QUOTE(Bhaskara @ Sep 10 2007, 10:44 AM) [snapback]3199269[/snapback]
Wow! Great! Thank you, Zaw Gyi! Amyaji chezu tinbade! So you guys already wear shirts in the 9th century?I thought all of SEA people were topless (including the women

) at that time.
The people in the pics are nobility . Men in Burma ( out in the fields ) are topless even now in the 21st century

.
As for women I'm not sure where Burmese modesty came from but certainly since about the 16 - 18th century the Burmese identity involved less bling and more clothes than our Eastern or Western neighbours . Maybe this was made worse by colonisation by Queen Victoria and her very prudish sensibilities as at least for the past 300 -400 years showing your midriff like in Thai , Lao , Khmer was a very no , no. ( although showing a bit of leg in the form of a split down the length of the female sarong was very de rigeur in Bayinnaung's times 15th -16th century according to Portugese observers who insinuated that this was to prevent Burmese men pursuing more homosexual pursuits

) .
This modesty was what I was brought up with as what separated us from the other Indianised countries in SE Asia and what made our syle of court dress less "Indian" . This included comics showing embassies between Burma and Thailand showing the Siamese king / prince wearing much bling but no shirt ( as in 5th picture below ) . When this sensibility came about I have no idea . It could have been fairly recent .
An average Burmese perception of a historical Indian ,


An average Burmese perception of a historical Siamese ,



^^ notice the bare mid section and shoulders even in aristocracy . In Burma a shawl would cover both or just one shoulder .
An average Burmese perception of historical Burmese,




Much evidence comes from murals etc and there is a distinct lack of nipples and bellybutton in Burmese art .
My theory is that we are not particularly Hindu ( and HIndu iconography features very little as opposed to Buddhist iconogarphy ) as the Burmese civilisations of the Mon and Pyu ditched Hinduism fairly early ( possibly as early as 2nd century BCE but certainly after 5-6th cebntury BCE ) compared to the rest of Indianised mainland SE Asia who were children of Hindu Angkor . The image of breasts midriff etc I would most certainly associate as being very Hindu .
Here is Burmese Inwa ( Ava ) dress in art from about 14th through to late 18th Century










I'll post some art from the Bagan era for comparison and that from the last dynasty . Essentially the Burmese liked to cover up if they could afford it .
In fact look no further than each country's interpretation of the Ramayana , classical dance and wedding outfits as a good representation of national dress from bygone days