Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Is Indonesia regressing back into the dark age?
Asia Finest Discussion Forum > Asian Culture > Indonesian Chat
gabrielj81
Various provinces in Indonesia are adopting a strict form of Sharia law, including stoning for adulterers, chopping off the hands of thieves, caning those who drink alcohol, and so on. Everyone is also required to pray five times a day, fast during Ramadan, and adopt Muslim dress.

http://www.news.com.au/story/0,27574,26050186-23109,00.html
flipcombatmedic
But isn't Aceh been kinda nutty for a while? LOL. I mean Aceh and fundamentalism isn't really new.
jrockerz
well its the price of full freedom of state,
if you dont like just move to another province, which is much more freedom than before 1998 in indonesia

personally i strongly not agree with aceh strict law, but hey, they can live with it.
if the most public dont agree why should you push every kind liberal ideology to one nation?

kelapa
The news is overdue. According to the newest survey (released around a month ag0 in 2009), support for sharia laws diminished significantly from people because it is imposing more restrictions and used by the local government only to gain sympathies.
Ralf
QUOTE (jrockerz @ Sep 10 2009, 11:49 AM) *
well its the price of full freedom of state.....
Hmmm.... the GAM rebels were never so severe with all this fire-and-brimstone punishment scenario.
I strongly suspect the people who fought for autonomy from the Java-centric government are not the same people who are now ruling Aceh.
Looks like one type of tyranny has been replaced with another type.
Perhaps the new clerics and kingpins are just opportunists who stepped in to fill the vacuum left by GAM.
Aceh is more devoted to a spiritual lifestyle than other parts of Indonesia, and it is sometimes called the "window on Mecca", and the religion of Islam was a strong unifying power in the struggle against the colonial forces.
But when the staunchly secular Jakarta government starts offering sharia laws, I smell a rat.
From my chats with Indonesian students and from watching documentaries about Gerakan Aceh Merdeka, the original leaders pushing for freedom were more concerned about being exploited and dominated by Jakarta and the abuse of power by the Indonesian military forces, than ever wanting to install sharia law.
GAM and the hardline clerics were ideologically not even on the same page.
Also to assume that the long-suffering rakyat of Aceh wants sharia law is wrong.
The times have changed since Islam first came to the "window on Mecca". We now have groups in Aceh defending women's issues.... we have pop culture.... we have Human rights.... modern laws.
It seems to me that this proposal by the Jakarta government to allow full sharia law in Aceh is just a political move to win support of the powerful clerics in northern Sumatra.

Any search of the internet will show plenty of critical journalism examining this issue.
Here's one such article from the Jakarta Post newspaper :

QUOTE
The unwanted gift to Aceh…and Indonesia
Julia Suryakusuma , Jakarta | Wed, 08/26/2009 10:33 AM |

Giving the right gift is an art. It takes time, consideration and effort. And, despite the best efforts of friends and family the best gift is often one you choose yourself.

It seems that the Acehnese understand this principle. How so?

Remember the long-running conflict in Aceh, on the northernmost tip of Sumatra?
Tragically, it took the devastating tsunami of December 2004 to finally trigger an end to about three decades of conflict between the Indonesian government and the separatist Free Aceh Movement, better known as GAM (Gerakan Aceh Merdeka).
The tsunami eventually led to the Helsinki Peace Agreement, signed on Aug. 15, 2005 (almost exactly four years ago), officially ending the conflict between GAM and Jakarta.
But years before the tsunami struck, talks were held and peace packets offered, and one of them led to the limited implementation of sharia. In 1999, Aceh was gifted special status by Jakarta, and in 2002 formal sharia-isation began, with the full support of the provincial government.

Cynics say it was a ploy by Jakarta to win over local Muslim clerics, and this was probably true. Aceh is considered to be one of the strongholds of Islam and is often called Serambi Mekah (Mecca’s veranda) because it’s thought of as one of the main portals for the entry of Islam into South East Asia. So it is a natural assumption that Acehnese want the full implementation of Islamic law.

