Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: A Vietnamese architect designed Beijing
Asia Finest Discussion Forum > Asian Culture > Vietnamese Chat
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Nam Quoc Son Ha
QUOTE (tongbao_vince @ Aug 30 2004, 10:37 PM)
QUOTE (Clean @ Aug 30 2004, 10:29 PM)
QUOTE (Nam Quoc Son Ha @ Aug 30 2004, 09:27 PM)
QUOTE (aaronly @ Aug 30 2004, 10:22 PM)
QUOTE (福州市长 @ Aug 30 2004, 10:13 PM)
do chinese cares who is he??
he not even mention in our history books...

if you dont care you need to come in here and post, and yet you come back again and again embarassedlaugh.gif

It's a fine example of Chinese arrogance that they think they're the best in EVERYTHING.

It will be heartbreaking for them if they realise that a man from a smaller state of An Nam actually designed their capital. What a shame, you can't even design your own capital. embarassedlaugh.gif

TBV, this is where you should've posted what you said earlier embarassedlaugh.gif

You wish. China has had many capitals and many cities that Vietnam will never possibily rival. This Viet eunch didn't have a big deal to do with Beijing's history as Clean believes. Beijing of 1420 is not Beijing of 2004. City Planners today do more work than any City planner of the Ming dynasty, Yuan dynasty, Qing dynasty or Republic would ever do. This eunch didn't design sewers, power lines, 6 lane roads, etc. Beijing has always been there. He never 'created' or fully designed Beijing because Beijing's history begins well before 1420 almost 800 years earlier. If this story is even true, the only visable influence he and other architects made on the planning of Beijing is the location of the Forbidden City and temples surrounding it.

Dude, we're not talking about the city of PEEKING, we're talking about the design of the Forbidden City, an architectural marvel of which a Vietnamese contributed greatly. And as usual, the Chinese never recognize other cultures' advances and always think that they're on top of the world. Which is sad for a country of 1.35 billion minds really.
supernovasp
embarassedlaugh.gif Seriously, we didn't really care about Nguyen An till now... Actually, we don't need to care about it
Clean
QUOTE (tongbao_vince @ Aug 30 2004, 09:37 PM)
QUOTE (Clean @ Aug 30 2004, 10:29 PM)
QUOTE (Nam Quoc Son Ha @ Aug 30 2004, 09:27 PM)
QUOTE (aaronly @ Aug 30 2004, 10:22 PM)
QUOTE (福州市长 @ Aug 30 2004, 10:13 PM)
do chinese cares who is he??
he not even mention in our history books...

if you dont care you need to come in here and post, and yet you come back again and again embarassedlaugh.gif

It's a fine example of Chinese arrogance that they think they're the best in EVERYTHING.

It will be heartbreaking for them if they realise that a man from a smaller state of An Nam actually designed their capital. What a shame, you can't even design your own capital. embarassedlaugh.gif

TBV, this is where you should've posted what you said earlier embarassedlaugh.gif

You wish. China has had many capitals and many cities that Vietnam will never possibily rival. This Viet eunch didn't have a big deal to do with Beijing's history as Clean believes. Beijing of 1420 is not Beijing of 2004. City Planners today do more work than any City planner of the Ming dynasty, Yuan dynasty, Qing dynasty or Republic would ever do. This eunch didn't design sewers, power lines, 6 lane roads, etc. Beijing has always been there. He never 'created' or fully designed Beijing because Beijing's history begins well before 1420 almost 800 years earlier. If this story is even true, the only visable influence he and other architects made on the planning of Beijing is the location of the Forbidden City and temples surrounding it.

Every single person has a role. On the overall level he may not be the person who single-handedly create Beijing, but like i said, i didn't say he was. All i said was he had a major role. He did help make Beijing what it is today by making it what it was back then, it changed lots, yes, but it doesn't mean he has no hand in it whatsoever. sure.gif
tqt
Why is this such a big deal, it's not like this person designed the Notre Dame Cathedral of France.
supernovasp
QUOTE (tqt @ Aug 30 2004, 10:40 PM)
Why is this such a big deal, it's not like this person designed the Notre Dame Cathedral of France.

For the first time, I agreed with this guy..
Clean
lol, true embarassedlaugh.gif

I honestly don't care about him personally. So i guess i'll just leave this to NQSH and supernovaasp, and i guess tqt.
Nam Quoc Son Ha
I don't actually cares about whether he designed or not, I'm just fed up with Chinese superiority complex and disregard for other cultures' contribution to their history and civilization.
Clean
QUOTE (Nam Quoc Son Ha @ Aug 30 2004, 09:43 PM)
I don't actually cares about whether he designed or not, I'm just fed up with Chinese superiority complex and disregard for other cultures' contribution to their history and civilization.

I see that often too. I honestly have yet to hear a person to say that Beijing was single-handedly designed by a Viet. Heck, the Chinese, first SunWeinging, then Kulong, accused us of implying it or saying it first. You only came in afterwards to piss them off (honorable mention for that btw).

