Channel classification of Northeast Asia
XIUNGNU(匈奴) TYPE - Sushen (肅愼), Mohe 靺鞨, Jurchen (女眞), Tujue 突厥 KITAN契丹, Turkey (the west variation of MONGOL TUJUE), Hungary (the west variation of MONGOL XIUNGNU-HUN), THE TERRITORY OF COMMON NAME-ALTAIC LANGUIGE. Horse riding nomadism TUNGUS races
ASADAL(阿斯達) JOSEON(朝鮮) TYPE - To the Korean Peninsula and the Japanese archipelago Pacific Ocean orgin and AINU COMBINATION,XIUNGNU comes to be more in the GROUP.
Flows IN a large scale steadily and the northern continent type(mogolian nomad) became main stream of the group.
THE initial of human civilization.
Will be able to define THIS AS tungus races which threw away a nomadic folk character.
YE濊, MAECK貊, BURU夫餘, THREE HAHN FRDERATION三韓, Koguryo高句麗, KUDARA百濟, Shilla新羅, GAYA加耶 , YAYOI WA 彌生 倭(=THREE HAHN WA 三韓 倭), YAMATO WA 大和 倭(=BURU WA夫餘 倭),
CHINESE TYPE - the artificial RACIAL group which USES artificial LANGUAGE OF CHINA.
秦 Qin Dynasty, 漢 Han Dynasty, 宋 song dynasty, 明 ming Dynasty,
Xia-Shang-Zhou夏-商-周, liao-Chin- Yuan-Qing 遼-金-元-淸 are NATURAL tugus not ARTIFICIAL chinese.
There is only basis layer of altaic in Korean language
The Korean language is different much with other altaic languages in the aspect of pronoun, numerals, body expression, and grammar structure.
It is ambiguous that Korean language could be included in altaics.
-Ramstedt, Gustaf John-
The Korean language and Japanese, when seeing these two languages from the different language group, are to be considered a twin language where the frame of language is extremely similar.
Ainu, Japanese, Korean language is another Northeast Asian language CLASIFICATION which is independent from altaic (ANCIENT Asadal joseon阿斯達 朝鮮 language group)
please distinguish between BURU夫餘 and THREE HAHN 三韓, and between Asadal JOSEON(朝鮮) and XIUNGNU(匈奴).
The Upper Xiajiadian culture 夏家店上層=XIUNGNU(匈奴)
The Lower Xiajiadian culture 夏家店下層=Asadal joseon阿斯達 朝鮮
Hua Xia culture 華夏=CHINA
Chinese who shout chinese支那-hung shan 紅山 civilization, chinese支那-BURU夫餘 horse riding race, ancient chiese dan-gun檀君, chinese goguryeo高句麗, and Korean who sing loudly LIKE haemosu解慕漱 yongaesomun淵蓋蘇文 qingiskhan and native american all belong to proto korean race, are all the same.
THE FORMING PROCESS OF THREE COUNTRIES(高句麗, 百濟, SHILLA新羅 IN ANCIENT KOREAN PENINSULA IS THE PROCESS WHERE AGRICULTURAL ASADL GROUP -THREE HAHN FEDERATION三韓 朝鮮 WAS CONQUERED AND RULED BY HORSE RIDING ASADAL GROUP BURU夫餘 朝鮮.
THE EXCEPTION IS SHILLA 新羅.
THE RULING GROUP OF SHILLA 新羅 IS NOT ASADAL JOSEON TYPE BUT XIUNGNU匈奴.
THOSE ALL WERE ORIGINATED FROM THE COLAPSE OF HAHN韓 DAN-GUN檀君 ASADAL JOSEON AND
usurpation OF authority OR coup-FROM HAHN韓 DAN-GUN檀君 TO HAE解 DAN-GUN檀君 DONE BY HAEMOSU解慕漱.
ORIGINAL authority DAN-GUN檀君 HAHN 韓 SIDE IS AGRICULTURAL THREE HAHN FEDERATION三韓, usurpation OR coup SIDE IS horse riding race BURU夫餘
THE UNRULED GROUP OF GOGURYEO高句麗, KUDARA百濟 AND SHILLA 新羅 IN ANCIENT KOREAN PENINSULA WAS THREE HAHN ASADAL三韓 阿斯達 朝鮮 PEOPLE WHO ARE PROTO KOREAN, AND THE RULING GROUP OF GOGURYEO高句麗 AND KUDARA百濟 IS BURU ASADAL夫餘 阿斯達 朝鮮 PEOPLE WHO ARE PROTO JAPAN.
