Viety_Cent
Dec 27 2005, 06:43 PM
IF Gengis Khan had not died his army would not be splited up and reduced and Mongolia would still control China , Korea ........
what would happen if Mongols ( Huns) still controlled these countrys wat will happend to all the rest of asian countrys like Vietnam, Japan, Thailand, Laos Malaysia, etc ?
I think
1) Total Assimilation and being part Mongol
2) Accepting Hun Culture, speaking language
3) Take away are beautiful asian womans and wed have take cocubines as gf
4) Europe, Middle East , Africa and North America well fall into the hands of Mongols due to mongol expansion
4) or all countrys unite and fight off the Hun Invaders togethers with nukes, soldiers and tanks, air and naval force
dalawapo
Dec 27 2005, 06:46 PM
the mongols should have done extensive invasion of european subcontinent, then europeans would be mixed with asians.. and alota smaller!
Miroku Bosatsu
Dec 27 2005, 06:49 PM
Then the Mongols would rule the world, everybody would live in yurts, and there would be 10,000 years of peace.
soltung
Dec 27 2005, 08:13 PM
u mean if they had implemented the final solution of killing all the men and taking the women for themselves???...
QUOTE(Miroku Bosatsu @ Dec 27 2005, 07:49 PM)
Then the Mongols would rule the world, everybody would live in yurts, and there would be 10,000 years of peace.
Miroku Bosatsu
Dec 27 2005, 09:17 PM
What?
kermit_criminal
Dec 27 2005, 09:34 PM
A world of Buddhism sounds alot more peaceful then the Christian and Muslim world we see today. but then again, the mongols, and buddhist in general were not as concerned with forcefully spreading the word as Christians are/were, so acceptance and freedom of religion would be commonplace.
Had the mongols gotten deep into western Europe they may have all but annhialated western civilation as we knew it just as they did to the Arabs in Baghdad(Babylon), which was the center of western civilization at the time. This is why today we see the Middle East(cradle of civilization) still trying to catch up to Europe, where before the mongol invasion.. they were ahead of Europe in terms of advancement and civilization.
dalawapo
Dec 27 2005, 09:39 PM
i thought mongols were animist
MING-LOYALIST
Dec 28 2005, 06:02 AM
QUOTE(dalawapo @ Dec 27 2005, 09:39 PM)
i thought mongols were animist
Mongols took many religions. They were shamanists initially.
The mongols of iran and russia were later converted to islam.
While the Mongols of Yuan dynasty adopted tibetan lama budhism.
Happy Asian
Dec 28 2005, 08:00 AM
What happen? The Mongols would probably gather citizens from the occupied countries and use them for shooting targets.
mongoljin
Dec 28 2005, 08:21 AM
If Chingis Khaan's state remained until today, world would've been much closer. I mean more united. He was very good at takin other's culture who's were more advanced. For example, Mongols brought savon(french word) into Asia for the 1st time. He was very willin to talk with Uigurs too.
He created the biggest empire in human history but at same time noway to hide its violence in other hand.
Happy Asian
Dec 28 2005, 08:26 AM
Much closer maybe but over a period of time it'll break up.
Bulldogg
Dec 28 2005, 08:44 AM
The Mongols should've had a more, communist iron fisted ruleing idealogy.
The Khan's were too lenient.
Happy Asian
Dec 28 2005, 09:29 AM
^OMG what are you saying?
LiTtLe
Dec 28 2005, 01:28 PM
QUOTE(Happy Asian @ Dec 28 2005, 08:00 PM)
What happen? The Mongols would probably gather citizens from the occupied countries and use them for shooting targets.
soro_i
Dec 28 2005, 02:19 PM
QUOTE(Bulldogg @ Dec 28 2005, 09:44 AM)
The Mongols should've had a more, communist iron fisted ruleing idealogy.
The Khan's were too lenient.

I think you're the first person to consider the Mongols as "too lenient"
They almost wiped out the whole Chinese pop... They reduced the whole human pop... They destroyed most of Muslim world... That's why the Christianity so prevalent today... If they continued to Europe, we'll probably be watching Hindus and Buddhist fighting each other today.
If the Mongols still rule today, will have "Pax Mongolia" in Mongolian of course