It's like they suddenly think we want to have anything to do with building their nation or something. Honestly it affects us ZERO.

TBV suddenly comes in and makes it sound like we've been saying he's the only person who mattered in Beijing's history. No one said that. All we said is that he has a role, and then he suddenly says he has a minor role. embarassedlaugh.gif
tongbao_vince
QUOTE (tqt @ Aug 30 2004, 10:40 PM)
Why is this such a big deal, it's not like this person designed the Notre Dame Cathedral of France.

It's a big deal because some ACVS are making comments like Chinese architecture was created by Vietnamese, Chinese are incapable of building their own cities, China wouldn't be what it is today without Vietnam and other total bull based on some information that no one has ever heard of.

No one is denying other cultures influence on Chinese culture. India, Mongolia, and Central Asia are the big outsiders that shaped some of our culture. However this source on this eunch - even if it were true - is just a speck of dust in the entire cultural development of China. Other cultures disregard China's influence as well when the influence is much more appearent and the sources much more reliable.
ChuonCheat_Khmer
same with me man.. i don't care either about thai architecture that is really khmer but the thais are like the chinese. very arrogant and think they're gods or something..
Nam Quoc Son Ha
QUOTE (tongbao_vince @ Aug 30 2004, 10:50 PM)
QUOTE (tqt @ Aug 30 2004, 10:40 PM)
Why is this such a big deal, it's not like this person designed the Notre Dame Cathedral of France.

It's a big deal because some ACVS are making comments like Chinese architecture was created by Vietnamese, Chinese are incapable of building their own cities, China wouldn't be what it is today without Vietnam and other total bull based on some information that no one has ever heard of.

No one is denying other cultures influence on Chinese culture. India, Mongolia, and Central Asia are the big outsiders that shaped some of our culture. However this source on this eunch - even if it were true - is just a speck of dust in the entire cultural development of China. Other cultures disregard China's influence as well when the influence is much more appearent and the sources much more reliable.

Don't put words into your mouth, CNA extremist member.

Also, it's not that it's unheard of, it's that you Chinese choose not to hear about it because it is a source of humiliation that such "superior" people has to handpick a Vietnamese to design their Forbidden City, which I consider a shame really.

We Vietnamese are willing to acknowlege Chinese contribution to Vietnam as a nation yet China refused to acknowlege other cultures' contribution to their civilization, history and cultural development. That really tells me alot about Chinese people.
Clean
QUOTE (tongbao_vince @ Aug 30 2004, 09:50 PM)
QUOTE (tqt @ Aug 30 2004, 10:40 PM)
Why is this such a big deal, it's not like this person designed the Notre Dame Cathedral of France.

It's a big deal because some ACVS are making comments like Chinese architecture was created by Vietnamese, Chinese are incapable of building their own cities, China wouldn't be what it is today without Vietnam and other total bull based on some information that no one has ever heard of.

No one is denying other cultures influence on Chinese culture. India, Mongolia, and Central Asia are the big outsiders that shaped some of our culture. However this source on this eunch - even if it were true - is just a speck of dust in the entire cultural development of China. Other cultures disregard China's influence as well when the influence is much more appearent and the sources much more reliable.

sure.gif Honestly the Chinese dudes came in here first and said that. Like i said, people only said that stuff out of anger of the Chinese guys who started it. Mainly Kulong.

No Viet in here said China's architecture was made by the Viets until Kulong came. NQSH only wanted to piss him off, if you can't even see that. Man, i ahve nothing else to say.
Nam Quoc Son Ha
kulong should be treated like a speck of dust because he hold no value in a civilized debate now that he's just a angst-ridden individual with a bitter aftertaste.
supernovasp
Dong Son architectures resembles thai architecture without indian influence: High floor et.c
Clean
QUOTE (Nam Quoc Son Ha @ Aug 30 2004, 09:56 PM)
kulong should be treated like a speck of dust because he hold no value in a civilized debate now that he's just a angst-ridden individual with a bitter aftertaste.

Was he ever good at debating? embarassedlaugh.gif
ChuonCheat_Khmer
supernovasp,
how does the dong son architecture look like? can you post some pics?
Nam Quoc Son Ha
QUOTE (Clean @ Aug 30 2004, 10:57 PM)
QUOTE (Nam Quoc Son Ha @ Aug 30 2004, 09:56 PM)
kulong should be treated like a speck of dust because he hold no value in a civilized debate now that he's just a angst-ridden individual with a bitter aftertaste.

Was he ever good at debating? embarassedlaugh.gif

He might have... until I came along embarassedlaugh.gif
supernovasp
QUOTE (ChuonCheat_Khmer @ Aug 30 2004, 10:58 PM)
supernovasp,
how does the dong son architecture look like? can you post some pics?

