Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Death Reveals Harsh Side of a 'Model' in Japan
Asia Finest Discussion Forum > Asian Culture > Japanese Chat > Japanese Serious Talk
VAMAN
Death Reveals Harsh Side of a 'Model' in Japan


A man was found dead in this house, apparently from starvation, about two months after he stopped receiving welfare benefits.

By NORIMITSU ONISHI
Published: October 12, 2007

KITAKYUSHU, Japan — In a thin notebook discovered along with a man’s partly mummified corpse this summer was a detailed account of his last days, recording his hunger pangs, his drop in weight and, above all, his dream of eating a rice ball, a snack sold for about $1 in convenience stores across the country.

“3 a.m. This human being hasn’t eaten in 10 days but is still alive,” he wrote. “I want to eat rice. I want to eat a rice ball.”

These were not the last words of a hiker lost in the wilderness, but those of a 52-year-old urban welfare recipient whose benefits had been cut off. And his case was not the first here.

One man has died in each of the last three years in this city in western Japan, apparently of starvation, after his welfare application was refused or his benefits cut off. Unable to buy food, all three men wasted away for months inside their homes, where their bodies were eventually found.

Only the most recent death drew nationwide attention, however, because of the diary, which has embarrassed city officials who initially defended their handling of the case and even described it as “model.”

In a way that the words of no living person could, the diary has shown the human costs of the economic transformation in Japan. As a widening income gap has pushed up welfare rolls in recent years, struggling cities like Kitakyushu have been under intense pressure to tighten eligibility.

The fallout from the most recent death has shown just how far the authorities in Kitakyushu went to achieve a flat welfare rate.

Japan has traditionally been hard on welfare recipients, and experts say this city’s practices are common to many other local governments. Applicants are expected to turn to their relatives or use up their savings before getting benefits. Welfare is considered less of an entitlement than a shameful handout.

“Local governments tend to believe that using taxpayer money to help people in need is doing a disservice to citizens,” said Hiroshi Sugimura, a professor specializing in welfare at Hosei University in Tokyo. “To them, those in need are not citizens. Only those who pay taxes are citizens.”

Toshihiko Misaki, head of the city’s welfare section, did not refer to the three deaths as from starvation, but called them “solitary.” He defended the system.

“On the one hand, there are people who’ve done their utmost to remain standing on their own feet,” Mr. Misaki said. “On the other hand, there are those who’ve gotten into trouble because they’ve led idle lives and are now receiving welfare. That’s taxpayers’ money. We get criticized by people who are trying their best, so we have to find the right balance.”

With no religious tradition of charity, Japan has few soup kitchens or other places for the indigent. Those that exist — run frequently by Christian missionaries from South Korea or Japan’s tiny Christian population — cater mostly to the homeless.

Like the diarist, the other two men were sickly, and they seemingly starved after their applications for welfare were rejected. One, 68, was found lying face down in his apartment, where the gas and electricity had been cut off half a year earlier.

The man reportedly told neighbors that he had been denied benefits even though he had prostrated himself before a city official. At his death, he had lost about a third of his weight and had only a few dollars.

The application of the third man, 56, was rejected twice even though a city worker trying to collect an unpaid water bill reported seeing him weak and crawling on his apartment floor. Neighbors who last saw him said his legs had withered to the size of bamboo poles. His mummified corpse was discovered four months after his death.

Between 2000 and 2006, as Japan’s welfare rate grew to 1.18 percent from 0.84 percent, Kitakyusha’s rate grew microscopically — to 1.28 percent from 1.26 percent. That ranked it toward the bottom among major cities even though its economy was doing poorly.

To the central government — which bears 75 percent of welfare costs, began cutting benefits in 2003 and plans to rein in more — that made the city a model.

“We were the so-called honor student,” Mr. Misaki said in an interview.

He added: “Other cities came here to learn from us — how we did things. And the Welfare Ministry also showcased Kitakyushu’s methods.”

Applicants first had to undergo an interview with a welfare official who then decided whether to hand them a one-page application form. In 80 percent of the cases here, applicants could not obtain a form.

After becoming ill and unable to work as a day laborer, another man, 56-year-old Hiroki Nishiyama, tried to apply for benefits twice last year but was told by the same city official to turn to his relatives for help.

“He was arrogant, his way of speaking,” Mr. Nishiyama said. “He was like, ‘What do you want? Go home quickly.’”

Desperate, eating only bread for months, Mr. Nishiyama tried to hang himself. He finally qualified for benefits this year after calling a hot line run by Tateyasu Takaki, a human rights lawyer who helps the needy apply. He hopes to resume working.

“This is, after all, shameful for me,” he said of the $930 he receives monthly.