THEREFORE, THE RULEDS IN THREE COUNTRIES WERE COMMUNICATIVE EACH OTHER(KOREAN), AND SO(JAPANESE) WERE RULLINGS OF GOGURYEO高句麗, KUDARA百濟.
DIFFERENT LANGUAGES WERE USED BETWEEN RULEDS AND RULLINGS IN KUDARA百濟.
HAEMOSU解慕漱 AND GODAMDUCK高談德=Goguryeo高句麗 GREAT KING 好太王 USED NOT AGRICULTURAL THREE HAHN 三韓-KOREAN LANGUAGE BUT horse riding BURU夫餘-JAPANESE.
THERE IS NO KOREAN IN CLASIFICATION OF NOTHEASTERN LANGUAGE.
AT LEAST THAT`S THE WAY ACCEPTED OVER THE WORLD
INSTEAD, BURU夫餘 LANGUAGE GROUP EXISTED.
MAYBE THAT`S THE RESULT FROM RESERCH AND SPREADS OF JAPANESE SCHOLARS IN EARLY 20TH`S.
JAPANESE language classification EXISTED, OF COURSE.
ARE KOREAN LINGUISTIC SCHOLARS NO MATCH FOR THOSE OF JAPAN OF 80 YEARS AGO?
BURU夫餘 LANGUAGE IS UNDER Japanese language classification ACCORDING TO WORLD OFFICIAL LINGUISTIC SCHOLARSHIP.
GOGURYEO高句麗, AND KUDARA百濟 ARE NOT KOREA BUT JAPAN?
PROF. Christopher Beckwith OF INDIANA UNIV. IS PRESENTING THE STRONG AND ACTUAL CLUES TO THIS THEORY.
FOR INSTANCE, THE MOST FUNDERMENTAL GRAMMAR
-the possessive case IS ALL THE SAME AS の[no] IN
GOGURYEO高句麗, KUDARA百濟 AND JAPAN.
ALSO a conjunction し[shi].
Besides, most of language known so far has major similarity with Japanese.
WHO IS THE OFFSPRING OF GOGURYEO高句麗, CHINA, KOREA, JAPAN?
coincidence of numerals between GOGURYEO高句麗, KUDARA百濟 AND JAPAN.
[みっつ(3)mit-tsu]=密 mir<彌知 mit
[むっつ(6)mut-tsu] change -i- to -u- in mittsu(3)
[いつつ(5)itsu-tsu]=于次 itcha
[なな(7)nan-a]=難隱 nan
[とお(10)to-]德tog
mind:居尸 kor =心 ko-kor-o
child:仇斯 kus =子 ko
bear:功木 kom =熊 kum-a
tree:? ki =木 ki
castle:己, 只, 紀 ki =小城 ogi(small castle,小[o]=small, 城gi=castle)
cf.水城 mizuki=water castle.
lead:乃勿 naimur= 鉛 なまり nam-ar-i
wave:內米 naimi= 波 なみ nam-i
valley:旦, 呑, 頓 tan =谷 たにtan-i
mountain:達 tar =岳, 高い [tak-e], [tak-a-i]
red:沙非 sabi =?びる sabi-ru
willow:要un youn =柳 yana
rabbit:烏斯含 osah-am(usig-am) 兎, = うさぎ, おさぎ u-sag-i, o-sag-i
dog:仍斤? iŋna-i =犬 いぬ in-u
~si(conjunction), ~no(posessive) most fundumental fact in grammar, game over.
Haemosu解慕漱 spoke japanese...
KOREA HAS NO DIRECT CONNECTION TO GOGURYEO高句麗 AND KUDARA百濟
UNLESS KUDARA百濟 IS JAPANESE HISTORY, DAN-GUN檀君 WOULD BE ANCIENT CHINESE.
IS CHINESE LANGUAGE ARTIFICIAL ONE?
CHINESE LANGUAGE IS EXOTIC TO ANY LANGUAGE IN THE WORLD.
