This could be potentially a very interesting time. China is going out of its way to itemise and highlight the activities of those overseas groups that it blames for orchestrating the violence in Xinjiang and by extension pointing the finger at those official and Government agencies that support them.
Simple question, if 180 US citizens were killed in this way and Washington started highlighting the activities of the groups responsible and those Governments that supported them, where would you assume it was leading?
So, do you think China is thinking anything different and what reprisal action do you think, China could, should or will take?
Full Version: How to deal with Foriegn Interference
QUOTE (Sampanviking @ Jul 13 2009, 05:07 PM) 
This could be potentially a very interesting time. China is going out of its way to itemise and highlight the activities of those overseas groups that it blames for orchestrating the violence in Xinjiang and by extension pointing the finger at those official and Government agencies that support them.
Simple question, if 180 US citizens were killed in this way and Washington started highlighting the activities of the groups responsible and those Governments that supported them, where would you assume it was leading?
So, do you think China is thinking anything different and what reprisal action do you think, China could, should or will take?
Simple question, if 180 US citizens were killed in this way and Washington started highlighting the activities of the groups responsible and those Governments that supported them, where would you assume it was leading?
So, do you think China is thinking anything different and what reprisal action do you think, China could, should or will take?
I thought the strong nationalism shown by general chinese population during the tibet event are what pushed back the west's interference. The west and Dalai lamar miscalculated the response of the chinese people. I think the west has learned that therefore the xinjinag event response by the west was no where near the one shown during the tibet event. It also has something to do with uighurs being muslims whereas Tibetans are not.
What's going on anyway? what's provoking the Uighur to a revolt? is there any known anti-uighur elements in China that may provoke this event?
QUOTE (Comancheros1 @ Jul 16 2009, 12:21 PM)
SyedHussein, stop sucking up. The Uighurs are revolting for the same reason why forcefully occupied nations revolt. They want their land back from the Chinese who attacked and annexed them in 1949. They also want their culture back which has been swamped by the millions of Han Chinese who have been sent there over 5 decades.
stop twisting facts. it was a few radical uighurs that did. to say "the uighurs" you need to be talking about the majority. the majority didnt do anything.
QUOTE (Comancheros1 @ Jul 16 2009, 12:42 PM)
Frankly the repressive chinese system doesn't really understand any other language. Pacifism and non-violence are perceived as weaknesses. Aggression is perceived as a strength. That is how you grabbed the Uighur land in the first place.
that could be true. if the radicals want to go down that route, im sure the CCP will oblige. its their funeral though.
QUOTE (SyedHussein @ Jul 15 2009, 08:55 AM)
What's going on anyway? what's provoking the Uighur to a revolt? is there any known anti-uighur elements in China that may provoke this event?
basically the polices caught some men (4-6 people) who have different ideology with the government. and then there's a group of people ( around more than 1000 peole ) walked on the road with all the banners and shoutcast, asked to release them ( i think it's peaceful way, because there's no violence. )
the polices refused and then to suppress and disband the crowd, they attacked the crowd with their guns. Few people died and the crowd got upset and started to burn public building and transports.
QUOTE (papen @ Jul 19 2009, 05:29 AM)
basically the polices caught some men (4-6 people) who have different ideology with the government. and then there's a group of people ( around more than 1000 peole ) walked on the road with all the banners and shoutcast, asked to release them ( i think it's peaceful way, because there's no violence. )
the polices refused and then to suppress and disband the crowd, they attacked the crowd with their guns. Few people died and the crowd got upset and started to burn public building and transports.
the polices refused and then to suppress and disband the crowd, they attacked the crowd with their guns. Few people died and the crowd got upset and started to burn public building and transports.
Stop spreading lies.
You made wrong assertion since your first sentence.
Who are you? Another troll?
Please go away and troll some other forums.
QUOTE (Sampanviking @ Jul 13 2009, 06:07 PM)
This could be potentially a very interesting time. China is going out of its way to itemise and highlight the activities of those overseas groups that it blames for orchestrating the violence in Xinjiang and by extension pointing the finger at those official and Government agencies that support them.
Simple question, if 180 US citizens were killed in this way and Washington started highlighting the activities of the groups responsible and those Governments that supported them, where would you assume it was leading?
So, do you think China is thinking anything different and what reprisal action do you think, China could, should or will take?
Simple question, if 180 US citizens were killed in this way and Washington started highlighting the activities of the groups responsible and those Governments that supported them, where would you assume it was leading?
So, do you think China is thinking anything different and what reprisal action do you think, China could, should or will take?
China should return the favor by instigating their own internal problems and racial tension.
By "they" I mean USA and any other countries who participate in that sabotage operation.
America will always interfere with other nations capable of challenging it and would the christian rigt wing to help them. Pretty soon, it would be a "christian imperative" to help the taliban in xinjiang
white christians have had enough of the taliban already, and of tolerating some of their secret services to subsidize anti-communist islamic jihads.
they know already what they get from this. sure no respect by islam. they increase number of domestic radicals.
if you really manage to meet in uiguristan a fifth column that is under angloamerican control, it must be the most stupid people ever who are involved in this. you know the west is not entirely monolithic, not even the US.
they know already what they get from this. sure no respect by islam. they increase number of domestic radicals.
if you really manage to meet in uiguristan a fifth column that is under angloamerican control, it must be the most stupid people ever who are involved in this. you know the west is not entirely monolithic, not even the US.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.