http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/finance...n-minister.html
Tokyo has a chance to be a world Finance center now
The Investment bank in US that has returned the foreign capital to the United States up to now is in the state of the crisis.
I think the Japanese ones will be the substitute.
That is, the capitals of the world are collected in Tokyo and it returns to the
United States.
A political responsibility of the United States is to make the war.
And, the president at that time cannot be Obama.
It changes the recession of the world into the boom. only US can do that in internationl politics and it never change.
Tokyo substitutes for NY if there is an ambition in Japan.
do you agree?
Full Version: Tokyo will be called global financial center
It's possible. Nomura holding bought the Lehman brothers holdings in Asia and MUFG bought 20% of Morgan Stanley. They've definitely extended their reach considerably in two moves. They also blocked Chinese and Korean bankers from expanded their banking reach as well.
Japan had been one of the world financial centers for a long time. Japan just has too much money in her banking system...tens of trillions of saving in post-system alone.
QUOTE(popcandy @ Oct 23 2008, 03:12 AM) [snapback]3979601[/snapback]
Japan had been one of the world financial centers for a long time. Japan just has too much money in her banking system...tens of trillions of saving in post-system alone.
Nikkei is dropping 10 something percent points every once in a week.
LOLMAO
Well I am not frustrated.
Don`t project your inner feelings on Koreans. troll.
And don`t name yourself after famous korean drinks. You're unworthy the name.
Don`t project your inner feelings on Koreans. troll.
And don`t name yourself after famous korean drinks. You're unworthy the name.
QUOTE(Amen @ Oct 23 2008, 03:19 AM) [snapback]3979668[/snapback]
Nikkei is dropping 10 something percent points every once in a week.
LOLMAO
LOLMAO
Dude, why do you need to provoke man. You're making Koreans look bad. Why don't you concentrate on Korea's situation rather than put others down.
It is the Japanese trolls who have Korean names, are obsessed with negative Korean news, and put Koreans down who are the ones that we should mock for being insecure. IE: Chilsung Cider and Chinilpa, etc.
QUOTE(Amen @ Oct 23 2008, 06:19 AM) [snapback]3979668[/snapback]
Nikkei is dropping 10 something percent points every once in a week.
LOLMAO
LOLMAO
Japan's problems are within it's people. The public since the bubble economy crash have feared investing in their own stock which is why Japan took such a long time to regain it's economic prowess. It's happening again with the global recession, the Japanese public once again are weary and are pulling their money out of stock causing their own economy to suffer again.
QUOTE(manko @ Oct 24 2008, 03:09 PM) [snapback]3981420[/snapback]
Japan's problems are within it's people. The public since the bubble economy crash have feared investing in their own stock which is why Japan took such a long time to regain it's economic prowess. It's happening again with the global recession, the Japanese public once again are weary and are pulling their money out of stock causing their own economy to suffer again.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't Japan have a very high level of savings though?
QUOTE(Suijen @ Oct 24 2008, 05:13 PM) [snapback]3981429[/snapback]
Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't Japan have a very high level of savings though?
Not anymore, people are spending it on high lifestyle much like Americans. I do believe many companies are recording record profits in the last decade or so and yet somehow there's been a Job crisis. I think it has to do with the kids farmers leaving and moving out to the City and effectively destroying the Country along with greedy Corporations and lack of morality.
QUOTE(manko @ Oct 24 2008, 04:26 PM) [snapback]3981451[/snapback]
Not anymore, people are spending it on high lifestyle much like Americans. I do believe many companies are recording record profits in the last decade or so and yet somehow there's been a Job crisis. I think it has to do with the kids farmers leaving and moving out to the City and effectively destroying the Country along with greedy Corporations and lack of morality.
the Japanese Yen is so strong Now.
It means it is an evidence that the money which want safe are moving to Japan.
I think the real booming in domestic demand might be beguan by strong Yen.
Japan can cause big influence power for the United States economy and politics under name of "support"
The stability of the investment of Japan can be measured by doing so.
15th Aug, 1971
After the war, President Nixon suddenly abolished the exchange system of the dollar- gold as the United States economic policy on August 15, 1971(anniversary of Japan's defeat in WWII).
World War2,there was no wartime catastrophe in The United States.