I don't have any pictures right now icon_sad.gif
Clean
QUOTE (Nam Quoc Son Ha @ Aug 30 2004, 09:59 PM)
QUOTE (Clean @ Aug 30 2004, 10:57 PM)
QUOTE (Nam Quoc Son Ha @ Aug 30 2004, 09:56 PM)
kulong should be treated like a speck of dust because he hold no value in a civilized debate now that he's just a angst-ridden individual with a bitter aftertaste.

Was he ever good at debating? embarassedlaugh.gif

He might have... until I came along embarassedlaugh.gif

embarassedlaugh.gif His debating skills are quite sad...

If he was ever good. Good job on reducing them embarassedlaugh.gif
Nam Quoc Son Ha
Some stuffs from the Dong Son Civilization (not culture, it's a civilization) Circa 1500-500 BC





ChuonCheat_Khmer
those are some advanced-looking pieces of artifacts considering Dong Son predates the rest of SEAsian civilizations.
Clean
QUOTE (ChuonCheat_Khmer @ Aug 30 2004, 10:04 PM)
those are some advanced-looking pieces of artifacts considering Dong Son predates the rest of SEAsian civilizations.

At the height of the Dong Son civilization they were the most advanced bronze civilization on earth.
Nam Quoc Son Ha
Exactly. You only need to look at the intricate details to see how refined their bronze casting skill were. It is believed that the Chinese learnt advanced bronze casting technique from Dong Son.

But of course, some Chinese with superiority complex will brush this aside.
supernovasp
Off topic.. but I just found out ...

The museum of Trieu da in Guangdong has Vietnamese translation side by side with Chinese informations...
Clean
QUOTE (supernovasp @ Aug 30 2004, 10:24 PM)
Off topic.. but I just found out ...

The museum of Trieu da in Guangdong has Vietnamese translation side by side with Chinese informations...

Why would they have that though?
Nam Quoc Son Ha
What do they have in the museum?
supernovasp
QUOTE (Clean @ Aug 30 2004, 11:25 PM)
QUOTE (supernovasp @ Aug 30 2004, 10:24 PM)
Off topic.. but  I just found out ...

The museum of Trieu da in Guangdong has Vietnamese translation side by side with Chinese informations...

Why would they have that though?

I honestly don't know embarassedlaugh.gif
supernovasp
QUOTE (Nam Quoc Son Ha @ Aug 30 2004, 11:26 PM)
What do they have in the museum?

Don't ask me, I haven't been there
Clean
QUOTE (supernovasp @ Aug 30 2004, 10:26 PM)
QUOTE (Clean @ Aug 30 2004, 11:25 PM)
QUOTE (supernovasp @ Aug 30 2004, 10:24 PM)
Off topic.. but  I just found out ...

The museum of Trieu da in Guangdong has Vietnamese translation side by side with Chinese informations...

Why would they have that though?

I honestly don't know embarassedlaugh.gif

I'm wondering how many Viets actually visit that museum each year...
Nam Quoc Son Ha
I hope they have the bow of 10,000 arrows in there icon_wink.gif embarassedlaugh.gif embarassedlaugh.gif icon_redface.gif icon_redface.gif
tongbao_vince
QUOTE (Clean @ Aug 30 2004, 11:28 PM)
QUOTE (supernovasp @ Aug 30 2004, 10:26 PM)
QUOTE (Clean @ Aug 30 2004, 11:25 PM)
QUOTE (supernovasp @ Aug 30 2004, 10:24 PM)
Off topic.. but  I just found out ...

The museum of Trieu da in Guangdong has Vietnamese translation side by side with Chinese informations...

Why would they have that though?

I honestly don't know embarassedlaugh.gif

I'm wondering how many Viets actually visit that museum each year...

Because Trieu Da was a Chinese General who went to Vietnam.
Clean
QUOTE (tongbao_vince @ Aug 30 2004, 11:15 PM)
QUOTE (Clean @ Aug 30 2004, 11:28 PM)
QUOTE (supernovasp @ Aug 30 2004, 10:26 PM)
QUOTE (Clean @ Aug 30 2004, 11:25 PM)
QUOTE (supernovasp @ Aug 30 2004, 10:24 PM)
Off topic.. but  I just found out ...

The museum of Trieu da in Guangdong has Vietnamese translation side by side with Chinese informations...

Why would they have that though?

I honestly don't know embarassedlaugh.gif

I'm wondering how many Viets actually visit that museum each year...

Because Trieu Da was a Chinese General who went to Vietnam.

Still, is it necessary to have Viet if not many Viets go? I don't hear of too many Viets going at all to museums in Guangdong.
tongbao_vince
QUOTE (Clean @ Aug 31 2004, 12:18 AM)
QUOTE (tongbao_vince @ Aug 30 2004, 11:15 PM)
QUOTE (Clean @ Aug 30 2004, 11:28 PM)
QUOTE (supernovasp @ Aug 30 2004, 10:26 PM)
QUOTE (Clean @ Aug 30 2004, 11:25 PM)
QUOTE (supernovasp @ Aug 30 2004, 10:24 PM)
Off topic.. but  I just found out ...

