AsiaFinest Forum
Ad: 123Designing.com

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

6 Pages V  « < 3 4 5 6 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Total War, usa, china
kunomchu
post Apr 11 2006, 04:38 AM
Post #81


AF Supreme
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 18,693
Joined: 23-June 05
From: Behind you




statistics show otherwise..
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
danoc
post Apr 11 2006, 04:45 AM
Post #82


AF Pro
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 2,118
Joined: 2-April 06




QUOTE (kunomchu @ Apr 11 2006, 04:38 AM) *
statistics show otherwise..


yup.. but you must see a real statistics from stock-markets in honkong and singapur and other data from international agencys.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
han2
post Apr 11 2006, 04:59 AM
Post #83


AF Elite
Group Icon

Group: AF Forum Police
Posts: 9,047
Joined: 24-January 06
From: middanġeard




QUOTE (danoc @ Apr 11 2006, 04:08 AM) *
if you see how many firms were bancrott and how many people have lost their work, money and exsitences, you can say it was a real war between them both.



yup.. that is modern art of war in globalisation time.

sorry. but i dont see that China is a biggest strategic partner of USA.
it is more Canada, britanian comenthwool(?) and Europe as China.

in the next short time China do more loose many points in USA and their economic.
(China cann't and dont want to make industrial transfers into other countries, therefore you can see in China now a biggest "production-costs-inflation".

Japan as investmen and ASEAN countries as a production around China are now a "big winner" in Soth-East Asia.


With all due respect danoc, its quite difficult to understand your English -- do you mind making your statement more legible.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nationalist Fron...
post Apr 11 2006, 05:55 AM
Post #84


Newbie
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 19
Joined: 4-March 06




I doubt China is able to win even with the slightest margin if any war with the USA should occur.

Even Sun Tzu said "In war, it is not about the quantity of soldiers but rather the tactics and strategies".

I am a Chinese and I am trying to be realistic, China is not ready for any war in this decade.

Basically, the US has more experience in warfare and not to mention their technology is up-to-date than any other country.

China on the other hand has poor logistic and bad supply-line management. Just look at the Korean war, China lost more than 500,000 (approximately) which Mao's son was one of the KIA. Most of them KIA was due to hunger and sickness instead of war attrition.

China might be able to defend its country well* coz Chinese are generally patriots but to launch an all out offensive, that's suicide.

Cheers.

*Assuming Nukes werent used.

This post has been edited by Nationalist Front: Apr 11 2006, 06:00 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mid-Night_Sun
post Apr 11 2006, 06:08 AM
Post #85


AF Supreme
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 11,759
Joined: 10-March 05
From: $auga /-\zians




psh...idiots, China will win simply because all the Chinatowns will become nydus canals that supply ghosts. internal destruction=GG.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
danoc
post Apr 11 2006, 09:14 AM
Post #86


AF Pro
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 2,118
Joined: 2-April 06




QUOTE (Mid-Night_Sun @ Apr 11 2006, 06:08 AM) *
psh...idiots, China will win simply because all the Chinatowns will become nydus canals that supply ghosts. internal destruction=GG.


(IMG:http://www.asiafinest.com/forum/style_emoticons/default/rotflmao.gif)

(IMG:http://www.asiafinest.com/forum/style_emoticons/default/rockon.gif)


(IMG:http://www.honeyisland.org/images/chinese.jpg)

(IMG:http://www.xeni.net/images/boingboing/bigbadmama.jpg)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
intestine_treasu...
post Apr 17 2006, 06:30 AM
Post #87


AF Pro
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 1,016
Joined: 22-July 05




QUOTE(LX1 @ Apr 7 2006, 02:17 PM) [snapback]1726507[/snapback]

are you joking? china could easily be beaten if needed.


i cannot be easily beaten and cannot easily win either; same goes for usa
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
freefallz
post Apr 17 2006, 07:05 AM
Post #88


AF Elite
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 9,253
Joined: 20-April 04
From: xxxxxxx




War is about achieving objectives, not you build your base, I build mine and then we engage with armies and various flying saucers.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JustAnObserver
post Apr 17 2006, 12:43 PM
Post #89


AF Fan
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 63
Joined: 11-April 06




QUOTE(WarEngineer @ Apr 6 2006, 08:19 PM) [snapback]1726220[/snapback]

dumb topic.
it wont happen.

china cannot be beaten, no country is dumb enough to try



In a normal conventional war, China has no chance whatsoever. The US navy and airforce is way too strong right now.

China could only win a war on her mainland.

QUOTE(millersdude @ Apr 6 2006, 10:25 PM) [snapback]1726531[/snapback]

China has 6,000 nukes. China itself can flat out the world and makes every living thing on this planet disappear, unless you are from Mars of course. Then China still can destroy you. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif)


No, China does not have 6000 nukes. Every source I check has China with having 400-800 nukes.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Suijen
post Apr 17 2006, 12:49 PM
Post #90


AF Legend
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 38,231
Joined: 15-June 05
From: TEAM RAMROD




400-800 nukes is more than enough to flatten the world. If China does go, it'll be sure to send its compliments to every nuclear armed country in the world.

I'm sure Russia, France, and GB have supply the nukes to reach Washington.


This post has been edited by Suijen: Apr 17 2006, 12:54 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JustAnObserver
post Apr 17 2006, 12:50 PM
Post #91


AF Fan
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 63
Joined: 11-April 06




QUOTE(toronto_chinese @ Apr 7 2006, 04:12 PM) [snapback]1729011[/snapback]

but the point is with such a huge army, america still dont' dare to touch the chinese. Also, with such a huge army and they could still let 911 happen which just proves a huge army with advanced technology doesn't mean much. All countries in the world have armies that are less powerful than U.S. but no 911 happen to others but only U.S.

