QUOTE(Nfamouz @ Feb 1 2008, 05:33 AM) [snapback]3462685[/snapback]
how did you feel about tom criuse learning the ways of the sword and leading the last samurai laugh2
QUOTE(KimJongIL @ Feb 4 2008, 09:27 AM) [snapback]3470249[/snapback]
Last Samurai movie was pure Whiteman's fantasy.
My friend Mussa remarked that history is written by the victors.
I was doing a bit of research for the Suharto Indonesian topic when I found an article by a journalist reviewing a movie about Dutch colonialism.
I wanted to post this passage here because it is also very much relevant to this topic and it clearly expresses what some of us are feeling about The Last Samurai with Tom Cruise as the moral saviour.
"I'm usually frustrated that most films about colonial oppression view the drama from the position of the lone moral European (invariably a white male) who stands up against his own race to defend the native peoples. It's as if the privileged white man's defiance is more heroic because he risks position and wealth where the natives merely risk their lives in the face of tyranny and crippling poverty." When I was watching The Last Samurai, it was this aspect which annoyed me a bit.
I am always a sucker for heroic blockbusters, but my enjoyment was nagged by some elements which did not ring true - the unlikely relationship between Cruise and the wife of the samurai whom he killed and the simplistic way the children accept him as a replacement father figure, the homogenising and sanitising of the Samurai, the imposition of contemporary lifestyle values on a fuedal society, Cruise's uncanny ability to survive bullets and cannons while the other Samurai perish......
I love big epics.
I don't know if it is just a "boy thing", but I really like those sweeping epics of great change, emotional turmoil, large-scale action, and characters who rise to the challenge of a complex world. And maybe something about the Human condition is illustrated along the way. I am too old for simple Disney resolutions. If pop culture is my daily brain food, then I want to get a balanced diet.
QUOTE(flipcombatmedic @ Feb 8 2008, 11:12 AM) [snapback]3480673[/snapback]
....and those that watched and enjoyed brave heart, the passion of the christ, pearl harbor, and pretty much all movies done american or otherwise. it's pathetic to think that movies should be the source of historical facts. its entertainment. nothing more northing less.
Fair enough, but too much headcandy gonna make your brain rot.
Why accept low grade fodder, if we can demand something more tasty ?
I enjoy action movies.
I don't want to label it a guilty pleasure, because in my experience it is just part of Human nature and to deny it would be artificial and über politically correct. At the same time it would be wise to bear in mind that our cultural mindsets are gradually shaped by the pop culture we consume.
If we don't believe that, then we had better tell the advertising boys to stop wasting millions of dollar$ on their candycoated propaganda.
I think we can all agree that movies should not be expected to replace a good education, but I would urge you to consider that movies represent more than just entertainment.
Movies are such a pervasive and influential medium.
Even in the jungles of Borneo they have movies.
Movies shape the perceptions of our young.
Movies are part of our cultural legacy; they portray our pleasures; our aspirations; our fears; our art and literature; our history.
And if that history is continually portrayed with a subtle bias, then sections of our next generation may accept that slant as part of their normal attitude.
I love movies and I want to see more.