I saw many of his movies, and i like a lot his way of showing life and japanese culture (which i am huge fan

, becouse of him i started learning japanese

).
And i know people who like him, but on many forums i saw opinions like:
QUOTE ('kunomchu')
I never liked him. He plays the same roles and he can't act for $hit.
or
QUOTE
He's movies are boring, with violence he tries to divert people attention from his lack of talent, etc.
And i that in europe you can find diffrent cultures but as a whole continent it is not so diffrent as culture of polish and japanese people. First of all in tha asian culture the violence thing it isn't something rare and in european movies, film with such amount of blood and violence as in korean or japanese is very rare. And when someone will do sucha movie it almost all the time will get not-so-friendly reviews ('bla bla bla the director has no concept and idea how to make a movie and put in it a lot of sex, violence and blood bla bla bla...'

) I heard also comments of people who have seen Audition in the cinema, and they say that was the most boring movie ever made, and some of them were going out of the cinema while 'kiri kiri kiri', whith disgust

And that's how Miike is seen by many people (not all of them, but many

). And that's why i was asking if in Japan he is also shocking and controversial director without idea how to act or make a movie or just he is high rank profesional who is loved by the crowds (and by some is hated, you can give all the people what they want

)