LoveAndPeace
Apr 18 2010, 09:28 PM
I don't want to disrespect mongolians relatives since they also share similar face with east asians (compared with turkish obviously).But to the mongolians who are disrespecting my east asians brothers,calling them weak and pathetic.What has kazakh,kyrgyz,yakutia,buryatia,hazara achieved? other than living in oppressed and poverty lives.East asia is far better in economy,military,olympic but central asia is the complete opposite of that.Modern mongolians are not contributing anything to society other than clinging to ancient mongol achievements.You talk about how you conquer others but don't remember you were also conquered by manchus qing dynasty,gokturks,xiognu.Inner mongolia also became an puppet state of japan in 1937 now owned by chinese,you think you're so great because you conquered east europeans or caucasians middleast, japan has conquered the "caucasian" ainu of north japan long time ago too, before mongol even started an empire.Don't forget that mongol also failed to invade japan twice.
See this? This is the japanese empire, it may not be as great as mongol empire but comparing with your cousins achievement, it's like comparing an dog with an elephant, so stop with the crap that east asians are weak.Only mongolian was strong in central asia but others were weak.
KraterosHellas
Apr 18 2010, 10:03 PM
it's funny how people think mongol empire was so great because of its size. these are amateurs who know nothing about history of course. historians and intelectuals all know that the roman empire was the greatest empire that this planet had ever seen. territorial size doesn't mean anything! it's the wealth, culture, influence, sophistication that are surer measures of empires. by god, britain controlled a fourth of world territory in their hey days like mongols. and roman empire controlled a fourth of the world populations..china also now controls about 5th of world population
all who worship power bow down to rome!
LoveAndPeace
Apr 18 2010, 10:26 PM
QUOTE (KraterosHellas @ Apr 18 2010, 10:03 PM)

it's funny how people think mongol empire was so great because of its size. these are amateurs who know nothing about history of course. historians and intelectuals all know that the roman empire was the greatest empire that this planet had ever seen. territorial size doesn't mean anything! it's the wealth, culture, influence, sophistication that are surer measures of empires. by god, britain controlled a fourth of world territory in their hey days like mongols. and roman empire controlled a fourth of the world populations..china also now controls about 5th of world population
all who worship power bow down to rome!
Here is the thing though the romans decendants has dissapeared completely plus their not asians but mongols were,and looked like this at least...

You're right hat territorial size does not neccesarily mean everything, but the thing is mongols were the only asians that
did conquered people of many different cultures and races under their rule. China were great in wealth,culture,influence but not as conquerors.
LoveAndPeace
Apr 18 2010, 11:17 PM
Yes,china was an big of chunk land but the difference between roman and china is that roman as warriors has conquered people of many different cultures which is far more impressive than chinese empire who was controlling mostly chinese. Interestingly, I once saw an program about an roman invasion of china but were defeated, this is claimed by some chinese and european scholars but it was also disputed by others.
China was only impressive during the times of tang dynasty but this is nothing compared with mongol or manchu.
Oyabun
Apr 18 2010, 11:36 PM
QUOTE (KraterosHellas @ Apr 18 2010, 11:03 PM)

it's funny how people think mongol empire was so great because of its size. these are amateurs who know nothing about history of course. historians and intelectuals all know that the roman empire was the greatest empire that this planet had ever seen. territorial size doesn't mean anything! it's the wealth, culture, influence, sophistication that are surer measures of empires. by god, britain controlled a fourth of world territory in their hey days like mongols. and roman empire controlled a fourth of the world populations..china also now controls about 5th of world population
all who worship power bow down to rome!
Ayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy ohhhhhhhhhhhhh ayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.....what da fu-k??!!! ::grabs crotch:: dirty Italian fu-k, get ouf othis thread.
DKhasElementalResistance
Apr 18 2010, 11:39 PM
QUOTE (LoveAndPeace @ Apr 19 2010, 12:17 AM)

Yes,china was an big of chunk land but the difference between roman and china is that roman as warriors has conquered people of many different cultures which is far more impressive than chinese empire who was controlling mostly chinese. Interestingly, I once saw an program about an roman invasion of china but were defeated, this is claimed by some chinese and european scholars but it was also disputed by others.
China was only impressive during the times of tang dynasty but this is nothing compared with mongol or manchu.