Or do they?
I read a paper Dr. Arskal Salim presented last week at a seminar in Melbourne (http://intranet.law.unimelb.edu.au/staff/events/files/Salim4.pdf), that revealed a new twist to the plot - quite a dramatic one, in fact.
It should give us plenty of food for thought about giving gifts.
In recent years, Arskal said, things have begun to change in Aceh, because two important new actors have stepped onto the political stage. Irwandi Yusuf, former head of GAM, was the first. He was elected Governor of Aceh in 2007.
The second new actor stepped up in 2009: Partai Aceh won 33 of the 69 seats in the April elections, making it the biggest player in the new provincial legislature (DPRA), due to be sworn in next month.
The point is that Irwandi and Partai Aceh are both basically opposed to sharia-ization – Partai Aceh even ran on an overtly non-religious platform.

Irwandi’s position is not that surprising, given that GAM was never all that keen on sharia anyway.
It has always been afraid that implementing Islamic law would hand power to the ulamas, Islamic religious scholars, GAM’s natural rival for power. And they don’t want the world to label the Acehnese “fundamentalists”.
For the same reasons, Irwandi also objects strongly to the death penalty for adultery that is proposed in a bill for a new Qanun (Acehnese Regional Regulation) on Islamic penal rules (Rancangan Qanun Hukum Jinayat) currently before the DPRA together with another on harsh Islamic penal procedures.
These were prepared for the 2007 regional legislation program (Prolega), but were only looked at in late 2008.
Can you imagine what they would do to Indonesia’s struggling human rights reforms and our international reputation if they were passed?

Maybe they won’t be. Time’s fast running out for the current legislators to do anything about the bills, which — believe it or not — would also introduce rajam (stoning).
The new DPRA will be filled with Partai Aceh faces, and it’s very unlikely they’ll pass the bills, at least not without heavy watering-down.
There are other factors that make it look like Islamization maybe won’t stick in Aceh. The Ulama Consultative Assembly (MPU, Majelis Permusyawaratan Ulama) is one of the key governance agencies in Aceh.

A relic of Soeharto’s New Order (1966-1998), it’s made up of ulamas and Muslim intellectuals, and has been an assertive supporter of harsh and conservative Islamization.
Now its political power is declining, not just because of opposition from groups including human rights NGOs and women’s organizations, but also because of the emergence of competing ulama organizations, notably HUDA and MUNA.
HUDA is the Association of the Dayah Ulama of Aceh and MUNA is the Nanggroe Aceh Ulama Council.
They have set themselves up as rivals to MPU and, despite being ulama organizations themselves, MUNA at least is more in line with Partai Aceh and Irwandi– in fact, he attended its inauguration!
Perhaps the key to understanding what’s happening in Aceh is Irwandi’s interpretation of sharia, which is not just focused on punishment. In an interview with a local women’s tabloid, Beujroh, Irwandi stated: “Economic empowerment must be considered part of sharia: Making people to be honest, improving welfare and increasing healthy lives are all core values of sharia.”
That makes sense — since when did cutting hands ever alleviate poverty? The recent elections suggest most Acehnese agree.

I think the developments in Aceh are good news for the rest of Indonesia, and are indicative of trends throughout the country: We don’t want sharia-ization!
Those who want to give us “gifts” like the Pornography Law and various Islamizing Perdas (regional ordinances) that oppress and criminalise women, and curtail freedom of expression, should take their gifts elsewhere.

Seems that the Acehnese, like the rest of the Indonesian people, would prefer to be left alone to choose their own gift of freedom and democracy!


The writer (www.juliasuryakusuma.com) is the author of Julia’s Jihad.
DutchEastIndiesMan
QUOTE
Aceh passes adultery stoning law

Indonesia's province of Aceh has passed a new law making adultery punishable by stoning to death, a member of the province's parliament has said.

The law also imposes severe sentences for rape, homosexuality, alcohol consumption and gambling.

Opponents had tried to delay the law, saying more debate was needed because it imposes capital punishment.

Sharia law was partially introduced in Aceh in 2001, as part of a government offer to pacify separatist rebels.

A peace deal in 2005 ended the 30-year insurgency, and many of the former rebels have now entered Aceh's government, which enjoys a degree of autonomy from the central government in Jakarta.

The legislation was passed unanimously by Aceh's regional legislature, said assembly member Bahrom Rasjid.

"This law will be effective in 30 days with or without the approval of Aceh's governor," he said.

The governor of Aceh, a former rebel with the Free Aceh Movement, is opposed to strict Sharia law. He had urged more debate over the bill.

'Moral degradation'

Married people convicted of adultery can be sentenced to death by stoning. Unmarried people can be sentenced to 100 lashes with a cane.

