Full Version: hanfu dynasty
i havent seen all the dynasties of hanfu but so far i like the tang dynasty one. if anyone has hanfu from different dynasties, then post pic
all got their idea from qin dynasty so i'll go with qin.
I like the CCP Dynasty
Ming dynasty
Anyone kind enough to post pictures of hanfus from each dynasty?
The Tang Dynasty ones are nice
BUT I personally MUCH prefer the more modest hanfu. What dynasties are these from? Song? Ming? Han?
I like'em simple and comfy-looking.
Some examples include:
Anyway, here are some examples of Tang Dynasty ones.
The Tang Dynasty ones are nice
BUT I personally MUCH prefer the more modest hanfu. What dynasties are these from? Song? Ming? Han?
I like'em simple and comfy-looking.
Some examples include:
Anyway, here are some examples of Tang Dynasty ones.
i agree... tang dynasty hanfu looks the best... and the tang dynasty is the best!! 
i think they can make these hanfu better. plz no 100 RMB for han costume.
whenever i saw this kind of girl i just wanted to gouge out my eyes. http://i159.photobucket.com/albums/t160/ch...hanfuglow-1.jpg
whenever i saw this kind of girl i just wanted to gouge out my eyes. http://i159.photobucket.com/albums/t160/ch...hanfuglow-1.jpg
QUOTE(paperball @ Dec 14 2007, 01:49 AM) [snapback]3365545[/snapback]
whenever i saw this kind of girl i just wanted to gouge out my eyes. http://i159.photobucket.com/albums/t160/ch...hanfuglow-1.jpg
Why?
QUOTE(Ling7 @ Dec 14 2007, 01:41 AM) [snapback]3366871[/snapback]
Why?
shes pretentious women whose head looks like a ball.
what about men's? i dont think i have seen them except maybe one or two. surely womens' hanfu arent the only representations of hanfu..
Yea, lots of pics of hanfu for guys online - especially if you look for series set in Ancient China.
Anyway, if you want more hanfu pictures, go to the gallery of the images I posted above. If there are any hanfu pics that aren't there yet, just notify me and I'll add them.
very nice. thanks. i like your gallery
i guess the fancy ones are the royalties' hanfu. cool.
i guess the fancy ones are the royalties' hanfu. cool.
Look at these pics I found. Ming dynasty hanfu look kind of similar to Tang, but different in lower body garment. It's interesting that men and women of Ming dynasty wore pleated skirt... 
Ming dynsty paintings:
Ming dynsty paintings:
Ming dynasty actual artifacts from Ming tombs:
Hanfu enthusiast's design - reconstruction of Ming attires:
Hanfu enthusiast's design - reconstruction of Ming attires:
Anyone got pcitures of Hanfu from Yuan dynasty?
It's very interesting to see that Mongol/Koryo cultural influence outlasted the Yuan Dynasty well into the early Ming Dynasty court, but this is a more reliable representation of Ming Dynasty hanfu that continues the Chinese tradition, not so altered by foriegn influence:
Ming Dynasty Hanfu in modern day usage:
Ming Dynasty Hanfu in modern day usage:
QUOTE(SantaKlaws @ Dec 15 2007, 08:32 PM) [snapback]3369911[/snapback]
It's very interesting to see that Mongol/Koryo cultural influence outlasted the Yuan Dynasty well into the early Ming Dynasty court, but this is a more reliable representation of Ming Dynasty hanfu that continues the Chinese tradition, not so altered by foriegn influence:
Hahahah............
Korean influence? Korea was a tribute of both Mongol Yuan and Ming......Korean influence? Ya sure.....The entire Korean Chaoxian dynasty was a copy of Ming dynasty. No wonder why you guys are confused. Unlike koreans always claim this and that without evidence, Chinese always have plenty of texual evidences and actual artifacts to show for. On the contrary the Koreans have never shown us actual artifacts. A very big difference. "Korean made history" is re-consturcted with a pile of nonsen by present-day korean historians that fills with historical inferiority complex and nationalistic overtone. No actual artifacts, no history documentation, no historical drawings, and no nothing. Just lip service. You people, simply have no credibility whatsoever. These pics are not even from the early Ming. They are fairly famous paintings of Ming Xian Zong period. (the mid Ming period). Please don't write something you clearly have no knowledge of.
