Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Sony back on top.
Asia Finest Discussion Forum > Asian Culture > Japanese Chat
Pages: 1, 2
Musashino
Finally, some positive news on Sony.

http://www.localnewsleader.com/olberlin/st...lnews&id=160390
QUOTE
TV Demand Helps Japan Electronics Makers
Staff and agencies
17 March, 2006

By YURI KAGEYAMA, AP Business Writer 17 minutes ago

TOKYO - Just five years ago, Japan‘s electronics makers were in a sorry state. Profits were sinking as less expensive Asian rivals grabbed market share — and prices for everything from computer chips to DVD players dropped. These days, they‘ve found a savior: the flat-panel TV.

The new sets helped Panasonic parent Matsu$hita Electric Industrial Co.‘s profits jump 39 percent in the October-December quarter, while flat-panel sales helped drive Sharp‘s earnings up 26 percent during the same period.

The switch in TV technology is an opportunity that only comes once in several decades, said Fumio Ohtsubo, Matsu$hita‘s incoming president.

"We have been a big success because we chose early on to focus on and invest in plasma display panels," Masaaki Fujita, director of Matsu$hita‘s plasma display panel TV business, said. "People are really moved when they see the quality of the images in our TVs."

Now once again, Japanese electronics companies are proving through flat panel TVs that they can deliver both quality and value — not unlike automakers Toyota Motor Corp. and Honda Motor Co., said Yuichi Ishida, analyst with Mizuho Investors Securities.

The sophisticated technology required for such TVs is one area the Japanese makers, with their longer history in the industry, can hope to beat newcomers, analysts say.

Well-to-do shoppers like Yoshiki Inoue, recently seen strolling through a sprawling store in downtown Tokyo, aren‘t looking for bargains but for quality, even status symbols, and they‘re willing to pay more for brand power.

Inoue, 58, who runs his own construction business, isn‘t dead set against non-Japanese brands such as Samsung Electronics Co. of South Korea . It‘s just that he hasn‘t seen anything from them so far that he‘s liked, he said.

In the fourth-quarter of last year, Matsu$hita‘s profits jumped to $424 million, largely on the back of booming flat-panel TV sales, as quarterly sales jumped 4 percent to $20.6 billion.

Unlike Sharp and Matsu$hita, Sony was an exception among the Japanese in falling behind in flat-panel TVs, which proved disastrous for its books.

Its fortunes have improved dramatically after it started selling LCDs TVs developed and made under a joint venture with Samsung. Especially telling of Sony‘s brand power is that it is beating Samsung in global share of LCD TVs.

Sony reported a $1.4 billion profit for the quarter ended Dec. 31, up 17.5 percent from the same period a year ago, as its LCD TVs sold briskly during Christmas.

For all manufacturers, there‘s a risk in that prices will drop too quickly — something that‘s good for consumers, but difficult for manufacturers.

But profit margins still tend to be fatter for the newest TVs, and both Matsu$hita and Sharp made sure they were out with products ahead of the rivals before serious price drops set in.

Toshishige Hamano, Sharp‘s executive in charge of international operations, brushed off the threat from cheaper Asian rivals, saying he‘s confident that Sharp can offer the best quality for the price.

"Major players are also bringing down costs, and so they won‘t have much of a price advantage," Hamano said.

The excitement over flat-screen TVs is obvious at a downtown Tokyo branch of retail chain Yodobashi Camera Co.

Even on a weekday morning, customers are everywhere at the bustling store, carefully studying dozens of competing TV models in various sizes from Japan‘s top brands, which also include Toshiba Corp. and Hitachi Ltd.

Most of the screens are big — and they aren‘t cheap. A 32-inch LCD TV costs about $2,200.

Tomoo Yoneta, manager at the chain, can barely control his excitement.

"It‘s all about TVs now," he said, adding that he expects solid sales to continue for some time.


Good to hear that Sony currently holds the biggest market share of LCDs in terms of units sold since 2005's Q4.

