QUOTE(lclover @ Jul 14 2006, 09:31 AM)

often its the middle easterners who are lumped into being "indian"
it's bizzare.
Well, the difference between say an Iranian from Mashad and Indian from Gujart may seem huge to the groups involved, but in my experience with Americans, be they White, Black or Hispanic, have shown little capacity to distinguish them apart.
To them, Indians are Arabs, Arabs are Iranians, and Iranians are Indians.
QUOTE
there are cultural overlaps but they're totally different.
True, and I agree, perhaps to an extent.
Of course, then we get into such discussions as to where Eastern Europe ends, and the Near(Middle) East begins and ends and what it's boundries are, how Central Asia relates to the Near East, where South Asia begins and Ends, and what truly contitutes the whole of Asia from a non-Eurocentric point of view.
QUOTE
increasingly these days I see east asians referring to south asians as asian as well. so it's all good
I have noticed that as well, in the United States of course.
It just goes to show the nature of effective propaganda techniques.
30 years ago, the notion of an Indian and a Chinese person being lumped into one racial group would have seemed absurd.