Muslim men in Aceh are expected to attend prayers every day.

Previously, Aceh's partially-adopted Sharia law enforced Muslim dress codes and mandatory prayers.

"This law is a preventive measure for Acehnese people so that they will avoid moral degradation," said Moharriyadia, a spokesman for the Prosperous Justice Party.

A new parliament will be sworn in next month, after local polls saw the moderate Aceh Party win the most seats in the provincial assembly.

The Aceh Party has said it will review the law once the new parliament is sitting.

"It needs more public consultation. We need to involve the ulemas - the Islamic clerics - in drafting the law," said Adnan Beuransah, a spokesperson for the Aceh Party.

About 90% of Indonesia's 235 million people are Muslim, practising a moderate form of the religion.


Is it just me or there was no actual plebiscite to decide on this ? How can I know for sure that this is the will of the Acehnese people rather than the will of certain individuals ?
As far as I see it, morals they are like culture they change, they are not static. Jakarta should intervene if needed.
jrockerz
http://thejakartaglobe.com/home/its-offici...top-spot/329182



Tommy Suharto (File Photo: Jewel Samad, AFP)

'Embarrassing': Tommy Suharto Launches Bid to Lead Golkar
Hutomo “Tommy” Mandala Putra, the controversial favored son of former President Suharto, confirmed on Thursday that he would run for chairman of the Golkar Party, his father’s former political vehicle.

Speaking during a news conference in Kuningan, Central Jakarta, the high-flying businessman and convicted murderer outlined his vision for the party, saying that Golkar should become an independent political party and not a member of a coalition government.

The comments were likely aimed at Coordinating Minister for People’s Welfare Aburizal Bakrie, another businessman with a questionable track record, who analysts believe has the greatest chance of becoming chairman of the former ruling party, which suffered a crushing defeat in the recent legislative elections.

Tommy brushed aside questions concerning his past, including his conviction for ordering the July 2001 murder of Supreme Court Justice Syafiuddin Kartasasmita, who convicted him of fraud in 2000, saying he respected the justice system.

The fraud conviction was later overturned and though Tommy was convicted of murder in 2002, he was released after serving just four years.

“Let the Golkar members be the judges of whether I am truly guilty or whether the law had been manipulated against me,” he said.

Hadar Gumay, head of the Jakarta-based Center for Electoral Reform, told Bloomberg that Tommy’s foray into politics, if he was allowed to run, could hurt President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono’s attempt to attract investors to help revive the economy.

“This is embarrassing,” Hadar said. “Indonesia will be seen as a place where systems cannot be relied upon. People will think that anything can be twisted.”

Political analyst Sebastian Salang criticized the decision, questioning what Tommy could bring to Golkar. “We just know that he is the son of a former president and has a lot of money. He has no experience in how to grow and maintain a party,” Salang said.

“Now the question for all Golkar members is whether they are going to give their votes to a candidate who has a lot of money, or to a candidate who can give them new power to rise up and overcome the embarrassing loss in the last election.”

Salang also questioned the direction of Golkar itself if it allowed such a controversial figure to contest the chairmanship.

Yuddy Chrisnandy, who is also contesting the position and is promoting himself as a reformer, accompanied Tommy during the news conference. He congratulated Tommy on his decision to run.

“Now there are four candidates, two from the old generation and two from the young generation of Golkar,” he said.

--------------------------------------------------------------

if you ask me which is the upcoming dark age is , id point this one
Ralf
OMG !
BENTO wanna be the Big Boss ?!?! embarassedlaugh.gif
Iwan Fals was right about that bastard.
Kantata Takwa, crank it up. rockon.gif
DutchEastIndiesMan
Tommy Suharto was never really imprisoned and had his liberty taken...Most of us would probably think that due to his imprisonment his activity would be limited, actually I believe that his "business" activity was not even affected by the imprisonment but rather have never got busier. So it's really no surprise for me or my Dad, he talks about this all the time....in a sense this is meant to happen.
Ralf
Maybe it is a sign of the "dark age" when a bag of ganja gets you 20 years, but murder lets you out after just 4 years..... if you are rich and powerful like Bento ya ?
DutchEastIndiesMan
^It's Indonesia....not the dark ages lol. icon_wink.gif
jrockerz
hmmm i guess its not good to be "maklum" all the time
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2009 Invision Power Services, Inc.