The museum of Trieu da in Guangdong has Vietnamese translation side by side with Chinese informations...

Why would they have that though?

I honestly don't know embarassedlaugh.gif

I'm wondering how many Viets actually visit that museum each year...

Because Trieu Da was a Chinese General who went to Vietnam.

Still, is it necessary to have Viet if not many Viets go? I don't hear of too many Viets going at all to museums in Guangdong.

Well this guy was important to Vietnamese culture so shouldn't you be happy that Chinese are allowing information to also be in Vietnamese?
DaiNamViet
QUOTE (tongbao_vince @ Aug 31 2004, 01:15 AM)
QUOTE (Clean @ Aug 30 2004, 11:28 PM)
QUOTE (supernovasp @ Aug 30 2004, 10:26 PM)
QUOTE (Clean @ Aug 30 2004, 11:25 PM)
QUOTE (supernovasp @ Aug 30 2004, 10:24 PM)
Off topic.. but  I just found out ...

The museum of Trieu da in Guangdong has Vietnamese translation side by side with Chinese informations...

Why would they have that though?

I honestly don't know embarassedlaugh.gif

I'm wondering how many Viets actually visit that museum each year...

Because Trieu Da was a Chinese General who went to Vietnam.

I don't think he ever did , they lied about the history.. he never went to Vietnam
Clean
QUOTE (tongbao_vince @ Aug 30 2004, 11:24 PM)
QUOTE (Clean @ Aug 31 2004, 12:18 AM)
QUOTE (tongbao_vince @ Aug 30 2004, 11:15 PM)
QUOTE (Clean @ Aug 30 2004, 11:28 PM)
QUOTE (supernovasp @ Aug 30 2004, 10:26 PM)
QUOTE (Clean @ Aug 30 2004, 11:25 PM)
QUOTE (supernovasp @ Aug 30 2004, 10:24 PM)
Off topic.. but  I just found out ...

The museum of Trieu da in Guangdong has Vietnamese translation side by side with Chinese informations...

Why would they have that though?

I honestly don't know embarassedlaugh.gif

I'm wondering how many Viets actually visit that museum each year...

Because Trieu Da was a Chinese General who went to Vietnam.

Still, is it necessary to have Viet if not many Viets go? I don't hear of too many Viets going at all to museums in Guangdong.

Well this guy was important to Vietnamese culture so shouldn't you be happy that Chinese are allowing information to also be in Vietnamese?

That's true, but still... Oh well, i'll stop questioning it.
DaiNamViet
QUOTE (tongbao_vince @ Aug 31 2004, 01:24 AM)
Well this guy was important to Vietnamese culture so shouldn't you be happy that Chinese are allowing information to also be in Vietnamese?

I don't think so, Vietnamese people don't even know this dude... I far us most of us are concerned he was a Chinese... No matter what he claims to have become , the guy is still a Chinese.. :genius:
tqt
QUOTE
Well this guy was important to Vietnamese culture


That's completely absurd. The guy was nothing but an invader. The guy was nothing important to the Vietnamese culture except pludering and pillaging Vietnam just like his counterpart.
Clean
QUOTE (DaiNamViet @ Aug 30 2004, 11:27 PM)
QUOTE (tongbao_vince @ Aug 31 2004, 01:24 AM)

Well this guy was important to Vietnamese culture so shouldn't you be happy that Chinese are allowing information to also be in Vietnamese?

I don't think so, Vietnamese people don't even know this dude... I far us most of us are concerned he was a Chinese...

A LOT of Viet history is still up to questioning i guess. But still, in books he has some role in what we learn in school. Whether he had any TRUE role on us, no one REALLY knows.
tongbao_vince
QUOTE (Clean @ Aug 31 2004, 12:30 AM)
QUOTE (DaiNamViet @ Aug 30 2004, 11:27 PM)
QUOTE (tongbao_vince @ Aug 31 2004, 01:24 AM)

Well this guy was important to Vietnamese culture so shouldn't you be happy that Chinese are allowing information to also be in Vietnamese?

I don't think so, Vietnamese people don't even know this dude... I far us most of us are concerned he was a Chinese...

A LOT of Viet history is still up to questioning i guess. But still, in books he has some role in what we learn in school. Whether he had any TRUE role on us, no one REALLY knows.

QUOTE
To the north, however, the powerful Chinese King, Shih Hwang-ti, of the Ch'in Dynasty, sent his General, Do Thu, on a mission to conquer the lands to the south; and the Tan dynasty then divided into three parts, the conquered lands, including the Kingdom of Au Lac which King An Duong Vuong had been forced to surrender.


One of these three regions came to be governed by the Chinese general, Trieu Da.