In response to the deaths of the first two men, the city this spring made applications available inside interview rooms, though it is still expected that the interviewer hands out the form. It stopped short of placing them next to other forms by reception desks. But a policy of removing recipients from the rolls as quickly as possible went unchanged. The diarist, a former taxi driver, qualified last December after receiving diagnoses of diabetes, high blood pressure and a bad liver brought on by alcohol abuse. He lived in a dilapidated row house whose walls and roof had partly collapsed. Electricity and gas had been cut off.

According to city documents, the man’s case worker began pressing him to find a job within weeks of his receiving benefits. Tadashi Inagaki, a professor at the University of Kitakyushu who is leading a committee to investigate the three deaths, said the case worker’s goal, in keeping with the welfare office’s practice, was to get the man off welfare within six months.

Three months after he started receiving benefits, the man signed a form saying he no longer needed welfare. The city said it was voluntary, but an entry in his diary belies that. Writing that he was about to start looking for work, he added: “I was just about to give it a try when they cut me off. Are they telling the needy to die as quickly as possible?”

Takaharu Fujiyabu, a former case worker here who is now a lecturer at the University of Kitakyushu, said the city’s 142 case workers, each handling 73 recipients, must remove five a year from welfare. Promotions are tied to the quota, he added.

Mr. Misaki, the head of the welfare section, said that the link to promotions existed about 15 years ago but added they were no longer tied. He said the quotas would be eliminated next year.

In his first year as a case worker, Mr. Fujiyabu recalled, a woman in her 50s, smelling of alcohol, asked for assistance. “I was told by my supervisor, ‘You know, don’t you think someone like that is better off dead?’”

Perhaps out of shame, the man with the diary did not turn to his relatives or neighbors for help, even though he had lived all his life on the block.

“2 a.m. My belly’s empty,” he wrote on May 25, some 45 days after his benefits were cut. “I want to fill my belly with rice balls.”

He added: “Weight is also down from 68 kilograms to 54 kilograms” — from 150 pounds to 119.

In front of the man’s abandoned home, people have left flowers and a can of grapefruit-flavored alcohol.

“Now I’m filled with regret,” said Yoshikazu Okubo, 65, a neighbor who remembered playing with the dead man when they were boys. “If he had just asked me for one drink, I would have said, ‘Sure, drink up, then.’”

But the dead man’s next-door neighbor, Yoshiaki Kita, 72, said the city had handled his case appropriately.

“He may have starved to death, but I believe he reaped what he sowed,” Mr. Kita said. “He was still young, so he could have taken on any job to feed himself.”

Mr. Kita — who had once seen corpses in his job as a general contractor — had guessed from the stench that his neighbor had died. He had watched swallows fly out of the broken house with greenbottle flies in their beaks.

A friend found the dead man’s corpse on July 10, long after his last diary entry on June 5. In his diary, the man dreamed of rice balls to the end. To most Japanese, rice balls, which are now sold in convenience stores, were traditionally a snack that mothers usually made by hand: a ball of rice, wrapped in seaweed with perhaps a red plum buried inside, to be eaten during a hiking trip or some other pleasant activity.

“My belly’s empty,” read the diary’s last entry. “I want to eat a rice ball. I haven’t eaten rice in 25 days.”

Source - http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/12/world/asia/12japan.html?pagewanted=1&th&emc=th
ClearBlueWater
Why was he on wellfare? Why wasn't he working? I know the one guy was sick and tried to go back, but what about the others? Why weren't they working?

He said "I was about to start looking for a job..." But why wasn't he looking already?
Takashi
QUOTE(ClearBlueWater @ Oct 12 2007, 03:27 PM) [snapback]3263173[/snapback]
Why was he on wellfare? Why wasn't he working? I know the one guy was sick and tried to go back, but what about the others? Why weren't they working?

He said "I was about to start looking for a job..." But why wasn't he looking already?

The 52 yr old was a lazy fu-ker, the 68 yr old was too old to work and the 56 yr old.....who wants to employ someone just for four years?
ClearBlueWater
QUOTE(Takashi @ Oct 12 2007, 11:49 AM) [snapback]3263212[/snapback]
The 52 yr old was a lazy fu-ker, the 68 yr old was too old to work and the 56 yr old.....who wants to employ someone just for four years?