U.S. don't dare to touch china since U.S. need China and of course China just can't beat U.S. with their current technology but then the point is U.S. just won't do anything directly to confront China. Even if they do, U.S. will probably win eventually but with the number of people in China and such a huge land , china is not easy to confront and remember how the U.S. fight in Iraq.



The US won vs the Iraq army very very easily.
The problem is the US is having right now is with guerillas and terrorists which are causing the most deaths.

A US- Chinese war would be a normal conventional war.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JustAnObserver
post Apr 17 2006, 01:20 PM
Post #92


AF Fan
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 63
Joined: 11-April 06




QUOTE(Suijen @ Apr 17 2006, 12:49 PM) [snapback]1760704[/snapback]

400-800 nukes is more than enough to flatten the world. If China does go, it'll be sure to send its compliments to every nuclear armed country in the world.

I'm sure Russia, France, and GB have supply the nukes to reach Washington.


Of course, a few hundred hunkes can destroy any country.


QUOTE(Nationalist Front @ Apr 11 2006, 05:55 AM) [snapback]1740340[/snapback]

I doubt China is able to win even with the slightest margin if any war with the USA should occur.

Even Sun Tzu said "In war, it is not about the quantity of soldiers but rather the tactics and strategies".

I am a Chinese and I am trying to be realistic, China is not ready for any war in this decade.

Basically, the US has more experience in warfare and not to mention their technology is up-to-date than any other country.

China on the other hand has poor logistic and bad supply-line management. Just look at the Korean war, China lost more than 500,000 (approximately) which Mao's son was one of the KIA. Most of them KIA was due to hunger and sickness instead of war attrition.

China might be able to defend its country well* coz Chinese are generally patriots but to launch an all out offensive, that's suicide.

Cheers.

*Assuming Nukes werent used.


Yes. I agree.
Some people here are letting their nationalism get in the way of reality.

--------------------------


And by the way, there will not be a war. So you armchair generals can cool down.

In todays world, money is the most important thing. And both China and the US both have lots of money involved with each other.

This post has been edited by JustAnObserver: Apr 17 2006, 01:21 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Chinese DesertFo...
post Apr 17 2006, 02:37 PM
Post #93


AF Elite
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 8,327
Joined: 12-July 04
From: TEAM RAMROD




Most of you are still underestimating the destructive power of WMDs. I've said numerous times that it doesn't take 10,000+ nuclear warheads to bring the entire world to its knees. And here we have people talking casually about "nuking this or nuking that."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Chinese_Soldier
post Apr 17 2006, 02:38 PM
Post #94


AF Addict
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 757
Joined: 20-November 05




there aren't gonna be a war, why do people make these China vs USA scenarios. I see them like on every forum.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kunomchu
post Apr 17 2006, 02:39 PM
Post #95


AF Supreme
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 18,693
Joined: 23-June 05
From: Behind you




Wasn't it Bush who was debating options whether to use bunker nukes in Iran?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
danoc
post Apr 17 2006, 02:44 PM
Post #96


AF Pro
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 2,118
Joined: 2-April 06




QUOTE(kunomchu @ Apr 17 2006, 02:39 PM) [snapback]1760965[/snapback]

Wasn't it Bush who was debating options whether to use bunker nukes in Iran?



blah.. he and wolfowitz are crasy to use this weapon.

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/sure.gif)

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/thumbsdown.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SUNDAY
post Apr 17 2006, 02:52 PM
Post #97


AF Fan
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 40
Joined: 7-April 06




QUOTE(Chinese_Soldier @ Apr 18 2006, 02:38 AM) [snapback]1760962[/snapback]

there aren't gonna be a war, why do people make these China vs USA scenarios. I see them like on every forum.


I think people want a war between China vs US.

If there is war, China will be really destroyed. US won't move a finger if neighbours jump on China. Even North Korea might attack China
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kunomchu
post Apr 17 2006, 02:57 PM
Post #98


AF Supreme
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 18,693
Joined: 23-June 05
From: Behind you




QUOTE(SUNDAY @ Apr 17 2006, 03:52 PM) [snapback]1760995[/snapback]

I think people want a war between China vs US.

If there is war, China will be really destroyed. US won't move a finger if neighbours jump on China. Even North Korea might attack China



ok now that is just plain dumb. lol
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Chinese_Soldier
post Apr 17 2006, 02:58 PM
Post #99


AF Addict
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 757
Joined: 20-November 05




QUOTE(SUNDAY @ Apr 17 2006, 02:52 PM) [snapback]1760995[/snapback]

I think people want a war between China vs US.

If there is war, China will be really destroyed. US won't move a finger if neighbours jump on China. Even North Korea might attack China


North Korea attack China? Thats suicide since China pretty much owns N. Korea. How is China going to be destroyed, I can't think of any neighbors of China that can defeat it. Mongolia? Vietnam? Kazakstan? Russia?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SUNDAY
post Apr 17 2006, 03:06 PM
Post #100


AF Fan
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 40
Joined: 7-April 06




QUOTE(Chinese_Soldier @ Apr 18 2006, 02:58 AM) [snapback]1761006[/snapback]

North Korea attack China? Thats suicide since China pretty much owns N. Korea. How is China going to be destroyed, I can't think of any neighbors of China that can defeat it. Mongolia? Vietnam? Kazakstan? Russia?

If US nukes China. that is enought sign for others start attacking.
Chinese Xinjiang might rebel ., Hui/ Uigurs would have huge support from Muslim world. Tibet migh start it nonsense. All supporrt would com through neighbours...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

6 Pages V  « < 3 4 5 6 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 22nd November 2009 - 12:36 AM