Capitalizing on the decay of the Tan dynasty, Trieu Da killed all the Chinese who were still loyal to the Emperor, and expanded the territories under his control. Trieu Da, who had by this time adopted the customs of the Viets, married his son Trong Thuy to the princess My Chau, daughter of King An Duong. In the year 208, the fiftieth year of An Duong Vuong's reign, the princess connived in a plot with her husband, so the story goes, and the pair managed to make off with the magic crossbow which had heretofore made her father, King An Duong Vuong, invincible. Thus it was that Trieu Da was able to benefit by his son's marriage to conquer and annex the Kingdom of Au Lac. Unfortunately, his daughter-in-law, the princess, was beheaded by her father, who drowned himself in the sea before the invaders could reach his citadel.


Trieu Da reigned as absolute monarch under the royal name of Trieu Vu Vuong, and his new, enlarged kingdom was renamed Nam Viet. This dynasty lasted for 70 years, from 208 B.C. until the beginning of the Chinese domination.


http://www.vietspring.org/history/glimpse.html


Once Source.
Clean
QUOTE (tongbao_vince @ Aug 30 2004, 11:31 PM)
QUOTE (Clean @ Aug 31 2004, 12:30 AM)
QUOTE (DaiNamViet @ Aug 30 2004, 11:27 PM)
QUOTE (tongbao_vince @ Aug 31 2004, 01:24 AM)

Well this guy was important to Vietnamese culture so shouldn't you be happy that Chinese are allowing information to also be in Vietnamese?

I don't think so, Vietnamese people don't even know this dude... I far us most of us are concerned he was a Chinese...

A LOT of Viet history is still up to questioning i guess. But still, in books he has some role in what we learn in school. Whether he had any TRUE role on us, no one REALLY knows.

QUOTE
To the north, however, the powerful Chinese King, Shih Hwang-ti, of the Ch'in Dynasty, sent his General, Do Thu, on a mission to conquer the lands to the south; and the Tan dynasty then divided into three parts, the conquered lands, including the Kingdom of Au Lac which King An Duong Vuong had been forced to surrender.


One of these three regions came to be governed by the Chinese general, Trieu Da.


Capitalizing on the decay of the Tan dynasty, Trieu Da killed all the Chinese who were still loyal to the Emperor, and expanded the territories under his control. Trieu Da, who had by this time adopted the customs of the Viets, married his son Trong Thuy to the princess My Chau, daughter of King An Duong. In the year 208, the fiftieth year of An Duong Vuong's reign, the princess connived in a plot with her husband, so the story goes, and the pair managed to make off with the magic crossbow which had heretofore made her father, King An Duong Vuong, invincible. Thus it was that Trieu Da was able to benefit by his son's marriage to conquer and annex the Kingdom of Au Lac. Unfortunately, his daughter-in-law, the princess, was beheaded by her father, who drowned himself in the sea before the invaders could reach his citadel.


Trieu Da reigned as absolute monarch under the royal name of Trieu Vu Vuong, and his new, enlarged kingdom was renamed Nam Viet. This dynasty lasted for 70 years, from 208 B.C. until the beginning of the Chinese domination.


http://www.vietspring.org/history/glimpse.html


Once Source.

There's one important line in that source. "so the story goes"

Viet history is honestly very confusing because a lot of it is uncertain. And in many ways he was simply an invader, but other people see him as a hero. Depending on the perspective confused.gif
DaiNamViet
QUOTE (Clean @ Aug 31 2004, 01:34 AM)
Viet history is honestly very confusing because a lot of it is uncertain. And in many ways he was simply an invader, but other people see him as a hero. Depending on the perspective confused.gif

He went south as a conquer for the Qin emperor, how can any one accept an aggressive foreigner as their king?? .. he only did that so that he could get loyalty from the natives... otherwise they would have rebelled and killed him and all his men.. It happened in other former Qin areas.... :genius:
tam_ca
soooo.......

anyone have picture of imperial hue being restored or of restored buildings of imperial hue.?.

OR just restored vietnamese buildings lol, i would like to see.
福州市长
QUOTE (Nam Quoc Son Ha @ Aug 30 2004, 10:27 PM)
QUOTE (aaronly @ Aug 30 2004, 10:22 PM)
QUOTE (福州市长 @ Aug 30 2004, 10:13 PM)
do chinese cares who is he??
he not even mention in our history books...

if you dont care you need to come in here and post, and yet you come back again and again embarassedlaugh.gif

It's a fine example of Chinese arrogance that they think they're the best in EVERYTHING.

It will be heartbreaking for them if they realise that a man from a smaller state of An Nam actually designed their capital. What a shame, you can't even design your own capital. embarassedlaugh.gif

dont' tell vietnamese aren't arragont...and at that time, An Nam is not state it is province...
Johannjs
Have the people in Beijing eventually celebrate the Vietnamese Chief-Architect Nguyễn An as was suggested by some Chinese historians ???
tongbao_vince
QUOTE (Johannjs @ Sep 1 2004, 09:41 PM)
Have the people in Beijing eventually celebrate the Vietnamese Chief-Architect Nguyễn An as was suggested by some Chinese historians ???