The ROmans conquered mainly noob barbarian people like Gauls, Britains, Arabs. Hell they couldnt even conquer the Germans past the danube. You have to remember the Arabs were nothing until Islam, they were just savages looked down on by Persians and Egyptians.
The Romans got pwned by a race of people who were kicked out of China called the Huns.
China has a lot of different cultures, there all just assimilated now to cal themeselves Heibei Hans or Shandong Hans or So so Hans they would of al had a more unique culture had they not become part of China. its like Europeans today, there culture is basically all the same $hit!
Since when did Rome go to China? What a crock of $hit! When they talk about Roman decendants in China the thoery is Roman slaves were sent to China via the Parthians. Romans had some impressive technology like the aquaduct. I think that was thier most epic invention, how al they conquered where those northern barbarians who were tribal based and primitive. They hit a brick wall when they actually got to a civilisation, which was the mid east or Iran -Parthia - Sassinids etc. The only one who punched through that was Alexander the Great and he only went to India only to get pwned by those curry munching elephant riders. And ALexander wasnt even Roman.
Oyabun
Apr 18 2010, 11:44 PM
QUOTE (DKhasElementalResistance @ Apr 18 2010, 11:39 PM)

The ROmans conquered mainly noob barbarian people like Gauls, Britains, Arabs. Hell they couldnt even conquer the Germans past the danube. You have to remember the Arabs were nothing until Islam, they were just savages looked down on by Persians and Egyptians.
The Romans got pwned by a race of people who were kicked out of China called the Huns.
China has a lot of different cultures, there all just assimilated now to cal themeselves Heibei Hans or Shandong Hans or So so Hans they would of al had a more unique culture had they not become part of China. its like Europeans today, there culture is basically all the same $hit!
Since when did Rome go to China? What a crock of $hit! When they talk about Roman decendants in China the thoery is Roman slaves were sent to China via the Parthians. Romans had some impressive technology like the aquaduct. I think that was thier most epic invention, how al they conquered where those northern barbarians who were tribal based and primitive. They hit a brick wall when they actually got to a civilisation, which was the mid east or Iran -Parthia - Selucids etc. The only one who punched through that was Alexander the Great and he only went to India only to get pwned by those curry munching elephant riders. And ALexander wasnt even Roman.
Krateros is an Italian @$$hole who always talks about how great wops and greeks are while insulting various Asian cultures and claiming wops and greeks are better.
LoveAndPeace
Apr 19 2010, 12:00 AM
QUOTE (DKhasElementalResistance @ Apr 18 2010, 11:39 PM)

The ROmans conquered mainly noob barbarian people like Gauls, Britains, Arabs. Hell they couldnt even conquer the Germans past the danube. You have to remember the Arabs were nothing until Islam, they were just savages looked down on by Persians and Egyptians.
The Romans got pwned by a race of people who were kicked out of China called the Huns.
China has a lot of different cultures, there all just assimilated now to cal themeselves Heibei Hans or Shandong Hans or So so Hans they would of al had a more unique culture had they not become part of China. its like Europeans today, there culture is basically all the same $hit!
Since when did Rome go to China? What a crock of $hit! When they talk about Roman decendants in China the thoery is Roman slaves were sent to China via the Parthians. Romans had some impressive technology like the aquaduct. I think that was thier most epic invention, how al they conquered where those northern barbarians who were tribal based and primitive. They hit a brick wall when they actually got to a civilisation, which was the mid east or Iran -Parthia - Selucids etc. The only one who punched through that was Alexander the Great and he only went to India only to get pwned by those curry munching elephant riders. And ALexander wasnt even Roman.
Theres no 100% evidence that the huns (xiongnu) who invaded china were the same as the huns who invaded europe.Historians in the past generally associated them as the same but there's no evidence of an direct connection between the Xiongnu and the Huns.
DKhasElementalResistance
Apr 19 2010, 12:04 AM
QUOTE (LoveAndPeace @ Apr 19 2010, 12:00 AM)

