Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: China and japanese emperors
Asia Finest Discussion Forum > Asian Culture > Chinese Chat
Pages: 1, 2, 3
islandBrother
hi!!

i know only few chinese are interested in this topic.
i posted in Vietnamese chat, and i only want Vietnamese advise but some chinese join.
so, I put the topic in China Chat, so chinese people can talk in
relevant to chinese.

late and now, japanese thinks that the japanese emperor roots in south east asia or Sundaland, 3,000-20,000 years ago.
some southern chinese tribes have D1 but no papers that O2b1 is in Chinese, so less
relation to southern chinese, but maybe some tribes stay in china when south east asian
migrated to japan.

Origin of Imperial House of Japan
http://www.cjapan.net/en/content/origin-imperial-house-japan

another article is helps me.

Imperial family descended from Jomon/Ainu of Japan
http://www.cjapan.net/en/content/imperial-...jomonainu-japan

QUOTE
japanese culture and people is south east asian style long long time ago.scholars found it
In ancient Japan, there were essentially two different types of houses. The first was what is known as a pit-dwelling house, in which columns are inserted into a big hole dug in the ground and then surrounded by grass. The second was built with the floor raised above the ground. The style of house with an elevated floor is said to have come to Japan from Southeast Asia, and this type of building was apparently used to store grain and other foods so that they wouldn't spoil from heat and humidity.


The History of Japanese Houses
http://web-japan.org/kidsweb/virtual/house/house02.html

I am Japanese,and many I spoke to are no problems with roots in south east asia, or vietnam, indonesia, phillipine, thailand, burma, east india, andaman islands.

about koreans, there is one korean concubine who married emperor, she was 10th generation korean-japanese after the korean hostage from korean kingdom naturalized to japan, 1500 years ago. probably now, 0.000001% of japanese emperor shares korean blood.

also, there are one concubine from china, and married with the japanese emperor. so, 0.0000001% of japanese emperor also shares chinese bloods. there is open secret, but japan hide it because the chinese blood in imperial family tree can anger american

But, 99.99999% of japanese emperors blood are south east asian (also including some southern chinese tribes with D1, and probably O2b1).

source = http://www.cjapan.net/en/content/origin-imperial-house-japan
Mid-Night_Sun
QUOTE (islandBrother @ Sep 5 2011, 09:05 AM) *
I am Japanese,and many I spoke to are no problems with roots in south east asia, or vietnam, indonesia, phillipine, thailand, burma, east india, andaman islands.



ejays probably crying tears of joy and amazement right now.
phop
hmmm... You Japan belong to china, one day we will take back. just wait japan, china will save you. Korea Vietnam and all souteast asia belong to china, we will also one day save you, but we need to save japan first.
islandBrother
many japan came from south east asia
togepi
Japanese Imperial family is descended from Korea.
Yerroperil
This whole hypothesis that Japanese are descended from SEA is if haplogroup D originated in SEA. Haplogroups D1 and D3 exists in Tibetans,Miao and Han Chinese who live near Tibetans and Central Asians,while D2 seems to be restricted to Japan,D* a paragroup is found in Andaman Islanders,10% of Tais and 1% of Mongolic/Turkic populations of Central Asia.

The earliest records of Chinese meeting Japanese is during the Three kingdoms. Wei dynasty established contact with Himiko/Pimiko ruler/shaman queen of Yamatai (that may or may not be Yamato) during AD 238 in Northern Kyushu or where Yamato was. Wei Zhi said that Himiko was the leader however Hou Han Shu which used Wei Zhi as a reference stated that there was a king of Yamatai possibly her brother or son. Himiko sent 160 slaves as tribute and the Wei court responded by giving her the titles Queen of Wa and Friend of Wei. Chinese recorded them as Wa(dwarf),Ti Zhun arrived at AD 240 asked there origin which they claimed their ancestor is Wutaibo(The elder brother of King Wen of Zhou,he felt his brother was superior to him and left with his younger brother to establish the kingdom of Wu of the Warring States information from Yuejueshu and Shiji) they were also said to be tattooed. When Himiko died a male heir was established but quickly assassinated and replaced by Iyo a 13 year old female. Alternate accounts state that another tribe conquered her lands it might have been King of Kunu, Pimikuku who was at odds with her. Himiko also made contact with King Adalla of Silla in May AD 172. Sources for her existence are the Wei shu,Hou Han Shu,Sanguozhi,Sui shu,Samguk Sagi,Nihonshoki establishes her as Queen Jingu or omits her. Imo she was probably of Jomon stock. Wei zhi also states however there were over a hundred kingdoms in Japan and some of them sent embassies to the Han court. In Wei times, there were still 30 Japanese kingdoms whose languages were known to the court's translators. http://kongming.net/encyclopedia/Queen-Himiko is pretty much what I summed up.

The legend of Xu fu originated in Japan,Xu fu historically from the Shiji was to retrieve the secret of immortality from Mount Penglai,he sailed however for naught,Qin shi huang questioned him about why he didn't retrieve immortality and Xu fu asked for some archers to rid a giant fish who was blocking the path,however Xu fu sailed with x number(some sources state 500 males and females other say thousands of them) never to return and supposedly reached Chanzhou or Danzhou,their descendants traded with Chinese in Shaoxing. Sun Quan wanted to find it so he sent his navy but reached Yizhou which is either Taiwan or Okinawa. There seems to be multiple Xu fu monuments in China and Japan,I suspect Xu fu might be Jimmu also Jimmu speeches copied Han Gaozu speeches. If you can read Chinese this will explain alot http://bike9.com/xufu.htm,courtesy of Yun of Chinese history forum he translated this

最早提出徐福到日本定居的,是五代后周的义楚和尚,其著《义楚六帖·城廓·日本》载:“日本国亦名倭国。东海中。秦时,徐福将五百童男、五百童女止此国,今人物一如长安。”据义楚自述,这一说法得之于他的日本朋友弘顺和尚。近代的中日学者最初也都首肯此说,并指出至今日本新宫市还保留着徐福和他的侍员七人墓、徐福祠等遗迹,每年八月新宫市还要举行大祭仪式。甚至有人提出,徐福到日本后建立了日本王朝,徐福就是神武天皇。但是,也有很多学者对徐福到过日本一说,提出疑问。他们认为,徐福的船队无法战胜海洋上的狂风恶浪,只能停留在中国千里海岸的各个港口成沿海大小岛屿上,并逐步向中国内陆移居。日本学者更有兴起否定之说者。他们认为,涂福东渡日本多属牵强附会,日本神武天皇是神话时代的人物,根本无法与徐福挂钩。新宫市的徐福遗迹,是后世好事者的伪造。传说中徐福到达的三神山,只是渤海湾的小岛,并非日本境内,他们还进一步考证说,徐福东渡日本的传说,产生于十世纪左右的日本,随着中日交流的频繁,常有日本和尚来到中国,他们带来了有关徐福的传说。中国的义楚和尚不辨真伪,记人《义楚六帖》中。到了宋代,中国人已对此深信不疑,于是以讹传讹.直至今日。


The earliest person to suggest that Xu Fu settled in Japan was the monk Yichu from the Later Zhou dynasty of the Five Dynasties period. His book "Six Notes by Yichu" says: "Japan is also called Wo. It is in the eastern sea. During the Qin dynasty, Xu Fu led 500 virgin boys and 500 virgin girls to this country, and their descendants today still look like people from Chang'an." Yichu himself claimed that he got this story from his Japanese friend, the monk Hongshun. Chinese and Japanese scholars in modern times initially all agreed with Yichu's claim, and pointed out that the city of Shingu in Japan (Wakayama prefecture) still has the tombs of Xu Fu and 7 of his assistants, a Xu Fu shrine, and other related sites. In the eighth month of every year, Shingu even holds a ritual sacrifice for Xu Fu. Some people even claimed that Xu Fu founded the Japanese imperial dynasty and was none other than the Jimmu emperor. However, there were also many scholars who expressed doubt about the idea that Xu Fu went to Japan. They felt that Xu Fu's ships would not have been able to overcome the waves and storms in the Eastern Sea and could only seek refuge in harbours or islands along the Chinese coast, from which they could slowly migrate inland. Japanese scholars have been even more fervent in rejecting the Xu Fu theory - they argued that it was mostly speculation, and in any case Jimmu was a mythological figure and could not have had any relation to Xu Fu. The Xu Fu relics in Shingu were hoaxes made by later opportunists. The three immortal isles that Xu Fu was said to have reached were just small islands in the Bohai Gulf, and not in Japan. These scholars further showed with evidence that the "Xu Fu in Japan" story originated in 10th-century Japan, at a time when China-Japan interactions were extensive and Japanese monks were bringing legends about Xu Fu to China. Yichu did not discern that the story was false, and recorded it as fact. By the time of the Song dynasty, Yichu's story was already accepted without question, and has been further embellished and passed on to today.


1999年发现的「吉野之里古迹」(北九州佐贺县),证明了日本弥生时代确实有中国人到过日本。即使是同意徐福曾到日本的学者,对于徐福的登陆地点,也各执一辞。有的认为徐福是在今新宫市东北数里的波多须浦登陆的。据《日本书纪》和《续日本纪》记载:东汉灵帝曾孙河智曾“率十七县人归化”。这些汉人,被集中安置在高市郡桧前村居住,这一地区成为汉人主要活动天地。因此,另有人认为。根据当时的自然条件与航海技术.徐福一行的路线应与他们相似,登陆点不会是波多须。虽是二千多年前的旧事,却是中日关系史上的一个重要课题。可惜迄今为止,仍有众多有关徐福的疑谜无法作出肯定或否定的结论。

The Yoshino relics found in northern Kyushu in 1999 proved that there were indeed Chinese going to Japan in the Yayoi period. Even those scholars who support the theory that Xu Fu went to Japan, however, cannot agree on where he landed. ... According to the ancient Japanese histories Nihon Shoki and Ko Nihongi, Hezhi, the great-grandson of Emperor Ling of the Eastern Han, led the population of 17 counties to Japan. These Han people were allowed to sette at Takaiti prefecture ... Thus some have suggested that Xu Fu would have followed a similar route... Unfortunately, to this day there are many stories about Xu Fu that have not been conclusively proven or disproved.