PS... and my name would be Hulagu.
southernstar
Dec 28 2005, 02:35 PM
The Mongol conquests was the among the greatest disaster in the world's history. They contributed nothing to the world but death, destruction and misery.
Talking about being constructive.
Bulldogg
Dec 28 2005, 04:24 PM
Maybe i should've elaborated more.
The Mongols were known to have the army of every nation they conquered serve under them, as well as scholars & engineers...The Mongols used the people who were useful in helping their empire flourish...however it did not work..
Kublai Khan tried very hard to govern a civilized empire, but failed & all who came after him in the Khan clan.
It was too much, too soon.
kermit_criminal
Dec 28 2005, 07:56 PM
QUOTE(southernstar @ Dec 28 2005, 02:35 PM)
The Mongol conquests was the among the greatest disaster in the world's history. They contributed nothing to the world but death, destruction and misery.
Talking about being constructive.
who cares, he conquered whitey and thats all that matters
chris1980
Dec 28 2005, 08:23 PM
QUOTE(southernstar @ Dec 28 2005, 02:35 PM)
The Mongol conquests was the among the greatest disaster in the world's history. They contributed nothing to the world but death, destruction and misery.
Talking about being constructive.
You're wrong. He created the first postal service.
soro_i
Dec 29 2005, 08:23 AM
QUOTE(southernstar @ Dec 28 2005, 03:35 PM)
The Mongol conquests was the among the greatest disaster in the world's history. They contributed nothing to the world but death, destruction and misery.
Talking about being constructive.
That's the common perception for ppl in the West about anything other than "White" hegemony... BTW are you a white person?
The Mongols actually contributed a lot to the World at that time... For an example... They ensured safe passage from East to West... Which was very important for economy, exchange of technology, arts, goods, ideas, etc... And I think everybody knows about their contribution to military.
QUOTE(Bulldogg @ Dec 28 2005, 05:24 PM)
Maybe i should've elaborated more.
The Mongols were known to have the army of every nation they conquered serve under them, as well as scholars & engineers...The Mongols used the people who were useful in helping their empire flourish...however it did not work..
Kublai Khan tried very hard to govern a civilized empire, but failed & all who came after him in the Khan clan.
It was too much, too soon.
Kublai Khan was just in China... Mongols dominance was all over...
Their prob was that there were not enough Mongols to go around.
bond007
Dec 29 2005, 04:38 PM
QUOTE(southernstar @ Dec 28 2005, 03:35 PM)
The Mongol conquests was the among the greatest disaster in the world's history. They contributed nothing to the world but death, destruction and misery.
Talking about being constructive.
No. I say the European conquest was among the greatest destruction in world's history. They entered where people did not invite them, spread diseases, and genocided groups. Most important they introduced to humanity the true meaning of what evil is. The world would have been better off without them.
And for all the people who will respond with "technology" the planet has limited resources. The "primitives" who live in huts and take what they need and not what they want are the smartest people. They do not attempt to control nature but work with it. people wanting 6 houses, 50 cars like mike tyson, and objects that nature is ill prepared to accomodate. What is going to happen when all these resources are gone?
soltung
Dec 29 2005, 06:38 PM
and in fact one may argue the mongol conquests paved the way for the later european conquests as it resulted in spread of technology and ideas to the west which led to its discovery of the New World and the rise of the west.... the Mongol conquests gave Europe knowledge about the wealth in the East, which is what motivated the earliest voyages by Portugese and Columbus....
[quote=bond007,Dec 29 2005, 05:38 PM]
[quote=southernstar,Dec 28 2005, 03:35 PM]The Mongol conquests was the among the greatest disaster in the world's history. They contributed nothing to the world but death, destruction and misery.
Talking about being constructive.
[/quote]
No. I say the European conquest was among the greatest destruction in world's history. They entered where people did not invite them, spread diseases, and genocided groups. Most important they introduced to humanity the true meaning of what evil is. The world would have been better off without them.
Viety_Cent
Dec 29 2005, 09:54 PM
@ all
The New World for European Conquest contributed an brought technology to many nations
Wei_TianDi
Dec 29 2005, 10:15 PM
We'd all be mongols , instead of chinese.
bond007
Dec 29 2005, 11:16 PM
QUOTE(soltung @ Dec 29 2005, 07:38 PM)
and in fact one may argue the mongol conquests paved the way for the later european conquests as it resulted in spread of technology and ideas to the west which led to its discovery of the New World and the rise of the west.... the Mongol conquests gave Europe knowledge about the wealth in the East, which is what motivated the earliest voyages by Portugese and Columbus....
The "New World " was already inhabited hence it was not the new world to begin with.
I have yet to hear the USA or Europe apologise to the aboriginal americans, Australian and New Zealander for their evil and total genocide behaviour.
If China had colonised these regions do you think she would have invoked the same policy? Or if Euro. women instead of men.
Magii
Dec 30 2005, 11:21 AM
then mongolia would be rich and have big land and stuff and lot of mixes
soltung
Dec 30 2005, 11:48 AM
no...if you were a han chinese...you would be either dead or a slave...haha...
QUOTE(Wei_TianDi @ Dec 29 2005, 11:15 PM)
We'd all be mongols , instead of chinese.
Wei_TianDi
Dec 30 2005, 12:00 PM
QUOTE(soltung @ Dec 30 2005, 08:48 AM)
no...if you were a han chinese...you would be either dead or a slave...haha...
QUOTE(Wei_TianDi @ Dec 29 2005, 11:15 PM)
We'd all be mongols , instead of chinese.
Well they had their chance to do that , obviously they coudlnt do it.
soltung
Dec 30 2005, 05:07 PM
no...the Chinese certainly would not have invoked genocidal policies...
if the mongolians had not conquered China it is quite possible the Chinese would have reached the Americas and then perhaps the history would be very different...
>The "New World " was already inhabited hence it was not the new world to begin with.
I have yet to hear the USA or Europe apologise to the aboriginal americans, Australian and New Zealander for their evil and total genocide behaviour.
If China had colonised these regions do you think she would have invoked the same policy? Or if Euro. women instead of men.
[/quote]
Happy Asian
Dec 30 2005, 11:13 PM
QUOTE(Viety_Cent @ Dec 30 2005, 12:54 PM)
@ all
The New World for European Conquest contributed an brought technology to many nations
And to pay for those technologies many nations have to serve the whites as slaves.
Bulldogg
Dec 31 2005, 07:46 AM
QUOTE(soro_i @ Dec 29 2005, 08:23 AM)
QUOTE(southernstar @ Dec 28 2005, 03:35 PM)
The Mongol conquests was the among the greatest disaster in the world's history. They contributed nothing to the world but death, destruction and misery.
Talking about being constructive.
That's the common perception for ppl in the West about anything other than "White" hegemony... BTW are you a white person?
The Mongols actually contributed a lot to the World at that time... For an example... They ensured safe passage from East to West... Which was very important for economy, exchange of technology, arts, goods, ideas, etc... And I think everybody knows about their contribution to military.
QUOTE(Bulldogg @ Dec 28 2005, 05:24 PM)
Maybe i should've elaborated more.
The Mongols were known to have the army of every nation they conquered serve under them, as well as scholars & engineers...The Mongols used the people who were useful in helping their empire flourish...however it did not work..
Kublai Khan tried very hard to govern a civilized empire, but failed & all who came after him in the Khan clan.
It was too much, too soon.
Kublai Khan was just in China... Mongols dominance was all over...
Their prob was that there were not enough Mongols to go around.
Heil my Viet Minh brother.
Viety_Cent
Dec 31 2005, 11:07 AM
QUOTE(Happy Asian @ Dec 30 2005, 11:13 PM)
QUOTE(Viety_Cent @ Dec 30 2005, 12:54 PM)
@ all
The New World for European Conquest contributed an brought technology to many nations
And to pay for those technologies many nations have to serve the whites as slaves.
indeed