Of course, there are other creases that Sony needs to smooth out *coughWalkmancough* *coughdelayingthePS3cough*, but overall big moves to restructure the company and its products have been rewarding.
dedman
i live in America,california. and i buy nothing but Sony,Panasonic, BEST PRODUCTS EVER.. i have had my Ps2 for 5 years,and tv's for like 8-9 years.tons of other products never have had a problem with them, unlike other products my brother and sisters buy, everything they get is non sony,panasonic, it breaks or wears out ect..

LONG LIVE SONY and PANASONIC....

YAYA (Thank you JAPAN for AWESOME PRODUCTS. and ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT : )



is good Sony delayed the PS3,,cause everyone was buying the Xbox360,who would have EXTRA money right now for the PS3??? so now that PS3 is shipping in November EVERYONE will buy one for Christmas,, unlike the Xbox360 that only shipped 600,000 Unites in 2 months.. Sony is Shipping 6,000,000 Units in the first 3 months,, which is awesome... and because they delayed,they were haven problems with the Cooling system on the Ps3,and trouble with the Blueray Reading disc's..

everything will be good in the end
Takashi
QUOTE (dedman @ Mar 18 2006, 06:55 PM) *
is good Sony delayed the PS3,,cause everyone was buying the Xbox360,who would have EXTRA money right now for the PS3??? so now that PS3 is shipping in November EVERYONE will buy one for Christmas,, unlike the Xbox360 that only shipped 600,000 Unites in 2 months.. Sony is Shipping 6,000,000 Units in the first 3 months,, which is awesome... and because they delayed,they were haven problems with the Cooling system on the Ps3,and trouble with the Blueray Reading disc's..

everything will be good in the end

No. The reason the delay isnt good is because the November release is for Japan and the consoles usually arent released in the US and UK until a good few months after the Japanese release which would mean missing the Christmas rush icon_rolleyes.gif
Elysee
SONY does not have a reputation of being the best durable electronics producer, but the most innovative one. I love sony a lot too, it represents innovation.
CJK
They dont make them like they used to.
supernovasp
Sony is being run by a white guy icon_confused.gif
Tieu Su Phu
I'll buy one of those flat panels when they become cheaper... someday.
PervertBurger
QUOTE (supernovasp @ Mar 18 2006, 05:04 PM) *
Sony is being run by a white guy icon_confused.gif


Hi son,
The CEO might be White now, but who do think does all the innovation?
Surely not Sony USA Team embarassedlaugh.gif
Happy Asian
Sony fu-king owns.
Musashino
QUOTE (supernovasp @ Mar 18 2006, 05:04 PM) *
Sony is being run by a white guy icon_confused.gif


Who in turn is being run by bespectacled Japanese investors and a Japanese board of directors embarassedlaugh.gif
gangi788
,,,
Musashino
QUOTE (gangi788 @ Mar 19 2006, 12:14 AM) *
Written by a Japanese; figures. Sony does not own anything. I'd say that LCD market is quite fickle in that a top dog now can easily fall behind, coz technology changes so rapidly. For goodness sakes, Sony needs the help of Samsung to launch its LCD divison coz it doesn't even have the technology. That's quite telling.


rotflmao.gif

You people are predictable!

http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/Stor...google&keyword=
QUOTE
Japan's Sharp considers building LCD-TV plant in Europe

TOKYO (MarketWatch) -- Sharp Corp. (6753.TO) said Friday it is considering building a liquid crystal display TV plant in Europe, as it steps up efforts to cope with strong demand.
"We are planning to build a new plant" to facilitate integrated production of LCD TVs from LCD panels shipped from Japan to finished products, a Sharp spokesman said.

His comments came after the Nihon Keizai Shimbun reported that the Osaka-based consumer electronics maker, known for its "Aquos" brand LCD TVs, will invest Y60 billion to build the plant in Poland. About 10,000 jobs would be created at the Polish site, which will have capacity to produce 100,000 units per month, the report said.

But the spokesman said such details as the location and the amount of the investment haven't been decided.
The plant would be Sharp's second in Europe, following its LCD TV assembly line in Spain.
Earlier this year, Sharp said it is mulling new LCD TV production facilities in Europe and the U.S. as early as late 2006 or 2007.