No. Alot of people helped build Beijing - from the Mongols to the Ming to the Manchus. This architect has to wait in line.
RiverPlate4Life
Awesome. I did not know it was a Vietnamese architect who designed Beijing. Good stuff. beerchug.gif
Doan Du
That's not the only contribution that Vietnamese gave to China. Here is what Chinese history says.

There were also 20,000 Annamese highly skilled craftsmen who were forcibly brought to Beijing to do construction work after the Ming defeated the Vietnamese dynasty of Ho quy Ly. Timber from Northern Vietnam were imported for construction material.

That caused an Annamese landowner named Le Loi to revolt. The struggle against the Ming lasted for twenty years and Le Loi finally routed the last Ming fortress at Xuong Giang in 1427. (Jung-Pan Lo, "Intervention in Vietnam: A case study of the Foreign Policy of the Early Ming government," Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies, new series 7, 2 (1969))

In the Ming conquest of the Ho dynasty in 1407, the Ming acquired from the Vietnamese a weapon called shen qiang, shen qiang jian or shenji huaqiang, meaning literally "magic fire-lance arrow". It was a fire-lance, but better than its Chinese counterpart due to one unique feature: It had a heavy wooden wad (mu ma zi in Chinese) made of ironwood to increase pressure within the barrel. The arrow could therefore be shot as far as 400 paces. It can be imagined that the Vietnamese employed this indigenous resource to invent the wooden wad in order to increase the range of the fire-lance. This technique was adopted in China for handguns by 1415, as a Ming handgun made in this year had a wooden wad between gunpowder and "bullets", while the handguns prior to this time did not have this salient feature.

Moreover, the igniting device of the handguns made at least from 1410 on was improved in that, instead of a small hole where a fuse was inserted, now a rectangular slot with lid was added on the rear part of the barrel. Thus it became more convenient to ignite the gunpowder in the slot and the lid could prevent the gunpowder and fuse from getting wet in rainy days. It has been positively identified as a Vietnamese invention to counter the tropical climate of Southeast Asia where humidity and long rainy seasons are a part of life.

Upon the order of Yongle Emperor, Vietnamese captives who were good at making firearms such as handguns and cannons (huo chong), short lance (duanqian) and fire-lance (shenjian), and gunpowder were sent to the Chinese capital of Nanjing with many other kinds of craftsmen. Altogether, 28,000 were taken captive to China. This included Ho nguyen Trung ("Li Cheng" in Chinese). The Vietnamese chronicle specifically mentions that in 1407 Nguyen Trung made firearms and warships to combat the invading Chinese. The fact that Nguyen Trung as the "Left Grand Councilor" (zuo xiangguo in Chinese) was skilled in making firearms shows the importance Dai Viet attached to gunpowder technology and the intense competition between Dai Viet and its neighbor, primarily China and Champa. Also interestingly, it was this expertise that changed Nguyen Trung's life in China, as after having captured to Nanjing Nguyen Trung's father's Ho quy Ly and brother Ho han Thuong - two kings of the Ho dynasty - were thrown in jail, but Nguyen Trung was pardoned and allowed to serve in the Ming Ministry of Works due to his skills. He took charge of manufacturing firearms and gunpowder at the weapon manufacturing bureau (Bingzhangju) and was eventually promoted to the Minister of Works. He played a very important role in establishing the Firearms Battalion in Ming China. According to official Chinese account, receiving the order to accompany the Yongle Emperor to attack the Mongols on the north frontier, three Vietnamese including Nguyen Trung set up the Firearms Battalion prior to 1412. At least one of them (other than Nguyen trung) participated in the campaign and died soon afterwards on June 9, 1412.

According to other Chinese records, when the Ming court held a ceremony for the "God of Firearms" they also offered a sacrifice to Ho Nguyen Trung. Upon his death at the age of seventy three, his son replaced him and continued to manufacture firearms for the Ming until he retired aged seventy in 1470. Up to 1489, the descendents of these Vietnamese craftsmen were still in the service of the Ming. In addition to the fire-lance and ignition device, a bow called "Vietnamese bow" (Jiaozhi gong) also spread to Ming China around this time or earlier.

The abovementioned Vietnamese techniques were used widely and had some implication for the Ming military. During the early Hongzhi reign (1488-1505) 30,000 linden and 90,000 sandalwood wooden wads were manufactured. Another kind of hard wood was sent from Vietnam as tribute to the capital for the manufacture of fire-lances. The wooden wad technique was still used even after the arrival of Portuguese firearms in China in the late sixteenth century, as was the new ignition device. The establisment of the Firearms Battalion, to which the Vietnamese contributed both personel and techniques, proved effective and sometimes crucial in Ming China's fighting with the Mongols. In 1414, Yongle and his armies were surrounded by Mongols, it was firearms with Vietnamese technical features that helped the Ming troops break the siege. The effectiveness of the firearms in this event impressed the Koreans, as they recorded it in their veritable record of the Yi (Choson) dynasty.