My father is 67 and he still works. icon_neutral.gif

I would have denied them too. thumbsdown.gif
Takashi
QUOTE(ClearBlueWater @ Oct 12 2007, 05:32 PM) [snapback]3263262[/snapback]
My father is 67 and he still works. icon_neutral.gif

I would have denied them too. thumbsdown.gif

As far as I'm aware in Jp companies don't have to keep workers on after the age of 60, that's the official retirement age last I heard, a lot do but if you're already out of work and trying to get a job again past that age it's most likely gonna be nono.gif
ClearBlueWater
QUOTE(Takashi @ Oct 12 2007, 03:04 PM) [snapback]3263407[/snapback]
As far as I'm aware in Jp companies don't have to keep workers on after the age of 60, that's the official retirement age last I heard, a lot do but if you're already out of work and trying to get a job again past that age it's most likely gonna be nono.gif

Yeah, that's how it was for my dad; he 'retired' years ago, but kept working. I think most employers (even in Japan) appreciate tacit knowledge.
charade
lol I read this article in the NY Times this morning. Harsh my @$$. If anything, we should adopt similar welfare policies here in the states. There's a plethora of lazy 20-year olds who receive Medicaid and other welfare benefits at the taxpayer's expense.

QUOTE(ClearBlueWater @ Oct 12 2007, 03:14 PM) [snapback]3263419[/snapback]
Yeah, that's how it was for my dad; he 'retired' years ago, but kept working. I think most employers (even in Japan) appreciate tacit knowledge.


Same here, except it's my grandfather. He was a physician/med director at Samsung Medical Center and traveled around the world for a year or so after taking a leave of absence and still works even though he's attained plenty of success and money. The whole retirement experience just didn't sit well with him since he's pretty restless. I think I'll probably end up like him too if I'm in good health at that age.
TwistedLogic
QUOTE(charade @ Oct 12 2007, 03:39 PM) [snapback]3263440[/snapback]
lol I read this article in the NY Times this morning. Harsh my @$$. If anything, we should adopt similar welfare policies here in the states. There's a plethora of lazy 20-year olds who receive Medicaid and other welfare benefits at the taxpayer's expense.
Same here, except it's my grandfather. He was a physician/med director at Samsung Medical Center and traveled around the world for a year or so after taking a leave of absence and still works even though he's attained plenty of success and money. The whole retirement experience just didn't sit well with him since he's pretty restless. I think I'll probably end up like him too if I'm in good health at that age.


Yep, same with my grandfather. He's a self-taught engineer and is actually more skilled than university-trained engineers. He retired and all of a sudden had a buncha health problems. Then he went back to work and felt healthy again. I think it runs in the family. I would die without having something to do.
MethodMan
Ever think the dude might have been mentally ill, just not lazy?
tokyolovestory
This is the general attitude in Japan. Basically, there's no excuse for not working. Though, admittedly, I think the United States is hemorrhaging money because the policies really are rather lax. I know it's rough being a single mom, etc... but if you couldn't support them, you shouldn't have had them. (Jeez, is that harsh?) icon_neutral.gif
ClearBlueWater
QUOTE(MethodMan @ Oct 14 2007, 12:53 PM) [snapback]3266386[/snapback]
Ever think the dude might have been mentally ill, just not lazy?

But yet in enough capacity to get down to the welfare office and apply? confused.gif
bangaroo
Millions more are starving in India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Africa, NK, China etc.. And yet we discussing this poor bugger starved to death due to he couldn't get $$$ from his Government?
michinobu_zoned
QUOTE(tokyolovestory @ Oct 14 2007, 06:59 PM) [snapback]3266832[/snapback]
This is the general attitude in Japan. Basically, there's no excuse for not working. Though, admittedly, I think the United States is hemorrhaging money because the policies really are rather lax. I know it's rough being a single mom, etc... but if you couldn't support them, you shouldn't have had them. (Jeez, is that harsh?) icon_neutral.gif

There's mixed feelings about that. In this country, many believe that abortion is wrong. Typically, the Christian right try to prevent mothers from having abortions altogether, but a relaxed welfare system and a rather harsh legal system against the fathers of their babies is designed to prevent women from being encouraged to have abortions.

England used to have a serious problem with this back when the book "Gulliver's Travels" was first published. Johnathan Swift's writings in the book about promiscious 16, 15... even nine-year-olds in the various countries that Gulliver traveled was Swift's highly sexist criticism of England's high unwanted pregnancy rate in the early 1700's. They had condoms back then, made out of lamb intestines, but that really wasn't all that helpful and there wasn't really a welfare system for them and many kids went into orphanages. That's why you have stories about orphan factory workers like Charles d!cken's "Oliver Twist" (1838), because there were so many orphans around the two centuries before the 20th century.

Problems with crime, gangs, child-labor, etc were because of the unwanted birth-rates, which stemmed from poverty and a Right-Winged way of thinking, in which the poor were found at fault for being promiscuous and criminals, didn't really help the situation out any. This is partly why people accepted regimes such as Communism and etc. Christianity and Social Darwinism theory didn't convince many that you had a just reason for the social injustices going on during these times, which is why a welfare system was implemented in the West.