Such facilities are crucial for Sharp in its battle with such rivals as Sony Corp. (6758.TO) and South Korea's Samsung Electronics Co. (005930.SE).

Sharp recently lost its lead in the global LCD TV market as a shortage of LCD panels caused its market share to drop, particularly in the U.S. after Sony began marketing its "Bravia" brand TVs there in late August.

In the October-December period, Sony became the biggest supplier of LCD TVs worldwide with a market share of 14.6% in volume terms, according to data by U.S. research firm DisplaySearch.

Sharp slipped from the top spot to third place with a 13.6% share in the quarter, behind Philips Electronics NV (PHG) of the Netherlands with 14.2%.

In trading on the Tokyo Stock Exchange, Sharp shares were up 0.4% at Y2,005 midday.

-Edited by Shawn Schroter


Oh, and before you go through your list of excuses about how the writer, Shawn Schroter, must either be a Japanophile or someone paid by Sony, the S-LCD venture between Sony and Samsung shares nothing more than materials and floor space.

Their LCD TVs are built and designed separately.

Anyway, the point of this whole thread is to shed at least some good news on Sony, since anti-Japanese posters have been gloating about the end of the company since this board was created.

The main thing is, Sony's improving.
gangi788
,,,
Musashino
QUOTE (gangi788 @ Mar 19 2006, 12:34 AM) *
No one talks about the Japanese anymore,


There's about 6 billion people on the planet, son. You'd need to provide data to show that 0 out of those 6 billion don't "talk about the Japanese" rotflmao.gif

QUOTE (gangi788 @ Mar 19 2006, 12:34 AM) *
and the margins are too close to say that Sony dominates anything.


Who the fu-k said anything about Sony "dominating"? icon_rolleyes.gif

That clearly wasn't the point of the thread.

QUOTE (gangi788 @ Mar 19 2006, 12:34 AM) *
Where the hell does that dog$hit article come from?


OMG! I KNEW IT!!! embarassedlaugh.gif

First you complain about the first article being written by a Japanese.

Then when I provide one that isn't, you turn back to your bag of cop-outs and excuses.

When will it ever stop? embarassedlaugh.gif

QUOTE (gangi788 @ Mar 19 2006, 12:34 AM) *
Yes, Sony has a white CEO; guess there's no Japanese talent to turn the company around. Quite sad. It's quite the laughing stock story in the US actually.


I feel like I'm repeating myself embarassedlaugh.gif2

A CEO has to be chosen. That means a CEO has others to answer to - namely, a board and investors.

And a CEO isn't 100% responsible for building or designing products.

QUOTE (gangi788 @ Mar 19 2006, 12:34 AM) *
Sony's going downhill. They need Samsung's help coz they don't have the technology, which Sony execs even readily admitted.


Hey, there's no shame in admitting there's others who've done better.

It's this thing about being honest and humble that you clearly don't understand.

QUOTE (gangi788 @ Mar 19 2006, 12:34 AM) *
I really don't know why Samsung even agreed to to the venture; they agreed supposedly coz they lacked the brand popularity of Sony at the time. Quite stupid of Samsung; they should have just let Sony die.


That's just too bad for you biggrin.gif
gangi788
,,,
Chinese DesertFox
QUOTE (gangi788 @ Mar 19 2006, 12:54 AM) *
This is an idiotic thread that gives everyone the wrong impression about what is happening now. I only wanted to clarify. Don't dissect my argument like that, coz your I'm arguing with the main subject of your thread, that Sony is back on top. Don't deceive people. Why does it need a white CEO if it can't get its act together. My analysis--no talent amongst the talent pool to turn the company around; thus, Japanese are getting desperate. Quite telling to hire someone from the outside from a xenophobic society like the Japanese.

If anyone is overreacting in this thread, it's you.

Now calm yourself.
Musashino
QUOTE (gangi788 @ Mar 19 2006, 12:54 AM) *
This is an idiotic thread that gives everyone the wrong impression about what is happening now. I only wanted to clarify. Don't dissect my argument like that, coz your I'm arguing with the main subject of your thread, that Sony is back on top.


Forgot your glasses?

I never said anything about "dominating". Go on, pin point exactly where I even alluded to that term.