The Vietnamese fire-lance was also put into good use. Chinese sources specifically state when the Yongle Emperor fought the Mongols, "they just got the fire-lance from Annam; one barbarian (lu) marched straight forward, and two followed; they were all hit by the fire-lance and died." Teng Zhao, the Vice Minister of the Ministry of War during the reign of Chenghua (1465-1487) commented: "We basically rely on the fire-lance to defeat the ennemies and win victories. From Yongle (1403-1424) to Xuangde (1426-1435), the fire-lance was properly drilled and was most feared by the barbarians (luzei, or the Mongols). IN 1449, after the Ming suffered the Tumu debacle, more 28,000 handguns and 440,000 fire lances were collected from the battle scene.

Sources:

Wang Ao, Zhenze jiwen (Notes of Wang Ao), in Shen Yunlong, ed., Ming Qing shiliao huibian, series one, book 3 (Taibei: Wenhai Chubanshe, 1967), vol. 1 15a.

Ming shilu leizuan-junshi shiliao juan (Categorical compilation of the Ming shilu -- the volume of historical sources on military affairs) (Wuhan: Wuhan Chubanshe, 1993), pp. 88-186; Wada Sei, trans. by Pan Shixian, Ming dai Menggu shi lun ji (Collection of essays on the history of the Mongols during the Ming dynasty) (Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan, 1984), vol. 1, pp. 66, 68.

Ming shilu, "Xianzong," vol. 168, quoted in Zhang, "Mingdai Jiaozhi ren zai," p. 57.

Qiu Jun, Daxua yanyi bu (Supplements to the Daxue yanyi) (Reprint, 1971), vol 122, pp. 11b-12a; Yan, Shuyu, 183, 243; Hui LU, Ping pi baijin fang (The washerman's precious salve) (Reprint, c. 1844), vol. 4, p. 32b; Zhang Xiumin, "Mingdai Jiaozhi ren zai Zhongguo zhi gongxian" (Contributions by the Vietnamese people in China during the Ming dynasty), in Zhang Xiumin, Zhong Yue guanxi shi lunwenji (Collection of articles on Sino-Vietnamese relations) (Taibei; Wenshizhe Chubanshe, 1992), pp. 55-57.
Johannjs
Welcome back Doan Du!

WOW. You're always the same ultra-specialist about weaponry and whatever military aspects as I can see!

OK, I found your sources:

http://www.google.com/search?num=50&hl=en&...ung&btnG=Search
福州市长
QUOTE (Doan Du @ Sep 3 2004, 09:48 AM)
That's not the only contribution that Vietnamese gave to China. Here is what Chinese history says.

There were also 20,000 Annamese highly skilled craftsmen who were forcibly brought to Beijing to do construction work after the Ming defeated the Vietnamese dynasty of Ho quy Ly. Timber from Northern Vietnam were imported for construction material.

That caused an Annamese landowner named Le Loi to revolt. The struggle against the Ming lasted for twenty years and Le Loi finally routed the last Ming fortress at Xuong Giang in 1427. (Jung-Pan Lo, "Intervention in Vietnam: A case study of the Foreign Policy of the Early Ming government," Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies, new series 7, 2 (1969))

In the Ming conquest of the Ho dynasty in 1407, the Ming acquired from the Vietnamese a weapon called shen qiang, shen qiang jian or shenji huaqiang, meaning literally "magic fire-lance arrow". It was a fire-lance, but better than its Chinese counterpart due to one unique feature: It had a heavy wooden wad (mu ma zi in Chinese) made of ironwood to increase pressure within the barrel. The arrow could therefore be shot as far as 400 paces. It can be imagined that the Vietnamese employed this indigenous resource to invent the wooden wad in order to increase the range of the fire-lance. This technique was adopted in China for handguns by 1415, as a Ming handgun made in this year had a wooden wad between gunpowder and "bullets", while the handguns prior to this time did not have this salient feature.

Moreover, the igniting device of the handguns made at least from 1410 on was improved in that, instead of a small hole where a fuse was inserted, now a rectangular slot with lid was added on the rear part of the barrel. Thus it became more convenient to ignite the gunpowder in the slot and the lid could prevent the gunpowder and fuse from getting wet in rainy days. It has been positively identified as a Vietnamese invention to counter the tropical climate of Southeast Asia where humidity and long rainy seasons are a part of life.