Important Japanese clans of Chinese origin from wikipedia
Hata clan (秦氏) - descended from Prince Yuzuki no Kimi, a descendant of Emperor Qin Shi Huang of the Chinese Qin Dynasty.
Kawachi no Aya clan (西漢氏)
Kawachi no Fumi clan (西文氏) - descended from the scholar Wani, ultimately from Emperor Gaozu of the Chinese Han Dynasty.
Koremune clan (惟宗氏) - lateral branch of the Hata clan, descended from Prince Kōman-Ō of the Chinese Qin Dynasty.
Ōkura clan (大蔵氏) - a branch of the Yamato no Aya clan.
Ōtomo clan (大友氏) - descended from Chinese immigrants; no direct relation to the native Ōtomo clan (大伴氏) or feudal Ōtomo clan (大友氏).
Takamuko clan - descended from Emperor Wen of the Chinese Cao Wei Dynasty; famous for Takamuko no Kuromaro.
Yamato no Aya clan (東漢氏) - descended from Prince Achi no Omi, a great-grandchild of Emperor Ling of Han of the Chinese Han Dynasty.
Yamato no Fumi clan (東文氏) - possibly a branch of the Yamato no Aya clan.



islandBrother
D1, D3 can not become D2 in instant. i think

Hugham
I somehow believe that some of the ancestor of Japanese and Korean came from the South China or even SE Asia. Although some people arguing about it.
This my reasons:

They eat rice, not grain like Northern Chinese.

The number of immigrant came from rice agriculture place must be in an influential number, that rice became the main food in Japan and Korea.

According to archeologists, rice fields already exist in Japan and Korea long time before they made contact with Chinese Imperial dynasties. So eating rice culture in Korea and Japan was not borrowing from South China, instead it was a native main food.

The similarity of some words in Japan, Korea and South China, was not came from the borrowing words during the contact with China, instead it was the original language of Japanese and Korean natives (or immigrant). Such simple and popular words like Yes No, Sky, Mountain, etc hardly came from borrowing from other countries.


Anyway, this is just my personal theory. What do you think?
Yerroperil
QUOTE (Hugham @ Sep 6 2011, 03:57 AM) *
I somehow believe that some of the ancestor of Japanese and Korean came from the South China or even SE Asia. Although some people arguing about it.
This my reasons:

They eat rice, not grain like Northern Chinese.

The number of immigrant came from rice agriculture place must be in an influential number, that rice became the main food in Japan and Korea.

According to archeologists, rice fields already exist in Japan and Korea long time before they made contact with Chinese Imperial dynasties. So eating rice culture in Korea and Japan was not borrowing from South China, instead it was a native main food.
The similarity of some words in Japan, Korea and South China, was not came from the borrowing words during the contact with China, instead
it was the original language of Japanese and Korean natives (or immigrant). Such simple and popular words like Yes No, Sky, Mountain, etc hardly came from borrowing from other countries.


Anyway, this is just my personal theory. What do you think?

Well,according to Himiko's subjects they already claim themselves as Southern Chinese since Wu state lies at the mouth of the Yangtze,I think domestication of rice in the Yangtze spread to Korea to Japan or Ryukyu to Japan (http://www.sciencenewsline.com/biology/2011050313000047.html) however rice probably spread before the identity of Korean,Japanese or Chinese even existed. http://www.kahaku.go.jp/special/past/japan...pix/5/5-14.html this claims that Han dynasty and Yayoi period skeletons were compared from Jiangsu to Yamaguchi and Fukuoka which some showed similarities and lending credibility that some early Japanese originated in Wu state. I think Yayoi was Chinese and Koreans mixing with Ainus(Jomon). Southern Chinese dialects are descendants of Middle Chinese yet they resemble some words,Japanese language imo is related to Korean.
islandBrother
hugham

I agree on your theory.

south east asia, Vietnam, and Indonesia and Malaysia, are probably sources, but neighbors of vietnamese and indonesians / malayasians, like phillipines, Thailand, southern china, burma, are probably all related to japanese emperors before they came to japan through land bridge during ice age.
islandBrother
Okinawans had very high D2, O2b1, and some O2b* and O3a3.

O2b1 and D2 origin like 8,000 - 20,000 years ago. and asians who has BOTH O2b1 and D are vietnamese and indonesians.

How many Chinese has D and O2b1?

Japanaese language is language isolate.

source = http://www.cjapan.net/en/content/imperial-...jomonainu-japan
islandBrother
The linguist's mainstream is the austronesian foundation borrowing some altaic words through the sea trades, or tamil or creol tamil language which grammer is similar to japanese.

オーストロネシア語族説
オーストロネシア語族が日本祖語を形成した言語のひとつだったとする説。現在、主流な説は、日本語がアルタイ系言語と南島語の混合語起源とするものであるが、「混合」の定義・プロセスについては、論者の間で見解の相違がある。日本人の民族学人類学的な特徴が混合的なものであることは、古くから指摘されてきた所であるが、言語学者の間では日本語アルタイ起源説が19世紀以来、定説とみなされてきた。

国語学の観点
日本語と南方系言語との関係は、昭和中期までは、主に国語学者によって論じられた。新村出は、日本語と南方系言語との関係を論じ、「ウルチ(粳)」をインドネシア語の「ブラス」と比較した(1930年)。この時期の先駆者として、北里闌[19]や奥寺将健[20]がいる。また昭和30年代には、日本語学者の大野晋が、日本語の母音の終わりの音韻構造をポリネシア語起源とし、身体語彙にインドネシア語と類似するものが多いと主張した(1957年)。

オーストロネシア比較言語学の観点
オーストロネシア比較言語学は、1938年、ドイツのオットー・デンプヴォルフによって基礎が確立された。祖語が再構されたことにより、古代日本語と南島諸語の比較を行う前提条件が整い、音韻体系や語彙に関する類似が指摘された。例えば上記の「(粳)ウルチ」の例では、現代インドネシア語で「粳」は「ブラス」に類似した発音であるが、祖語に遡れば、むしろ「ブハス」に近い発音であった。またポリネシア諸語の母音終わりの特徴も、子音終わりを許す祖形からの発展である事が証明された。しかしいまだ系統関係は実証されたとはいいがたい。

再構された南島祖語と上代日本語の比較を初めて組織的に行ったのは、言語学者の泉井久之助[21]である。泉井は約50語を取り上げて音韻対応則の検討を行ったが、日本語と南島語の系統的な関係については懐疑的であり、両者間の類似語の存在は借用によるとみなした。

日本語と南島諸語が系統関係にある可能性を指摘したのは、ロシアの言語学者、E.ポリワーノフである。ポリワーノフは、日本語の接頭辞が南島諸語起源と考えられる事、日本語のピッチ(高低)アクセントや、重複形による強調表現などがフィリピンのタガログ語やメラネシア語と類似している事などを指摘し、日本語が南島諸語と系統的な関係にあることの証明を試みた[22][23]。

混合言語説
ロシアの言語学者、エフゲニー・ポリワーノフは、特に日本語のアクセント史に関する研究[24]を基に、日本語がオーストロネシア諸語とアルタイ系言語との混合言語であるという説を初めて提唱した。例えば、「朝」のアクセントは京都方言では a_(低)sa^(高低) という形をしているが、後半の特徴的なピッチの下降は、朝鮮語の「朝」 achΛm との比較から語末鼻音 m の痕跡と解釈される事、また「朝顔」(asagawo)のような合成語に見られる連濁現象( k からg への有声音化)も asam+kawo > asaNkawo > asagawo のような過程から生じた語末鼻音の痕跡であるとし、日本語の古形が子音終わりを許すものであったと主張した。更にポリワーノフは、日本語のピッチアクセントを、アルタイ系言語における位置固定のストレスアクセントとは根本的に異なるものと考え、その起源をフィリピン諸語に求めた。また、日本語の「真っ黒」(makkuro < ma+ku+kuro) は、接頭辞 ma を伴う形容詞 kuro の不完全重複形で、同一の形式がフィリピンやメラネシア諸語にも見られる事を指摘し、日本語は起源的に「オーストロネシア要素と大陸的なアルタイ的諸言語との混合物(アマルガム)」であると主張した[25]。

村山七郎はポリワーノフの先駆的研究を再発見し、混合言語説を展開した。村山は元来、アルタイ比較言語学の立場から日本語系統問題を考究していたが、日本語にはアルタイ起源では説明がつかない語彙があまりに多いという見解に達し、南島語と日本語の比較に注目するようになった。村山によれば、いわゆる基礎語彙の約35%、文法要素の一部が南島語起源であり、このような深い浸透は借用と言えるレベルを超えたもので、日本語はアルタイ系言語と南島語の混合言語であると主張した(1973-1988年)。この見解は、南島言語学の崎山理や板橋義三に継承されている。また、オーストロ・タイ語の研究で世界的に知られるP.ベネディクトは、村山とは異なる独自の観点から日本語とオーストロネシア語の関係について論じた(1985年)。

現在、主流の見解は、南島語を基層とし、アルタイ系言語が上層として重なって日本語が形成されたとするものだが、安本美典[26]や川本崇雄(1990年)は、逆にアルタイ系言語が基層で南島語が上層言語であったと主張する。アルタイ単独起源説を主張するS. スタロスティン(2002年)ですら、南島語の基礎語彙への浸透を認めていることから分かるように、古代日本語の形成に南島語が重要な役割を演じたことについては、多くの論者が同意している。しかし、それを単なる借用とみなすのか、系統関係の証拠と見るかについてはまだ合意に至っていない。

この説の最大の理論的争点は、混合言語の存在についてであろう。伝統的な比較言語学は混合言語の存在を認めないが、最近の歴史・比較言語学者、社会言語学者の一部には異なる見解も見られる。これは言語学の基礎理論にも関わる問題である。

