i think japanese eyes tend to be larger and more prominent than the other asian people. mainly men. did the Jomonese (ancient Japanese) give japanese these great features?








compare chinese and korean

korean







chinese

LOL this one had me cracking up


he looks like Al Capone or some italian mob boss

shorter heads, lower maxillary, bigger teeth, larger head, more protruding eyes, more protruding cheekbones, shorter jaws, larger braincases, more elliptical dental arcs.

Japanese = big face lol
not very attractive imo
but each nation has good looking ones and ugly ones

no come to japan; they're pretty chinesey
they do have big teeth though

Yeap

The Japanese are part Malayan. Especially further South you notice more facial hair, bigger eyes etc....

Um no...they r not...its evident when u compare a pure japanese to a half breed

Pure Japanese



half Japanese who is half austronesian...

What is pure japanese? I thought japanese is immigrants from china and korea mixed with ainu?

I remember watching a japanese show that said they are not even homogenous.

The most dominant native ethnic group is the Yamato people; the primary minority groups include the indigenous Ainu[108] and Ryukyuan, as well as social minority groups like the burakumin.[109]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japan

Yeah but Yamato is immigrants from Korea and China. Their own japanese show on their origin claims this. So I don't know what exactly you meant by "pure".




This woman is japanese and doesn't have naturally large eyes.

Pure as in not mixed with foreigners or outsiders

Yes Japanese came from China...well pretty much all Asians...NEAsians and SEAsians originated from China
Does that mean there r no pure siamese, pure kihn, pure malay???

Ah I got you. What is austronesian though?

Taiwanese aboriginals and maori people are austronesian , but they don't look anything alike.


look at this maori person



She doesnt even look asian to me.

becasuse maori r polynesian...they r not pure austronesian...but they r rather an older form of austronesian who mixed with paupans
It has more to do with language then ethnicity though

here is a modern day pure austronesian

I thought it has to do with both language and genetic family. So were the jomonese austronesian or are they proto mongoloids? I read that the ainu speak a austronesian language.


Hey look at this ainu person..




They look so different from regular japanese below




they look like night and day

ahhhhhhhh

and thats a girl?

That idea's just as silly as the other threads I've seen like "Being Korean makes you a better fighter" or "So and so is a better looking ethnic group". Cause if I didn't know any better, I'd mistake any of the pictures posted for Koreans, Chinese, Japanese and so on.

I agree , it's pretty retarded. Why do asian people on here love talking about eyelids and eye size. I swear its like they're gonna have sex with a woman's eye.

What's next? "I wanna jizz on her double eyelids so bad"

Japanese are quit diversified.



He is a japanese with Jomon features.

i like her look

yes. indeed.

^ agreed

hey guys. check this video out.. they're on japanese origin. something interesting to share..

looking for the genetic roots of japanese

actually some taiwanese aborigines look like that, some don't look that different from han (probably mixed), some look filipino, but there are quite a few who resemble maori and even native americans

Yeah I just learned that native americans went to taiwan



I really like Maori art btw , something about it captivates me.

they look pretty chinesey to me
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82TzfLClGrw...feature=related

Judging from their facial traits and the things they wear:

Jomon - Ainu or/and aborigines from Taiwan and Ryukyu (Malay?). I am not really sure about Jomon people.
Yayoi - Korean and Chinese

^

Yayoi ain't no Chinese.
Yayoi are possibly Korean.

Jomon = Ainu and other Japanese Aborigines (okinawan).

wtf...ryukyu r malay???

well I am talking about the native people, not about Japanese people from the mainland who settled down there. The natives are very close to Taiwanese aborigines if I am not wrong. They are considered Malays or have at least a lot in common with Malay people.

Some believe that Jomon was comprised of early Austronesian speakers. Others think that they were mixed with "northern Australoids." In either case, it is likely that they were an early proto-population that spread across the world tens of thousands of years ago, and became "trapped" on the Japanese islands when the sea levels rose. It is also likely that they were not homogeneous.



Current research indicates that the Yayoi expansion started even earlier than previously thought - ie in 800 BC, well before there was a common "Korean" or "Chinese" identity. Thus, the immigrants/invaders would not have considered themselves "Korean" or "Chinese," but would've instead identified with the particular ethnic landscape of East Asia around 800 BC. At that time, the Western Zhou Dynasty maintained feudal overlordship in China, but the so-called "Yi" and "Man" were still active players. Meanwhile, Manchuria and the Korean peninsula was populated by various tribes which left no written records, and are so difficult to assess.

It is believed that the early Japanese had no written records. Consequently, it is unlikely that they were related to the Chinese aristocracy, which by 800 BC had already developed writing. If this group had immigrated to Japan to any large extent, they would've brought writing with them and we would've had continuous records, in all likelihood, from 800 BC onwards. But we don't, and so just as in the case of Manchuria and Korea, it is unlikely that the Chinese aristocracy, from either the Shang, the Zhou, or the early Warring States were present.

But what about non-aristocratic immigrants from China? This is plausible, as Japanese archaeologists have discovered archaeological and anthropological similarities between coastal sites in China and early Japan, and we also see that the majority of O3 haplogroups in Japan are O3a5, which is associated specifically with Sino-Tibetan populations. These could've been carried over to Japan by early proto-Chinese groups like the "Yi" and "Man," who were spread across the Chinese coast during the Zhou period, or later Chinese groups, ie merchants (later migrations are not contradictory as Japan adopted Chinese writing at some point in time).

Either way, they were joined by large groups of immigrants from early Manchuria and Korea, who came to Japan in waves starting from the early Yayoi period. These people would've brought agricultural techniques, largely known across in Asia by that time, and such technologies as bronze. Since Manchuria and Korea did not appear to have its own writing system in 800 BC, the lack of written records in early Japan is concordant with such an expansion. These people would've met with earlier Jomon natives, and either mixed with and/or displaced them (mixed is currently the more accepted theory).

pictures please

i was talkin about physical resemblance...

are you japanese?

is it relevant to this topic

i think it's just surgery to make the eyelids like that

japanese want to look white... and have big eyes

i thought japanese were mixed... so that's why they have bigger eyes

a lot of japanese girls want/marry into white guys. they're the population that likes white people a lot

koreans also likes them a lot... koreans dont' really have small eyes though

i think a lot of mainland cantonese (from china not hk) have smaller eyes, and single eylids... i dont really know... maybe cuz cantonese are stuck up and think they're better than them

japanese people are asian... all asians have small eyes.

i think those people were just born with big eyes

why are you talking about eyes... giving me the creeps