......... better then being primitative people with basic stuff
bond007
Dec 31 2005, 01:54 PM
QUOTE(Viety_Cent @ Dec 31 2005, 12:07 PM)
indeed

......... better then being primitative people with basic stuff

Those primitive people will be the eventual winners on this planet. as I stated prior they ONLY take what they need and not what they want. "Civilised" society are glutted by greed, murder, corruption, disease, graft, you name it.
Good luck pal.
Viety_Cent
Dec 31 2005, 11:20 PM
QUOTE(bond007 @ Dec 31 2005, 01:54 PM)
QUOTE(Viety_Cent @ Dec 31 2005, 12:07 PM)
indeed

......... better then being primitative people with basic stuff

Those primitive people will be the eventual winners on this planet. as I stated prior they ONLY take what they need and not what they want. "Civilised" society are glutted by greed, murder, corruption, disease, graft, you name it.
Good luck pal.
"Beggars are Choosers" yea i know what u mean !
they take wat they want and discard the rest !
No matter what there always be NEEDS on this planet !!!
sweetntwisted
Jan 1 2006, 04:00 AM
^no, u don't actually.
QUOTE(bond007 @ Dec 29 2005, 04:38 PM)
QUOTE(southernstar @ Dec 28 2005, 03:35 PM)
The Mongol conquests was the among the greatest disaster in the world's history. They contributed nothing to the world but death, destruction and misery.
Talking about being constructive.
No. I say the
European conquest was among the greatest destruction in world's history. They entered where people did not invite them, spread diseases, and genocided groups. Most important they introduced to humanity the true meaning of what evil is. The world would have been better off without them.
And for all the people who will respond with "technology" the planet has limited resources.
The "primitives" who live in huts and take what they need and not what they want are the smartest people. They do not attempt to control nature but work with it. people wanting 6 houses, 50 cars like mike tyson, and objects that nature is ill prepared to accomodate. What is going to happen when all these resources are gone?
bond...
Happy Asian
Jan 1 2006, 08:57 AM
QUOTE(bond007 @ Jan 1 2006, 04:54 AM)
QUOTE(Viety_Cent @ Dec 31 2005, 12:07 PM)
indeed