You probably just randomly posted those pics with no knowledge of Chinese attire systems at all. The following pic is fairly famous. It's from South-North Dynasty (pre-Tan peiord; 1000 years ahead of Ming dynasty). It's very fishy to randomly throw some pics you have no knowledge of to prove your point. (or maybe you have no point?)
Please don't come near here to embarass yourself. Thanks.
Now I'm pretty sure that JohnnyWalker's the Chinese troll who's been getting constantly banned for insulting Koreans and I know that talking about Korean traditional clothes is irrelevant here, but I'll just make one last reply just so that this troll's attempt of misinformation won't mislead others.
Reliable sources, both Korean and Western, point to the archaeologically attested fact that Korean traditional clothes remain relatively unchanged for the last couple thousands of years, a tradition that precedes both Ming and Tang dynasties by centuries. And Koryo, in fact, did have significant cultural influence over the Mongol Yuan Dynasty court in the later years, and the early Ming Dynasty court painting that JohnnyWalker posted wreaks of both Mongol and Koryo influence.
Chinese hanfu of Ming dynasty, as represented by the pictures I have posted, remains relatively unchanged from Song dynasty, but it's pathetic that some people would deliberately distort and misrepresent their very own cultural legacy to associate themselves to whom they feel inferior, hence the need to associate. If anyone feels doubtful, just do an independent search on Hanfu and see what they generally look like throughout history, and look at what it looked like during Ming Dynasty, instead of relying on the bigotries of a troll who constantly gets banned for making relentless insults, full of lies and deciet, on Korea.
Reliable sources, both Korean and Western, point to the archaeologically attested fact that Korean traditional clothes remain relatively unchanged for the last couple thousands of years, a tradition that precedes both Ming and Tang dynasties by centuries. And Koryo, in fact, did have significant cultural influence over the Mongol Yuan Dynasty court in the later years, and the early Ming Dynasty court painting that JohnnyWalker posted wreaks of both Mongol and Koryo influence.
Chinese hanfu of Ming dynasty, as represented by the pictures I have posted, remains relatively unchanged from Song dynasty, but it's pathetic that some people would deliberately distort and misrepresent their very own cultural legacy to associate themselves to whom they feel inferior, hence the need to associate. If anyone feels doubtful, just do an independent search on Hanfu and see what they generally look like throughout history, and look at what it looked like during Ming Dynasty, instead of relying on the bigotries of a troll who constantly gets banned for making relentless insults, full of lies and deciet, on Korea.
QUOTE(SantaKlaws @ Dec 16 2007, 06:52 AM) [snapback]3370655[/snapback]
Now I'm pretty sure that JohnnyWalker's the Chinese troll who's been getting constantly banned for insulting Koreans and I know that talking about Korean traditional clothes is irrelevant here, but I'll just make one last reply just so that this troll's attempt of misinformation won't mislead others.
huh?
Hello? this is Chinese chat. This topic is about Chinese attires. You came in here spewing your misinformation and I become a troll? You logic?
QUOTE
Reliable sources, both Korean and Western, point to the archaeologically attested fact that Korean traditional clothes remain relatively unchanged for the last couple thousands of years, a tradition that precedes both Ming and Tang dynasties by centuries.
what reliable sources? don't just throw empty words. Show us primary sorurces.
QUOTE
And Koryo, in fact, did have significant cultural influence over the Mongol Yuan Dynasty court in the later years, and the early Ming Dynasty court painting that JohnnyWalker posted wreaks of both Mongol and Koryo influence.
Nonsense. Not only you have no idea how Chinese attire system evolved, nor do you have a very clear idea how your own attires evloved.