The United States bore the revival demand in the world single-handed and was the capital supply source to liberal nations including Japan.
Japan and West Germany economy grow up rapidly in the 1960's and the industrial
productivity has approached the United States.
The United States transferred the seat of a product-making , a huge exporter, and the world's largest creditor to Japan and West Germany. (It is Japan and West Germany in the defeat anniversary of Japan of 1971.
both are defeated countries)
I think that it was the United States concession speech by Nixson.
And, the United States kept walking as a large consumption country, finance center, IT, trade deficit country, and the world's largest external debt country. ..
It is the United States investment banks to have produced the cycle of prosperity by this bubble and the recession by burst of the economic bubble.
NY without them is not NY anymore
Who can do their substitute?
After the war, President Nixon suddenly abolished the exchange system of the dollar- gold as the United States economic policy on August 15, 1971(anniversary of Japan's defeat in WWII).
World War2,there was no wartime catastrophe in The United States.
The United States bore the revival demand in the world single-handed and was the capital supply source to liberal nations including Japan.
Japan and West Germany economy grow up rapidly in the 1960's and the industrial
productivity has approached the United States.
The United States transferred the seat of a product-making , a huge exporter, and the world's largest creditor to Japan and West Germany. (It is Japan and West Germany in the defeat anniversary of Japan of 1971.
both are defeated countries)
I think that it was the United States concession speech by Nixson.
And, the United States kept walking as a large consumption country, finance center, IT, trade deficit country, and the world's largest external debt country. ..
It is the United States investment banks to have produced the cycle of prosperity by this bubble and the recession by burst of the economic bubble.
NY without them is not NY anymore
Who can do their substitute?
QUOTE(wonda51 @ Oct 25 2008, 11:01 PM) [snapback]3983020[/snapback]
the Japanese Yen is so strong Now.
It means it is an evidence that the money which want safe are moving to Japan.
I think the real booming in domestic demand might be beguan by strong Yen.
Japan can cause big influence power for the United States economy and politics under name of "support"
The stability of the investment of Japan can be measured by doing so.
It means it is an evidence that the money which want safe are moving to Japan.
I think the real booming in domestic demand might be beguan by strong Yen.
Japan can cause big influence power for the United States economy and politics under name of "support"
The stability of the investment of Japan can be measured by doing so.
Good point, but one of the biggest fears I've heard about a strong Yen is they fear people will stop importing goods and end up losing business instead.
Japan is stagnant. They will NOT be the global financial center.
Japan has gone the way of the white man. The white man's global dominance is over.
East Asia will be the dominant global superpower. But it will not include Japan. It will be East Asia, India, and the Middle East as the primary players.
Japan has gone the way of the white man. The white man's global dominance is over.
East Asia will be the dominant global superpower. But it will not include Japan. It will be East Asia, India, and the Middle East as the primary players.
^ China will be the centre of it.
East Asia (Asean +3) will be a center,
EU will be a center,
North America will be a center
South America will be a center
Africa Union(in far future) will be one
There will not be a one-country-dominate-all system anymore. As the article stated, the world is heading toward a multipolar system where consensus between polar points will make major decisions.
TomAsia
EU will be a center,
North America will be a center
South America will be a center
Africa Union(in far future) will be one
There will not be a one-country-dominate-all system anymore. As the article stated, the world is heading toward a multipolar system where consensus between polar points will make major decisions.
TomAsia
QUOTE(TomAsia @ Oct 26 2008, 04:37 PM) [snapback]3983776[/snapback]
East Asia (Asean +3) will be a center,
EU will be a center,
North America will be a center
South America will be a center
Africa Union(in far future) will be one
There will not be a one-country-dominate-all system anymore. As the article stated, the world is heading toward a multipolar system where consensus between polar points will make major decisions.
TomAsia
EU will be a center,
North America will be a center
South America will be a center
Africa Union(in far future) will be one
There will not be a one-country-dominate-all system anymore. As the article stated, the world is heading toward a multipolar system where consensus between polar points will make major decisions.