Theres no 100% evidence that the huns (xiognu) who invaded china were the same as the huns who invaded europe.Historians in the past generally associated them as the same but there's no evidence of an direct connection between the Xiongnu and the Huns.
ok then forget the huns, the Mongols went there too.
Asian have punched into Europe before, more often with more cnosquences than the reverse. No one set foot in the far east as conquerors until about 300 years ago.
Those revered Knight Templars, Tuetonic Knights, Knight Hospitallers, all those highly revered European warriors with thier whole aura of power and invincibility stomped by Mongolians, if we wanna claim Huns were refugees out of China they also pwned all the people in Europe they came across.
There was a minor victory by the Roman general Aetius but that didnt stop the horde ransacking all over West Roman empire and getting tribute from East Roman empire.
WHites were $hit until the renaisssance! The west is trying to white wash history and depict themselves as better than they were now that they are in the position that they are today.
The east is where its always been.
khuvxim
Apr 19 2010, 12:18 AM
QUOTE (LoveAndPeace @ Apr 19 2010, 01:00 AM)

Theres no 100% evidence that the huns (xiongnu) who invaded china were the same as the huns who invaded europe.Historians in the past generally associated them as the same but there's no evidence of an direct connection between the Xiongnu and the Huns.
Urm, Xiongnu and Huns are the same.
KraterosHellas
Apr 19 2010, 12:35 AM
QUOTE (Oyabun @ Apr 19 2010, 12:44 AM)

Krateros is an Italian @$$hole who always talks about how great wops and greeks are while insulting various Asian cultures and claiming wops and greeks are better.
haha, can't think of a derogatory label for greeks huh? see, they're too above for u to defame.
LoveAndPeace
Apr 19 2010, 12:37 AM
QUOTE (DKhasElementalResistance @ Apr 19 2010, 12:04 AM)

ok then forget the huns, the Mongols went there too.
Asian have punched into Europe more often with more cnosquences than the reverse. No one set foot in the far east as conquerors until about 300 years ago.
Those revered Knight Templars, Tuetonic Knights, Knight Hospitallers, all those highly revered European warriors with thier whole aura of power and invincibility stomped by Mongolians, if we wanna claim Huns were refugees out of China they also pwned all the people in Europe they came across.
There was a minor victory by the Roman general Aetius but that didnt stop the horde ransacking all over West Roman empire and getting tribute from East Roman empire.
WHites were $hit until the renaisssance!
The huns were an confedaration of tribes and unions of multiple ethnicities such as mongol,turkic,yenisians, finno-urgic and white tribes.Btw you keep taking about how asians conquered europe but don't forget these people were central asians who dont like east asian,I know mongolians and northern parts of central asia shares similar face to east asians but these people were still culturely different, who went to conquer china,korea and than invaded japan twice. They are NOT brothers with us man.Why do you care so much how asians have conquered whites? Japan has done that way before mongols anyway.
Do these people look white enough for you.These people were indegious people known as "ainu", anthropology shows their an caucasoid people who lived in north japan for 20,000 years until the samurais invaded and suceeded in conquering them
in 9th century, beginning by taking their territories in north honsu tohoku and assimilating them.


DKhasElementalResistance
Apr 19 2010, 12:48 AM
QUOTE (LoveAndPeace @ Apr 19 2010, 01:37 AM)

The huns were an confedaration of tribes and unions of multiple ethnicities such as mongol,turkic,yenisians, finno-urgic and white tribes.Btw you keep taking about how asians conquered europe but don't forget these people were central asians who dont like east asian,I know mongolians and northern parts of central asia shares similar face to east asians but these people were still culturely different, who went to conquer china,korea and than invaded japan twice. They are NOT brothers with us man.Why do you care so much how asians have conquered whites? Japan has done that way before mongols anyway.
Do these people look white enough for you.These people were indegious people known as "ainu", anthropology shows their an caucasoid people who lived in north japan for 20,000 years until the samurais invaded and suceeded in conquering them
in 9th century in north honsu tohoku/



I dont care if they were brothers or not. The fact is todays history and eduaction, social understanding is the west has been the best since time immorial. OK?
The truth of the matter is the East was more economically, technologically, militarily dominant than the west. I care because people, society in general keep pushing the notion that whites have been dominating the world since man began ok? This fked up mythology has to stop and im just revealing facts of my own to make my point. Im opposed to this global agenda to white wash history.
The Huns were a confederation but they came from and were organised by the ones out of China. That being said, they were a mixed lot but thier legacy originates from the east, came from the east and i doublt those mixed whites are small enough to even ride effectively on those midget horses they use in Mongolia now.
No one gives a $hit about Ainus, i dont think people think there really white anyway. You could also say the Tocharians are pwned caucasian people in asia but no one gives a damn about them either.
LoveAndPeace
Apr 19 2010, 01:09 AM
QUOTE (DKhasElementalResistance @ Apr 19 2010, 12:48 AM)