ドラヴィダ語族説
日本語とドラヴィダ語族との関係を主張する説もあり、とりわけ大野晋による、ドラヴィダ語族のひとつのタミル語との対応関係研究があるが、批判もおおく、まだ学説としては確定していない。ドラヴィダ語族との対応関係については、文法構造が膠着語であること、そして語彙の対応があることを芝ススムや藤原明、江実らが提起した[27]。また、ドラヴィダ語族は古代のシュメール語やアッカド語等、とも関連しているという説はインドにおいて存在しており、タミル語はどちらかといえば古代メソポタミアで話されていた言葉に起源がある可能性も否定できないので、日本語の起源はシュメール語にもある可能性はある。

クレオールタミル語説 [編集]大野晋はインド南方やスリランカで用いられているタミル語と日本語との基礎語彙を比較し、日本語が語彙・文法などの点でタミル語と共通点をもつとの説を唱えるが[28]、比較言語学の方法上の問題から批判が多い[29]。後に大野は批判をうけ、系統論を放棄し、日本語はクレオールタミル語であるとする説を唱えた。

「大野晋#クレオールタミル語説」も参照

大野はオックスフォード『ドラヴィダ語語源事典』[30]を参照するうち、サンスクリット学の悉曇のため、日本語の五十音順と同じくa, i, u, e, o, ka, ki, ku …の順番で表記されていることに驚き[31]、のちマラヤーラム語、カンナダ語、テルグ語などのドラヴィダ語のうちとりわけタミル語との対応が著しいことにきづいた。

発音・音韻の対応 [編集]北インドの多くの言語が三母音(サンスクリット等で母音/半母音として扱われるrやlを除いて)を基礎としており、またヒンディー語等ではe、oが常に長母音として扱われるのに対して、タミル語の基本はa, i, u, e, oの五母音であり、それに長短の別と二重母音(aiとau)が加わることで計12の母音を区別する。また子音は有気音と無気音を区別しない他、有声音(日本語で言う濁音)と無声音(同じく清音または半濁音)の間の対立もない。ただ単語の先頭や同子音が重なった場合に無声音、単語の中途、同系の鼻音の後などに有声音で発音される傾向があり、これらの点は日本語の連濁と相似である。

日本語との差異は、日本語で「ラ行」にあたる音、英語を含む西洋語なら r や l の流音に相当する音に、五種の区別が存在すること[32]、また、反舌音(舌の先を硬口蓋まで反らせて発音する一連の子音)がある[33]。

大野説のうち、その根幹にあるのが音韻複合対応に関する対応関係の分析であり、大野は音韻複合対応表をつくっている[34]。以下、概要を記す。

タミル語と日本語間の音韻の複合対応については、タミル語内部にa/i、a/u、k/v、v/p、v/m(音価省略)などの交替形が併存する。そうすると、たとえばタミル語ca-に対し、日本語sa-、si-双方の対応が考えられ、またタミル語ka-に対し、日本語ka-、ha-(タミル語va-より日本語*pa->fa->ha-対応)双方の対応が考えられる。同時にタミル語/v/は日本語/w/との対応も考えられる。更には日本語においても「さびしい」と「さみしい」など唇音同士の交替、また「ほどろ」と「はだら」などの交替がある上に、原初の日本語の音韻などを保存していると見られる古代東国方言では「こころ」を「けけれ」と言うなど、活発な交替がみられる。こうしてタミル語内部の交替に影響された音韻対応が見られる。

またタミル語neriという名詞には[(1)規則, 原理、(2)方法、(3)教訓、道徳、(4)宗旨、(5)<馬のごとき>歩み、(6)曲がっている]という六つの意味がある。他方、日本語noriは[(1)規則。法令。法度、(2)方法。例「そのマジナイやむる法(ノリ)を定む」(神代紀)、(3)教化。例「わが風(ノリ)を万国に光(てら)すこと」(継体紀)、(4)仏法、仏の教え。例「仏にあひ奉りてノリを聞くべし」(宇津保物語)、(5)里程。例「道のノリ5里なり」(日葡辞典)。道の「歩み」という意味、(6)伸(の)り(刀の反りのこと)。建築・土木で、垂直を基準にした傾斜の度合。また、その傾斜した面。]という意味がある。タミル語のner-iの意味(1)~(6)は、日本語nor-iの意味(1)~(6)に完全に対応するのである。この場合、タミル語-e-はその古形*-a-からa/o対応したと考えられる[35]。

こうしてタミル語と日本語の多義語の間には偶然以上の合致が多く認められる。更には、たとえば倭迹迹日百襲姫(ヤマト・トト・ヒ・モモソ・ヒメ)のような日本の神の名もタミル語で解読できる事例もある。タミル語でツタや蛇瓜の意味を持つ語が日本語では蛇となっている例が多いところから、タミル語で蛇瓜を意味するtatt-anは列島内でtotoに変化し「ヘビ」を意味し、またタミル語maimai[崇拝の意]は日本語mom-oと対応し、日本語に「ももす」という動詞があったと想定し[36]、倭迹迹日百襲姫は、ヤマトの「toto(ヘビ)霊を崇拝する姫」ということになる。そして倭迹迹日百襲姫は日本神話上、ヤマトの蛇巫(へびふ)とされているので、それにふさわしい神名となる。もっともこうした対応は、系統論的観点からは認められない[37]。

音韻複合対応の要因については、日本列島にフィリピンや台湾、朝鮮半島と同様に、複数の異言語話者がいたことが考えられる。たとえば隼人は明らかにヤマト言葉とは異なる言語の話者であったとされる[38]。

文法の対応関係
古典タミル語と古典日本語の文法構造の共通性には以下がある[39]。

語順(ともに主語―目的語―動詞―助動詞―助詞)
語順は日本語と同様、SOV型。OSV型となる場合もあるが、動詞に接辞をつけて文相当の意味を持たせる場合はSOVが基本。ただし、マラヤーラム語と同様に、主部だけが文末に来るOVS型も少なからず用いられる。[40]。
関係代名詞がない
複文を作るための関係詞はなく、日本語と同じく「水を-飲む-人」、「私が-見た-物」という順でつなげばよい。ただし、文芸作品ではサンスクリット語の影響を受けた関係節表現が見られる[41]。また代名詞の前に動詞(「・・・する人」など)や形容詞(「よい人」など)を付加して複合名詞にする。
文末は動詞―助動詞―助詞でおわる
助動詞の配列順序が同一である

Nata(動詞)・tta(使役)・ppat(受身)・tatt(完了)・um(推量)・ kollo(疑問)
行か(動詞)・せ(使役)・られ(受身)・たら(完了)・む(推量)・か(疑問)

助詞・助動詞は22語も対応する
格を表すのにも日本語の助詞に相当する接尾辞が用いられる。また日本語の「こ・そ・あ・ど」にちょうど相当する4種の接頭辞i、a、u、e がある。vaḻi 「道」に対して、ivvaḻi 「この道」、avvaḻi 「あの道」、uvvaḻi 「その道」、 evvaḻi 「どの道」。ただし、uは古語および擬古体で用いられ、普通の現代語では用いられず、「その」はaにより代表される。

疑問は文末に疑問の助詞をつけくわえる
「係り結び」現象がある。
ほか、和歌の五七五七七韻律の形式についても、中国にも朝鮮にもそれがないが、約二千年前のタミルに「サンガム」という歌集があり、それが同じ形式をもっていたと大野は指摘する[42]。 タミル言語学者のアゲスティアリンガム教授はタミルの韻律は特殊であったと考えていたが、この構造的対応に驚いたという[43]。

なお、『日本語の起源 新版』[44]で大野晋は、タミル文化圏から日本への文化移入に、五百年のタイムラグを伴っていることを示している[45]が、近年、放射年代測定の進展によって日本の弥生時代が五百年遡る可能性が出てきた。つまり、農業、宗教祭祀、金属器とそれらに伴う言語・詩歌などの文化が、両地域にほぼ同時期に伝えられていたとする大野説を補強する可能性が示唆された。2004年、大野晋は『弥生文明と南インド』[46]を著し、言語のみならず総合的な文明の移入、朝鮮語を加えた三者の関連といった点を重点に論じている。

ほか大野は、タミル人は日本に行くと良質の真珠が採れる、という話を聞き、日本に赴いて真珠を採取し、あるいは日本列島の現地人を用いて真珠を採取せしめた結果、現地でピジン・クレオール語が生じた、とする説を示した[47]。

islandBrother
rice existed very long time ago, can be traced to 6,000 years ago.

in japan, oldest wet rice discovered by science was 2,800 - 3,000 years ago.


稲作の起源とその考古学的分析 [編集]「稲作#日本への伝来」も参照

日本人の渡来ルートを知るために稲作の渡来ルートを考える研究があり、いくつかの説が存在している。

かつて、佐々木高明らによる照葉樹林文化論は、稲作が中国雲南省などの山間部における陸稲を発祥としていると主張していたが、近年、長江文明の全貌が明らかにされるにつれ、稲作は長江下流域の水稲耕作を発祥とする説が有力視されつつある。

従来、稲作は弥生時代に朝鮮半島を南下、もしくは半島南部を経由して来たとされてきたが、2005年、岡山県彦崎貝塚の縄文時代前期(約6000年前)の地層から稲のプラント・オパールが見つかっており[32]、縄文中期には稲作(陸稲)をしていたとする学説が多数出た[33][34][35][36]。それに加え、遼東半島や朝鮮北部での水耕田跡が近代まで見つからないこと、朝鮮半島で確認された炭化米が紀元前2000年が最古であり、畑作米の確認しか取れず、日本より遡れないこと、極東アジアにおけるジャポニカ種の稲の遺伝分析において、朝鮮半島を含む中国東北部からジャポニカ種の遺伝子の一部が確認されないことなどの複数の証拠から、水稲は大陸からの直接伝来ルート(対馬暖流ルート・東南アジアから南方伝来ルート)による伝来である学説が見直され、日本から朝鮮半島へ伝わった可能性を指摘する佐藤洋一郎の説もある[37]。一方、これらに対して農学者の池橋宏は、従来の「縄文稲作農耕」説は農学的に見ても疑わしく、日本の稲作は江南を起源とし、北九州に持ち込まれた可能性が高いと主張している[38]。しかしながら、最近の遺伝子解析技術の進歩はめざましく、こういった学説では日本での水田跡が紀元前まで遡るのに比べて、朝鮮半島では水田耕作の遺跡が約1500年前くらいまでしか遡れない事実と符合するものでもある。[39]現在、炭素14による日本最古の水田稲作遺跡は約2800 - 3000年前とされている
Rayzor
What the!!?? islandBrother, how many similar thread you want to create?

http://www.asiafinest.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=243171
http://www.asiafinest.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=288129
http://www.asiafinest.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=288129
http://www.asiafinest.com/forum/index.php?...p;#entry4865914

Oh well, I will just post everything again for reference.