Both articles clearly indicated that, so far, Sony holds the largest share in global LCD sales and production. That means Sony is ranked no.1 in the LCD segment.

How the fu-k is that not being "on top" (which, btw, were the words I used, not "dominating") icon_rolleyes.gif

QUOTE (gangi788 @ Mar 19 2006, 12:54 AM) *
Don't deceive people.


Son, 'deception' isn't the issue here.

It's your reading comprehension skills embarassedlaugh.gif

QUOTE (gangi788 @ Mar 19 2006, 12:54 AM) *
Why does it need a white CEO if it can't get its act together. My analysis--no talent amongst the talent pool; thus, Japanese are getting desperate. Quite telling to hire someone from the outside from a xenophobic society like the Japanese


How Sony decides to conduct its business is something they should worry about themselves.

I mean, I don't see what good b!tching and complaining about it would do. Besides, it's not as if any of its people will take your opinions seriously (let alone actually bother to hear about them) rotflmao.gif
gangi788
,,
Musashino
QUOTE (gangi788 @ Mar 19 2006, 01:05 AM) *
No one praises Japanese supposed being on top over LCDs now, except a Japanophile


The thread was made to show that Sony is improving its fortunes.

No one said anything about 'dominance'. Being no.1, or improving, does not equal 'dominance'. Just ask General Motors.

QUOTE (gangi788 @ Mar 19 2006, 01:05 AM) *
an even makes that bold assertion that Sony is somehow on top coz as I've said the market is just too fickle to say the least.


How is that a "bold assertion"?

http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/Stor...google&keyword=
QUOTE
In the October-December period, Sony became the biggest supplier of LCD TVs worldwide with a market share of 14.6% in volume terms, according to data by U.S. research firm DisplaySearch.


These are assertions made by market analysts - i.e. people qualified to give accounts on what's going on in the market.

So far, Sony has the biggest market share. Therefore they are currently sitting at no.1.

What's there not to understand?

Oh, and again, no-one said anything about "dominance". You're not the first one to realise that the market is indeed "fickle" icon_rolleyes.gif

QUOTE (gangi788 @ Mar 19 2006, 01:05 AM) *
This thread is just strange.


rotflmao.gif

I don't know why I bother.
Takashi
QUOTE (gangi788 @ Mar 19 2006, 05:34 AM) *
Yes, and I also have an article I can dig up by THE preeminent American newspaper. I will dig it up. No one talks about the Japanese anymore, and the margins are too close to say that Sony dominates anything.

Yes, Sony has a white CEO; guess there's no Japanese talent to turn the company around. Quite sad. It's quite the laughing stock story in the US actually.

Sony's going downhill. They need Samsung's help coz they don't have the technology, which Sony execs even readily admitted. I really don't know why Samsung even agreed to to the venture; they agreed supposedly coz they lacked the brand popularity of Sony at the time. Quite stupid of Samsung; they should have just let Sony die.

lol not at all, you're only thinking about the US, the article was about the global market.
For TVs in the UK, noone ever talks about Samsung, I dont even think I know anyone with a Samsung tv, most of the tvs in stores are Sony, Panasonic and Philips.
Major competition for Sony comes from LG, seeing as they were the worlds number 1 tv manufacturer in 2005, Samsung were second but in terms of LCDs but just reading on some site now for LCDs 1 is Sharp and 2 is Sony so I'm not sure which article to believe.
gangi788
,,,
Takashi
QUOTE (gangi788 @ Mar 19 2006, 06:52 AM) *
So what if Sony had one profitable year in LCDs? My assertions

1) Sony doesn't have the technology to keep up their fortunate year. Telling is the joint venture with Samsung and their Sony's own admission that they don't have the technology.

2) LCD market is too young and fickle.

Most important is #1 technology; and Sony is simply lacking in that department to stay at #1.

As long as Sony and Samsung stay together its easily going to beat any other competitors. People buy Sony products for its name, as long as they at least have the same technology as everyone else they're not going to take much dip in sales.
Musashino
QUOTE (gangi788 @ Mar 19 2006, 01:52 AM) *
So what if Sony had one profitable year in LCDs? My assertions

1) Sony doesn't have the technology to keep up their good fortune. Telling is the joint venture with Samsung and their Sony's own admission that they don't have the technology.