......... better then being primitative people with basic stuff

Those primitive people will be the eventual winners on this planet. as I stated prior they ONLY take what they need and not what they want. "Civilised" society are glutted by greed, murder, corruption, disease, graft, you name it.
Good luck pal.
Yes, and the "advance" white race were the ones who make those standard. We have to corrupt ourselves in order to be at the top.
jamaika
Jan 18 2006, 07:30 PM
QUOTE(Miroku Bosatsu @ Dec 27 2005, 09:17 PM)
What? 
I AM TOTALLY AGREE WITH YOU.
Happy Asian
Jan 18 2006, 09:52 PM
The modern Mongolian Army, OMG!!!!!!!!!!
northwestern_student
Jan 18 2006, 09:57 PM
then all the countries would have adopted chinese culture and pay homage to beijing, as the mongols themselves adopted chinese culture and moved their capital to Kambalic (which developed into Beijing).
Miroku Bosatsu
Jan 19 2006, 03:13 AM
QUOTE(Happy Asian @ Jan 18 2006, 09:52 PM)
The modern Mongolian Army, OMG!!!!!!!!!!
Hahaha! They learned how to fly!
Be afraid! Genghis Khan will rise again!
tangawizi
Jan 19 2006, 04:57 AM
Where are all the horses??
Miroku Bosatsu
Jan 19 2006, 05:22 AM
QUOTE(tangawizi @ Jan 19 2006, 04:57 AM)
Where are all the horses??

Either doing farm work or on vacation.
batu
Jan 19 2006, 07:01 AM
QUOTE(southernstar @ Dec 29 2005, 03:35 AM)
The Mongol conquests was the among the greatest disaster in the world's history. They contributed nothing to the world but death, destruction and misery.
Talking about being constructive.
that is an old point of view. mongol conquests actually brought some positive things, such as unity, more open relationand trade between east and west, proof that religios tolerance can be successful. he did what was, is and will be most valuable thing for mongols, namely their identity.
VisitingAlien
Jan 19 2006, 07:14 AM
Too many if-then scenarios. Just stick with the reality, people. I wish the Mongols would invade Africa in addition to Europe, Asia, and Middle East so that the whole world would be united as ONE.

Regardless, the Mongol experiences clearly show that "empires rise and fall".
batu
Jan 19 2006, 07:29 AM
the question is actually hyper unrealistic. the mongol empire expanded very fast, hence was destined to collapse fast. it is safe to say it is nearly impossible to build such a huge empire with so little human power. one wonders how they could do that. i think the empire actually endured an amazingly long period.
Viety_Cent
Jan 19 2006, 10:05 AM
^ indeed a collaspe nation fell in their own hands
QUOTE(VisitingAlien @ Jan 19 2006, 07:14 AM)
Too many if-then scenarios. Just stick with the reality, people. I wish the Mongols would invade Africa in addition to Europe, Asia, and Middle East so that the whole world would be united as ONE.

Regardless, the Mongol experiences clearly show that "empires rise and fall".

African mixed with mongolian blood
theyll be part asian
i wonder wat would part black and asian look like ?
Voluptuousness
Jan 20 2006, 02:27 AM
They'll have tanned skin and look like Jennifer Lopez.
lovelytruth
Jan 20 2006, 02:47 AM
QUOTE(Voluptuousness @ Jan 20 2006, 02:27 AM)
They'll have tanned skin and look like Jennifer Lopez.
OMG now i know that Jeniffer is Afro Mongolian i,m so stupid why didnt i think that before
Happy Asian
Jan 20 2006, 07:14 AM
QUOTE(tangawizi @ Jan 19 2006, 07:57 PM)
Where are all the horses??

The horses are waiting for redeployment
lovelytruth
Jan 20 2006, 07:50 AM
QUOTE(tangawizi @ Jan 19 2006, 04:57 AM)
Where are all the horses??

There (shows with his finger to the north )
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.