QUOTE(Fil-Ger @ May 7 2007, 03:50 AM) [snapback]2927878[/snapback]
No, actually that has nothing to do with it at all. Let's not forget that these countries have only a fraction of the population of the United States and land.
I'm not sure how old you are, so your simplistic economic analysis will be pardoned.
The definition of an ethnic Filipino: those who have the genetic makeup of the original inhabitants of the Philippines.
If you consider an "ethnic Chinese" or "ethnic Spanish" to be "Filipino" simply because the live in the Philippines, and therefore you call them one of your own.... those are pretty low standards. (Are you yourself ethnic Filipino, or ethnic Chinese/Spanish?)
Or put yourself in this scenario: if you were Chinese and living in China, and hypothetically all Chinese billionaires were white....would you be "proud"? I mean, at least they call themselves "Chinese," right?
Talk about a lack of
real, authentic pride in being Filipino. If you were honest with yourself, you would want to assess why those not of the same origins as you are the ones who control the economic movement of your country. Are there cultural differences that determine why no ethnic Filipinos are billionaires?
In other words: Why is it that in a country that's less than 5% Spanish and Chinese, a disproportionate number of Chinese and Spanish control the wealth?
Before I continue, don't
oversimplify my statements. Is it wrong that these non-Filipinos control so much wealth?
No. And believe me, I don't hate Filipinos. I consider myself one (even though I'm half).
Do not equate my critique to hate. I hate to break it to you, but those of us who are independent, critical thinkers will do far more for the Philippines than those of you who walk lockstep.
http://www.colonialmentality.netfirms.com/CM.htmlI'm not sure what tax system you refer to. In America, I know we use a graduated income tax, for example. Care to describe the tax system in London?
"When" the Philippines becomes economically sound? You're far too comfortable with that notion...
You should really stop regurgitating what you hear about neoliberalism. You should read more into it and how countries like Singapore and China have become economic powerhouses. I'll give you a hint: it hasn't been from following the free market model. The matter as a whole is far more complex, with third world nations (like PI) making themselves
vulnerable and less likely to economically progress through free market models.
I'll recommend a good author to start with: Professor Walden Bello, a Filipino professor. His readings are pretty dense, but if you want the truth, you'll force yourself through it.
Do I come off as cocky? My bad. It's just impossible not to come off as cocky when divulging all of this.
I'm not sure what tax system you refer to. In America, I know we use a graduated income tax, for example. Care to describe the tax system in London?I mentioned London as this is where the majority of foreign Billionaires reside, but I was talking about the UK as a whole in regards attracting ultra-high net-worth individuals.
It is all to do with the distinction between residence and domicile. Britain has an unusually favourable tax regime for people who come to live here. Britons are taxed on our worldwide income, so if a Briton has property abroad, any rents have to be declared and tax paid. Foreigners, however, are taxed only on the money they bring to Britain and spend here.
It is no surprise
4 of the top 5 are NOT British. The typical billionaire pays the same tax rate as the the average teacher and nurse. There is no country in Europe that pays an upper tax rate less than 48% and consequently you just don't get the polarities we see in the UK.
What do we get out of it? (Like what I said about Filipino Billionaires who are not ethnic CAN benefit the Philippine economy)
Three things. First we get jobs. Wealth demands services at all levels, from housekeeping to investment management. That economic activity spreads outwards through the economy and is one of the reasons why inner London is Europe's wealthiest region. Thanks to the growth of service industries and international finance, the UK is now the second-richest country of the G7 developed nations, second only to the US, as measured by gross national income per head.
Second, we get skills. The mass of talented people should help secure this position as a top-end global service provider for another generation.
Third, we get influence. Because global talent chooses to locate in the United Kingdom for a period, Britain will have people who know it (and hopefully like it) in key positions around the world in the future.
But this is a system in which I woudn't embrace, especially in the Philippines, because its like moving into a feudal society again- where a rich elite own all the houses and the poor struggle to pay the rent and bills.
"When" the Philippines becomes economically sound? You're far too comfortable with that notion...You should really stop regurgitating what you hear about neoliberalism. You should read more into it and how countries like Singapore and China have become economic powerhouses. I'll give you a hint: it hasn't been from following the free market model. The matter as a whole is far more complex, with third world nations (like PI) making themselves vulnerable and less likely to economically progress through free market models. Excuse my
brief statement "When" the Philippines becomes economically sound. It was simplistic, as the title of this thread is "
Filipino Billionaires" and
NOT about the "economy of the Philippines!". I say "
When" because as a patriotic Filipino I secretly wish that the future is bright for my country. I don't expect the Philippines to become an economic giant with the likes of China, we all know it will take a higher, sustained growth path to make appreciable progress in the alleviation of poverty, given the Philippines high annual population growth rate and unequal distribution of income. Nevertheless, I am optimistic for a modest future, when statistics shows average GDP growth accelerated to about 5% between 2002 and 2006, high level of annual remittances from overseas workers, peso was East Asia's best performing currency in 2005-06. And with investors taking advantage of the country's improving investment climate, I hope foreign direct investments will finally gather pace. So, I am optimisic "When Philippines eventually becomes economically sound" note that I stated "economically sound" and not an economic powerhouse!? like China and Singapore as you stated!
Your recommendation of author Professor Walden Bello is much appreciated, '
take a gold star and go to the top of the class'.
Unfortunately for me, economics (or anything relating to) is not my forte so I would be an inferior trying to debate with you.
Do I come off as cocky? My bad. It's just impossible not to come off as cocky when divulging all of this. Your not cocky at all, like I said in my previous post, I welcome
constructive criticism. The process of offering valid and well-reasoned opinions will only raise and maintain standards on this forum.
If however, to up your ego?! then you have succeeded.....everyone! admire him/her.....
awaiting your reply