QUOTE(BlueAway @ Jan 7 2007, 10:32 AM) [snapback]2631829[/snapback]
you get sexier and sexier by the minute, big sis
yeh i agree. i find girls who are petite and are size 0 dont look emaciated at all. its just those runway models who have to be a certain height that makes them look emaciated.
im a guy and im super short too and i prefer something like what starry described, simply because it'll look ridiculous if I go out with someone taller and fatter than me.
QUOTE(Suijen @ Jan 7 2007, 10:53 AM) [snapback]2631859[/snapback]
I don't see what's so great about uber thin models. Most women aren't that thin, and most clothes look better on healthy women.
QUOTE(BlueAway @ Jan 7 2007, 10:56 AM) [snapback]2631861[/snapback]
i think uber-thin bodies are believed to exhibit the clothes on them more effectively but I don't really get it either. I like it when girls dress nice and wear stuff that actually fits their bodies quite nicely.
Well, the clothes they show on the catwalk aren't really for the general population. They're like a cover of a book that shows off the designer's creativity. I mean, would anyone really wear something like this to school?

EDIT:
I didn't notice the bit about print media before. Yeah, it would be great if they could use models that better reflect the general population in stuff like catalogs (although the models would still have to be pretty tall so that they can display the clothes to optimum effect). But if that happened then sales might go down. People look at the pretty, thin models and buy luxury items in the hopes that they will become like them. If they believed that Prada is meant for the girl next door, would they really want to spend as much money on it?