QUOTE
In the present study, the phylogenetic tree (Fig. 2) and
MDS scattergram (Fig. 3) showed that the Japanese
populations were somewhat closer to the southern
Chinese populations than the northern and central
Chinese populations
. This suggests that both the present
Japanese and the present southern Han Chinese share
some common features with each other
. Therefore, there
is a possibility that the southern Chinese contributed
more to the present day Japanese population than the
northern Chinese.


QUOTE
In short, Japanese (both Hondo- and
Okinawa Japanese) are isolated and distinguishable
from other east and Southeast Asian population, and
slightly more affected by southern part of Chinese than
by northern or middle part of Chinese
.


http://sayer.lab.nig.ac.jp/~saitou/paper-p..._HumGenet06.pdf



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_peop...-chromosome_DNA

QUOTE
Researchers appearing on the program conducted a morphological study of the facial features of 1,047 randomly selected Japanese. Of them, 35.1 percent were found to fit the northern Asian type, commonly found in the people of northern China; 22 percent were categorized as Korean Peninsula; 28.3 percent, southern China; 13.3 percent Indochina; and 5.1 percent fitted the facial features typical of the southern Pacific region.


http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/fl20020120a4.html
cosanostra
perhaps this is map the route of ancient Japan from Sundaland (Indonesia)

kieshin
this is like saying all european came from africa, that africa exactly is the south of europe, just like indonesia is the south of japan, everyone seem rooted from the south, near equator,

latest study says that all asian came from the southeast asia n indian is the mother of all asian....no surprise he?
islandBrother
QUOTE (kieshin @ Sep 6 2011, 11:52 AM) *
this is like saying all european came from africa, that africa exactly is the south of europe, just like indonesia is the south of japan, everyone seem rooted from the south, near equator,

latest study says that all asian came from the southeast asia n indian is the mother of all asian....no surprise he?


It is truth. asian are related.

22% Koreans are O2b* and 8% Koreans are O2b1, and 44.5% koreans are O3. 50% koreans are probably from south east asia.

Altaic language is roots in south east asia, or southern koreans were south east asian like japanese, before the end of ice age.
Yerroperil
QUOTE (islandBrother @ Sep 6 2011, 07:40 PM) *
It is truth. asian are related.

22% Koreans are O2b* and 8% Koreans are O2b1, and 44.5% koreans are O3. 50% koreans are probably from south east asia.

Altaic language is roots in south east asia, or southern koreans were south east asian like japanese, before the end of ice age.

Go on K chat and tell Koreans they are from SEA...
islandBrother
Yevgeny Polivanov, – January 25, 1938, Soviet linguist
Shichirō Murayama (村山 七郎, - 1995) ,Japanese linguist
P. Benedict

found 35% japanese base words are roots from language of filipino tribes and melanesian or austronesian language. grammer is similar to indonesian than altaic language.

altaic language is probably mixing of japanese (probably 90% south east asian), southern korean ( probably 50% south east asian) and manchurian (mongolian and north china). some altaic words related added to japan in mondern

http://bbs.jpwind.com/thread-6505-1-1.html
Yerroperil
QUOTE (islandBrother @ Sep 6 2011, 08:28 PM) *
Yevgeny Polivanov, – January 25, 1938, Soviet linguist
Shichirō Murayama (村山 七郎, - 1995) ,Japanese linguist
P. Benedict

found 35% japanese base words are roots from language of filipino tribes and melanesian or austronesian language. grammer is similar to indonesian than altaic language.

altaic language is probably mixing of japanese (probably 90% south east asian), southern korean ( probably 50% south east asian) and manchurian (mongolian and north china). some altaic words related added to japan in mondern

http://bbs.jpwind.com/thread-6505-1-1.html

How are Koreans 50% SEA?
islandBrother
QUOTE (Yerroperil @ Sep 6 2011, 09:35 PM) *
How are Koreans 50% SEA?


I told southern koreans.
Yerroperil
QUOTE (islandBrother @ Sep 6 2011, 08:39 PM) *
I told southern koreans.
e
What do you mean Southern Koreans according to other Koreans they said they were homogenous...
islandBrother
ancient korean kingdom was sam han.

Yerroperil. you don't want koreans to relato to south east asians?


QUOTE
22% Koreans are O2b* and 8% Koreans are O2b1, and 44.5% koreans are O3. 50% koreans are probably from south east asia.

Altaic language is roots in south east asia, or southern koreans were south east asian like japanese, before the end of ice age.


Koreans have south eastern DNAs, because east china sea was a land, during ice age, and it's why chinese not have O2b because O2b people live around coast, now below sea. O3 is probably chinese, but some from south east asia.
Hugham
^
You should know, there are many type of East Asian.

SE Asian has 3 type of people.

1. Khmer, Malays and Indonesian.
The original people of SE Asia are those Khmer, Malays and Indonesian. They are the people of Angkor Khmer Empire, Sri Vijaya Malays Empire and Majapahit Javanese Empire.

2. Laos, Northern Thailand and Northern Vietnam.
People of Laos, Hmong, Northern Thailand are immigrant from South China around Yunnan, around 1000 years ago, if I'm not mistake.

3. Papuan
Those people who live in Pacific Ocean.

I guess, there were multiple immigration to Japan, first is the Khmer-Malays kind of people, then Southern Chinese people. If I'm not mistake.

O yDNA ancestor was a good sailor, they went as far as Madagascar and Pacific islands.
kieshin
are all of you guys have low IQ or something

it is clearly said that ALL asian come from the south( south east asia) and then some move up north, this is like saying the european and afrikan are brother...because once the european was african that moved up north and stay there (isolated) for 10,000 yrs. there is this saying that goes: it doesn't matter where you from it is where you go and what you do right now that matters.

asian too came from the south and then some moved up north, through harsh condition, climate, changed of diet, they start mutating, the korean stayed in korea n didn't get mixed up with anyone for 5000 yrs that's why westerners called them hermit kingdom.

the chinese tho took the opposite path, they been mixing up with everyone non-stop since the beginning, north south, even the west, that's why han chinese looking ppl make up the largest number of humanity, no matter who they mix with nowadays they will end up looking han chinese now.

the japanese mixed up with the ainu or some islander, while the mongols mixing with the european


what baffle me tho why would ALL THESE SEA want to link with korean while they look nothing alike? while tons of chinese look exactly like SEA, the chinese mixing with SEA in SEA like crazy

this is what I see as the downside of these interracial thing, all these brown southerners like you when you look nothing like them but then if you starting to look like their mutant brother, they hate you
Yerroperil
QUOTE (islandBrother @ Sep 6 2011, 10:21 PM) *
ancient korean kingdom was sam han.

Yerroperil. you don't want koreans to relato to south east asians?




Koreans have south eastern DNAs, because east china sea was a land, during ice age, and it's why chinese not have O2b because O2b people live around coast, now below sea. O3 is probably chinese, but some from south east asia.

No just Koreans tell me they are Altaic and are not SEAs. O2b probably originated in around Manchuria.
doggyji
I don't know about the exact numbers, DNA analysis and what the most widely accepted theory currently is but Koreans are commonly aware of northern and southern origins, simply speaking. Siberian/Manchurian route and Southern Chinese mainland route, which in turn is related to SEA. It's only a matter of what contribution was more dominant.
islandBrother
if koreans told, you believe they are not south east asian?

QUOTE (Yerroperil @ Sep 7 2011, 01:29 AM) *
No just Koreans tell me they are Altaic and are not SEAs. O2b probably originated in around Manchuria.


So, you think koreans, O2b, are no relation to south east asians?
doggyji
What's funny about this whole ethnic origin thing is that it really depends on how far you want to trace back. Every human is related in one way or another, depending on how you look at it.
islandBrother
doggyji

so, you think O2b* are traced to south east asians?
doggyji
QUOTE (islandBrother @ Sep 7 2011, 03:44 AM) *
doggyji

so, you think O2b* are traced to south east asians?
As a non-expert who does not have a vested interest in genetics, I have no concrete opinion regarding that. embarassedlaugh.gif
thesecond
QUOTE (Hugham @ Sep 7 2011, 12:26 AM) *
^
You should know, there are many type of East Asian.

SE Asian has 3 type of people.

1. Khmer, Malays and Indonesian.
The original people of SE Asia are those Khmer, Malays and Indonesian. They are the people of Angkor Khmer Empire, Sri Vijaya Malays Empire and Majapahit Javanese Empire.

2. Laos, Northern Thailand and Northern Vietnam.
People of Laos, Hmong, Northern Thailand are immigrant from South China around Yunnan, around 1000 years ago, if I'm not mistake.

3. Papuan
Those people who live in Pacific Ocean.

I guess, there were multiple immigration to Japan, first is the Khmer-Malays kind of people, then Southern Chinese people. If I'm not mistake.

O yDNA ancestor was a good sailor, they went as far as Madagascar and Pacific islands.


Talk about diversified,
Southeast asians(from northeast india to philipine, from southwest china to indo-china peninsula) r more diversified than east asian(from southern china to NE china, from japan island to tibetan highland).
East asians r more diversified than north asia (from russia far east region to mid asia)
That's why scientists made conclusion "NEA was from SEA".