IN CHINESE, EVERY MEANING FACTOR CONSISTS OF ONE syllable.
ONE MEANING FACTOR ALWAYS MATCHES ONE syllable! ALWAYS!
ONE MEANING OF FATHER IS FORMED OF ONE CHARACTOR 父 AND CORRESPONDING SOUND VALUE OF ONE syllable [fu-].
THERE IS NEVER EXCEPTION OF THIS IN CHINESE.
I ONE CHARACTOR 我 ONE SYLLABLE [wo]
YOU ONE CHARACTOR 汝 ONE SYLLABLE[ni]
SIS-TER ONE CHARACTOR妹 ONE SYLLABLE[mei]
MA-THER ONE CHARACTOR 母 ONE SYLLABLE[mu]
MOUN-TAIN ONE CHARACTOR山 ONE SYLLABLE[shan]
TRANS-MITT-ING ONE CHARACTOR 過ONE SYLLABLE[guo]
MEA-SURE-MENT ONE CHARACTOR 測ONE SYLLABLE[ce]
BUI-TI-FUL ONE CHARACTOR 美 ONE SYLLABLE[mi]
IT IS PLAUSIBLE AND NATURAL THAT ONE MEANING IS PROJECTED TO ONE CHARACTOR, BUT IS IT POSSIBLE THAT ONE MEANING ALWAYS CONSISTS OF ONE SYLLABLE IN NATURAL SITUATION?
ISN`T IT STRANGE?
SPOKEN WORD IN CHINESE MUST BE NOTHING BUT SOUND WHICH IS CORRESPONDING AND ACRUED TO THE WRITTEN WORD AS THE MEANS OF READING OR PRONOUNCING THE WRITTEN WORD.
SO TO SPEAK, THERE EXISTED WRITTEN WORD BEFORE SPOKEN LANGUAGE DID.
THEN, AT THE MOMENT THE LETTER WAS MADE,
A. THERE WOULD NOT BE SPOKEN LANGUAGE
OR
B. WOULD BE NATURAL LANGUAGE WHICH IS LINGUISTIC SYSTEMETICALY DIFFERENT WITH CURRENT ONE WHICH MUST BE NOTHING BUT THE MEANS OF PRONOUNCING THE LETTER.
A. CAN THE PEOPLE NOT HAVING SPOKEN LANGUAGE MAKE WRITTEN WORD?
OR
B. WOULD`VE CERTAIN PEOPLE THEMSELVES CHANGED THEIR LANGUAGE SYSTEM FROM NATURAL ONE TO ARTIFITIAL ONE WHICH IS FOLLOWING OR subordinated TO THE LETTER AFTER THEY INVENTED THE LETTER?
BOTH ARE IMPOSSIBLE.
SO, HERE WE ARE CONVINCED CHINESE SPOKEN LANGUAGE IS NOT NATURAL BUT ARTIFITIAL, AND THE SUBJECT WHO ARE USING THE LANGUAGE MUST NOT BE THE SAME SUBJECT WHO FORMED THE LANGUAGE.
CHINESE IS ARTIFICIAL LANGUAGE.
1. ALL THE FACTORS CONSIST OF ONE SYLLABLE OF WORD OR BUNDLE OF THEM.
2. THE SENTENCE OF CHINESE IS FORMED OF SIMPLE POSITIONING OF WORD WITHOUT GRAMMARLY DIMENSIONAL STRUCTURE,
EACH WORD HAS NO stem, NO termination, NO declension, NO tense, NO PLAURAL, NO SEX, NO VARIATION. NOTHING.
3. CHINESE IS ARTIFICIAL LANGUAGE WHICH WAS MADE AS LETTER FORMER, AND OF WHICH THE SPOKEN ONE WAS DERIVED FROM THE WRITTEN, LATTER.
THERE WASN`T CHARACTORISTIC CHINESE SPOKEN LANGUAGE WHEN THE LETTER WAS INVENTED.
