**How is your economy going on???**
RockHeart.
| QUOTE |
| The Hmong economy relies on three main crops. These crops are rice, maize, and opium. Before maize was introduced from China in the sixteenth century, rice was the main staple. When maize was introduced, the population increased. However, we don't know if there was a causal relationship, or whether or not which may have caused which. The Hmong have always used rice as their principal subsistence item. When maize was introduced, it provided an alternative when rice production was low. As one may see, maize was a "standby" crop. Maize was also used to feed pigs-the significant source of protein for the Hmong. Maize also helped opium production, by reducing the amount of weeds as well as protecting the young opium plants from harsh rain conditions. The cultivation and use of opium, in southeast Asia, has occurred on a small scale, for a very long time. "The opium growing highlanders of northern Southeast Asia sometimes state that they have known opium from time immemorial and they even tell origin myths to illustrate this point" (Dessaint and Ngwama 1994).In the eighteenth century, the British trade of opium was flourishing. This trade influenced the use of opium in China. The consumption of opium became addicting to many Chinese, in many "walks of life." The Manchu government responded by making it illegal to import, cultivate or use opium. The British had bigger guns, so British trade continued. The Manchu government thus lost the opium war, and responded by growing and selling opium themselves. At some point, the pendulum swung back, and opium was again illegal. For example, opium was declared illegal in Thailand in 1958 (Dessaint 1992). The present population in Northern Thailand can be traced back over one hundred years. At this time, the Chinese population was increasing and the Chinese reached out to the outlying areas for resources to support their empire. The Chinese found the Hmong in their way. The Hmong responded by moving south to the mountains of Northern Thailand. At the same time, the Karen moved in from the west. These Hmong brought with them the knowledge and skills necessary for growing opium. These Hmong cultivated opium on a small scale to support the small number of addicts (Bernatzik 1947:517-22). Opium is now produced, on a larger scale, in the mountains. The location is beneficial because of its isolation. The isolation keeps the government from interfering with the opium production (Dessaint 1992). One may observe several ways in which producing opium was facilitated by the Hmong. First of all, opium can be planted in the same fields as maize. When comparing the amount of time a unit of land can be used, one notices a vast difference. Opium and maize can be grown for ten years or more. Rice can only be grown for 1-2 years. Another benefit is that opium harvest times fall at a different time that those of maize and rice. Opium is "easily portable, readily convertible to cash, and grows best at high altitudes in a monsoon climate," according to Cooper (ibid. 1984). These factors all made opium an ideal cash crop. One may also look at some external factors influencing opium production. The increase in opium production has resulted from an increased demand for this from the market in the United States and other industrial western countries (Dessaint 1992). As a result of this, the highlanders have had to reduce the amount of subsistence crops they produce. This requires them to rely more on the opium crop. As a result, the Hmong become more and more dependent on their cash crop and its associated market (Cooper 1984). This market stems from the outside of the Hmong community, so the Hmong have very little control over this market. So, in one sense, it is not risky because there is an established market. On the other hand it is risky, because the price of opium fluctuates out of control to the Hmong. III. SOCIAL STRUCTURE "Traditional" (which means whatever was happening previous to this point, not what is "supposed to be" or what is thought to have occurred forever) social relations in Hmong subsistence society were characterized by direct cooperation between related kin. Some characteristics of these relationships involve redistribution and "indirect reciprocity" (Cooper 1984). When the Hmong were changing to an opium dominated economy, their social relation took on change as well. The addition of a cash crop allowed the accumulation of surplus. This surplus could then be consumed, redistributed or reinvested. The introduction of a cash flow allowed the introduction of paid labor. The Karen and Khonmuang "landless" population readily filled this need. This additional labor allowed households (those fortunate enough to have the necessary resources) to increase total output. Those households that had unfavorable land were unable to make this change and had to continue to perform swidden agriculture or to opt for being a "proletariat." Once two new forms of social relations (indirect paid labor existing between spouse and spouse and direct paid laborbetween Hmong employer and non-Hmong employee) were introduced, the transition to a new economy was facilitated. |
| QUOTE (IYIiDWeSt_T.S.I3 @ May 1 2004, 02:10 PM) |
| Dumbass. |
| QUOTE (IYIiDWeSt_T.S.I3 @ May 1 2004, 11:33 PM) |
| Well he is dumb alright, just read some of the hmong topics.. oh wait read all of his topics and replys in forum. no wonder he is hatred in the viet section |
| QUOTE (Vajyilan @ May 1 2004, 11:08 PM) |
| What the hell is this... Hmong economy? That's B.S. there is no such economy. Damn... |