After the loss of war, Chiyou was decapitated by the Yellow Overlord. The succeeding southerners recorded in Chinese history would be called San-miao. At the times of Lords Yao-Shun-Yu, the 'Sanmiao' (Three Miao) people had been living in the middle Yangtze River, taking Lake Dongting as their very homeland. The middle Yangtze River would remain marshlands and lakes till the time of the Chu State of the Warring States period (403-221 BC). The State of Chu, 1500 years after Xia Dynasty was first established, would still belong to an alien ethnical group, and they were the first group of people to reject the overlordship of the Zhou Dynasty by declaring themselves as a king of equal footing. Historic annals repeatedly claimed SanMiao people were mostly exiled to San-Wei-Shan Mountain in Gansu Province's Dunhuang to counter the Xirong or Western Rong people. Today's Miao-zu minority, numbering 5 million per 1982 census, are said to be descendants of ancient Lord Chiyou who headed the Nine Li[2] tribes, i.e., ancestors of SanMiao people. Miao-zu's epic talked about "westward migration", which pointed to the fact that they had probably dwelled more to the center and east of China in ancient times. Mainly in today's Guangdong and Hunan provinces would exist Zhuang-zu and Yao-zu minorities, and mainly in today's Guizhou and Guangxi provinces would exist Miao-zu, Zhuang-zu, and Yao-zu minorities. Miao-zu, Zhuang-zu, and Yao-zu, living more closer to central China, should have closer affiliations with ancient San-Miao people, with the same character 'miao' embedded.

However, should we buy Luu Simian's research, then San-miao people would have shared the same origin as ancient Chinese. In accordance with Luu Simian dissertation, San-Miao, with 'miao' meaning descendants, could point to three ancient clans and tribes of Dihong-shi, Jinyun-shi, Shaohao-shi as their ancestors. After San-miao, history recorded extensively the people that would come to be known as 'Man[2]' or 'Nan [southern] Man2 [barbarian]'. Scholar Luo Xianglin stated that five tribal groups of Xia, Qiang, Di[1], Yi, and Man[2] shared the same origin.

Hmong people are telling the stories from both our ancient European maternal lineage and ancient Asian paternal lineage. In pre-Chinese text the earliest people in western China did had the blending of San-Miao people. Lord Shun previous relocated the Hmong to western China to guard against the western nomads (2357-2258 BC) . This is a possibility these western nomads were a branch of nomadic Indo-European people who intermixed with the San Miao people ( 2258 BC-)

so some of your ancient ancestry breaded with some white ppl? nothing to be proud of. They did fine white european settlements in Western China why in ancient times, it was on the discovery channel.

Why are we even talking about being proud here or not, people?
Does it matter? If it does then there's something racist going on here.

the point being, maybe some Hmong banged some white folks back in the day, and perhaps banged some mongols, some Manchu's, some han, some tibetians, etc, etc, etc.....

Its the same things as today, some Hmong are married to some white ppl, black ppl, Mexican ppl, etc, etc, etc.... 100 years from now are Hmong going to say they have some African or Mexican ancestories???

Hmong is Hmong, just because a few banged another group of ppl a thousand years ago doesnt make Hmong anything other then Hmong, with a few that banged some white folks. The few that banged some white ppl a thousand years ago doesnt make Hmong ppl as a whole anything other then being Hmong.

its like your saying when Marco Polo went into China and some of his men went and banged a few Chinese chicks, and those chinese whores had baby's with those europeans that came into china, so those descendants of those barstard kids have recessive European genese since the era of Marco Polo, who may infact number in the 10's of thousands today. So should Chinese then say, Chinese have recessive European genese because 1000 years ago a few chinese whores got banged and had babies with European traders?

You just discovered the problem with treating people as groups, as opposed to individuals. The reality is that every person in this world has an unique identity, and this identity can be traced to the dawn of mankind, or even to the first single-cell organism, for that matter. Treating this heritage in terms of groups, while convenient, does not speak to its nuance. The essence of individualism is to respect and understand each person for their own sake, as opposed to from the perspective of ethnic groups or races. Only this model can accommodate the long history of genetic and cultural mixing that occurred.

No dummy we are talking about the Hmong ppl, their lineage and heritage, not Bob, Steve and their pet dog snoopy. Hope you understand?

You seem to be clueless, my response is that so what if a handfull of hmong slept with a handful of white ppl in the past, their kids represent them and not the Hmong as a whole. It would be the same thing as if a Hmong girl married an African American, had a bunch of kids and those offspring ended up from generation to generation married other Hmong ppl instead of Africans, 2 hundred years from now their offspring still carry African genes. Those handful of kids with African genes dont represent Hmong ppl as a whole, they are individual, so would Hmong look at those recessive African genes the same way as they look upon the white genes? from generation to generation your going to have some Hmong kids with Nappy hair, being so no one is going to say Africans are apart of Hmong history and culture would they? africans are africans, hmong are hmong, dont mix them up. Europeans are Europeans.