Me: I think, in order for this country to move up, there should be a good business environment for the capitalist, that is. Make him financially healthy so that theoretically, the benefits would be felt by the people working for him (his employees) through things like a salary increase.
Her: You mean working from the top?
Me: Yup.
Her: I was thinking of working things from the bottom.
Me: You mean a legislative law about wage increase?
Her: Yup!
Me: Well, no matter how many laws you create every now and then about salary increase, if a businessman's business is dying, the law can't really do much. He'll just work his way around the law to prevent himself from giving what is due to the employees as stated by the law.
Here, I'll use a more simple illustration. Imagine a household where there's a nanny working there. Her salary as well as her perks would always depend on the financial health of the family she's working for.
Her: You mean the family needs to be rich?
Me: Yup.
Her: But what if the Daddy is greedy?
Me: Huh?
Her: I'm sorry. I just feel sorry for these poor people. I mean, I've been to squatter areas. You'd be surprised on what you'll see there. Anyway, I was thinking as well of government giving livelihood opportunities to these people.
Me: Small-time businesses?
Her: Yeah!
Me: Well, that's like fu-king off Henry Sy a bit (owner of SM Malls) just to give these people a fighting chance. Kinda like what some countries are doing to Bill Gates.
Her: Yup!
Me: Well, I'm a consumer rights advocate. I always go for the best provider, which is usually the tycoon. I don't care if that tycoon is a Filipino or not, as long as I get the best products or services. Anyway, if you give these people a fighting chance, are you sure that they would be aggressive enough to fight back, or will these people just be satisfied with a small business, let's say, a sari-sari store for example? Can they give a better product or service to the people or will the best product and service still belong to the tycoon, which we'll be fu-king off?
__________________
I was thinking that maybe if you eradicate entirely the communist rebels in the country, that will not really remove the problem of communism/socialism ideologies in the country. Why? Well, I think in some ways, a lot of us think like the communists do, we may just not be aware of it.
For example:
1. We have an inherent hate for a business tycoon, even more so if he's a foreigner -- which is aggravated by years of watching soap operas in TFC (i.e., the struggle between the poor and the rich (proletariat versus bourgeoisie)) . LOL!
2. An expectation for the government to be the ultimate provider, even if the business sector can do the job better (This made me think of single-party states where it acts as the ultimate mother-figure in a country as a consequence of controlling the rise of business enterprising individuals) .
3. An apparent hate for privatization of some previously government owned institutions (or maybe Philippine media is just blowing this issue up, creating the impression that privatization = increased cost of that institutions products and services). Anyway, MWSS (Nawasa) has long been privatized and I'm still paying barely 300 pesos a month on my water consumption.
__________________
Anyway, me and my barkadas, most of them are working abroad before had a coffee table discussion about this and I found out that.
1. In Singapore, bureaucrats are ridiculously rich (it's in the law). The premise is, the bureaucrat will be less tempted to cheat since he's already rich by being in that position. Makes sense to me. The catch is, he'll suffer serious consequences if he's ever caught doing corrupt things. Whereas in the Philippines, I think senators (on paper) don't even earn above 50,000 pesos a month.
Heck, even in the military, their soldiers are pampered. They get Apache choppers for Christ's sake. I don't know why the hell would Singapore need an Apache, but......it's still cool though.
2. In some countries, there's a huge tax deductions for foreign investors. It's basically their way of letting them in and invest in their country. In the Philippines, a professional may have as much as 20% tax cut, and the capitalist will have something as high as a 30% tax cut, hence the urge to evade taxes is high). And the poor will have........uhm........well, they don't really contribute that much to the economy at all. LOL! They always get freebies one way or another. God knows how high the tax rate that the Philippine government will leech off from the foreigners.
______________
Anyway, what are your thoughts on this?