The Nom scipt that look like a r-ice field frozen in time.

First translation in accordance to Mr. Who:

Given an unclear problem that seek a clear answer requires a set of assumptions. So, in fact, the clear answer varies with this set. Each assumption has it own geometry: for example, one assumption that are build on another look like target sign on 2-d plane or a tower in 3-d space with gravity, with the fall of one assumption led to another. But indeed, the dependent of the clear answer on each tower varies; as such, each tower has it own size measurable with respect to one certain tower in this simple sienerio. But these size varies like a cell obsevrable on a microscope or that of swading building in an earthquake in certain situation; perhaps, like that of a rice field on a summer breeze. Normalization of its size depending on it effect of its outcome allow us the benefit of frozen assumptions. Like that of a beautiful butterfy aroma that cursed a storm out beyond our ocean shore, was it all a dream I asked. Yes it is, yes it is. And no, it is not a dream. But what of use when one have control nature itself, for it very beauty or beasty is destroyed. For I prefer its beauty of what it once was, a simple rice field under the sun.

For example, a note was pass around during class and has "Kiss that man." written on it. How might the reader react?

Fact: The reader did read the note. The note stated "Kiss that man." It was during class as in school. There are more than one student.

Logico: The reaction of the reader is dependent on his/her personality and how he/she intepreted this note.

Intepretation set1 = { Kiss that man (commandative), Kiss that man (desciptive),...}
Intepretation set2 = { Don't kiss that man (commandative), Don't kiss that man (desciptive),...}
Intepretation set3 = { Kiss this man (commandative), Kiss this man (desciptive), Kiss this man (Interrotative),...}
Intepretation set4 = { Kiss that woman (commadative), Kiss that woman (desciptive),...}
Intepretation set5 = { Kiss these men (commadative), Kiss these men (desciptive),...}
.
.
.

The existence of set1 came from common sense as the sentence is unclear. The existence of set2 came from the power of intention and FFLogico . The existence of set3, set4,... came from the fact that even through the sentence marker end a though communicated over this note, the unclear sentence and FFLogico can break it mark or seal, thus "Kiss that man." could be "kiss that man". It is therefore, in accordance to FFLogico and the power of intention we have set3, set4,...

Building 1:
[artificial basement/foundation]If the reader intepreted it as "Kiss that man (commandative)."
[1st floor]Then dependending on her or he they will react in different manner.
[2nd floor]Then dependending on he/she gay, lesbian, no sexuality he/she will react in different manner.
[3rd floor]Then dependending on his/her opponent/s he/she will react in different manner.
[4th floor]Then depending on the accumulative personality in relation to "lust/shyness/respect..." he/she will react in different manner.
.
.

Buiding 2:
[artificial basement/foundation]If the reader intepreted it as "Kiss that man (commandative)."
[1st floor]...
.
.

.
.
.


It is clear that her/his intepretion is dependent on his/her personality. The founding of this "city" allow for us to analyze his/her reaction. As the note move from one person to another, this "city" changed like a rice field reacting to a summer breeze.