So everyone in asia has a southern origin.

Hugham
^
May be I'm wrong, but this is what I know:

Our ancestor is part of MNOPS around 40000 years ago. Originated in Central Asia.

Then they immigrated to East Asia from 2 different paths, India and Xinjiang.

During that time, our ancestor didn't have modern look like us today, all of them look like Papuan people with a big jaw.

The evolution or mutation into modern look we know today, occurred around 10000 years ago in many different places:
1. Baikal Lake
2. Yellow River
3. Yunnan or South China
4. IndoChina to Nepal
5. Papua and Pacific Islands

That is why, although we all shared the NO yDNA, but we have different faces according to the place we evolved.

Around 10000 years ago, Khmer-Malays people immigrate to Indonesia islands.

Around 1000 years ago, Thai-Lao people immigrate to modern location today from South China. Pushed the Khmer-Malays people to the south.


When we talk about Japanese ancestors mentioned above, they came from which groups?

Southern Chinese or Khmer-Malays group?


I believe, mainly Japanese ancestor came from South China with small Khmer-Malays origins from Philippine and Taiwan.

That is my theory. What do you think?
crabdonut
It's already been proven that Japanese royalty came from the Korean peninsula.
Rayzor
QUOTE (kieshin @ Sep 7 2011, 01:16 AM) *
are all of you guys have low IQ or something

it is clearly said that ALL asian come from the south( south east asia) and then some move up north, this is like saying the european and afrikan are brother...because once the european was african that moved up north and stay there (isolated) for 10,000 yrs. there is this saying that goes: it doesn't matter where you from it is where you go and what you do right now that matters.

asian too came from the south and then some moved up north, through harsh condition, climate, changed of diet, they start mutating, the korean stayed in korea n didn't get mixed up with anyone for 5000 yrs that's why westerners called them hermit kingdom.

the chinese tho took the opposite path, they been mixing up with everyone non-stop since the beginning, north south, even the west, that's why han chinese looking ppl make up the largest number of humanity, no matter who they mix with nowadays they will end up looking han chinese now.

the japanese mixed up with the ainu or some islander, while the mongols mixing with the european


what baffle me tho why would ALL THESE SEA want to link with korean while they look nothing alike? while tons of chinese look exactly like SEA, the chinese mixing with SEA in SEA like crazy

this is what I see as the downside of these interracial thing, all these brown southerners like you when you look nothing like them but then if you starting to look like their mutant brother, they hate you


As I just said before, it all because of genetics. All this because of o2a-o2b-o2 connection. o2b, which are found in Korean and o2a common in southeast asia especially Indonesia are siblings since they are both descendant of haplogroup o2. You can tell islandBrother is using the very same reason as other southeast asian to relate southeast asian with Japanese and Korean.

QUOTE
It is a descendant haplogroup of Haplogroup O2.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_O2b_%28Y-DNA%29

QUOTE
Haplogroup O2a is a descendent branch of Haplogroup O2.


QUOTE
Haplogroup O2a reaches its highest frequencies among the populations of the islands of Sumatra, Java, Bali, and Borneo in western and central Indonesia.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_O2a_%28Y-DNA%29

As for the Han Chinese, they don't relate themselves with Han Chinese because they can't. Unlike the Korean, both northern Han Chinese and southern Han Chinese are o3 dominant, not o2 dominant group dominant.

QUOTE
Although Haplogroup O3 appears to be primarily associated with Chinese populations, it also forms a significant component of the Y-chromosome diversity of most modern populations of the East Asian region.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_O3_%28Y-DNA%29

It doesn't matter how you think Han Chinese look like, because it just your opinion, not fact. Looks/physical appearance is a subjective issue. By the way, Han Chinese in southeast asia do not mix with southeast asian natives. They are genetically the same and as pure as those Han Chinese in China.

By the way, you sound like a typical bitter asian guys that hate interracial marriage. Whatever the reason is, don't use Han Chinese physical appearances to justify your hatred.
islandBrother
QUOTE (Hugham @ Sep 7 2011, 03:40 AM) *
^
May be I'm wrong, but this is what I know:

Our ancestor is part of MNOPS around 40000 years ago. Originated in Central Asia.

Then they immigrated to East Asia from 2 different paths, India and Xinjiang.

During that time, our ancestor didn't have modern look like us today, all of them look like Papuan people with a big jaw.

The evolution or mutation into modern look we know today, occurred around 10000 years ago in many different places:
1. Baikal Lake
2. Yellow River
3. Yunnan or South China
4. IndoChina to Nepal
5. Papua and Pacific Islands

That is why, although we all shared the NO yDNA, but we have different faces according to the place we evolved.

Around 10000 years ago, Khmer-Malays people immigrate to Indonesia islands.

Around 1000 years ago, Thai-Lao people immigrate to modern location today from South China. Pushed the Khmer-Malays people to the south.


When we talk about Japanese ancestors mentioned above, they came from which groups?

Southern Chinese or Khmer-Malays group?


I believe, mainly Japanese ancestor came from South China with small Khmer-Malays origins from Philippine and Taiwan.

That is my theory. What do you think?


hugham

maybe it's true
many other japanese said japan are related to south china, and got rices harvest from china 8,000 - 10,000 years ago during ice age, there was a land bridge between china and japan .

but first article said its sunda land, sunda land is indonesia? indonesia is a source for some south china tribes, and others
about sunda land group, I don't know


korea is populated by O2b* + O3 from south east asia like 10,000 years ago during ice age, like japanese jomon migrated using foots on land bridge.
korea and japan separated by sea like 6,000 - 10,000 years ago.

korea is also from south china or from sunda land.

sources = http://www.cjapan.net/en/content/origin-imperial-house-japan
islandBrother
I have news.

QUOTE
Investigative Genetics 2011 result:

Japanese: (%)
C3: 6.88
N: 2.50
O3a3: 16.88
O3a*: 6.88
O2b1: 23.75
D2: 29.30

Vietnamese (%)
C3: 12.50
N: 2.08
O3a3: 27.08
O3a*: 29.17
O2b1: 4.17
D2: 0


many O3 are in vietnam, and O2b1 in vietnam, D1 in vietnam, maybe, 90% japanese were from south east asia, vietnam, indonesia, phillippine, laos, cambodia, thailand, malaysia during ice age, and japanese emperor is from south east asia, or tribes of southern china, like 10,000 years ago,

in ice age , japanese islands were part of chinese and south east asian continents. also, korea was also a part of chinese and south east asian contient during ice age. after ice age, human moved to mountains, now known japan, or korea, but korea connected to china, after ice age.


islandBrother
QUOTE (Rayzor @ Sep 8 2011, 07:28 AM) *
As I just said before, it all because of genetics. All this because of o2a-o2b-o2 connection. o2b, which are found in Korean and o2a common in southeast asia especially Indonesia are siblings since they are both descendant of haplogroup o2. You can tell islandBrother is using the very same reason as other southeast asian to relate southeast asian with Japanese and Korean.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_O2b_%28Y-DNA%29





http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_O2a_%28Y-DNA%29

As for the Han Chinese, they don't relate themselves with Han Chinese because they can't. Unlike the Korean, both northern Han Chinese and southern Han Chinese are o3 dominant, not o2 dominant group dominant.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_O3_%28Y-DNA%29

It doesn't matter how you think Han Chinese look like, because it just your opinion, not fact. Looks/physical appearance is a subjective issue. By the way, Han Chinese in southeast asia do not mix with southeast asian natives. They are genetically the same and as pure as those Han Chinese in China.

By the way, you sound like a typical bitter asian guys that hate interracial marriage. Whatever the reason is, don't use Han Chinese physical appearances to justify your hatred.



Rayzor,

i like your science approach. I misunderstood you, sorry.
thesecond
QUOTE (Hugham @ Sep 7 2011, 04:40 AM) *
^
May be I'm wrong, but this is what I know:
Our ancestor is part of MNOPS around 40000 years ago. Originated in Central Asia.
Then they immigrated to East Asia from 2 different paths, India and Xinjiang.
During that time, our ancestor didn't have modern look like us today, all of them look like Papuan people with a big jaw.
The evolution or mutation into modern look we know today, occurred around 10000 years ago in many different places:
1. Baikal Lake
2. Yellow River
3. Yunnan or South China
4. IndoChina to Nepal
5. Papua and Pacific Islands

That is why, although we all shared the NO yDNA, but we have different faces according to the place we evolved.

Around 10000 years ago, Khmer-Malays people immigrate to Indonesia islands.

Around 1000 years ago, Thai-Lao people immigrate to modern location today from South China. Pushed the Khmer-Malays people to the south.


When we talk about Japanese ancestors mentioned above, they came from which groups?

Southern Chinese or Khmer-Malays group?


I believe, mainly Japanese ancestor came from South China with small Khmer-Malays origins from Philippine and Taiwan.

That is my theory. What do you think?

Your theory is very popular pre WWII , which was very popular among those whites supremacist, for example, Adolf Hitler.
According to that theory, asians(I just mean mongoloid) can be divided into two groups, the north and the south. The north immigration farewell their whites brothers in mid asia(or pamir highland) and migrated to the east while their "white brothers" migrated to the west. All worlds' civilization was created by this group of immigration. Other ethnics like aboriginals of SE asia/south asia r just some inferior race which never created their own civilization.
Very racism? Right?

Check ice age. 40000 years ago, the mid asia was coverred by thick ice.Human beings can not survive there. And according to u, MNO r the ancestor of mongoloid, then how about those C in northern asia? They rn't mongoloid any more?


But at least u get a point. Whites or Yellows may look more like their australoid brothers at that time.

In the end There is no southern chinese group or khmer-malay group from anthropology
islandBrother
thesecond,

i understand. japanese emperor and jomons are also from southern china, Han Chinese of Sichuan, Guangxi, and Guangdong.

but even without O2* YDNA, chinese already relatives of japanese emperor because marriages of japanese emperor with chinese exile princess from chinese empire thousands of years ago.