Again...The painting I shown was not from early Ming dyansty. It's from mid Ming dyansty with then name "明憲宗元宵行樂圖" It's a fairly famous painting of Mid-Ming dynasty. Please don't distort information. It's very easy to verify the info. Please do so.
QUOTE
but it's pathetic that some people would deliberately distort and misrepresent their very own cultural legacy to associate themselves to whom they feel inferior, hence the need to associate. If anyone feels doubtful, just do an independent search on Hanfu and see what they generally look like throughout history, and look at what it looked like during Ming Dynasty, instead of relying on the bigotries of a troll who constantly gets banned for making relentless insults, full of lies and deciet, on Korea.
I did not even mention the word "korea" in my first post of this thread. It's YOU who came in here and began to spew your craps about korean this and that. Oh... we don't have to associate with your culture legacy because Choaxian dynasty was a full copycat version of Ming dynasty. Are you going to distort such clear fact? Ming dynasty was not too far back in time, you know? There are so many Ming textile artifacts available in China. Maybe you should pay a visit to Chinese textile Musem to see some actual artifacts, not some reconstructed craps.
And who is distorting info? you deliberately posted some pics of pre-Tang dynasty to distort how Ming attire was like. That's not your fishy attempt to distort info? Give me a break. Just show us some ancient texual info about how your country's attire evolved in continuity. Show us some ancient paintings of your country. show us some actual artifacts. Show us how your country's attire system influenced China. Not just empty words, theories, and reconstructed craps.
If factual and primary evidences I've presented constitute lies or insults to you, so be it.
QUOTE(SantaKlaws @ Dec 16 2007, 06:52 AM) [snapback]3370655[/snapback]
Now I'm pretty sure that JohnnyWalker's the Chinese troll who's been getting constantly banned for insulting Koreans and I know that talking about Korean traditional clothes is irrelevant here, but I'll just make one last reply just so that this troll's attempt of misinformation won't mislead others.
Reliable sources, both Korean and Western, point to the archaeologically attested fact that Korean traditional clothes remain relatively unchanged for the last couple thousands of years, a tradition that precedes both Ming and Tang dynasties by centuries. And Koryo, in fact, did have significant cultural influence over the Mongol Yuan Dynasty court in the later years, and the early Ming Dynasty court painting that JohnnyWalker posted wreaks of both Mongol and Koryo influence.
Chinese hanfu of Ming dynasty, as represented by the pictures I have posted, remains relatively unchanged from Song dynasty, but it's pathetic that some people would deliberately distort and misrepresent their very own cultural legacy to associate themselves to whom they feel inferior, hence the need to associate. If anyone feels doubtful, just do an independent search on Hanfu and see what they generally look like throughout history, and look at what it looked like during Ming Dynasty, instead of relying on the bigotries of a troll who constantly gets banned for making relentless insults, full of lies and deciet, on Korea.
Reliable sources, both Korean and Western, point to the archaeologically attested fact that Korean traditional clothes remain relatively unchanged for the last couple thousands of years, a tradition that precedes both Ming and Tang dynasties by centuries. And Koryo, in fact, did have significant cultural influence over the Mongol Yuan Dynasty court in the later years, and the early Ming Dynasty court painting that JohnnyWalker posted wreaks of both Mongol and Koryo influence.
Chinese hanfu of Ming dynasty, as represented by the pictures I have posted, remains relatively unchanged from Song dynasty, but it's pathetic that some people would deliberately distort and misrepresent their very own cultural legacy to associate themselves to whom they feel inferior, hence the need to associate. If anyone feels doubtful, just do an independent search on Hanfu and see what they generally look like throughout history, and look at what it looked like during Ming Dynasty, instead of relying on the bigotries of a troll who constantly gets banned for making relentless insults, full of lies and deciet, on Korea.
i hope you learn something before you open your mouth. It is not like you can claim anything you want withouth someone rebuke. If you really want to bring up something that is korean, then you should bring something that is Korean, not something from China.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.