QUOTE (BurdenOfAges @ Aug 24 2009, 11:53 PM)

"I don't live this double life, benefiting from the fact that my house is built on some other tribe's land and then pretending to regret that. I'll always remember having to study Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee, and everyone sobbing for the poor Indians, but nobody's gonna give them the land back. I mean, one way or the f*#king other: either you give them the land back, or you admit you're a predator and you eat meat.""
- Gary Brecher, War Nerd
ShawnSPS might represent a fringe opinion, or he might not. Either way, though, you guys should face the facts.
You are here because the Europeans conquered this land, and then invited you to join them for mutual economic benefits. Course it took a lot of convincing - Chinese Exclusion Act, anti-Asian immigration policies, and all that - but in the end the Western elites signed the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and decided that they couldn't hold your race against you when it came to immigration (there are other things they hold against you, but officially at least, it's not race). So in you came - sharing in the conqueror's spoils.
And it's nothing new, of course. The European elites have been doing this (moving people from one part of the world to another for their own profits) for a long time. It's part of their imperial culture. When Europe's own peoples became too lazy and/or rebellious and/or decadent to serve them, they turned to others. Like you.
Are Koreans going to support Sioux independence? Are Chinese going to help the Native Americans get their land back? Are Japanese going to return Hawaii back to the natives?
Don't be ridiculous. And if not, then what's the point of all this "Mongoloid unity?" Mongoloid is not even an identity. It's certainly nothing compared to the heritage that China, Japan, and Korea share, and they hate each other.
There's no point to talking about cooperation when you don't share the same interests, and there's no point to talking about unity when you don't even have your own house (meaning East Asia) in order.
Long time lurker at AF, new comer here at posting.
I like to point out something here as this is a topic that has always remained something close to me and it is of a concept that has kindled
certain passions inside me about perceptions relating to peoples who share close ties with Asian peoples and how it relates to my long time view that
there is more to be gained in this unity and cooperation as well as understanding (much broader scope of "Asian" Unity if one could ascribed such a thing) between our peoples rather than disunity and bickering and lack of understanding ona number of things, both broad and personal.
The truth of the matter is, We're much more closer than we think if we take into account all kinds of internal and external factors about our situations and our place in today's world.
As an East Asian myself, but whose life has been enriched all these years with long term and deep friendships and relations with folks from a number of indigenous backgrounds in the West including mingling and being close friends with folks belonging to the groups in the centre of this discussion here. I cannot help but point out here while there is no incentive, whether economic or political etc, for our peoples to come together, let alone come together at all in some imagined awkward embrace of universalhood in some pretentious "kumba ya" situation,
I am of the conviction that both our peoples on this side of the great blue yonder, of Asia and the Pacific and the peoples in that distant land (where once upon a time immemorial their ancestors of a cousin crossed over) are in a much better position than any other group in the world, to build bridges and to see and be astounded at how much commonalities all of us possess in relation to our understanding, our values, our perceptions of this world, and perhaps beyond that as well.
The potential to see our kinship and our commonalities should be emphasized just because, if not for the sake of seeing how great a potential future could be if we DID work together and I can tell you from my personal experience, it's worth it.
Yes we, understand the history, the politics, the social climate and all these issues. But in everything that an Asian or a Native American might bicker about concerning our personal attributes or non sequitur issues, there is more to be unlocked when we see how much is to be gained when we realize our links and work together.
It is not an identity, as such. No presecribed structure by academia or whathaveyou can label it. But I would try my best and say that contemplating building bridges of all kinds between Asians and Native Americans/Maori/Pacific Islanders etc. is an aspiration, an ideal that lurks, beckons beyond our perceived horizon, a dream that is still yet to even make manifest in the mind. Why? Because it reiterates just how dynamic and wonderful and diverse our humanity is. But even more so, with regards to when two distinct peoples of separate continents yet who amazingly share a kinship like no other peoples, a kinship that is cultural, behavioural, racial, social, even genetic, and perhaps even similar in spiritual outlook, when the two connect with each other and see how they in particular share distant yet distinct cultural bonds, it is just something to behold. Although I am not a Christian, I do marvel at the Biblical principle that the Book of Psalms says: "How good and how pleasant it is, for brothers and sisters to dwell together." and I and my own friends clearly see this with regards to Asians and Native Americans.
While I agree that "Mongoloid" unity whatever that is (and I agree that it is a pretty outlandish term) is absurd and is not something that is feasible in the current socio-political climate and I don't think many of the folks here are arguing in that tangent, I and probably other posters here do subscribe to the kind of optimistic vision that because our peoples and their peoples share so much there is alot to be gained, because the potential for social empowerment on so many levels you cannot imagine is there.
If I had more time right now, perhaps I can elaborate further in a discussion. But perhaps another time. I understand I am likely sounding very fantasizing about this. But I would say that connecting between our two sets of peoples is not something of a political goal (well as of now anyway) but it is a moral argument if not an imperative if we're to see that mentioned empowerment.