Which was part of the reason why the S-LCD venture was initiated in the first place embarassedlaugh.gif

QUOTE (gangi788 @ Mar 19 2006, 01:52 AM) *
2) LCD industry is too young and fickle.


The LCD market looks healthy enough.

In fact, it's booming.

http://digital-lifestyles.info/display_pag...atforms&id=3087
QUOTE
LCD TV Revenues Outstrip Cathode Ray TVs

Mike Slocombe
13 Mar 2006

It looks like the days of chunky, clunky cathode ray tube TVs are numbered as worldwide revenues from slimline LCD (liquid crystal displays) TVs surpassed those of cathode-ray (CRT) televisions in the fourth quarter last year.

Fuelled by football-crazy punters grabbing a gogglebox in time for the World Cup, revenues of LCD TVs in the last quarter sailed past $10 billion for the first time, with flat panel displays now commanding more than 50 percent of the global market.

The figures come from DisplaySearch, a US-based display market research firm, who recorded LCD TV revenues reaching $10.09 billion (£5.84bn, €8.4bn) in the fourth quarter last year, adding up to a hefty 54.3 percent increase from the previous quarter's $6.48 billion (£3.75bn, €5.43bn).

But the trusty old cathode ray tube isn't dead yet, with CRT TV sales rising 9.6 percent from the previous quarter, a modest jump from $6.88 billion in the third quarter to $7.46 billion (£4.32bn, €6.25bn) in the fourth quarter.

Sales were healthy for plasma-screen televisions, growing 31.3 percent to reach $5.29 billion in the same quarter, giving them the third-largest share of the market after LCD TVs and cathode-ray TVs.

Trailing in fourth place were projection TVs, notching up a 38.4 percent rise in sales revenue to net a record-breaking $2.87 billion.

Looking at the global TV market, the total volume revenues for the fourth quarter last year was estimated to reach $25.49 billion, with LCD TVs accounting for 39 percent, cathode-ray TVs 29 percent, Plasmas at 20 percent and projection TVs at 11 percent.

Commenting on the booming LCD sales, Ross Young, president and CEO of DisplaySearch said, "Now that LCD TVs have overtaken CRT TVs on a revenue basis, the next target for TFT LCD manufacturers is to overtake CRT TVs on a unit basis."


biggthumpup.gif

QUOTE (gangi788 @ Mar 19 2006, 01:52 AM) *
In fact I'd refrain from saying that Sony's back in force considering it's bleeding in all other departments, as indicated by the fact they hired a white CEO.


Sony's doing fine in digital cameras and mobile phones.

Next!
gangi788
,,,
Takashi
QUOTE (gangi788 @ Mar 19 2006, 07:10 AM) *
Are you even Japanese? You're pulling anything out of your @$$ to prop up Sony, which everyone agrees is a TROUBLED company.

You have no objectivity in your analysis. You seem to have one point in mind that Sony is a great, legendary company and you are using everything in your arsenal to prop that idea up, however skewed might be your evidence. You're completely laughable; and your supposed evidence doesn't hold water. I'm wasting my time here. Goodbye.

Actually Sony isnt that troubled since their downsize and concentration on the camera market.
Musashino
QUOTE (gangi788 @ Mar 19 2006, 02:10 AM) *
Are you even Japanese? You're pulling anything out of your @$$ to prop up Sony, which everyone agrees is a TROUBLED company. This is ridiculous.


So only Japanese people can appreciate Sony?

rotflmao.gif

I also happen to love McDonalds, Microsoft and the iPod.

Does that make me an American?

rotflmao.gif

Your "logic" sure is fu-ked up.

Oh, btw, I never said that Sony isn't "TROUBLED". Again, all I said was that it's improving.

Grab a dictionary and make sure you understand the meanings of certain words to avoid making a fool out of yourself embarassedlaugh.gif

QUOTE (gangi788 @ Mar 19 2006, 02:10 AM) *
You have no objectivity in your analysis. You seem to have one point in mind that Sony is a great, legendary company and you are using everything in your arsenal to prop that idea up, however skewed might be your evidence.