The subclades of Haplogroup O2a with their defining mutation, according to the 2006 ISOGG tree:

O2a (M95) Typical of Austro-Asiatic peoples, Kradai peoples, Malays, Indonesians, and Malagasy, with a moderate distribution throughout South Asia, Southeast Asia, East Asia, and Central Asia
O2a*
O2a1 (M88, M111) Frequently found among Hani, She people, Tai peoples, Cambodians, and Vietnamese, with a moderate distribution among Qiang, Hlai, Miao, Yao, Taiwanese aborigines, populations of Borneo,[6] and Han Chinese of Sichuan, Guangxi, and Guangdong

O2a1*
O2a1a (PK4) Found at low frequency among Pashtuns,[7] Tharus,[8] and tribals of Andhra Pradesh[8]
O2a2 (M297)
kieshin
QUOTE (Rayzor @ Sep 8 2011, 07:28 AM) *
As I just said before, it all because of genetics. All this because of o2a-o2b-o2 connection. o2b, which are found in Korean and o2a common in southeast asia especially Indonesia are siblings since they are both descendant of haplogroup o2. You can tell islandBrother is using the very same reason as other southeast asian to relate southeast asian with Japanese and Korean.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_O2b_%28Y-DNA%29





http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_O2a_%28Y-DNA%29

As for the Han Chinese, they don't relate themselves with Han Chinese because they can't. Unlike the Korean, both northern Han Chinese and southern Han Chinese are o3 dominant, not o2 dominant group dominant.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_O3_%28Y-DNA%29

It doesn't matter how you think Han Chinese look like, because it just your opinion, not fact. Looks/physical appearance is a subjective issue. By the way, Han Chinese in southeast asia do not mix with southeast asian natives. They are genetically the same and as pure as those Han Chinese in China.

By the way, you sound like a typical bitter asian guys that hate interracial marriage. Whatever the reason is, don't use Han Chinese physical appearances to justify your hatred.


so this is complete waste of time, but you gave me the link, did you read those link that you gave?
either u did not understand what you read (because you are dumb) or you have hidden motif

without further ado, I will paste the whole $hit here, unlike u which only pasted one sentence suited to ur agenda, I will paste the whole $hit!

QUOTE
Haplogroup O2a (Y-DNA)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Haplogroup O2a
Possible time of origin
Possible place of origin
Ancestor O2
Descendants O2a1, O2a2
Defining mutations M95

In genetics, Haplogroup O2a (M95) is a human Y-chromosome DNA haplogroup.

Haplogroup O2a is a descendent branch of Haplogroup O2. Its closest extant phylogenetic relatives are the Haplogroup O2* Y-chromosomes found at a low frequency throughout most of East Eurasia and the Haplogroup O2b Y-chromosomes found at low frequencies among the indigenous populations of Inner Mongolia and Manchuria and at much higher frequencies in Korea and Japan.
[edit] Distribution

Haplogroup O2a is distributed widely in Asia, from southern India to the Altai Mountains and Central Asia in the west, and from Indonesia to northern China and Japan in the east. It is found only at marginally low frequencies of approximately 1% at the periphery of its distribution in southern India, Central Asia, northern China, and Japan, but many populations within the vast intervening territory in South Asia, Southeast Asia, and southern China display a greatly elevated frequency of Haplogroup O2a Y-chromosomes. Patrilines within Haplogroup O2a predominate among the Austro-Asiatic populations of South and Southeast Asia, such as the Khmer of Cambodia and the Khasi of Meghalaya in northeastern India. Some researchers have reported that slightly over half of all men in a composite sample of Austro-Asiatic speakers belonged to Haplogroup O2a. Haplogroup O3 (M122), which attains its peak frequency among the Sino-Tibetan and Hmong–Mien peoples of China and Southeast Asia, and Haplogroup O1a (M119), which predominates among Taiwanese aborigines and many populations of the Philippines, also generally occur among speakers of Austro-Asiatic languages in South China and the Indochinese Peninsula, but usually at much lower frequencies than Haplogroup O2a. The hypothesis that Haplogroup O2a was the major Y-chromosome haplogroup of the proto-Austro-Asiatic population is strengthened by the fact that Haplogroup O2a is the only haplogroup found among many Austro-Asiatic-speaking tribes, such as the Juang of mainland India and the Shompen of the Nicobar Islands.[1][2]

Haplogroup O2a also has been observed with high frequency in samples of Daic-speaking peoples of Thailand and neighboring areas, which may reflect assimilation of the older Austro-Asiatic Mon–Khmer populations that have left ample evidence of their presence in the region prior to the immigration of Daic speakers.

Outside of the region in which Austro-Asiatic languages are currently spoken or have a historically attested presence, Haplogroup O2a reaches its highest frequencies among the populations of the islands of Sumatra, Java, Bali, and Borneo in western and central Indonesia.[3] Haplogroup O2a has been found to be by far the most common Y-chromosome haplogroup among the Balinese, occurring in approximately 58.6% (323/551) of a sample of Balinese men; Haplogroup O1a-M119 and Haplogroup O3-M122, which are typical of Austronesian peoples outside of Malaysia and Indonesia, were observed in only 18.1% (100/551) and 6.9% (38/551) of Balinese men.[4] Haplogroup O2a has also been found to be the most frequently occurring haplogroup among Malay men in Singapore.[5] The reason for its substantial presence in these populations, all of which are Austronesian-speaking, is yet to be elucidated.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_O2a_%28Y-DNA%29

QUOTE
Haplogroup O2b (Y-DNA)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Haplogroup O2b
Possible time of origin 6,300 [95% CI 600–37,000] years ago[1]
Possible place of origin Manchuria or a nearby part of northern East Asia
Ancestor O2
Defining mutations M176/SRY465, P49, 022454
Highest frequencies Japanese 32%[2] (26%[3][4]-36%[1]), Koreans 30%[5] (19%[3][6]-40%[1]), Okinawans 23%[7] (22%[8]-23%[9]), Manchus 19%[10] (4%[11]-34%[1])

Haplogroup O2b (SRY465, a.k.a. M176) is a human Y-chromosome DNA haplogroup. It is a descendant haplogroup of Haplogroup O2. Haplogroup O2b is found mainly in the northernmost parts of East Asia, from the Uriankhai and Zakhchin peoples of western Mongolia[1] to the Japanese of Japan, though it also has been detected sporadically in the Buryats[3] and Udegeys[12] of southern Siberia, very rarely among populations of Southeast Asia (including Indonesia,[8][3] the Philippines,[3] Thailand,[3] and Vietnam[8][3]), and Micronesians].[8] This haplogroup is found with its highest frequency and diversity values among modern populations of Japan and Korea and is absent from most populations in China, but it has been detected in some samples of Han Chinese from Beijing[3] and Jiangsu,[13] Daurs,[14] Hezhes,[14] Koreans in China,[14][1] Manchus,[14][1][11] and Sibes.[14]
Subgroups

The phylogeography of Haplogroup O2b suggests an ancient origin in Manchuria or a nearby part of northern East Asia, followed by a long period of isolated evolution and population increase in the vicinity of the Korean Peninsula. Only branches of this haplogroup that are labeled as Haplogroup O2b*, i.e. those that do not exhibit the 47z mutation, have been detected among the indigenous populations of Inner Mongolia and northern Manchuria, and even then they are found only at very low frequencies. However, Haplogroup O2b* Y-chromosomes have been detected with high frequency in Korea, where they account for approximately 14%[3][4][14] to 33%[8] of the Korean male population.
Haplogroup O2b1
Possible time of origin 7,870 [95% CI 5,720–12,630] years ago[8]
Possible place of origin Korean Peninsula or Japanese Archipelago[3][8]
Ancestor O2b
Defining mutations 47z
Highest frequencies Japanese 24%[15] (19%[3]-25%[8][9]), Okinawans 17%[16] (11%[8]-20%[9]), Koreans 8%[17] (4%[8][11]-12%[14]), Manchus 7%[18] (0%[11][8][14]-19%[4])

A subclade of Haplogroup O2b, namely Haplogroup O2b1-47z, is found with high frequency among the Yamato people and Ryukyuan populations of Japan. Haplogroup O2b1 has been detected in approximately 22% of all males who speak a Japonic language, while it has not been found at all among a total of twenty Ainu males whose Y-DNA has been sampled in two genetic studies.[8][19] Based on the STR haplotype diversity within Haplogroup O2b1, it has been estimated that this haplogroup began to experience a population expansion among the proto-Japanese of approximately 4,000 years ago, which makes it a good candidate for a marker of the intrusion of a Neolithic population of the prehistoric Korean Peninsula into the southwestern parts of the Japanese Archipelago. However, the parent haplogroup, O2b*, is also found among Japanese, although at a relatively low frequency of approximately 4%[14] to 8%[9], and the descendant haplogroup O2b1 is found only with low frequency among samples of modern Koreans, which suggests the possibility that Haplogroup O2b* might have colonized the Japanese Archipelago much earlier, with the subgroup O2b1 subsequently evolving within the proto-Japanese-Ryukyuan population of the western parts of the archipelago.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_O2b_%28Y-DNA%29