TomAsia
Ok guys ,I mean nomura bought Lehman Brothers
other Japanese Banks are buying the systems of US investment banks.
who bring money..
anyway.. It is assumption............. if there is an ambition in Japan.
delete
QUOTE(wonda51 @ Oct 26 2008, 06:30 PM) [snapback]3983893[/snapback]
Ok guys ,I mean nomura bought Lehman Brothers
other Japanese Banks are buying the systems of US investment banks.
who bring money..
anyway.. It is assumption............. if there is an ambition in Japan.
other Japanese Banks are buying the systems of US investment banks.
who bring money..
anyway.. It is assumption............. if there is an ambition in Japan.
and US responsibility is to make WAR..
McCain is the suitable person for war
QUOTE(wonda51 @ Oct 26 2008, 06:30 PM) [snapback]3983893[/snapback]
Ok guys ,I mean nomura bought Lehman Brothers
other Japanese Banks are buying the systems of US investment banks.
who bring money..
anyway.. It is assumption............. if there is an ambition in Japan.
other Japanese Banks are buying the systems of US investment banks.
who bring money..
anyway.. It is assumption............. if there is an ambition in Japan.
did they? or do you assume it because of your weak ego?
Tokyo is ranked number 9.
Basically, Europe has London; America has London; Asia has Hong Kong/Singpoare; and most likely in the future, the Middle East will have Dubai and Hindu country like India will have Mumbai.
Europe: London Financial Center
America: New York Financial Center
Asia: Hong Kong/Singapore Financial Center
Muslim countries in Middle East: Dubai Financial Center
Hindu countries in India: Mumbai Financial Center
Basically, Europe has London; America has London; Asia has Hong Kong/Singpoare; and most likely in the future, the Middle East will have Dubai and Hindu country like India will have Mumbai.
Europe: London Financial Center
America: New York Financial Center
Asia: Hong Kong/Singapore Financial Center
Muslim countries in Middle East: Dubai Financial Center
Hindu countries in India: Mumbai Financial Center
QUOTE
http://www.finfacts.com/irishfinancenews/a...e_1012772.shtml
Centre Rank GFCI Rating* Overall Assessment
London
1 (1) 795 (806) London remains in top place in GFCI 3, despite losing 11 points from its rating in GFCI 2, after slipping slightly across the board in assessments made after the difficulties of Northern Rock and the publication of proposed changes in the tax treatment of non-domiciled residents, and in the light of continuing criticism of its airport and other transport infrastructure. London does, however, remain in the top quartile of instrumental factors (see Appendix C), and is still rated very highly by most questionnaire respondents, demonstrating its resilience as a financial centre.
New York
2 (2) 786 (787) New York also remains in the top quartile in over 80% of its instrumental factors and has only dropped by one point since GFCI 2. For the first time, respondents from the banking sector rated it more highly than London, and it remained strong in all other sectors in spite of continued criticism from respondents over burdensome regulatory requirements under Sarbanes-Oxley.
Hong Kong
3 (3) 695 (697) Hong Kong remains comfortably in third place, losing only two points overall in the ratings. It also retained a strong position in the five key competitiveness areas, though slipping one place to 4 th among respondents in the insurance sector.
Singapore
4 (4) 675 (673) Singapore performs well in GFCI 3, moving two points closer to Hong Kong. It was one of only two of the top ten to gain points (the other being Tokyo), and was rated 5 th in the world by respondents in the insurance sector, where it had failed to make the top ten previously. Singapore’s banking regulatory environment is still perceived as very strong.
Zurich
5 (5) 665 (666) Zurich remains the strongest niche centre in GFCI 3. Private banking and asset management are its key specialisms. Its high ratings in the key areas of competitiveness have not changed since GFCI 2 and it has gained 35 points in Insurance.
Frankfurt
6 (6) 642 (649) Frankfurt remains a key European hub for finance. It improved its standing on people and labour issues since GFCI 2 among respondents, and remained strong on other competitive factors, including professional services.
Geneva
7 (7) 640 (645) Geneva is the third financial centre in continental Europe, with continuing high ratings for asset management, banking, and government/regulatory issues. It has, however, slipped in ratings for insurance and professional services.
Chicago
8 (8) 637 (639) The number two centre in the US received higher ratings in GFCI 3 than previously in several competitive areas, especially business environment, and general competitiveness, as well as for banking and government/regulatory issues.