You can't even read properly, let alone know what's going on in my mind icon_rolleyes.gif

Do please pinpoint where I used words such as "dominance" or "legendary" or even "great".

You can't?

Typical embarassedlaugh.gif

And at least I do provide articles to back my $hit up. All you've done is let your racist mind do all the trash talking.

QUOTE (gangi788 @ Mar 19 2006, 02:10 AM) *
You're completely laughable; and your supposed evidence doesn't hold water.


Again, I've provided this so-called "evidence"; you've done nothing more than troll around.

QUOTE (gangi788 @ Mar 19 2006, 02:10 AM) *
Don't waste my time with your bull$hit. Goodbye.


Don't let the door hit your @$$ on your way out biggrin.gif
gangi788
,,,
Takashi
QUOTE (gangi788 @ Mar 19 2006, 07:20 AM) *
You want to talk about fu-ked up logic; You sure sound like fanatic fool; read your posts idiot. Some people are so oblivious.

Actually he didnt until you started ranting icon_rolleyes.gif
Musashino
QUOTE (gangi788 @ Mar 19 2006, 02:20 AM) *
You want to talk about fu-ked up logic; You sure sound like fanatic fool; read your posts idiot. Some people are so oblivious.


O.K.

Let's talk "logic".

Didn't you just say:

QUOTE (gangi788 @ Mar 19 2006, 02:10 AM) *
Don't waste my time with your bull$hit. Goodbye.


You can't even live up to your troll comments.

embarassedlaugh.gif2 embarassedlaugh.gif rotflmao.gif

QUOTE (gangi788 @ Mar 19 2006, 02:10 AM) *
What exactly are you getting by posing as a Japanese here or arguing on their behalf?


Go and find a post where I've said I was "Japanese".

You can't?

rotflmao.gif

And since when was I arguing on the "Japanese" people's "behalf"?

I thought it was clear that the thread was about SONY, not Japan or the Japanese icon_rolleyes.gif

Oh boy. This is getting easier by the post biggrin.gif
gangi788
,,,
Takashi
QUOTE (gangi788 @ Mar 19 2006, 07:39 AM) *
Someone with a Japanese username and sounding like a fanatic Japanese nationalist in almost every one of your posts clearly has identity issues.

lmao he sounds nothing like a Japanese nationalist.
Musashino
QUOTE (gangi788 @ Mar 19 2006, 02:39 AM) *
Someone with a Japanese username and sounding like a fanatic Japanese nationalist in almost every one of your posts clearly has identity issues.


rotflmao.gif

Point number 1:

This thread is about SONY.

It's about SONY.

It's about SONY.

It's about SONY.

Point number 2:

I think Australia is the best country in the world. In fact, I've said it several times before on this board.

Gee, I sure am a "Japanese nationalist" rotflmao.gif

Point number 3:

I suggest you save whatever dignity you've got left and live up to your childish tantrums, namely this:

QUOTE (gangi788)
Don't waste my time with your bull$hit. Goodbye.


rotflmao.gif
Emawk
QUOTE (PervertBurger @ Mar 18 2006, 09:29 PM) *
Hi son,
The CEO might be White now, but who do think does all the innovation?
Surely not Sony USA Team embarassedlaugh.gif

Actually, Sony, being the global company that it is, has research facilities in many other countries besides Japan, most notably in the U.S., Europe and other East Asian countries. Some of its innovation comes from these countries.
gangi788
,,,
Zezei
QUOTE (gangi788 @ Mar 19 2006, 02:39 AM) *
Someone with a Japanese username and sounding like a fanatic Japanese nationalist in almost every one of your posts clearly has identity issues.



he doesn't sound like a fanatic japanese nationalist. and the reason he got a japanese username is probably it sounded good to him, just like with shiro or boku_wa.



anyway, you want to talk about Toyota, it's kind of pushing other car-companies away in the US-market.
Musashino
QUOTE (gangi788 @ Mar 19 2006, 08:53 AM) *
the main argument that Sony's one time profitability in LCDs is a temporary gig


What argument?