4. A GROUP OF PEOPLE NOT HAVING SPOKEN LANGUAGE NANNOT INVENT THE LETTER.
OR
A GROUP OF PEOPLE WHO, AFTER INVENTED THE LETTER, THEMSELVES CHANGED THEIR SPOKEN LANGUAGE SYSTEM FROM NATURAL ONE TO ARTIFITIAL ONE WHICH IS FOLLOWING OR subordinated TO THE LETTER, OR THE OFFSPRING OF THEM CANNOT BE CONSIDERED THE SAME TYPE OF PEOPLE WITH THEIR ANCESTER WHO WERE IN NATURAL LINGUISTIC SYSTEM.
5.IN CHINESE LANGUAGE THE SUBJECT WHO ARE USING THE LANGUAGE MUST NOT BE THE SAME SUBJECT WHO FORMED THE LANGUAGE.
CHINESE WAS MADE BY EXOTIC RASE(TUNGUS) WHO WERE IN NATURAL LINGUISTIC SYSTEM, AND ADOPTED TO CHINESE PEOPLE ARTIFICIALY.
Those ABOVE ARE THE REASON CHINA ARE ALWAYS DEFEATED IN THE HISTORY ISSUE ALTHOUGH ABUNDANT CULTURE AND ENORMOUS ECONOMY BACK UP THEM.
IDENTITY OF CHINA-ARTIFICIAL RACE FORMED BY EXOTIC PEOPLE.
http://blogfiles2.naver.net/data14/2005/12...e-zorbapark.gif
PLEASE CONFIRM THAT TUNGUS GOGURYEO高句麗 AND QINGISKHAN CANNOT BE
HISTORY OF CHINA-ARTIFICIAL TRIBE.
AN ACT OF BARBARITY OF CHINA
PLEASE VISIT AND CHECK AT
http://blog.naver.com/hollybaikal/10017490029
THE PYRAMID COULD NEVER BE CHINESE-THE ARTIFICIAL TRIBE.
THERFORE THEY DESTROY, HIDE, REFORM, DISTORT.
THEY ALREADY BURY THE GOGURYEO高句麗 PYRAMID COMPLEX IN Ji'an 集安 MANCHURIA ALTERNATING IT AS DAM
THE HISTORY DISTORTION CONDUCTED BY Ssuma Ch'ien司馬遷.
"THE 25 BOOKS OF Ssuma Ch'ien司馬遷`S Shiji 史記 IS DESPERATE REFORMATION REVERSING THE FACT THAT DAN-GUN檀君 ASADAL阿斯達 朝鮮 RULED THE CHINA INTO THE OPPOSITE
THE NAME OF CHINESE DYNASTY HAN 漢 IS STRAITLY BORROWED FROM TUNGUS ASADAL THREE HAHN 韓"
-JAPANESE HISTIRIAN AGOU KIYOHIKO 吾鄕淸彦
VISIT http://blogfiles2.naver.net/data14/2005/12...e-zorbapark.gif
DRAVIDIAN AND SUMERIAN IS NOT LOCALY ORIGINATED NATIVES, THEY WERE TUNGUS ASIAN IMMIGRANT.
PLEASE STUDY KOREAN, SUMERIAN, DRAVIDIAN languages.
PLEASE DISTINGUISH SIMPLY BORROWING WORD FROM FUNDURMENTAL LINGUISTIC STRUCTURE.
THOSE ARE THE FLESH AND BONE IN LANGUAGE.
WORD-FLEXIBLE-FLESH.
STRUCTURE-CONSTANT-BONE.
ABOUT HALF OF ALL WORD IN KOREAN IS BORROWED FROM CHINESE.
IT SHOWS JUST CULURAL INFLUENCE FROM CHINA.
IT`S NOT ABOUT FUNDURMENTAL BASIS OF THE GROUP OF PEOPLE.
YOU WOULD FIND THAT IF YOU UNDERSTAND JUST WORD-FLEXIBLE-FLESH AND STRUCTURE-CONSTANT-BONE.
EXTREME SIMILARITY OF STRUCTURE-BONE BETWEEN KOREAN AND JAPANESE SHOWS THEIR ID.
THERE IS NO BONE IN CHINES LANGUAGE.
SO IT COULD NEVER HAVE RELATION TO ANY OTHER LANGUAGE. NATURALLY SO BECAUSE IT`S ARTIFICIAL.
IT`S SNOWMAN.
Xia-Shang-Zhou夏-商-周, liao-Chin- Yuan-Qing 遼-金-元-淸 are NATURAL tugus not ARTIFICIAL chinese.