Upon the order of Yongle Emperor, Vietnamese captives who were good at making firearms such as handguns and cannons (huo chong), short lance (duanqian) and fire-lance (shenjian), and gunpowder were sent to the Chinese capital of Nanjing with many other kinds of craftsmen. Altogether, 28,000 were taken captive to China. This included Ho nguyen Trung ("Li Cheng" in Chinese). The Vietnamese chronicle specifically mentions that in 1407 Nguyen Trung made firearms and warships to combat the invading Chinese. The fact that Nguyen Trung as the "Left Grand Councilor" (zuo xiangguo in Chinese) was skilled in making firearms shows the importance Dai Viet attached to gunpowder technology and the intense competition between Dai Viet and its neighbor, primarily China and Champa. Also interestingly, it was this expertise that changed Nguyen Trung's life in China, as after having captured to Nanjing Nguyen Trung's father's Ho quy Ly and brother Ho han Thuong - two kings of the Ho dynasty - were thrown in jail, but Nguyen Trung was pardoned and allowed to serve in the Ming Ministry of Works due to his skills. He took charge of manufacturing firearms and gunpowder at the weapon manufacturing bureau (Bingzhangju) and was eventually promoted to the Minister of Works. He played a very important role in establishing the Firearms Battalion in Ming China. According to official Chinese account, receiving the order to accompany the Yongle Emperor to attack the Mongols on the north frontier, three Vietnamese including Nguyen Trung set up the Firearms Battalion prior to 1412. At least one of them (other than Nguyen trung) participated in the campaign and died soon afterwards on June 9, 1412.

According to other Chinese records, when the Ming court held a ceremony for the "God of Firearms" they also offered a sacrifice to Ho Nguyen Trung. Upon his death at the age of seventy three, his son replaced him and continued to manufacture firearms for the Ming until he retired aged seventy in 1470. Up to 1489, the descendents of these Vietnamese craftsmen were still in the service of the Ming. In addition to the fire-lance and ignition device, a bow called "Vietnamese bow" (Jiaozhi gong) also spread to Ming China around this time or earlier.

The abovementioned Vietnamese techniques were used widely and had some implication for the Ming military. During the early Hongzhi reign (1488-1505) 30,000 linden and 90,000 sandalwood wooden wads were manufactured. Another kind of hard wood was sent from Vietnam as tribute to the capital for the manufacture of fire-lances. The wooden wad technique was still used even after the arrival of Portuguese firearms in China in the late sixteenth century, as was the new ignition device. The establisment of the Firearms Battalion, to which the Vietnamese contributed both personel and techniques, proved effective and sometimes crucial in Ming China's fighting with the Mongols. In 1414, Yongle and his armies were surrounded by Mongols, it was firearms with Vietnamese technical features that helped the Ming troops break the siege. The effectiveness of the firearms in this event impressed the Koreans, as they recorded it in their veritable record of the Yi (Choson) dynasty.

The Vietnamese fire-lance was also put into good use. Chinese sources specifically state when the Yongle Emperor fought the Mongols, "they just got the fire-lance from Annam; one barbarian (lu) marched straight forward, and two followed; they were all hit by the fire-lance and died." Teng Zhao, the Vice Minister of the Ministry of War during the reign of Chenghua (1465-1487) commented: "We basically rely on the fire-lance to defeat the ennemies and win victories. From Yongle (1403-1424) to Xuangde (1426-1435), the fire-lance was properly drilled and was most feared by the barbarians (luzei, or the Mongols). IN 1449, after the Ming suffered the Tumu debacle, more 28,000 handguns and 440,000 fire lances were collected from the battle scene.

Sources:

Wang Ao, Zhenze jiwen (Notes of Wang Ao), in Shen Yunlong, ed., Ming Qing shiliao huibian, series one, book 3 (Taibei: Wenhai Chubanshe, 1967), vol. 1 15a.

Ming shilu leizuan-junshi shiliao juan (Categorical compilation of the Ming shilu -- the volume of historical sources on military affairs) (Wuhan: Wuhan Chubanshe, 1993), pp. 88-186; Wada Sei, trans. by Pan Shixian, Ming dai Menggu shi lun ji (Collection of essays on the history of the Mongols during the Ming dynasty) (Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan, 1984), vol. 1, pp. 66, 68.

Ming shilu, "Xianzong," vol. 168, quoted in Zhang, "Mingdai Jiaozhi ren zai," p. 57.

Qiu Jun, Daxua yanyi bu (Supplements to the Daxue yanyi) (Reprint, 1971), vol 122, pp. 11b-12a; Yan, Shuyu, 183, 243; Hui LU, Ping pi baijin fang (The washerman's precious salve) (Reprint, c. 1844), vol. 4, p. 32b; Zhang Xiumin, "Mingdai Jiaozhi ren zai Zhongguo zhi gongxian" (Contributions by the Vietnamese people in China during the Ming dynasty), in Zhang Xiumin, Zhong Yue guanxi shi lunwenji (Collection of articles on Sino-Vietnamese relations) (Taibei; Wenshizhe Chubanshe, 1992), pp. 55-57.

so vietnamese are slaves??
hahah..
Byron
Yes during the 1000 year reign.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2009 Invision Power Services, Inc.