Oh...wait...the ones you have in your head, right?

rotflmao.gif

QUOTE (gangi788 @ Mar 19 2006, 08:53 AM) *
Sony hired the white CEO specifically to turn the company around;


No $hit Sherlock embarassedlaugh.gif

QUOTE (gangi788 @ Mar 19 2006, 08:53 AM) *
Why am I wasting my time here?


rotflmao.gif

You really don't want me to answer that rhetorical question embarassedlaugh.gif embarassedlaugh.gif embarassedlaugh.gif
Elysee


Musashino~



LCD........um, SONY doesn't OWN LCD, SHARP does.
MightyCrown
Regarding general overall, for durability of brand new items, Sharp has a bad reputation and many reports of new product's failure or breaking. Sony makes many interesting items and offers many innovative options but they are also known for weak contruction and less durability like Sharp. The best in general overall quality in my opinion is Panasonic although they are not as imaginative as the others. I guess there is no perfect brand. If you choose one there is some kind of trade off in some area.

Pehaps a good informal rule is choice by brand should consider "What kind of product do you want to get?" and "What company has a proven history of specialization and good reputation in that product line?" For example Sharp and Sony are examples of wide range general electronics makers. So they cover many kind of electronic products, TV, stereos, heaters, etc. But within these areas there might already be a specialist company that has a better record for focus and durability. For example Sharp is not a focus specialist in electronic dictionaries as Casio. Sharp is relatively new and trying to compete in that field which has long been dominated by Casio. So Sharp will compete by more innovations and options than Casio. But, unlike Casio which is a traditional specialist in calculation instruments such as dictionaries, Sharp is a general maker so it has less experience in customer satisfaction, so Sharp tends to comprise durability.
Elysee
QUOTE (MightyCrown @ Mar 19 2006, 04:46 PM) *
Regarding general overall, for durability of brand new items, Sharp has a bad reputation and many reports of new product's failure or breaking. Sony makes many interesting items and offers many innovative options but they are also known for weak contruction and less durability like Sharp. The best in general overall quality in my opinion is Panasonic although they are not as imaginative as the others. I guess there is no perfect brand. If you choose one there is some kind of trade off in some area.

Pehaps a good informal rule is choice by brand should consider "What kind of product do you want to get?" and "What company has a proven history of specialization and good reputation in that product line?" For example Sharp and Sony are examples of wide range general electronics makers. So they cover many kind of electronic products, TV, stereos, heaters, etc. But within these areas there might already be a specialist company that has a better record for focus and durability. For example Sharp is not a focus specialist in electronic dictionaries as Casio. Sharp is relatively new and trying to compete in that field which has long been dominated by Casio. So Sharp will compete by more innovations and options than Casio. But, unlike Casio which is a traditional specialist in calculation instruments such as dictionaries, Sharp is a general maker so it has less experience in customer satisfaction, so Sharp tends to comprise durability.


Very well written, 100% agree.

SHARP has a record of offering very decent MD walkman, and it doesn't require someone has a engineering degree to find out that SHARP makes the best LCD television. (very wide viewing angle, brightness, sharp contrast...the only con is probably the relatively low screen resolution).

Sadly enough, SONY has lowered its head to profites. It has cancelled quite a lot innovative programs. But still it is one of the most prestigious consumer electronic brands.
MightyCrown
QUOTE (Elysee @ Mar 20 2006, 12:59 AM) *
Very well written, 100% agree.

SHARP has a record of offering very decent MD walkman, and it doesn't require someone has a engineering degree to find out that SHARP makes the best LCD television. (very wide viewing angle, brightness, sharp contrast...the only con is probably the relatively low screen resolution).
You bring a good point. Sharp has used this audio and visual technology experience from its other products to compete with the electronic dictionary specialist Casio, by offering both audio and color screen Sharp electronic dictionaries, which is an innovation to that product field. Color TV-like screens will undoubtedly revolutionize that field. Casio has yet to make a response to this challenge.