QUOTE
Haplogroup O3 (Y-DNA)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article's lead section may not adequately summarize its contents. Please consider expanding the lead to provide an accessible overview of the article's key points. (May 2008)
Haplogroup O3
Possible time of origin 10,000[1] to 30,000[2] years ago
Possible place of origin China[1] or Southeast Asia[2]
Ancestor O
Defining mutations M122
Highest frequencies Derung 100%,[2] Nishi 94%,[3] Adi 89%,[3] Tamang 87%,[4] Achang 82.5%,[2] Apatani 82%,[3] Naga 76%,[3] Nu 70%[2]-86%,[5] She 63%[6]-74%,[7] Bai 48%[2][5]-82%,[2] Yao 34%[7]-83%,[7] Miao 44%[2]-70%,[6] Han 30%[8]-74%,[9] Garo 55%[10]-59%,[11] Tujia 53%[6]-54%,[2] Filipinos 33%[12]-62%,[13] Va 48%,[2] Lisu 47%[2]-65%,[5] Shui 20%[14]-70%,[2] Hezhe 44%,[7] Vietnamese 39%[13]-41%,[6] Manchu 38%[6]-43%,[15] Koreans 32%[15]-47%,[16] Lahu 36%[5]-43%,[2] Qiang 36%,[7] Western Yugur 35%,[17] Tibetans 32%[5] [10%[17]-45%[5]], Eastern Yugur 31%,[17] Salar 30%,[18] Khasi 29%[10]-32%,[11] Malaysians 31%,[6] Yi 29% [20%-44%],[5] Bonan 28%,[18] Hani 18%[7]-47%,[5] Hui/Dungans 17%[7][19]-40%,[20] Polynesians 25%[12][21]-32.5%,[22] Sibe 27%,[7] Daur 26%,[7] Thai 16%,[13]-35%[2][23] Dongxiang 24%,[18] Manchurian Evenks 23%[7]-24%,[6] Mosuo 23%,[24] Micronesians 18%[12]-27%,[22] Zhuang 16%[6]-29%,[22] Dai 22% [3%-40%],[25] Blang 21%,[2] Newar 21%,[4] Japanese 16%[15]-23%,[7] Okinawans 16%[12]-21%,[26] Buyei 4%[25]-31%,[7] Cambodians 14%[2]-22%,[27] Mongolians 8%[20]-23%[12]

In human genetics, Haplogroup O3 (M122) is a Y-chromosome haplogroup.
Contents
[hide]

1 Origins
2 Distribution
3 See also
4 References
5 External links

[edit] Origins

Haplogroup O3 is a descendant haplogroup of haplogroup O. Some researchers believe that it first appeared in China approximately 10,000 years ago[1], while others believe it to have had an origin in Southeast Asia approximately 25,000-30,000 years ago.[2] The prehistoric peopling of East Asia by modern humans remains controversial with respect to early population migrations. In a systematic sampling and genetic screening of an East Asian–specific Y-chromosome haplogroup (O3-M122) in 2,332 individuals from diverse East Asian populations, results indicate that the O3-M122 lineage is dominant in East Asian populations, with an average frequency of 44.3%. Microsatellite data show that the O3 haplotypes are more diverse in Southeast Asia than those in northern East Asia.[2] This suggests a southern origin of the O3-M122 mutation to be likely.
[edit] Distribution

Although Haplogroup O3 appears to be primarily associated with Chinese populations, it also forms a significant component of the Y-chromosome diversity of most modern populations of the East Asian region. Haplogroup O3 is found in over 50% of all modern Chinese males (with frequency ranging from 30/101 = 29.7% among Pinghua-speaking Hans in Guangxi[8] to 110/148 = 74.3% among Hans in Changting, Fujian[9]), about 40% of Manchu, Korean, and Vietnamese males, about 33.3%[12] to 62%[13][28] of Filipino males, about 10.5%[22] to 55.6%[22] of Malaysian males, about 10% (4/39 Guide County, Qinghai)[17] to 45% (22/49 Zhongdian County, Yunnan)[5] of Tibetan males, about 20% (10/50 Shuangbai, northern Yunnan)[24] to 44% (8/18 Xishuangbanna, southern Yunnan)[5][6] of Yi males, about 25% of Zhuang[29] and Indonesian[30] males, and about 16%[15][31] to 20%[12] of Japanese males. The distribution of Haplogroup O3 stretches far into Central Asia (approx. 40% of Dungans,[20] 30% of Salars,[18] 28% of Bonan,[18] 24% of Dongxiang,[18] 18% to 22.8%[12] of Mongolians, 12% of Uyghurs,[20] 9% of Kazakhs,[20] 6.2% of Altayans,[32] and 4.1% of Uzbeks[20]) and Oceania (approx. 25%[12] to 32.5%[22] of Polynesians, 18%[12] to 27.4%[22] of Micronesians, and 5% of Melanesians[33]), albeit with reduced frequencies of most subclades. It should be noted that Haplogroup O3* Y-chromosomes, which are not defined by any identified downstream markers, are actually more common among certain non-Han Chinese populations than among Han Chinese ones, and the presence of these O3* Y-chromosomes among various populations of Central Asia, East Asia, and Oceania is more likely to reflect a very ancient shared ancestry of these populations rather than the result of any historical events. It remains to be seen whether Haplogroup O3* Y-chromosomes can be parsed into distinct subclades that display significant geographical or ethnic correlations.

Haplogroup O3 is also found very frequently among populations of Northeast India (Garo 42/71 = 59.2%,[11] Khasi 112/353 = 31.7%[11]) and Nepal (Tamang 39/45 = 86.7%, Newar 14/66 = 21.2%, general population of Kathmandu 16/77 = 20.8%).[4]

Among all the populations of East and Southeast Asia, Haplogroup O3 is most closely associated with those that speak a Sinitic, Tibeto-Burman, or Hmong–Mien language. Haplogroup O3 comprises about 50% or more of the total Y-chromosome variation among the populations of each of these language families. The Sinitic and Tibeto-Burman language families are generally believed to be derived from a common Sino-Tibetan protolanguage, and most linguists place the homeland of the Sino-Tibetan language family somewhere in northern China. The Hmong–Mien languages and cultures, for various archaeological and ethnohistorical reasons, are also generally believed to have derived from a source somewhere north of their current distribution, perhaps in northern or central China. The Tibetans, however, despite the fact that they speak a language of the Tibeto-Burman language family, have high percentages of the otherwise rare haplogroups D1 and D3, which are also found at much lower frequencies among the members of some other ethnic groups in East Asia and Central Asia.

Haplogroup O3 has been implicated as a diagnostic genetic marker

of the Austronesian expansion when it is found in populations of Oceania. Its distribution in Oceania is mostly limited to the traditionally Austronesian culture zones, including moderately high frequencies in the Philippines, Malaysia, Indonesia, and Polynesia, with generally lower frequencies found in coastal and island Melanesia, Micronesia, and Taiwanese aboriginal tribes.

The subgroup O3a5-M134 is particularly closely associated with Sino-Tibetan populations, and it is generally not found outside of areas where a Sino-Tibetan language is currently spoken or that are historically supposed to have undergone Chinese colonization or immigration, such as Korea, Japan, Vietnam, Malaysia, the Philippines, and Indonesia. However, its presence among non-Sino-Tibetan populations is always very limited and never amounts to more than 10% of the total Y-chromosome diversity. There are also reports that Y-chromosomes belonging to Haplogroup O3a5 have been sampled from populations of such far-flung places as Western Samoa. Surprisingly, Haplogroup O3a5-M134 Y-chromosomes have also been found in about 1% to 3% of indigenous Australian men in the northwest of that continent, which might indicate that a certain degree of contact has occurred between the Austronesian expansion from Asia and some indigenous Australian populations. The fact that Haplogroup O3a5 is so strongly associated with Chinese populations, however, and the fact that no Y-chromosome haplogroups characteristic of Austronesian populations have been found among these indigenous Australian populations may be taken to suggest the possibility of some direct Chinese-Australian contact in the precolonial era. Within Japan, the subgroup O3a5-M134 forms the majority of the haplogroup O3 Y-chromosomes detected.

Haplogroup O3's brother clade, Haplogroup O1, displays a similar geographical distribution, being found among nearly all the populations of East and Southeast Asia, but generally at a frequency much lower than that of Haplogroup O3. Another brother clade, Haplogroup O2, has an impressive extent of dispersal, as it is found among the males of populations as widely separated as the Kolarians of India and the Japanese of Japan; however, Haplogroup O2's distribution is much more patchy, and the Haplogroup O2 Y-chromosomes found among the Mundas and the Japanese belong to distinct subclades.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_O3_%28Y-DNA%29
Conclusion:

O2 spread all over asian pop
O2b origin from manchuria! so if u want to relate korean with southeas asian DONT LEAVE OUT MANCHU AND MONGOLS! OK! predominantly among northeastern
O2a predominantly among SEA
O3 origin: most likely SEA, highest found among Sino-Tibetan, Hmong–Mien peoples of China and Southeast Asia, spread to china and to southeast asian males pop.



QUOTE
It doesn't matter how you think Han Chinese look like, because it just your opinion, not fact. Looks/physical appearance is a subjective issue. By the way, Han Chinese in southeast asia do not mix with southeast asian natives. They are genetically the same and as pure as those Han Chinese in China.


it is not only a fact, but it is common sense, u can tell KOREAN and SEA apart MOST LIKELY YOU WILL BE, korean can overlap with SEA but less likely,
han chinese almost 1 billion ppl, han chinese can look korean, japanese, SEA, etc. or a mixture of all them.

look at those genetic research han chinese genes are veried, from O2a to O2b to O3 can be found among chinese, just to remind you O3 most likely originated from SOUTHEAST ASIA (according to your wikipedia) because highest diversified among SEA population


the chinese mixing with the SEA a lot how do i know? , I LIVE THERE idiot! these ppl are my friends and families LOL
even a lot of chinese in SEA have european ancestry n later they are mixing with SEA, the same pattern u'll find in filipine, thailand, indonesia, singapore...etc...go to all these countries live there, n u will see!! those datuk mak cik n pak cik in malaysia have chinese names, go out, buy a ticket travel around, or READ MORE MORE....even if u are idiot cant understand wht u read, but keep reading, finally u'll get it!

why do everyone claim they are connected with korean from the turk to SEA why? is it bcz korean are pretty?, do they want to claim it was their genes that make the korean look like that? lol

the turk called them altaic blood brother LOL, SEA call them what? their young brother?, the TURK AND THE SEA SOMEHOW CONNECTED THRU KOREAN LOL!!!! how so?
fact is in ancient times the chinese mixing with the turk, arabs, persians, europeans, sea, tibetans, mongolians, etc.....they are all contributed to how han chinese are today
while the korean are homogenous for thousand of years
but look at the two generations today....
korean ancestor must have DONE SOMETHING RIGHT, while our chinese ancestor must have screwed us up! but i'm happy pls do not associate ur own kind with us, but live up to ur word dont be like vietnamese ho chi minh
Rayzor
QUOTE (kieshin @ Sep 11 2011, 06:03 AM) *
so this is complete waste of time, but you gave me the link, did you read those link that you gave?
either u did not understand what you read (because you are dumb) or you have hidden motif

without further ado, I will paste the whole $hit here, unlike u which only pasted one sentence suited to ur agenda, I will paste the whole $hit!