Many saw that the social problems that went on in society were due to poverty, and welfare was seen as a solution. Even the Roman Republic used welfare as a means to keep the unemployed mobs from hurting the rich, by giving the unemployed spending money and free government housing, similar to the housing projects we have today but much more dangerous as sometimes those really cheap buildings collapsed and killed people.

But, back to the point, social scientists saw welfare as a means to alleviate crime and all other problems with society, because poverty was seen as the major cause for those problems.

QUOTE(ClearBlueWater @ Oct 15 2007, 10:41 AM) [snapback]3268240[/snapback]
But yet in enough capacity to get down to the welfare office and apply? confused.gif

Depends.... Some people with mental illnesses are too weird to get a job, even if they continuously try because the employer doesn't want someone like that to work for them. I've seen that happen to a woman who said she was homeless at my old job. My boss didn't want to hire her.

So, with people who can't get jobs because of behavioral problems, and a welfare system where a person has to charm some @$$hole just to get the application for welfare, you won't be having too many mildly mentally ill people being able to apply for welfare. Probably would have to be really extreme and have someone get the application for them because they're incapable of doing so. If I was one of them, and no one wanted to hire me and no one wanted to help me out, I'd fake being crazy bad. That kind of reminds me of an episode of "It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia" where this one guy tries to have his sister fake being retarded so they could get welfare, lol.

Anyways, the news article didn't mention the man who died of starvation as being mentally ill or mentally handicapped in anyway. Probably he was just too old and had no relatives or friends who wanted to help him. They should do what they do here in this country, and let old people greet customers walking into Wal-Mart.

QUOTE(bangaroo @ Oct 16 2007, 01:45 AM) [snapback]3269447[/snapback]
Millions more are starving in India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Africa, NK, China etc.. And yet we discussing this poor bugger starved to death due to he couldn't get $$$ from his Government?


We talk about this "poor bugger" because it's so unusual. You expect people to starve to death in Africa, but not in Japan becuase it's a developed country. I'd be weirded out to findout someone starved to death in my apartment or anywhere here because there's so many fat people in the US. It's like, some of them could have given that guy an exra cheese burger or something, when they bought six of them at Mc Donald's for six bucks.

But, I guess since food's more expensive in Japan and people in Japan don't care enough I guess like in this country. I mean, we give homeless people $hit in this country, but we'd still throw change at them or give them a dollar to have them leave us alone. That's why you see so many FAT homeless people in the States. Apparently, they look at begging like a job or something and make enough money for drugs, prostitutes, and restaurant food.
michinobu_zoned
edit: double post
bangaroo
I understand that even in japan, some poor ppl starved due to costly living standard, but this is no comparable to countries like China, NK, India, Africa etc.., we can't compare just few deaths to thousands.

believe it or not, the pension system in japan is one of worse pension system in the world. It's like having no pension at all.
I think this is same for USA as well.
michinobu_zoned
QUOTE(bangaroo @ Oct 22 2007, 02:13 AM) [snapback]3279919[/snapback]
I understand that even in japan, some poor ppl starved due to costly living standard, but this is no comparable to countries like China, NK, India, Africa etc.., we can't compare just few deaths to thousands.

Yeah, but no one is comparing Japan to third world countries. They're just pointing out a disturbing fact, that even in a nation as rich as Japan, that someone could fall through the cracks of the system and starve to death. Think of it from the man who died's point of view, his story needs to be told so that no else would have to go through the same thing. It's almost inexecusable when someone starves to death in a place with more than enough food to eat.
hgnis
Not making any excuses here but generally in the culture, after one crosses a certain age, most employers hesitate to hire. This is a result of general salary expectations, perceived health issues, potential pension obligations etc. IT IS ALSO VERY HARD TO SURVIVE ON A PART TIME JOB IN A PLACE LIKE JAPAN as well....
Kambojiya
Well, life is harsh we all have to find some way of living. Its too bad those guys who died didnt have family to rely on. The question I pose to everyone is this....who are you without your family?
silverblackcat
It's very sad that these men starved to death because they couldn't get any money, but why didn't they have any savings? Why didn't they have jobs? What happened to their old jobs? Why were they denied benefit? Where were their families?
furball
It is hard to imagine that this happened in a country as wealthy as Japan.

A simple rice ball was all that he wanted.
yhellothar
He didn't really ask anyone for help either.

IMO they should just send people inexpensive but high-protein food with the nutrients they need to sustain their bodies well. Then they will be able to get a job easier.
furball
It's the Asian mentality of saving face.

He lost his job, he didn't have any money, he lost his welfare assistance. He was too ashamed to ask any of his relatives, friends, and neighbors for help.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2009 Invision Power Services, Inc.