Yes Sony has always been well respected perhaps because its great successes in other products make up for shortcomings in other areas. Their product showrooms are always interesting to visit because of this reputation for new product innovations.
gangi788
,,
Takashi
Both of you should stop arguing about random crap.
The point is Sony has either the largest or 2nd largest market share in LCDs icon_rolleyes.gif
Musashino
QUOTE (gangi788 @ Mar 19 2006, 02:44 PM) *
Then why argue stupid points like definitions of CEO, profitability of LCD markets, among others. I don't give a $hit! You are argue for the sake of arguing rather than to make any kind of point. Who the fu-k cares about you anyway.


You still here! Gee, I thought you said you didn't care embarassedlaugh.gif2

QUOTE (gangi788 @ Mar 19 2006, 02:44 PM) *
Then why argue stupid points like definitions of CEO, profitability of LCD markets, among others.


There's a difference between making a point and arguing it, fool.

Besides, if you take a look at post #23, all I did was post an article about the LCD market. Hardly worthy of an argument icon_rolleyes.gif

And if you bothered to check, the only time I made a comment on the "definitions of CEO" in regards to you was way back in post #14 only.

Again, you tend to get confused with the meanings of certain words embarassedlaugh.gif

QUOTE (gangi788 @ Mar 19 2006, 02:44 PM) *
I don't give a $hit!


Then why the fu-k are you still here?

You've been saying that same $hit for so long, yet you're always coming back here b!tching and whining like a drama queen.

My guess is that you're an attention whore.

You continue making dramatic exits - i.e. "I DON'T CARE!!!" "GOODBYE!!!" - yet in the end, you keep coming back for more embarassedlaugh.gif

All that's missing now is a finger snap from you.

QUOTE (gangi788 @ Mar 19 2006, 02:44 PM) *
You are argue for the sake of arguing rather than to make any kind of point.


You can't even build a proper sentence. AND you can't even find the right words to rant properly.

No wonder you're struggling to get your points across embarassedlaugh.gif2

QUOTE (gangi788 @ Mar 19 2006, 02:44 PM) *
Who the fu-k cares about you anyway.


Obviously you do since you can't help but spend almost an entire day b!tching in my threads.

Like I said, stalker embarassedlaugh.gif2
Emawk
You knew Sony was fu-ked up in the head when they brought out that Aibo robotic dog as a subsitute for real dogs. If they said it was a toy for children, I would understand, but it was meant to replace real dogs. I mean, do you guys see the problem with this "dog"? That Aibo did little for Sony; no wonder they pulled the plug on it.
Tami
QUOTE (Takashi @ Mar 18 2006, 02:23 PM) *
No. The reason the delay isnt good is because the November release is for Japan and the consoles usually arent released in the US and UK until a good few months after the Japanese release which would mean missing the Christmas rush icon_rolleyes.gif

The PS3 will be released globabally in November.
http://www.gamesindustry.biz/content_page.php?aid=15355

I know the post was kind of old but the information was wrong :P
Takashi
QUOTE (Tami @ Mar 22 2006, 08:08 PM) *
The PS3 will be released globabally in November.
http://www.gamesindustry.biz/content_page.php?aid=15355

I know the post was kind of old but the information was wrong :P

Yeah I know, but they're not used to the same date global release so I'm not sure that its a good idea anyway embarassedlaugh.gif
Elysee
QUOTE (Takashi @ Mar 22 2006, 09:22 PM) *
Yeah I know, but they're not used to the same date global release so I'm not sure that its a good idea anyway embarassedlaugh.gif



I am so gonna get a Playstation 3. Xbox 360 just doesn't look yummy to me.
Takashi
QUOTE (Elysee @ Mar 22 2006, 08:25 PM) *
I am so gonna get a Playstation 3. Xbox 360 just doesn't look yummy to me.

Xbox 360 is alright, the graphics arent as good as I was expecting though.
poonster
man ps3 is gonna own all when it comes out. =] definite buy
kaizen
QUOTE (Elysee @ Mar 22 2006, 03:25 PM) *
I am so gonna get a Playstation 3. Xbox 360 just doesn't look yummy to me.

How can you like PS3 design? It looks like a fu-king portable grill!!

In terms of design, Xbox360 smokes PS3...
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2009 Invision Power Services, Inc.