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_O2a_%28Y-DNA%29


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_O2b_%28Y-DNA%29





http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_O3_%28Y-DNA%29
Conclusion:

O2 spread all over asian pop
O2b origin from manchuria! so if u want to relate korean with southeas asian DONT LEAVE OUT MANCHU AND MONGOLS! OK! predominantly among northeastern
O2a predominantly among SEA
O3 origin: most likely SEA, highest found among sino tibetan, spread to china and to southeast asian males pop.





it is not only a fact, but it is common sense, u can tell KOREAN and SEA apart MOST LIKELY YOU WILL BE, korean can overlap with SEA but less likely,
han chinese almost 1 billion ppl, han chinese can look korean, japanese, SEA, etc. or a mixture of all them.

look at those genetic research han chinese genes are veried, from O2a to O2b to O3 can be found among chinese, just to remind you O3 most likely originated from SOUTHEAST ASIA (according to your wikipedia) because highest diversified among SEA population


the chinese mixing with the SEA a lot how do i know? , I LIVE THERE idiot! these ppl are my friends and families LOL
even a lot of chinese in SEA have european ancestry n later they are mixing with SEA, the same pattern u'll find in filipine, thailand, indonesia, singapore...etc...go to all these countries live there, n u will see!! those datuk mak cik n pak cik in malaysia have chinese names, go out, buy a ticket travel around, or READ MORE MORE....even if u are idiot cant understand wht u read, but keep reading, finally u'll get it!

why do everyone claim they are connected with korean from the turk to SEA why? is it bcz korean are pretty?, do they want to claim it was their genes that make the korean look like that? lol

the turk called them altaic blood brother LOL, SEA call them what? their young brother?, the TURK AND THE SEA SOMEHOW CONNECTED THRU KOREAN LOL!!!! how so?
fact is in ancient times the chinese mixing with the turk, arabs, persians, europeans, sea, tibetans, mongolians, etc.....they are all contributed to how han chinese are today
while the korean are homogenous for thousand of years
but look at the two generations today....
korean ancestor must have DONE SOMETHING RIGHT, while our chinese ancestor must have screwed us up!


Did you even read what I said? I said o2a-o2b are both descendant of o2. In other words, they are both evolve form o2. o2a and o2b are brother and sister. That is why southeast asian relate themselves with Korean. I leave out Manchu because you are asking why southeast asian want to relate themselves with Korean. Doesn't matter where o3 came from because it clearly said there o3 are primarily associated with han Chinese. Just like how o2b are associated with Korean. Also, which part of southeast asia you live?
kieshin
QUOTE (Rayzor @ Sep 11 2011, 07:09 AM) *
Did you even read what I said? I said o2a-o2b are both descendant of o2. In other words, they are both evolve form o2. o2a and o2b are brother and sister. That is why southeast asian relate themselves with Korean. I leave out Manchu because you are asking why southeast asian want to relate themselves with Korean. Doesn't matter where o3 came from because it clearly said there o3 are primarily associated with han Chinese. Just like how o2b are associated with Korean. Also, which part of southeast asia you live?

primarly associated with han chinese u know why they call it that way even its origin from SEA, it is found highest freq among sea n Chinese population? because chinese make up 1.3 billion ppl ..... idiot! it only beause of the NUMBER, nothing to do with closeness or connections compare to thailand, malaysia, indonesia, filipines combined they are less than 500 mill people

O3 is SEA origin! found highest freq among chinese, SEA and sino tibetan.

while O2b is MANCHU, MONGOLS ORIGIN!
rarely found among SEA!!!
Rayzor
QUOTE (kieshin @ Sep 11 2011, 07:20 AM) *
primarly associated with han chinese u know why they call it that way even its origin from SEA, it is found highest freq among sea n Chinese population? because han chinese make up 1.3 billion ppl ..... idiot!

O3 is SEA origin!

while O2b is MANCHU, MONGOLS ORIGIN!
rarely found among SEA!!!


You clearly did not read everything.

QUOTE
This suggests a southern origin of the O3-M122 mutation to be likely.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_O3_%28Y-DNA%29

Did you see they use the word likely? It because it just a hypothesis that they are not confirmed yet. That is why I don't bring this up. It said it found highest freq among Chinese because each Chinese are o3 dominant, not because there make up 1,3 billion. It similar to the way o2b are associated with korean because it found highest frequency among each Korean individual. By the way, you still haven't answer my question. Which southeast asia you come from?
kieshin
QUOTE (Rayzor @ Sep 11 2011, 07:25 AM) *
You clearly did not read everything.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_O3_%28Y-DNA%29

Did you see they use the word likely? It because it just a hypothesis that they are not confirmed yet. That is why i don't bring this up. It said it found highest freq among Chinese because each Chinese are o3 dominant, not because there make up 1,3 billion. By the way, you still haven't answer my question. Which southeast asia you come from?

Haplogroup O3 has been implicated as a diagnostic genetic marker

of the Austronesian expansion when it is found in populations of Oceania. Its distribution in Oceania is mostly limited to the traditionally Austronesian culture zones, including moderately high frequencies in the Philippines, Malaysia, Indonesia, and Polynesia, with generally lower frequencies found in coastal and island Melanesia, Micronesia, and Taiwanese aboriginal tribes.

O3 is GENETIC MARKER OF SEA, it is found HIGHEST FREQ among SEA n Chinese (TOO BAD, be careful korean, run away from these people! soon as you look like them they dont want anything to do with you!)

they use the word likely because they found a lot the variations of O3 among SEA POPULATIONS
your english comperhension is fuk up....find someone to translate english to your language
Rayzor
QUOTE (kieshin @ Sep 11 2011, 07:29 AM) *
Haplogroup O3 has been implicated as a diagnostic genetic marker

of the Austronesian expansion when it is found in populations of Oceania. Its distribution in Oceania is mostly limited to the traditionally Austronesian culture zones, including moderately high frequencies in the Philippines, Malaysia, Indonesia, and Polynesia, with generally lower frequencies found in coastal and island Melanesia, Micronesia, and Taiwanese aboriginal tribes.

O3 is GENETIC MARKER OF SEA, it is found HIGHEST FREQ among SEA n Chinese (TOO BAD, be careful korean, run away from these people! soon as you look like them they dont want anything to do with you!)

they use the word likely because they found a lot the variations of O3 among SEA POPULATIONS


Its distribution in Oceania is mostly limited to the traditionally Austronesian culture zones, including moderately high frequencies in the Philippines, Malaysia, Indonesia, and Polynesia, with generally lower frequencies found in coastal and island Melanesia, Micronesia, and Taiwanese aboriginal tribes.

Haplogroup O2a reaches its highest frequencies among the populations of the islands of Sumatra, Java, Bali, and Borneo in western and central Indonesia.
I don't think o3 is Indonesian dominant. Seem to me wikipedia contradict with itself. First they said o3 are associated with Chinese, then they said it haplogroup O3 has been implicated as a diagnostic genetic marker of the Austronesian expansion when it is found in populations of Oceania

You still haven't tell me which part of southeast asia you live. Why you keep avoiding this questions?
islandBrother
QUOTE (kieshin @ Sep 11 2011, 07:29 AM) *
Haplogroup O3 has been implicated as a diagnostic genetic marker

of the Austronesian expansion when it is found in populations of Oceania. Its distribution in Oceania is mostly limited to the traditionally Austronesian culture zones, including moderately high frequencies in the Philippines, Malaysia, Indonesia, and Polynesia, with generally lower frequencies found in coastal and island Melanesia, Micronesia, and Taiwanese aboriginal tribes.

O3 is GENETIC MARKER OF SEA, it is found HIGHEST FREQ among SEA n Chinese (TOO BAD, be careful korean, run away from these people! soon as you look like them they dont want anything to do with you!)


D* and O2* are in south east asia.

korea sam han kingdoms was not south east asian? what about mtDNA ? korean women mtDNA is same as ainu and jomon?
kieshin
QUOTE (islandBrother @ Sep 11 2011, 07:40 AM) *
D* and O2* are in south east asia.

korea sam han kingdoms was not south east asian? what about mtDNA ? korean women mtDNA is same as ainu and jomon?


O3 is genetic marker of austronesian expansion! LOL (do u understand what that mean?NO?) they associated this genes with chinese because chinese is 1.3 billion people, even if HALF of it is still 700 million, while the whole SEA combined pop only less than 600 million....your english comprehension is BAD
Rayzor
I don't mind being associated with southeast asian because as dongyi said, everyone share similar ancestors, it just a matter how much you trace back time. So, whatever you said really make no difference.

@kieshin, just answer which part of southeast asian you live, then I will be able to tell whether you are lying or not when you said Chinese mix with southeast asian. Right now I'm more interested with this.
zoopiter
QUOTE (islandBrother @ Sep 7 2011, 11:21 AM) *
ancient korean kingdom was sam han.

Yerroperil. you don't want koreans to relato to south east asians?




Koreans have south eastern DNAs, because east china sea was a land, during ice age, and it's why chinese not have O2b because O2b people live around coast, now below sea. O3 is probably chinese, but some from south east asia.


there are already theories that linked koreans to southeast asians, that one of them being the hmong. but those are more of a pre-historic mythology, and little real life relevance is present. not being an expert on land migrations or as such, i dun think that stretches to the ice age. mythology had it that a great flood and wars with the chinese forces the hmong to split from the koreans and migrated via inland route down the western parts of china (at that time), across szechuan and then into the southwest of china now.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2013 Invision Power Services, Inc.