I dont care if they were brothers or not. The fact is todays history and eduaction, social understanding is the west has been the best since time immorial. OK?
The truth of the matter is the East was more economically, technologically, militarily dominant than the west. I care because people, society in general keep pushing the notion that whites have been dominating the world since man began ok? This fked up mythology has to stop and im just revealing facts of my own to make my point. Im opposed to this global agenda to white wash history.
The Huns were a confederation but they came from and were organised by the ones out of China. That being said, they were a mixed lot but thier legacy originates from the east, came from the east and i doublt those mixed whites are small enough to even ride effectively on those midget horses they use in Mongolia now.
No one gives a $hit about Ainus, i dont think people think there really white anyway.
Whites only begand dominating the world around 15th century I do believe east asians are the only ones that can rival the west today.
I wouldn't say they don't give...you can check those white supremists at stormfront still making ridiculous claims that ainu are part of their aryan race.
DKhasElementalResistance
Apr 19 2010, 01:16 AM
QUOTE (LoveAndPeace @ Apr 19 2010, 01:09 AM)

Whites only begand dominating the world around 15th century I do believe east asians are the only ones that can rival the west today.
I wouldn't say they don't give...you can check those white supremists at stormfront still making ridiculous claims that ainu are part of their aryan race.
I dont go to stormfront. People in stormfront are retarded. Actually i went there a few times ages ago, cant stand that place especially when i read those suck up asians trying to fit in. Ugh. I remember a Kath Hak Sung? a ChinaNo1? And a NinjaSamurai, a Korean Chinese and Japanese all trying to fit in with the white boys while trying to say asians are cool. my god i had to get the fk out of there it was so emabrassing.
That being said i do notice the central asians scoff at east asians but i dont really care coz they got no clout however they do get a bit insufferable sometimes.
I had a Hazara housemate who scoffed at any Altai link between Koreans and Central asians, i didnt even talk about Chingis Khan i just said we came from there and i wanna go one day. he was all no we Hazara are decendants of Chingis Khan. The dude looked seriously just white too, not even eurasian looking but just white. I felt a bit affronted but decided not to press the issue.
I find it weird how they are so willing to adopt and love Russian people and writing style, yet hate chinese so thoroughly. I mean i read ni the newspaper only about 3 days ago how 4 central asians had been murdered by skin heads in Russia.
That being said my negative experience was with a Turkmen who looked 100% white Hazara. My experience with a mongoliod looking Mongol was actually very postive. I mean he did state Mongols are very different to other asians, and i can understrand where he's comming but he felt asian to me, and we related well, while my experience with Afghan Hazaras was they felt more like Arabs, Wops/Wogs from i mean most of the arrogance is over the internetz and theres a lot of bull$hit on the internetz. Everyone is proud in thier own way.
LoveAndPeace
Apr 19 2010, 01:47 AM
QUOTE (DKhasElementalResistance @ Apr 19 2010, 01:16 AM)

I dont go to stormfront. People in stormfront are retarded. Actually i went there a few times ages ago, cant stand that place especially when i read those suck up asians trying to fit in. Ugh. I remember a Kath Hak Sung? a ChinaNo1? And a NinjaSamurai, a Korean Chinese and Japanese all trying to fit in with the white boys while trying to say asians are cool. my god i had to get the fk out of there it was so emabrassing.
That being said i do notice the central asians scoff at east asians but i dont really care coz they got no clout however they do get a bit insufferable sometimes.
I had a Hazara housemate who scoffed at any Altai link between Koreans and Central asians, i didnt even talk about Chingis Khan i just said we came from there and i wanna go one day. he was all no we Hazara are decendants of Chingis Khan. The dude looked seriously just white too, not even eurasian looking but just white. I felt a bit affronted but decided not to press the issue.
I find it weird how they are so willing to adopt and love Russian people and writing style, yet hate chinese so thoroughly. I mean i read ni the newspaper only about 3 days ago how 4 central asians had been murdered by skin heads in Russia.
That being said my negative experience was with a Turkmen who looked 100% white Hazara. My experience with a mongoliod looking Mongol was actually very postive. I mean he did state Mongols are very different to other asians, and i can understrand where he's comming but he felt asian to me, and we related well, while my experience with Afghan Hazaras was they felt more like Arabs, Wops/Wogs from but i mean most of the arrogance is over the internetz and theres a lot of bull$hit on the internetz. So i duno.
You can say that again,those whitewashed asian in stormfront got on my nerves too, They are an humiliation to asians.
Hmm...maybe because they feel more closer to white? Well most hazaras I've seen look slightly more asian but It don't suprise me if there one or two hazaras who look 100% white.Persians are middleasterners but many of them do look racially similar to whites.Many half white and half asians who's children can turn out to looking like 100% white. I mean look at keanu reeves or kristin kreuk both are half chinese.
Chagatai
Apr 19 2010, 06:04 AM
As far as I know mongolians never disrespected East Asians except for the Chinese