Tokyo
9 (10) 628 (625) Tokyo has overtaken Sydney to move into ninth place. It and Singapore are the only two centres in the top ten to gain points in the GFCI 3 ratings. Its economy continues to strengthen, and it has the second-largest stock market in the world (by capitalisation). These two features offset long-term regulatory difficulties and poor access to international financial personnel.
Sydney
10 (9) 621 (636) Sydney dropped to 10 th place in GFCI 3, but was rated highly by respondents in the banking sector and will continue to be a key regional hub in Asia-Pacific. In spite of its geographic isolation, it has strong advantages in English language markets, and quality of life.
Centre Rank GFCI Rating* Overall Assessment
London
1 (1) 795 (806) London remains in top place in GFCI 3, despite losing 11 points from its rating in GFCI 2, after slipping slightly across the board in assessments made after the difficulties of Northern Rock and the publication of proposed changes in the tax treatment of non-domiciled residents, and in the light of continuing criticism of its airport and other transport infrastructure. London does, however, remain in the top quartile of instrumental factors (see Appendix C), and is still rated very highly by most questionnaire respondents, demonstrating its resilience as a financial centre.
New York
2 (2) 786 (787) New York also remains in the top quartile in over 80% of its instrumental factors and has only dropped by one point since GFCI 2. For the first time, respondents from the banking sector rated it more highly than London, and it remained strong in all other sectors in spite of continued criticism from respondents over burdensome regulatory requirements under Sarbanes-Oxley.
Hong Kong
3 (3) 695 (697) Hong Kong remains comfortably in third place, losing only two points overall in the ratings. It also retained a strong position in the five key competitiveness areas, though slipping one place to 4 th among respondents in the insurance sector.
Singapore
4 (4) 675 (673) Singapore performs well in GFCI 3, moving two points closer to Hong Kong. It was one of only two of the top ten to gain points (the other being Tokyo), and was rated 5 th in the world by respondents in the insurance sector, where it had failed to make the top ten previously. Singapore’s banking regulatory environment is still perceived as very strong.
Zurich
5 (5) 665 (666) Zurich remains the strongest niche centre in GFCI 3. Private banking and asset management are its key specialisms. Its high ratings in the key areas of competitiveness have not changed since GFCI 2 and it has gained 35 points in Insurance.
Frankfurt
6 (6) 642 (649) Frankfurt remains a key European hub for finance. It improved its standing on people and labour issues since GFCI 2 among respondents, and remained strong on other competitive factors, including professional services.
Geneva
7 (7) 640 (645) Geneva is the third financial centre in continental Europe, with continuing high ratings for asset management, banking, and government/regulatory issues. It has, however, slipped in ratings for insurance and professional services.
Chicago
8 (8) 637 (639) The number two centre in the US received higher ratings in GFCI 3 than previously in several competitive areas, especially business environment, and general competitiveness, as well as for banking and government/regulatory issues.
Tokyo
9 (10) 628 (625) Tokyo has overtaken Sydney to move into ninth place. It and Singapore are the only two centres in the top ten to gain points in the GFCI 3 ratings. Its economy continues to strengthen, and it has the second-largest stock market in the world (by capitalisation). These two features offset long-term regulatory difficulties and poor access to international financial personnel.
Sydney
10 (9) 621 (636) Sydney dropped to 10 th place in GFCI 3, but was rated highly by respondents in the banking sector and will continue to be a key regional hub in Asia-Pacific. In spite of its geographic isolation, it has strong advantages in English language markets, and quality of life.
QUOTE(Amen @ Oct 27 2008, 02:12 PM) [snapback]3984824[/snapback]
did they? or do you assume it because of your weak ego?
There's no assumption. Nomura DID buy up Lehman Brothers's entire Asia division and MFUJ owns huge chunk of Morgan Stanley. Both of which Chinese and Korean banks were trying to get a piece of.
QUOTE(manko @ Oct 27 2008, 06:55 PM) [snapback]3985207[/snapback]
There's no assumption. Nomura DID buy up Lehman Brothers's entire Asia division and MFUJ owns huge chunk of Morgan Stanley.Both of which Chinese and Korean banks were trying to get a piece of.
lol. ENTIRE ASIAN DIVISION??
I smell a DIRTY JEW.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.