So many disqualify guys been elected. People here vote for Baht.


1) Mr Yongyuth

The Supreme Court's Electoral Fraud Division ruled that Mr Yongyuth had attempted to bribe influential kamnan to back him and his PPP candidates in Chiang Rai. Mr Yongyuth's sister was earlier given a yellow card, and the verdict upheld that as well.

By a 3-2 vote, the court decided that Mr Yongyuth was guilty of the alleged vote-buying.

The court took two hours to read the background to the case and the verdict. The verdict cited a key witness in the case, kamnan Chaiwat Changkaokham of Mae Chan.

http://www.bangkokpost.com/topstories/tops...s.php?id=128778


2) Mr Chaiya

The government suffered its third justice-administered setback in 24 hours on Wednesday as the Constitution Court kicked Public Health Minister Chaiya Sasomsab out of office.

Judges even back-dated Mr Chaiya's dismissal to March 6, for failure to declare his wife's holding in a company.

Mr Chaiya said he didn't know he had to report the fact that Mrs Churai holds 50 per cent of a private company - 25,000 shares worth 2.5 million baht.

Any such holdings by a spouse or children above 5 per cent of the total value of a company must be reported to the National Counter Corruption Commission within 30 days of assuming office.

Since Mr Chaiya was sworn in and missed the March 7 deadline for reporting, the judges ordered his dismissal from the government as effective on that date.

The dismissal from the cabinet of Mr Chaiya is not just a further political blow.
http://www.bangkokpost.com/topstories/tops...s.php?id=128778

Also the old case

The Supreme Court on Wednesday issued an arrest warrant for veteran politician Vatana Asavahame after he failed to turn up to hear the verdict in the Klong Dan wastewater treatment project corruption case.

The warrant was approved by the court's Criminal Division for Holders of Political Positions after his lawyer Paiboon Phonoi told the bench of nine Supreme Court judges that he could not contact his client.

Mr Paiboon said he had talked to Mr Vatana, who is chief adviser to the Puea Pandin party, on the telephone a few days ago and his client had promised to show up.

Based on the lawyer's account, the court said that Mr Vatana was aware of the scheduled hearing but decided not to show up.

The court seized his bail of 2.2 million baht, issued the arrest warrant and set Aug 18 as the date for reading the verdict.

Chalao Timthong, a villager in tambon Klong Dan in Bang Bo district of Samut Prakan, who has fought for 10 years for justice in the Klong Dan case, said he was disappointed that Mr Vatana did not turn up.

"Mr Vatana fears he will be punished by the court. If he is brave enough, he should come to hear the verdict," Mr Chalao said.

Klong Dan locals were less interested in whether Mr Vatana goes to jail than in steps to protect their natural resources and to deliver justice, he said.

The state prosecution accused the former Samut Prakan MP of abusing his authority as deputy interior minister 16 years ago, by getting officials to illegally issue title deeds for public canals and rubbish dumps covering 1,900 rai.

The land was later sold to the Pollution Control Department at inflated prices for the department's project.

The 23-billion-baht plant is about 90 per cent complete. Construction was suspended years ago due to opposition by local people who fear the plant will harm the area's pristine coastal ecology.

http://www.bangkokpost.com/topstories/tops...s.php?id=128798

Who is next? may be the Noppadol guys the foreign minister who fail to do his job

http://www.bangkokpost.com/breaking_news/b...s.php?id=128801

http://www.straitstimes.com/Latest%2BNews/...ory_256432.html



The opposition has demanded that Foreign Minister Noppadon Pattama resign over a dispute with Cambodia centering on an ancient temple on the Thai-Cambodian border. -- PHOTO: AFP

Preah Vihear temple belongs to Cambodia and the world court agreed, when it belongs to me i can register whatever i want, do you agree ?
Just like Wat Phou in Laos, it was built by Khmer, but 2008 it belongs to Laos, so Laos can register whatever they like.

Simple as that. anymore question let me know.

no, hon. you 've done too much damage to lao reputation.

go back to the jungle, you belong there.

Many siamese like to twist the accords and treaties. Only look good in your own mind and your brainwashed children, but it make you people look like a idiot in the eyes of the world community. Pra Viharn belongs to Cambodia. World court agreed, UNESCO agreed. How hard is that to understand.

If you need some clarification let me know.

เอองั้นเมื่อก่อนที่รัฐบาลสหรัฐให้มีทาสได้อย่างถูกกฏหมายนั้นก็หมายความว่าถูกงั้นสิ ทั่วโลกสมัยก่อนก็บอกว่ามีทาสได้ แล้วทำไมสมัยนี้ไม่มี มึงนั่นแหละที่ถูกล้างสมองไอ้ลาว

If world court and UNESCO agrees base on their evidences, your parents are dog, I guess you should agree with them.

World standard has been changing my sh!ty head siamese. Dinosaur and people have been evolving This is 2008 , colonialism, child prostitutions, and slavery are not acceptable. UNESCO is a specialized agency of the United Nations, which has 193 Member States and 6 Associate Members. So far Siam is up against the world about the Pra Viharn issues. Just like Sadam Hussein believed in his own world that it was legitimated to take over their former land, Kuwait, literary the guy was up against the world. Don't tell me many siamese are thinking right that too.

In Laos case: The Franko-Siamese border treaty clearly indicates that all the islets in the Mekong border with Siam belongs to Laos and all the mountain peak that border with siam belongs to Laos. But some siamese politicians turn around and say Mano I & II islets in the Mekong belongs to Thailand, since thai farmers have been farming in the islets for generations. The argument was lame and childish, that like saying: Chinese have been farming and living in Bangc@ck for generations, so it belongs to China. LOL, what a joke.

Same thing at Phou Si Fah, the peak of the mountain belongs to Laos, but some thai politicians turned around and say: it belongs to thailand since it just a cliff on Laos side. Cliff or not the peak belong to Laos.

If you need some clarification let me know.

so world standard would stop changing after 2008???? what makes you think world court and UNESCO would not change their verdict in the future????

you have to keep fighting for me, don't you, hon?

Yeah, keep fighting just like many Nazi members are dreaming about the glory day while hitler was still alive. It's predictable mad man doesn't like to admit that he's crazy. The world has been telling arrogant siamese that it belongs to Cambodia. When it belongs to Cambodia they can register whatever they like, Just like Wat Phou in Laos, it belongs to Laos, Lao can register whatever they like.

Anymore question ?