and esspecialy not the japanese
thehorsemen
Apr 19 2010, 06:25 AM
I don't have a problem with east asians, except for the overly idiotic nationalists.
Oyabun
Apr 19 2010, 09:11 AM
QUOTE (KraterosHellas @ Apr 19 2010, 12:35 AM)

haha, can't think of a derogatory label for greeks huh? see, they're too above for u to defame.
Greeks above me? LOL No, they're faggots who invented homosexuality, other cultures introduced sex to women, certainly not the greeks.
thehorsemen
Apr 19 2010, 09:25 AM
QUOTE (Oyabun @ Apr 19 2010, 10:11 AM)

Greeks above me? LOL No, they're faggots who invented homosexuality, other cultures introduced sex to women, certainly not the greeks.
http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Greece
KraterosHellas
Apr 19 2010, 03:06 PM
if u think that's the nly thing the greeks invented, u obviously been home-schooled by some ape. and by the way homosexuality wasnt "invented"..it's natural human inclination found in some people in every ethnicity, not just the greeks. the greeks who molested boys were mostly bisexuals anyway.
and don't argue please. it's an accepted fact that world's development and progress from the couple hundred year sback after the dark ages is pretty much due to the adoption of greek ideas and mentality. ever heard of something like this in school: "there's hardly a branch of study or ideas today that had not yet been talked about in ancient athens." and one british scholar puts it "the whole of western philoosphy is a mere footnote to plato" do u think u can defame a culture this impregnable? sure we can criticize the americans, the british, the chinese, the romans...but not the greeks. they embody perfection. but i'm digressing, so let's get back to mongol empire, china all that good stuff.
matigasngulo
Apr 19 2010, 03:22 PM
yeah well now Greece's contribution to humanity are pork gyros and fake budgets
KraterosHellas
Apr 19 2010, 03:24 PM
i wasn't talking about modern greece smart one. a very big difference.
thehorsemen
Apr 19 2010, 03:26 PM
Greece's national export is MMA, male on male anal.
matigasngulo
Apr 19 2010, 03:29 PM
QUOTE (KraterosHellas @ Apr 19 2010, 03:24 PM)

i wasn't talking about modern greece smart one. a very big difference.
Even if modern Europeans can worship greek art, modern technology and science are far removed from slave-driven galleys and olive-oil presses, and goof-ball pedophiles discussing high-brow BS in public.
Oyabun
Apr 19 2010, 03:30 PM
Maybe if Greek men would have spent more time focusing on their country's economy than fu-king each other in the @$$ in a giant pile all day long, then Greece wouldn't be in such a horrible state now.
KraterosHellas
Apr 19 2010, 03:45 PM
we know that athens in its hey days possessed considerable amount of wealth throught heir trade and tribute system to fund the building porjects in the acropolis which today attract so many tourists and grecophiles and their wars with pathetic sparta and overseas to make themselves known. greece will always make some money even if they don't work simply by these legacies attracting tourists...others, sadly, must work for their money.
Chagatai
Apr 19 2010, 03:52 PM
^seriously dude who cares this is an asian forum, anly thing related to greece on an asian forum is how the Turks fu-ked you guys, ell not fu-ked cuz you might like that
thehorsemen
Apr 19 2010, 03:54 PM
LoveAndPeace
Apr 19 2010, 04:00 PM
QUOTE (Chagatai @ Apr 19 2010, 06:04 AM)

