ 1 ] ** [3.13%] North Korea [ 1 ] ** [3.13%] France [ 1 ] ** [3.13%] India [ 1 ] ** [3.13%] Japan [ 4 ] ** [12.50%] Taiwan [ 0 ] ** [0.00%] Mexico [ 0 ] ** [0.00%] someone has multiple accounts here..... This post has been edited by Kim Jung Il: Nov 30 2005, 09:57 PM |
|
|
|
Nov 30 2005, 09:56 PM
Post
#49
|
|
|
AF Elite Group: Members Posts: 9,253 Joined: 20-April 04 From: xxxxxxx |
LOL so many want to nuke China. Looks like the world is going down.
|
|
|
|
Nov 30 2005, 10:00 PM
Post
#50
|
|
|
AF Supreme Group: Members Posts: 16,645 Joined: 10-March 05 |
lol thats ok, as the hate rises, so does the dragon or vice versa...doesnt matter lol. point is no one can stop us, no one is nuking anyone. and if there was a country that would be nuked, it wouldnt be China. simply because China would take out the world before it lets itself get nuked.
|
|
|
|
Nov 30 2005, 10:01 PM
Post
#51
|
|
|
AF Pro Group: Members Posts: 2,460 Joined: 1-September 05 From: SoCal |
haha china got so many vote
i personally hate french, dont ask y |
|
|
|
Nov 30 2005, 10:47 PM
Post
#52
|
|
|
AF Guru Group: Members Posts: 4,531 Joined: 24-June 05 |
QUOTE (worker_bee @ Dec 1 2005, 12:46 PM) QUOTE (freefallz @ Nov 30 2005, 06:31 PM) The method you're suggesting is typically of genocidal scales. Are you going to nuke India as well? Their birth rate is higher... India also has a lot of people, but they all belong to many many different ethnic groups. As a whole, there are a lot, but when we separate them into those ethnic groups, the number for each group is still small. China, on the other hand, is filled with Han Chinese which I feel needs culling to keep the population under control. don't need to say anything, i've read your posts before in the past. you're an anti-chinese viet person. just admit it. your mind is just full of hatred towards chinese. This post has been edited by chilli21: Nov 30 2005, 10:48 PM |
|
|
|
Nov 30 2005, 11:26 PM
Post
#53
|
|
|
AF Elite Group: Members Posts: 5,959 Joined: 23-September 05 From: THE REAL TEAM RAMROD |
I would pick Switzerland, fu-k their neutrality $hit.
|
|
|
|
Nov 30 2005, 11:37 PM
Post
#54
|
|
|
AF Pro Group: Members Posts: 2,386 Joined: 12-August 05 From: A Loose Cannon |
I would nuke Mexico.
Simply because Cuba & Venezuela r anti-U.S.A...by being closer to Fidel Castro & Hugo Chavez. The communication & military supplying would be alot easier, also it will surely be able to convince all of S.America to join in on invadeing the U.S.A... Mexico would be right in U.S.A's backyard...Cuba & Venezuela r than welcome to land all of their military might right in Mexico & unite. Start a battlefront on the borders of California state & up to Washington state, cut off the pacific ocean water supplies. The other would be to move into Texas & eastward conquering Louisiana, Florida etc cutting off the Gulf... Landlock all of the west & central states from water supply, cut off all river flow from the oceans that lead to innerland. Yep Mexico would be the ideal strategic point of interest. |
|
|
|
Dec 1 2005, 12:39 AM
Post
#55
|
|
|
AF Pro Group: Members Posts: 2,600 Joined: 10-November 05 |
![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
Dec 1 2005, 12:49 AM
Post
#56
|
|
|
AF Elite Group: Members Posts: 6,279 Joined: 10-July 03 From: not sure. |
QUOTE (VietSk8rGUI @ Nov 30 2005, 08:20 PM) id nuke antartica i dont trust them penguins Apparently neither does this forum: http://www.thepenguinconspiracy.tk/ http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/penguins.php |
|
|
|
Dec 1 2005, 02:43 AM
Post
#57
|
|
|
AF Supreme Group: AF Forum Police Posts: 17,721 Joined: 5-June 04 From: Chicago |
Antartica. No one there. If you nuke a country too many innocent people have to die. Not worth it in my opinion. I sure as hell wouldn't want someone to nuke where I live based on half assed information or because of spoon-fed government bull$hit.
|
|
|
|
Dec 1 2005, 02:48 AM
Post
#58
|
|
|
AF Elite Group: Members Posts: 9,253 Joined: 20-April 04 From: xxxxxxx |
^Good choice man. That way everybody dies from accelerated effects of global warming. It certainly won't discriminate its victims.
|
|
|
|
Dec 1 2005, 02:50 AM
Post
#59
|
|
|
AF Pro Group: Members Posts: 2,811 Joined: 4-September 05 |
QUOTE (EvilAsianDude @ Nov 30 2005, 08:08 PM) If you were forced to choose a country in the list to be nuke, which one would it be? If you refuse to nuke any country then the trigger automatically activates all nukes which kills everyone. Pick now. LOL twisted thread... I was gonna say no one..but given your scenario... France they are damn rude and its the only country were a racist party is the second biggest political force... |
|
|
|
Dec 1 2005, 03:26 AM
Post
#60
|
|
|
AF Supreme Group: Members Posts: 18,936 Joined: 2-December 04 |
If I had to, Italy.
If I was given the choice.....still Italy. |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 21st May 2013 - 06:21 PM |