QUOTE (sakimsakapangyarihan @ Oct 11 2009, 11:58 PM)

We have too many provinces. Their number needs to be reduced and territory redrawn according to language groupings e.g. Ilocos for the Ilocanos, Bicol for Bicolanos, Pampanga for Kapampangan , a povince each for the Tagalogs, Cebuanos, Tausugs, etc. Some provinces like Pampanga will become bigger as a result of taking in some parts of Tarlac, Bulacan, N.E., etc. while some will disappear. A language gouping needs at least 1 million speakers in order to form a province otherwise they get incorporated into the bigger province. There are many economic and political benefits that could be get from this.
I don't believe economic development follows from reducing geography by language groupings. This will only lead to further in creating silos and alienation. What we need is to further emphasize and improve the use of industrial clusters similar in electronics in EPZA.
According to Michael Porter:
A cluster is a geographically proximate group of interconnected companies & associated institution in a particular field linked by commonalities & complementarities.
Why industrial clusters?
1. Many successful industrial development is cluster-based, not only historically but also at present throughout the world (e.g., Silicon Valley, Bangalore, Dhaka, Northern Italy, whole region of Taiwan, Wenzhou and many other regions in China, …..).
2. A small number of strong industrial clusters tend to dominate in the globalizing world, where country borders lose significance.
3. There is increasingly “broad” recognition that clusters have certain advantages over non-clusters.
4. There is also increasing recognition that development of SME-led labor-intensive industrialization is indispensable to reduce widespread poverty.
Cluster promotes enterprise-enterprise and enterprise-merchant transactions by reducing transaction costs. (Transaction costs = cheating, stealing, lying, shirking, etc)
Cluster stimulates multifaceted-innovations by attracting a variety of useful human resources.
So let's take a simple Luzon example and take a strip from Region III to Manila to Cavite as in the case of Electric Vehicles (where we may have a chance to leap-frog). I will not further expound but just give an idea.
1. Kapampangans and those from the Tarlac are said to be good metal-workers - bring advanced know-how from universities and learning centers and teach them on advanced technology on metal crafting (chasis and parts).
2. Progressively support and advance the industry on battery technology from Bulacan - advance product line-up from lead acid battery types to lithium-ion technology
3. Apply know-how on design and vehicle assemby from either Caloocan, Cavite, and Las Pinas; advance know-how from just assembly of jeeps and continue this towards building passenger cars or commercial vehicles.
4. Use the logistical know-how to deliver finished goods to and from NCR (and probably from Subic).
Unrelated local industries will also stem. But one can further link the production-supplier-value chains from other places in Luzon through deliberate and strategic distribution channels.
I know it's a simplistic view and indeed an old idea. You can call it a clear grasp of the obvious. But some obvious moves are often taken for granted. Also, at the moment, I find that our industrial clusters (as with EPZA) have not been utilized or optimized effectively.
This can apply to other regions as well each focusing on different main products.
The point is if we divide or group our provinces it should be by their comparative advantages not language.