As far as I know mongolians never disrespected East Asians except for the Chinese

and esspecialy not the japanese
Don't to be so sure about that,you could still read tons of comments from mongolian trying to insult east asians that's why I signed up and posted this thread.Well mongolians are in no position to disrespect japan anyway,since the 2 invasions ended in failure.Japan on the other hand turned inner mongolia into an puppet state.Mongolians wouldn't think of disrespecting manchus either since they they also conquered mongolia.They tend to look down at chinese and koreans, many koreans look up to mongol and hope they accept them as brothers. An korean(even chinese) look 9 million times like an mongol than turkish person,koreans are also linguistically related with mongolians but prefer turkish people as brothers.
Chagatai
Apr 19 2010, 04:02 PM
^both of the invasion on japan fail due to wind, not the japanese
I can't figure the Koreans out, great diplomats though allways have been
KraterosHellas
Apr 19 2010, 04:02 PM
and greece kicked these worms out in the independence war. lord byron loved greece so much that he actually fought in the war. this is why making ur culture attractive is important. greece owes to those grecophiles.
but enough of greece! talk about mongolia for god's sake. don't play with me.
thehorsemen
Apr 19 2010, 04:03 PM
He loved it due to, homosexual innuendos.
KraterosHellas
Apr 19 2010, 04:04 PM
i'll choose to ignore that for the sake of this thread staying on topic.
Chagatai
Apr 19 2010, 04:06 PM
greece is holding europe back hehe back wich is pretty nice
You guys had soem great philosophers I like plato, well like in a non homosexual way
Ps greece can suck and probably does balls, independance war my @$$. Greeks themself conrtibuted verry little to the war, except for raiding defensless ottoman villages.
LoveAndPeace
Apr 19 2010, 04:08 PM
QUOTE (Chagatai @ Apr 19 2010, 04:02 PM)

^both of the invasion on japan fail due to wind, not the japanese
I can't figure the Koreans out, great diplomats though allways have been
Yes I read about but the matter of fact is mongol did lose.After the wind hitted on mongolian, the japanese took the advantage and stormed in the boats and gave them an taste of our blade ,those who were lucky jumped off the boat.
thehorsemen
Apr 19 2010, 04:09 PM
Yes, because the wind was something obviously planned by the japanese, and was a tactical strategy.
KraterosHellas
Apr 19 2010, 04:11 PM
and yet, the EU still has the largest gdp on this planet. it's a sure fact that china will overtake it in the future. but it can still grow by gobbling up the rest of eastern europe and possibly russia to be at least be 2nd place and beat india or brazil or whoever that tries to be second.
Chagatai
Apr 19 2010, 04:13 PM
mabey they all farted at once :p
KraterosHellas
Apr 19 2010, 04:14 PM
神風 isn't exactly what the japanese sould be so proud of. other nations won naval battles through pure strategy and brains...like lord nelson for example..and phormio, themistocles, etc. i find these admirals more glorious.
thehorsemen
Apr 19 2010, 04:14 PM
I was thinking it was more like one big queef.
Chagatai
Apr 19 2010, 04:16 PM
dats gross dude
thehorsemen
Apr 19 2010, 04:17 PM
lol

Those geisha's man.
Chagatai
Apr 19 2010, 04:19 PM
kawaiiii
KraterosHellas
Apr 19 2010, 04:22 PM
um, are u guys still talking about kamikaze.?
thehorsemen
Apr 19 2010, 04:23 PM
This chat isn't for gay eyes.
Chagatai
Apr 19 2010, 04:25 PM
nor for other bodyparts
LoveAndPeace
Apr 19 2010, 04:29 PM
QUOTE (KraterosHellas @ Apr 19 2010, 04:14 PM)

神風 isn't exactly what the japanese sould be so proud of. other nations won naval battles through pure strategy and brains...like lord nelson for example..and phormio, themistocles, etc. i find these admirals more glorious.
My chinese friend,ever heard of "nelson of the east" admiral Togo heihachiro? he is the general that used an simple strategy to conquered china and defeated the russian army in manchuria. Japan also defeated british and dutch in southeast asia that's why it became part of japan are you saying those were won by luck? If only he was alive, I bet all of asia would have been under japan.
thehorsemen
Apr 19 2010, 04:31 PM
He isn't chinese, he's a greek queer.
Oyabun
Apr 19 2010, 04:34 PM
QUOTE (thehorsemen @ Apr 19 2010, 04:31 PM)

He isn't chinese, he's a greek queer.
there's another type of greek?? news to me.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.