QUOTE
The Umayyad hijack the Caliphate "kursi" from the Salaf.... bidaah the Caliphate "kursi" from "As-Shuarah" to "Monarchic". Their Kings as Yazid bin Muawiyah (you had brought up in other post) are not good examples of Muslims. A lot of innovations and fake hadiths were introduced in this era. To relate to them as examples to reflect the true Islam is an error.
Hi Mr Radzi
Only the Shia Muslim accused the Umayyad and Abbasid of iniquity and injustice. The statement that many hadiths were fabricated by the House of Umayyad and the House of Abbasids can be said the same for Shia themselves. Muawiya Bin Abu Sufyan was considered as one of the Sahabah, Companion, clerk who wrote down revelation(wahy). Are you saying that you are more knowledgable than him with regards of caliphate matter? He himself designated his son, Yazid as the caliph of all Muslims at that time after deceptively won over the Majlis At-Tahkim.
Since you considered Ali Bin Abu Talib as one of the rightly-guided caliph, then please explain this: Narrated Buraida:
The Prophet sent 'Ali to Khalid to bring the Khumus (of the booty) and I hated Ali, and 'Ali had taken a bath (after a sexual act with a slave-girl from the Khumus). I said to Khalid, "Don't you see this (i.e. Ali)?" When we reached the Prophet I mentioned that to him. He said, "O Buraida! Do you hate Ali?" I said, "Yes." He said, "Do you hate him, for he deserves more than that from the Khumus." Shahih Bukhari 5.59.637You see Mr Radzi, Muslims are always brainwashed with the bravery and asceticism of Ali Bin Abu Talib, however, little do they emphasize that this person was given female slave from booty obtained from war and then conveniently having sexual intercourse with them. If you believe that a Muslim soldier has the right to own female slave from captive of war so as to utilize them sexually, this is called rape, Mr Radzi.
All the Muslim caliphs including their sons owned and traded slaves.
Check Muwatta' Imam Malik, Book 2, Number 2.23.90:Yahya related to me from Malik from Nafi that the slave girls of Abdullah ibn Umar used to wash his feet and bring him a mat of palm leaves while they were menstruating.
Malik was asked whether a man who had women and slave girls could have intercourse with all of them before he did ghusl. He said, "There is no harm in a man having intercourse with two of his slave girls before he does ghusl. It is disapproved of, however, to go to a freewoman on another's day. There is no harm in making love first to one slave girl and then to another when one is junub."
Malik was asked about a man who was junub and water was put down for him to do ghusl with.Then he forgot and put his finger into it to find out whether it was hot or cold. Malik said, "If no filth has soiled his fingers, I do not consider that that makes the water impure."Cant you see? Cant you smell the fish? Muslims had been reading all those hadiths and stories without the slightest hint of the moral values in it. They thought that it's the expediency of that time that allowed all these immoral attitude. Even the marriage to 6 year old Aisha was now twisted to 14 or 16 year old in order to fit the modern day secular humanistic values. That's because people begin to pinpoint all these stories and protest with question such as "Is this the moral qualities of a "Prophet"?
Humanity is but one family.